iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Jose Feliciano, NJ Janitor, Convicted Of Murdering Rev. Edward Hinds In 2009

Feliciano

By DAVID PORTER   12/22/11 01:22 PM ET   AP

NEWARK, N.J. -- A former church janitor was convicted Thursday of murdering a New Jersey priest who was stabbed more than 30 times while brewing a cup of coffee in his kitchen, wearing his clerical robes.

Jose Feliciano, 66, of Easton, Pa., didn't deny stabbing the Rev. Edward Hinds to death in the rectory of St. Patrick Roman Catholic Church in Chatham in October 2009. But his lawyer told jurors during closing arguments on Monday that Feliciano killed him in a fit of rage over sexual blackmail.

The prosecution said Feliciano "slaughtered" the priest after Hinds discovered Feliciano had an outstanding arrest warrant in Philadelphia from the 1980s for sexually touching a child, and fired him.

Feliciano argued the priest demanded sex in exchange for keeping quiet about the warrant.

Feliciano, who testified for eight days during the trial, was found guilty in Morristown of murder, felony murder, two counts of robbery and two weapons counts. He is scheduled to be sentenced in February.

"I am proud and honored to have been part of a process to vindicate Father Hinds' murder and the slander of his reputation, which obviously the jury soundly did not believe," Morris County Prosecutor Robert Bianchi, who tried the case, said.

The 61-year-old Hinds was in his clerical robes when he was killed while brewing coffee. His body was found on a Friday morning after he failed to appear for Mass.

The slaying rocked Chatham, a well-to-do community of about 10,000 residents, where Hinds was a familiar face and beloved presence. It was the first violent death there since a 1990 manslaughter case.

Feliciano had been employed by the parish since 1991. Prosecutors said he had used aliases and fake identification over the years to mask his past.

The state public defender's office, which represented Feliciano, declined to comment on the verdict or whether an appeal would be filed.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CRIME

NEWARK, N.J. -- A former church janitor was convicted Thursday of murdering a New Jersey priest who was stabbed more than 30 times while brewing a cup of coffee in his kitchen, wearing his clerical ro...
NEWARK, N.J. -- A former church janitor was convicted Thursday of murdering a New Jersey priest who was stabbed more than 30 times while brewing a cup of coffee in his kitchen, wearing his clerical ro...
Filed by Ben Muessig  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 30
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:13 PM on 12/25/2011
Jose Feliciano must have bat-like hearing.
photo
stjoshy
"C is for COOKIEEEEE. thats good enough for me"
09:52 PM on 12/24/2011
sick and twisted no matter how you look at it. its not that far of a stretch to think the priest was blackmailing him.. disgusting
10:53 AM on 12/23/2011
Clearly in a court case where the victim cannot defend himself , the defense will slander their own mother. It is a terrible crime. If it was true he could have walked away and not had sex or killed the priest so true ir not the janitor is guilty,
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RevengeRook
Checkmate----and then some..
07:23 AM on 12/23/2011
If the priest had this knowledge about the warrant for the man molesting the child--as a priest it is "beyond" civic duty to inform. I believe he should have been on the phone instead of making coffee.
11:43 PM on 12/22/2011
He should have stuck to playing guitar and making believe he was blind.
04:41 AM on 12/23/2011
you beat me to it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:46 PM on 12/22/2011
how strange and ironic...here from the headlines I would have thought that Feliciano was a "victim" of the Preist....
12:13 AM on 12/23/2011
I'm not sure if you are joking or not. What headline are you talking about?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dan Crabtree
09:44 PM on 12/22/2011
Mexs love them blades..
photo
cmfrtblebbw
My micro bio is empty
08:38 PM on 12/22/2011
That's why we have trials...to fix our tribulations.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:06 PM on 12/22/2011
It's not mine to judge and for this I apologize, but I'm not on this jury and even I didn't believe his testimony (the little bit I saw), smh!!! It's a sad shame when people murder, they try to blame the victim.. Are their any guilty people in this world? Not according to our legal system, because even when a person does try to plead guilty a judge will ask: are you doing this of your own free will? What kinda mess is that? I just don't get it, and honestly, I don't really want too. I just wish it were simple enough for the guilty to take responsibility for their crimes so the innocent don't have too...
06:29 AM on 12/23/2011
The child he sexually touched in the 1980s was a victim too.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:36 AM on 12/24/2011
And, you said that to say what? It wasn't like my comment excluded anyone (especially a previous victim)... As I said, I just wish the guilty would just TAKE RESPONSIBILITY for their actions, whether the crime takes place today, tomorrow, next week or 30yrs ago!!! I'm assuming you wanted clarification. Does this do it for you???
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
charleyvldm9
He thinks outside the box.
07:40 PM on 12/22/2011
Stabbed more than 30 times,wow.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Susan Shaffer
watching you...
01:14 AM on 12/23/2011
you would have to think there was an awful lot of emotion there.
04:39 AM on 12/23/2011
accidently...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cruzzer101
You don't have to be insane to be crazy.
06:25 PM on 12/22/2011
It does sound like "Feliciano killed him in a fit of rage" seeing as there are so many stab wounds - but was it over sexual favors, or the loss of his job? We'll never know unless someone else steps forward with charges/claims - and there may be none. The priest may be innocent. Or guilty.

Sometimes we just have to accept that there are some things we can not know - unless more facts and evidence comes in. Until then, follow the American way: Assume innocent until proven guilty. Just because he's a priest doesn't give reason to jump to a conclusion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Susan Shaffer
watching you...
01:16 AM on 12/23/2011
I'd like to know if there were two cups out for the coffee he was brewing.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LaureenMillarHolt
TheConservativeCurmudgeon can cure your liberalism
05:43 PM on 12/22/2011
How convenient for him to claim the priest was trying to blackmail him for sexual favors!

He killed this man, who can't defend himself against this slander. Statements like this should not be allowed in court, if the person being accused of malfeasance can't answer.
Feliciano deserves to rot in prison til he's hauled out, cold, flat on back on gurney, toes pointing up.
03:34 AM on 12/23/2011
"Statements like this should not be allowed in court,..."

So you say. But then that would NOT be a true justice system.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LaureenMillarHolt
TheConservativeCurmudgeon can cure your liberalism
05:42 PM on 12/24/2011
Kweenbee;
The VICTIM of this man's malice is DEAD. He cannot talk, speak up, for himself, bcz of this man's MURDER of him. This priest deserves every benefit of doubt on this as a MURDER victim.
There is NO way to dis-/prove his UNSUBSTANTIATED claim of sexual advances. To have crap like this allowed @ trial--& the piece doesn't say whether/not this was said in court, or just outside of it--is to only try to defend what is indefensible: his taking of this man's life.

Kweenbee, if I made sexual advances toward someone, if i tried to blackmail someone w/sexual encounters, would that other person be justified in killing me?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LaureenMillarHolt
TheConservativeCurmudgeon can cure your liberalism
05:55 PM on 12/24/2011
Excuse me--the piece DOES say that the jury DID hear his lawyer "defend" his murder of this man as "a fit of rage over sexual blackmail." WHERE'S THE PROOF OF THAT? Sayin' it don't make it so. Unsubstantiated "accusation" is ALL that is. And the jury DIDN'T buy it.

YEAH, RIGHT. Like that explains anything. Like that mitigates his monstrous act of evil.

YEAH, RIGHT.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tiptop3
Microbio-birthschoolworkdeath
07:03 PM on 12/23/2011
unfortunately, the priesthood having it's share of sexual issues, it's completely believable.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LaureenMillarHolt
TheConservativeCurmudgeon can cure your liberalism
05:49 PM on 12/24/2011
To some people that may be believable.

But to paint ALL priests w/the same broad brush is WRONG. There are >58,000 Catholic priests in this country, & a SMALL %-age of them were ACCUSED, & a %-age
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LaureenMillarHolt
TheConservativeCurmudgeon can cure your liberalism
06:01 PM on 12/24/2011
(continued)

of the accused either were found not guilty, the "victim" dropped the case (as in Cardinal Cook's case in Chicago--"victim" admitted he made it all up, the Cardinal forgave him...), some pleaded guilty, & other cases were resolved by the statute of limits having run out.

I'm guessing, by your logic, that if sports coaches @ UVA, Duke, USC, Stanford, UGA...are accused of sexual misconduct, it's "completely believable" on account of what's going on @ Penn State, & all the other schools who've had this happen w/their coaches in the recent past, like, up to the last 10 years.....

Right? Make sense?