iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

'War Horse' Director Steven Spielberg Says Animal Safety Was A Top Concern

Posted: 12/22/11 01:53 PM ET

From Mother Nature Network's Gerri Miller:

According to "War Horse" director Steven Spielberg, "Four million horses were killed in World War I and not just from shelling or gunfire, but from malnutrition and exposure." Spielberg depicts that brutal reality in his new film, but despite the harrowing situations they face, the equine heroes of Spielberg's latest epic were not harmed in any way making the movie. Extra care was taken in a climactic sequence in which a horse is caught up in barbed wire in No Man's Land. "It took much longer to shoot that scene because we had to make sure every single shot was safe for the horse." The barbed wire was actually "Styrofoam rubber painted silver," he adds.

American Humane Society representative Barbara Carr was on set throughout and "had the power to pull the plug if she ever felt any of the horses were not up to the challenges or if she thought they could be injured in any way," says the director, who employed trainer Bobby Lovgren ("Seabiscuit") to assemble a crew of trainers, groomers, handlers, a vet and makeup artists that made the 14 horses that played the lead horse Joey look the same, with white "socks" and forehead markings. Lovgren's own horse, Finder, was one of two that did the most serious acting; others were trained for specific tasks.

A hundred horses were needed for a cavalry charge, many belonging to the riders who played the soldiers "so the horses would obey their commands," says Spielberg, who had special effects supervisor Neil Courbould build several full-sized animatronic horses to use in close-ups of the actors. He'd been enthralled by both Michael Morpugo's novel and the stage version of "War Horse" that he'd seen in London, and was familiar with horses because his wife and daughter both ride. "I know how smart horses are. I probably would have been the wrong director for the film had I not lived with horses," he believes.

Spielberg tapped longtime collaborators composer John Williams, with whom he's worked for nearly 40 years, and DP Janusz Kaminski, his cinematographer since "Schindler's List," to join him in England on the four-month shoot, but wanted an unknown to play the central role of Albert and found him in British newcomer Jeremy Irvine, who'd never acted in a movie before. "I was struggling as an actor for a long time in London," says Irvine, who'd most recently been a glorified extra with the Royal Shakespeare Company and never thought he'd get the part. "It was a huge risk for them. For all [Spielberg] knew I was going to get in front of the camera and freeze up. It was a long [casting] process, as it should be," says Irvine, who'd also had no previous experience with horses.

"I'd never been on a horse so a big part of it was learning how to be with them. I never thought I'd have such an emotional bond with them," he reflects. "I learned to ride but that pales in significance to the fact that I'd never acted in front of a camera before and that was a big challenge for me. We didn't have a rehearsal, which I'm used to on stage. Steven wanted it to be spontaneous. That's kind of stressful, particularly for someone who's used to three months of rehearsal." Irvine also acknowledges the pressure that comes with a leading role in a film "especially since this is such an established story, established role, and to do it justice," but credits Spielberg with easing that burden. "Steven makes it so easy. He makes you feel really comfortable on set. He doesn't have DIRECTOR on the back of his chair. He has DAD. You think of him as the master of his craft, this living legend. But he was just very kind and approachable."

Irvine believes that the theme of emotional connection in "War Horse" is something everyone can relate to. "We all have that childhood friend, be it an animal, a best friend, a brother or sister, and we can all imagine what it's like to have that taken away from us. For Albert, Joey is like a brother, a best friend, and the stakes need to be high in order to justify him risking his life to get this horse back."

"War Horse" is proving to be quite the career launcher for Irvine. Having recently completed "Now is Good" with Dakota Fanning, he is shooting a film adaptation of Dickens' "Great Expectations" with Ralph Fiennes and Helena Bonham Carter (he plays Pip), and next plays the young version of Colin Firth's character in "Railway Man," about a British soldier captured by the Japanese during World War II and forced to work on the Burma Railway.

As for Spielberg, he has two films in theaters this month, having directed the motion-capture-animation adventure "The Adventures of Tintin," opening Dec. 21, four days before "War Horse" hits screens. He's also executive-producing NBC's new musical drama "Smash," premiering Feb. 6.

Check out Mother Nature Network's celeb section and watch Ecollywood videos.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

From Mother Nature Network's Gerri Miller: According to "War Horse" director Steven Spielberg, "Four million horses were killed in World War I and not just from shelling or gunfire, but from malnut...
From Mother Nature Network's Gerri Miller: According to "War Horse" director Steven Spielberg, "Four million horses were killed in World War I and not just from shelling or gunfire, but from malnut...
Filed by James Gerken  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 30
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:27 AM on 03/07/2013
I just watched Warhorse and the barbed wire scene was cruel in ever way. You can't explain to a horse he's acting. Spielberg, you you be a shamed of yourself.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:31 AM on 12/24/2011
Thanks for the timely disclaimer Mr.Speilberg. Still no way I'll see this movie whether I believe you or not. I don't.
11:40 PM on 12/24/2011
Agreed...Speilberg hamming it up as per usual to mainstream America.
photo
GirlUsingBrain
The most dangerous animal in the forest is man.
01:18 PM on 12/23/2011
I will have to wait for this to come out on DVD. I know I will get too emotional and start sobbing in the theatre and it is just too embarassing in public.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grayshrimp
06:04 PM on 12/23/2011
same here!
11:19 AM on 12/23/2011
Funny how Spielberg's biggest concern was for the safety of the horse when Dreamworks Animation employs a dog killer. Yep, google it! Wonder if he would have partnered with them knowing that?

Yes, I know that Dreamworks and Dreamworks Animation are different divisions. If you bought or went to see Kung Fu Panda - they worked on that movie!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anne Mccormick
02:11 PM on 12/23/2011
and how exactly does this have anything to do with "War Horse"?
02:50 PM on 12/23/2011
Who do you think Spielberg partnered with to make `War Horse',exactly?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
runner 08
01:56 AM on 12/24/2011
Thank you for sharing that information. People should eb aware of cases of animal abuse.

While I do notthink this refkects on Spielberg's policy ensuring animal welfare, the subsidiary company, Dreamworks animation, should certainly be called on to treat a conviction on anuiaml abuse charges seriously and fire the alleged perpetrator, employee.

Have you heard what happened in this case? I found a lot of links to articles about what happened, and Young Song's arrest for brutally hammering a german shepherd puppy to death, but could not find one article about how the case turned out.

Here's one of the links that i found to the initial report :
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-20058656-504083.html
11:02 AM on 12/24/2011
Like you I haven't been able to find any follow up. And, of course, Dreamworks Animation isn't saying anything either. Which is why I still boycott their products. Hypocrisy is disgusting.
photo
Hugatreetoday
Do or do not, there is no try.
08:35 AM on 12/28/2011
I would gladly pay to watch him suffer the same fate, the rotten piece of garbage.
photo
mlaiuppa
Pres. Sarcasm Society. Like we need your approval.
10:20 PM on 12/22/2011
I can't bring myself to see this film, despite Spielberg. I just know I'll cry.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doodlebug2
05:07 PM on 12/22/2011
as it should be
photo
MikeDu
Both salubrious and lugubrious concurrently.
05:03 PM on 12/22/2011
Too bad his top concern wasn't that he might be making a film that was mawkishly sentimental.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ProudToBeVeryLiberal
Science is the antidote to the poison of religion
03:40 PM on 12/22/2011
Horses were extensively used in WWII as well. Mass mechanization had just begun and in fact it was only limited to elite units. Most infantry units would still march on foot and most artillery units would still be moved by horses. Not to mention that a large chunk of the logistics was still horse-drawn.

Cavalry units still existed in every army (some more than others, notably the Polish, Romanian and Soviet armies, the latter had 4 million horses at the time of Barbarossa), although their role had shifted mainly to reconnaissance.

About a million military horses perished in WWII (rough estimate), the vast majority on the Eastern Front. During the Battle of Stalingrad, tens of thousands of horses were sIaughtered for food on both sides. It also happened in other battles, but never to that dramatic extent.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
viking1969
04:24 PM on 12/22/2011
The US military was completely mechanized in Europe and the Pacific theatres. You are correct as to the semi mechanized nature of the German armies.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ProudToBeVeryLiberal
Science is the antidote to the poison of religion
08:51 PM on 12/22/2011
"The US military was completely mechanized in Europe and the Pacific theatres."

Not when WWII started in 1939.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:55 PM on 12/22/2011
The reason the Germans never used gas in WW2 is that they feared it would be used on their cities in return and they depended on horses for traction because so much of their industrial output had been turned over to military production. No gas masks for horses.

A terrible irony is that the Germans were so short of ammo that they started the war with only a two month supply. If the Allies had counterattacked immediately in 1939 they could have rolled up the German Army like a rug. It was a terrible failure of intelligence.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ProudToBeVeryLiberal
Science is the antidote to the poison of religion
04:25 PM on 12/23/2011
The truth is that the Allies were even less ready for war than Germany. What do you think the "phony war" was all about? Trying to build up maybe? Barbarossa was delayed by three crucial months (in which the Germans had to clear up MussoIini's mess in the Balkans, to protect their flank) and that might have actually lost Germany the entire eastern front, as the USSR was in the middle of the largest military buildup and attempt at modernization in history.