More

Payroll Tax Cut Fight: Mitch McConnell Says House Should Pass Two-Month Extension (UPDATE)

Payroll Tax Mcconnell

First Posted: 12/22/11 11:22 AM ET Updated: 12/23/11 11:30 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- Moments after House Republican leaders dug in their heels on blocking a two-month extension of the payroll tax cut, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell offered his colleagues a path out of the politically damaging position.

Last week the Senate overwhelmingly passed a two-month extension of the 2 percent break, which expires New Year's Day. But House GOP leaders rejected that deal, saying they would only accept a yearlong extension, even though many in their own party have been highly critical of the opposition.

So McConnell (R-Ky.), who negotiated the Senate deal, offered a new idea Thursday, suggesting that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) appoint members to a conference committee to work out a longer deal between the two chambers in return for the House passing the two-month stopgap now.

"House Republicans sensibly want greater certainty about the duration of these provisions, while Senate Democrats want more time to negotiate the terms," McConnell said in a statement. "These goals are not mutually exclusive. We can and should do both."

"Leader Reid should appoint conferees on the long-term bill and the House should pass an extension that locks in the thousands of Keystone XL pipeline jobs, prevents any disruption in the payroll tax holiday or other expiring provisions, and allows Congress to work on a solution for the longer extensions," McConnell continued.

The Senate bill includes a provision demanding that President Barack Obama make a decision on the controversial oil pipeline from Canada to Texas within 60 days. It also extends unemployment benefits and higher Medicare reimbursement rates for doctors, which expire Jan. 1.

Just before McConnell released his suggestion and despite the political pressure mounting on the GOP, House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and several other Republican leaders insisted that the only path was for Democrats to come back to the Hill and negotiate a new, yearlong bill in a conference committee.

"Sometimes it's hard to do the right thing," Boehner told reporters Thursday.

An aide to Boehner said the speaker had talked to the president earlier and reiterated his insistence on the longer extension.

"The speaker proposed that the president send members of his economic policy team up to Congress to find a way to accommodate the president's full-year request," the aide said. "The speaker explained his concern that flaws in the Senate-passed bill will be unworkable for many small business job creators. He reiterated that if their shared goal is a one-year bill, there is no reason an agreement cannot be reached before year's end. The president declined the speaker's offer."

Boehner's office did not immediately react to McConnell's proposal.

Reid responded by essentially repeating the Democratic position that his side has sought a longer-term bill all along and that he will continue to seek that -- once workers, the unemployed and those who rely on Medicare are protected in the short run.

"Once the House passes the Senate's bipartisan compromise to hold middle class families harmless while we work out our differences, I will be happy to restart the negotiating process to forge a year-long extension," Reid said in a statement. "Now, it is important that we now hear from Speaker Boehner in light of Senator McConnell's comments."

House Democrats, who were calling on Boehner to relent Thursday, sounded somewhat dubious that the McConnell plan would go anywhere, noting that McConnell had believed he cut a deal last week that the House would pass, only to have the House GOP rebel.

"I don't know whether Senator McConnell can speak on behalf of Speaker Boehner," remarked House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-Md.).

Michael McAuliff covers politics and Congress for The Huffington Post. Talk to him on Facebook.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Moments after House Republican leaders dug in their heels on blocking a two-month extension of the payroll tax cut, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell offered his colleagues a path o...
WASHINGTON -- Moments after House Republican leaders dug in their heels on blocking a two-month extension of the payroll tax cut, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell offered his colleagues a path o...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7,215
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (146 total)
  1 of 3  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS

photo
murphthesurf3 02:08 PM on 12/22/2011
AND THE SPEAKER WHINED:
WHY DOESN'T OBAMA HAVE MY BACK?
WHY DOESN'T THE CONSERVATIVE MEDIA HAVE MY BACK?
WHY DON'T THE GOP MEMBERS OF THE SENATE HAVE MY BACK?
WHY DOES THE SENATE MINORITY LEADER MCCONNELL HAVE MY BACK?
WHY DON'T THE GOP'S VETERANS AND NATIONALS LEADERS HAVE MY BACK?

1) The House GOP  Read More...
 
2) The Senate GOP knew the House Bill was unworkable and did not want to be seen as tax raisers and middle class haters....­so they worked out a stop gap agreement with the Senate Dems
 
3) To be sure it would not be a waste of time, the Senate GOP got Boehner's buy in on the agreement.

4) The Senate passed the bill 89 to 10 (talk about bipartisan!) and then adjourned certain all's well that ends well.


5) The Senate and House Dems (joined enthusiastically by Boehner) celebrated the compromise as it gave them the chance to fight the battle again after the new year while saving them from an instant attack by the middle and lower class champions.

6) Then Boehner heard from the House's shadow leadership and the Tea Party (which includes some of his erstwhile allies who had assured him of their support until they withdrew it) that the bill would never pass with a GOP only vote (which is all they were willing to accept.).

7) The bill would pass easily today with most Dems and some GOP votes. But that would not do at all. 

8) SO now, Boehner wants the Senate back in session to do another bill in a conference committee. AND, of all the brass, he wants Obama to get behind him and endorse the idea. 

Look Behind You John...IT APPEARS NO ONE HAS YOUR BACK.

Obama's role in all of this....le­t Congress be Congress..­..let the Party of No be the Party of No.
THE GOP ROLE....FOR GOD'S SAKE....LET'S CUT OUR LOSSES.
Boopsie2008
Obama 2012. Says it all.
04:31 PM on 12/23/2011
What's become clear in this incident is the sheer grandoise, power-hungry greed of the House GOPT.

It wasn't enough for them that Senate Republicans fought off a tax on the wealthy to pay for these extended benefits, or succeeded in linking mandatory presidential action of some sort regarding the Canadian oil pipeline to approval of the extension. The House GOPT were unmasked because they wanted even more huge financial concessions for the wealthy in return for approving the extension and mistakenly thought they could blackmail the Senate into ponying up.

At the core, the GOPT on both sides of the aisle once again erected an implacable Berlin Wall against any "pay fors" being levied against their precious corporations and wealthy taxpayers.

It's time the American people wake up and fully appreciate the stunning extent to which their GOPT representatives do not "represent" them. At most, they fake some concern for the little guy when convenient in an unrelenting crusade to slime President Obama while permanently bolstering the fortunes of the 1%.
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
06:33 PM on 12/23/2011
Does GOPT stand for Grand Ole Pee Tardy?
12:32 AM on 12/24/2011
Your position is based in partisan falsehoods. At ''the core'', Obama raised not only mortgage surtaxes on those making far less than one million a year, but took the Social Security ''lockbox'' and raided it to the effect that rather than workers taxes, which have been the mainstay of the program since it's 1935 inception, he will remove monies from the Trust Fund to bankroll the payroll tax cut while giving it an IOU which will never be paid so long as Obama continues his skyrocketing spending [ another one trillion dollar budget apart from the one which Reid has been too damned cowardly to pass, knowing well how much more this will place this nation in debt]. The Obama Press Corps has been quite expert in obscuring these facts ,especially as these apply to the Trust Fund and the national debt [deficit as well], but there are a few voices out there, from USA TODAY in its editorial from Dec.21st, BLOOMBERG, and even the AP, who are finally catching on and are tilting their ears to the alarms being sounded by Social Security trustees as well as Obamas own US Dept. of Commerce, which was recently hijacked by the Chinese.
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
06:34 PM on 12/24/2011
Too bad. Republicans should not have deliberately crashed the economy under Bush. Maybe our country wouldn't be in such bad shape if republicans would finally start putting country ahead of party (something they have never managed to do ever in the history of their party).
01:15 AM on 12/28/2011
How did Obama raise taxes? You do know the difference between President and Congressman, right?
01:51 PM on 12/23/2011
They have made too many deals to help our big businesses overseas, so I am sure they won't do this, but they should charge businesses a big charge for selling in this country.
photo
karim banned
A fool's mind is at the mercy of his tongue and a
01:54 PM on 12/23/2011
You have to show both parties that you can kick both of them out of the office.

Ron Paul for 2012
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edmundavolio
12:04 PM on 12/23/2011
Payroll tax is a band aid on a gunshot wound. Unless Congress has the common sense to require products SOLD in the US be made with the same mandates Congress requires of products MADE in the US, small business sales, unemployment, housing values, reduction in social services etc. will all get worse. So far, all talk by the presidential aspirants and Congress, regarding employment, has been meaningless babel to the unemployment problem.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
10:21 AM on 12/23/2011
the gop is exactly the reason why we need to end capitalism and void the constitution.

except this time when the constitution is drafted we exclude rich white men from the process.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sks504
right is right and left is wrong
11:38 AM on 12/23/2011
It would be easier for you to move to North Korea.
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
06:34 PM on 12/23/2011
Or for you to move to Somalia.
10:20 AM on 12/23/2011
the gop wants us all to first starve then die
09:43 AM on 12/23/2011
Much of america's focus has been on the presidential race by republicans. If americans want to repeal Pres. Obama's health care law, we must elect a super majority of republican senators this November. If your in a state with a democrat up for re-election, "vote republican."
03:17 PM on 12/23/2011
Just to let in you on a fact, most Americans do not want to repeal the health car law. You are a minority.
photo
bump00000
The Seventh Chakra, amazon
03:31 PM on 12/23/2011
The Tea Baggers have spoken.
09:30 AM on 12/23/2011
People need help in this obama economy. He wants to shut down coal mines which will cost us much more each month in gas and utilities.
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
06:35 PM on 12/23/2011
The same coal companies that kill their employees?
09:29 AM on 12/23/2011
Shame on the dems for their stance on cutting back unemployment benefits.
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
06:36 PM on 12/23/2011
You mean their stance that unemployment benefits shall not be cut back?
09:28 AM on 12/23/2011
Now it's time for the dems to back down from their stance of cutting back unemployment benefits. This story was on the Huff Post but is now buried not wanting people to see how shameful and uncaring the dems are. In this obama economy people need help. With the dems wanting to put new restricutions on coal mines forcing them to close and thousands to lose their jobs, people will need help. Gas will be at Europes price and utilities will jump 25% on your bills.
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
06:37 PM on 12/23/2011
As if you know what the future will bring. Show me your certificate of having passed econometrics (econ class where they teach you how to "predict the future" ie forecast).
photo
JubalTHarshaw
Just Passing Through...
08:54 AM on 12/23/2011
Play nice all.
photo
JubalTHarshaw
Just Passing Through...
08:43 AM on 12/23/2011
Those who are doing partisan dances and rants on this topic are playing into the hands of the Republicans and the Democrats. Neither party has anything to be proud of here if you look past the hyperbole and look at the cold, hard economic facts. We have an unsustainable debt. We engage in irresponsible spending because we treat so many programs as political third rails. We have a tax code that no one, including the IRS, understands. Everyone has their own idea of what “fair” means when it comes to taxation. That definition usually involves someone else paying more. We’ve seen no end of street theater on the subject. Warren Buffet got headlines for months with his anecdotal “Secretary Pays Higher Taxes Than Billionaire!” tale; you would think a guy that is touted as one of America’s fiscal geniuses might have been able to figure out how to rectify that. Everyone wants to raise taxes on the “rich” but people can’t agree on what “rich” means. What seems like a lot of money if you are living in Cow’s Butte, South Dakota is barely getting by if you live in Manhattan, San Diego or Boston. Any solution is going to require that everyone is going to feel some pain. Lets’ see if our elected officials have the moral courage to offer real solutions in an election year.
09:18 AM on 12/23/2011
Well said. You KNOW that the Dems and Obama have some pandering scams up their sleeves since they are unwilling to simply extend the anti-seniors tax cut for another year.
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
06:42 PM on 12/23/2011
Anti-Seniors tax cut? Oh, I'm real sure that being "anti-Senior" is all the democrats are concerned with, what with their steadfast support of such senior programs as Social Security and Medicare. Just because a tax cut doesn't directly benefit seniors does not make it "anti-senior". Unless maybe you are a senior and you are partisan about it and you don't want the govt spending any money on anyone except for you and if THAT is the case then you are nothing but a whining teat. The govt doesn't exist specifically to cater to you personally. It is there for ALL of us.
12:54 PM on 12/23/2011
not everyone wants to raise taxes on the rich........I am not rich and I believe that taxes are TOO HIGH on EVERYONE.. ( except those who pay ZERO )......Gov't WASTES so much money it is incredible........it seems that a federally run program cannot operate without waste and fraud ........... and to believe that government's increasing involvement in the HEALTH CARE INDUSTRY will be a good thing is RIDICULOUS..............
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
06:43 PM on 12/23/2011
Well if you don't want anyone paying zero then will you join with me in calling for a tax code where corporations have to pay at least $1, no matter how well-connected they are?
photo
JubalTHarshaw
Just Passing Through...
08:17 AM on 12/23/2011
I think we can all admit that it didn't take a lot of moral courage to be in favor of a "tax cut." I think we can also admit that Social Security is not solvent. This latest short term compromise extends the underfunding of that primary social safety net. Had the Fund been solvent rather than stuffed with IOUs placed there by both parties, a respite from collecting these revenues might not be as concerning. We are having celebrations about increasing our debt. I understand that the Social Security website makes claims about full funding from the General Fund and we have lots of creative projective accounting that tells us that we are seemingly able to do this with absolutely no downside. Regardless of party affiliation, our lawmakers know that the piper is about to present his bill.

We need to pressure our elected officials to abandon this stop-gap approach to serious problems. We need long term plans and we need a bipartisan acknowledgment that business as usual isn’t going to work if we are to save this economy. Our Members and Senators need to understand that we are paying attention. It’s well and good to complain about Boehner, Reid, Hoyer, Pelosi and the other top dogs. Pay closer attention to those who need your vote. Think nationally, act locally.
09:21 AM on 12/23/2011
We need a minimum tax on everyone so we don't have the 53% supporting the 47%. Everyone should have some skin the game. And the additional revenue collected can NOT be used by Democrats for more spending. It must go to Debt reduction only or the Republicans should reject it.
photo
JubalTHarshaw
Just Passing Through...
09:50 AM on 12/23/2011
I've always advocated a flat tax for individuals and corporations for ordinary income; one rate, no deductions, no exemptions. Capital gains are a different issue. I also object to the notion that the government ought to be able to tax money that they have already taxed simply because you stopped breathing. Many people who believe that there is an unending supply of Margaret Thatcher's "other people's money" feel it is unfair to demand that everyone pay something. After all, if we have a class of individuals who will not be affected by the cost of a program but will benefit from that program, they are going to vote with their self-interest, which is to support whoever offers them the most. That is reasonable behavior. It doesn’t help the problem. Like it or not, an individual, a family, a business and a nation cannot continually spend more than it takes in. A nation cannot cannibalize its own economy by seeking short term political gains at the expense of sound fiscal policy.
05:12 PM on 12/23/2011
I cannot believe there are intelligent people in this country who would be happy to beat people out of their retirement and say, "oh well"

Excess Social Security money was supposed to be used to buy treasurys. At the time it was set up, there wasn't that much excess money. In 1983 we started paying double in order to be sure there was enough money for our boomers to retire. They didn't want to burden the younger workers. Those so called IOUs are legal bonds that are as good as what you have in your 401ks.
08:12 AM on 12/23/2011
Hey Huff Post........let's see a story on the new EPA regulations that now go into effect costing the American people another $10 billion for their electricity. The Obama Administration and their EPA.......the gift that keeps on taking...........until Jan. 2013..............
photo
JubalTHarshaw
Just Passing Through...
08:46 AM on 12/23/2011
Candidate Obama made it very clear that it was his intention to bankrupt the coal industry in the United States as part of his plan to move towards "green" energy sources. Seemingly he hasn't yet learned that we do not presently have the alternative sources in place to replace the ones he dislikes. The Chevy Volt and the Solyndra debacles aren’t going to go away.
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
06:52 PM on 12/23/2011
What is your big criticism of the Chevy Volt? Is there some scandal there or are you just trying to ruin the brand name of an electric car by associating it with Solyndra? Is this one of your right-wing tricks like how you guys associated the names "Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden" as if they were a duo until the people believed they were a pair, not the life-long enemies that they were in reality.
09:23 AM on 12/23/2011
The latest EPA scam will little affect on world wide air quality but a big affect on your utility bill. AT least the libs will have to pay it too despite their claims of poverty and how a tax increase of $40 would devistate them..
06:44 AM on 12/23/2011
So McConnell (R-Ky.), who negotiated the Senate deal, offered a new idea Thursday, suggesting that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) appoint members to a conference committee to work out a longer deal between the two chambers in return for the House passing the two-month stopgap now.

Yeah, right...and THIS committee is going to work together...WHY????? This is just like their "Super Committee" who was to come up with the budget cuts...All McConnell is doing is grandstanding, trying to save face because even HE realizes that the GOP is in DEEP, DEEP DOODAH!
09:24 AM on 12/23/2011
In deep doodah only with the uneducated and gullible that is.
10:12 AM on 12/23/2011
Clearly, you don't read or watch the news very much...have you even SEEN their "approval" ratings? I think it was 8%...which more aptly shows the idioacy rate of Americans.
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
06:59 PM on 12/23/2011
85% of the American people hate your party's guts. I suppose you think 85% of us are uneducated and gullible. I guess that makes you the "landed elite" of America, then, does it? Do you fancy yourself to be a member of the permanent aristocracy? Are you a one percenter? You do realize that if you identify with the 1% then you are also at war with 99% of America, right? That you've been at war with us for thirty years and only now is it being officially announced, this "class war" now that the 99% are fighting back...