iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Shell Oil Spill Off Nigeria Likely Worst To Hit Those Waters In Decade

By JON GAMBRELL   12/22/11 12:33 PM ET  AP

LAGOS, Nigeria -- An oil spill near the coast of Nigeria is likely the worst to hit those waters in a decade, a government official said Thursday, as slicks from the Royal Dutch Shell PLC spill approached the country's southern shoreline.

The slick from Shell's Bonga field has affected 115 miles (185 kilometers) of ocean near Nigeria's coast, Peter Idabor, who leads the National Oil Spill Detection and Response Agency, told The Associated Press. Idabor said the slick continued to move toward the shore Thursday night, putting at risk birds, fish and other wildlife in the area.

Shell, the major oil producer in Nigeria, said Wednesday the spill likely occurred as workers tried to offload oil onto a waiting tanker. The company published photographs of the spill, showing a telltale rainbow sheen in the ocean, but said it believes that about 50 percent of the leaked oil has already evaporated.

The source of the leak has been plugged and experts from Britain were coming to help with the cleanup, Idabor said. Nigerian Navy ships also had been sent into the area to help control the spill, he said.

Shell estimates the Bonga spill likely was less than 40,000 barrels, or 1.68 million gallons. That's about the same amount of oil spilled offshore in 1998 at a Mobil field. The 1998 spill saw oil slicks extended for more than 100 miles (some 160 kilometers) to Lagos, the country's commercial capital.

"Since the Mobil spill, this is just about the most major one," Idabor said.

Nigerian authorities hope to use oil booms and chemicals to disperse or collect the spilled oil, Idabor said. In a statement, Shell said its Nigerian subsidiary already had sent ships out to the slick to use dispersant on the oil sheen. The company also said it would use infrared equipment to trace places where the sheen is the thickest.

However, the size of the spill may be even larger. SkyTruth, a nonprofit group based in West Virginia that uses satellite imagery to detect environmental problems, estimated the oil spill might stretch across roughly 350 square miles (920 square kilometers) of ocean – three times what Nigerian authorities believe.

"The spill could be near the upper limit of what Shell has stated," John Amos, SkyTruth's founder and president, told the AP on Thursday. However, he said he needed more information to determine the spill's true scope.

Bonga sits about 75 miles (120 kilometers) off Nigeria's coast. It can produce about 200,000 barrels of oil and 150 million cubic feet of gas a day, according to Shell's Nigerian subsidiary. Production at the field, which Shell operates in partnership with Italy's Eni SpA, Exxon Mobil Corp., France's Total SA and the state-run Nigerian National Petroleum Corp., has been halted since the discovery of the spill.

Environmentalists blame Shell and other foreign oil firms for polluting the country's oil-rich Niger Delta. Some environmentalists say as much as 550 million gallons of oil poured into the delta during Shell's roughly 50 years of production in Nigeria – a rate roughly comparable to one Exxon Valdez disaster per year. An estimated 11 million gallons was released during the 1989 Exxon Valdez spill in Alaska.

Shell in recent years has said most of the spills in the delta are caused by militant attacks or thieves tapping into pipelines to steal crude oil, which ends up sold into the black market or cooked into a crude diesel or kerosene. Company statistics kept by Shell show spills have dropped as militant attacks in the region subsided, though this single spill at Bonga roughly doubles the amount of oil spilled by Shell this year.

Apparently predicting interest in the spill would grow, Shell already had taken out Internet advertising Thursday on search engines, directing those searching for the spill to their website. Jonathan French, a Shell spokesman in London, said the advertising came in the "interests of full transparency" so people can read the company's updates on the spill.

Nigeria, an OPEC member nation producing about 2.4 million barrels of crude oil a day, is a top supplier to the U.S.

___

Online:

___

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

LAGOS, Nigeria -- An oil spill near the coast of Nigeria is likely the worst to hit those waters in a decade, a government official said Thursday, as slicks from the Royal Dutch Shell PLC spill approa...
LAGOS, Nigeria -- An oil spill near the coast of Nigeria is likely the worst to hit those waters in a decade, a government official said Thursday, as slicks from the Royal Dutch Shell PLC spill approa...
LAGOS, Nigeria -- An oil spill near the coast of Nigeria is likely the worst to hit those waters in a decade, a government official said Thursday, as slicks from the Royal Dutch Shell PLC spill approa...
LAGOS, Nigeria -- An oil spill near the coast of Nigeria is likely the worst to hit those waters in a decade, a government official said Thursday, as slicks from the Royal Dutch Shell PLC spill approa...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 54
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oranges869
07:14 AM on 12/24/2011
Anyone care to look at the pollution from Russian oil production? Talk about massive yahoooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
motoGpifupleez
watching with amusement
08:33 PM on 12/23/2011
Joe Barton will be sending Shell an apology any day now.
01:38 PM on 12/23/2011
Impossible. Big Oil and their Republican minions keep assuring us their operations are so safe that regulation is not necessary. There clearly must be some other reason.
04:42 AM on 12/23/2011
I think Shell should drop the 'S' and bear the proper name: HELL! - much more suitable.
10:47 PM on 12/22/2011
Can you stop talking about this and move back to something that we can continue to deny, like that climate change is caused by fossil fuels, for example? We, the Pro-Pollution for Profit Gluttons need to get back to something we can deny ASAP!

Thanks,
Big Oil
08:24 PM on 12/22/2011
The production and transport of oil is a fact of life. There is nothing, for decades, that will stop the occurrence of oil spills. There is no current deployed technology that can contain and clean a major spill before it does major environmental damage. This lack of effective capability is demonstrated on each major spill. There is one technology capable of containing and cleaning a major oil spill. This requires a technology that can be quickly deployed with a recovery capacity of many times the rate of spill. Current "emergency oil spill response vessels" do not have this capability. According to the BP website, during the Deep Water Horizon spill over 200 skimmer vessels averaged a recovery rate of less than 2% of the estimated 60,000 barrels per day spill rate. This fleet, which exemplifies our current capability, can neither be deployed quickly to prevent spread nor can it recover more than a small fraction of the rate of spill.
The oil/water separation technology that can enable the next generation of small, fast, ultra high processing capacity oil spill response vessels can be found at www.EVTN.com.
This Florida cleantech manufacturer originally built the gyro housings for the Hubble Space Telescope. EVTN's sub-surface Voraxial 8000 processes 170,000 BPD. The BP Gulf of Mexico spill is estimated in the range of 60,000 BPD.

Would live in a town with no fire department or one equipped with bicycles and water pistols if effective firefighting equipment was available?
04:46 PM on 12/23/2011
thanks first boca. Enviro voraxial is in BP's rapid attack team tested during the gulf spill and qualified afterwards. they are part of an ongoing coast guard test "...a subsea oil recovery system that is currently being evaluated by the US Coast Guard. "

re: 200 skimmer vessels averaged a recovery rate of less than 2% of the estimated 60,000 barrels per day spill rate. - I think it would only take 6-10 medium sized Voraxials to do the same but I have to do the math. more here http://www.evtn.com/index.html

and here

http://www.evtn.com/oil-spills.html The Voraxial® Separator Ten times more effective than current oil cleanup efforts (left hand column)
12:40 PM on 12/26/2011
here is where evtn's voraxial system is incorporated into a Coast Guard R & D plan for "Designing a Submerged Oil Recovery System" http://www.iosc.org/papers_posters/IOSC-2011-94-file001.pdf#search=
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
06:10 PM on 12/22/2011
Yabbut there was a 3 gallon spill from the Keystone pipeline!!!!!!!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Harpseal60
I'm not bossy...I just have better ideas than you!
06:10 PM on 12/22/2011
why isn't this a top story?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ShellinayaArt
07:18 PM on 12/22/2011
Because the media is in the pocket of Big Oil, Big Coal, etc. They get kickbacks to keep quiet about it. They get millions to run ads like the one at the beginning of this video. They run ads to advertise oil and gas to the viewing audience of network and cable NEWS. Weird, isn't it?

Government lobbyists make sure politicians cover it up too.
photo
1oldhippie
yes, WE can again!
05:19 PM on 12/22/2011
Condolences to the people affected by this disaster.
It will be interesting to see if our Gulf spill, has had any effect on clean up preparedness and what measures are taken.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
06:11 PM on 12/22/2011
The have Exxon Valdiz sized spills every year.

No one cares, because it isn't the oil sands.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ShellinayaArt
07:19 PM on 12/22/2011
No one cares because it's Africa, and no one cares about Africa.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Squiriferous
Annoying everybody on Huffington Post since 2011
04:17 PM on 12/22/2011
This is karma. Payback for all those 419 scam e-mails. Couldn't have happened to a nicer bunch.
04:14 PM on 12/22/2011
Ho, hum. Just another "natural disaster". Nothing to see here, folks, now move along.

Oh, and keep those tax breaks coming because this stuff benefits everybody, don'tcha know ...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Lee Harrington
I'd Love To Change The World..
01:51 PM on 12/22/2011
mercy mercy me
Ah things ain't what they used to be, no no
Where did all the blue skies go?
Poison is the wind that blows from the north and south and east
Woo mercy, mercy me, mercy father
Ah things ain't what they used to be, no no
Oil wasted on the ocean and upon our seas, fish full of mercury
Ah oh mercy, mercy me
Ah things ain't what they used to be, no no
Radiation under ground and in the sky
Animals and birds who live nearby are dying
Oh mercy, mercy me
Ah things ain't what they used to be
What about this overcrowded land
How much more abuse from man can she stand?
Oh, na na...
My sweet Lord... No
My Lord... My sweet Lord

Marvin Gaye
MERCY MERCY ME (THE ECOLOGY)
photo
born 2b different
research b4 u post
09:18 AM on 12/24/2011
Do you buy gasoline? If so then you are to blame as all gasoline and oil users are. There is no such thing as clean oil drilling, transporting , and processing. Every year there are thousands of spills, and there always will be. There's no such thing as a fail safe. If you want there to be gas at the pump, then spills will happen.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Lee Harrington
I'd Love To Change The World..
12:16 PM on 12/24/2011
WRONG.....SORRY

Deepwater Horizon oil spill

The Deepwater Horizon oil spill (also referred to as the BP oil spill, the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, the BP oil disaster, or the Macondo blowout)[5][6][7] is an oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico which flowed unabated for three months in 2010, and continues to leak fresh oil.[8] It is the largest accidental marine oil spill in the history of the petroleum industry...

In January 2011 the White House oil spill commission released its final report on the causes of the oil spill. They blamed BP and its partners for making a series of cost-cutting decisions and the lack of a system to ensure well safety. They also concluded that the spill was not an isolated incident caused by "rogue industry or government officials", but that "The root causes are systemic and, absent significant reform in both industry practices and government policies, might well recur".[30] After its own internal probe, BP admitted that it made mistakes which led to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deepwater_Horizon_oil_spill
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Lee Harrington
I'd Love To Change The World..
12:25 PM on 12/24/2011
Exxon Valdez oil spill

The Exxon Valdez oil spill occurred in Prince William Sound, Alaska, on March 24, 1989, when the Exxon Valdez, an oil tanker bound for Long Beach, California, struck Prince William Sound's Bligh Reef and spilled 260,000 to 750,000 barrels of crude oil.It is considered to be one of the most devastating human-caused environmental disasters. The Valdez spill was the largest ever in U.S. waters until the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill, in terms of volume released....
... the ship was carrying approximately 55 million US gallons of oil, of which about 11 to 32 million US gallons were spilled into the Prince William Sound.... Some groups, such as Defenders of Wildlife, dispute the official estimates, maintaining that the volume of the spill has been underreported. ... calculations, based on an assumption that the sea water rather than oil was drained from the damaged tanks, estimate the total to have been 25 to 32 million US gallons ....

...contributing to the incident:

...fail to supervise the master and provide a rested and sufficient crew for Exxon Valdez. ...this was widespread throughout the industry, prompting a safety recommendation to Exxon and to the industry.
... failed to properly maneuver the vessel, possibly due to fatigue or excessive workload.
... failed to properly maintain the Raytheon Collision Avoidance System (RAYCAS) radar....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exxon_Valdez_oil_spill
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
getsit
good morning, I'm here
12:54 PM on 12/22/2011
Come on trolls. Let's build that Keystone pipeline through environmentally sensitive lands. Afterall, it will create jobs and we can trust the oil companies to do it correctly. It will be completely safe. Nothing to worry about. You can trust us says the oil slimy salesmen.

Do you see? Do you? It's likely they won't even clean it up.
photo
TheEmptyMonty
President of Antarctica
02:55 PM on 12/22/2011
They'll never see. Or they'll see, but say the environment isn't worth the tens of thousands of mythical "jobs" they claim the pipeline will create.
04:43 PM on 12/22/2011
how about creating jobs to clean up the spill, and maintain the green spaces and also transform back to green the ones that aren't anymore. That would certainly be building for our future.

Oh wait the future for them is right now!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
06:12 PM on 12/22/2011
There are already dozens of pipelines there, it seems ok so far..
How will one more make the difference?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ShellinayaArt
07:20 PM on 12/22/2011
I hope you're joking. And you Canadians can keep your filthy toxic tar sands oil. we don't want it!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
olitenup
12:48 PM on 12/22/2011
And these same people want to drill in our clean and pristine waters. I don't think so.
12:02 PM on 12/22/2011
Oil spill ...oil spill ...oil spill......

Do oil companies know how to drill and protect the environment at the same time.

The impression I get is that oil companies just do not care about the environment. It is just part of the cost of doing business. Maybe some executives should spend some time in jail. That might get their attention.