More

Chinese Investment In Europe Unlikely To Be Overwhelming

China Europe Investment

First Posted: 12/26/11 11:16 AM ET Updated: 12/26/11 11:16 AM ET

VENICE (Reuters) - The sign in a boutique selling glass hand-crafted on the Venetian island of Murano betrays an uncertain grasp of English. But the owner is very sure who is to blame for the tough times confronting the 700-year-old local glassmaking industry.

"Everything in this shop is not made in China," it proclaims. A few doors away, imported Murano lookalikes sell for much less. To the untrained eye, they appear identical.

With Europe drowning in debt and flirting with recession, China's influence can only rise further. Euro zone governments would love Beijing to plough more of its $3.2 trillion in foreign-exchange reserves into their bonds.

China is also likely to chip in with a loan to the International Monetary Fund to provide a financing backstop in case Italy and Spain are shut out of the bond markets.

Last week's $3.5 billion acquisition by China Three Gorges Corp of the Portuguese government's stake in utility EDP is also a sign of things to come.

Financiers turn instinctively to fast-growing China as they try to flush out buyers for assets that are going on the block as European governments, banks and companies pay down debt.

But, despite Chinese leaders' expressing interest in diversifying the country's overseas asset base away from government paper, analysts do not expect a sea change in China's traditionally cautious approach to expanding in Western markets. Africa and Asia are likely to remain China's top targets for now.

"There are going to be opportunities, but we're not going to see China buying up Europe," said Thilo Hanemann, research director at the Rhodium Group, an investment advisory and strategic planning firm in New York.

TREADING SOFTLY

There are many reasons for the wariness.

Lengthy delays in obtaining the approval of regulators in Beijing put Chinese companies at a disadvantage in mergers and acquisitions when the seller wants a quick deal. Companies lack the management skills to integrate overseas acquisitions. And, perhaps most importantly, prospects are much brighter at home than they are in Europe.

"If you compare the rates of growth in China and in Europe, are you sensible buying into a brand that's seen its best years of growth? said Edward Radcliffe, a partner in Shanghai with Vermillion, an M&A advisory boutique that focuses on cross-border China deals.

Still, he said some larger Chinese groups, both state-owned and private, had started to explore opportunities in Europe and the United States.

The 27-member European Union is China's biggest export market. But foreign direct investment (FDI) has badly lagged, totaling $8 billion by the EU's reckoning or $12 billion on China's count - less than 0.2 percent of total FDI in the EU, according to Rhodium.

The firm has kept its own tally since 2003, but its total of $15 billion through mid-2011, though greater than the official data, is still small.

Hanemann said he was sure 2012 would see deals in Europe in technology and consumer products to enable Chinese firms to climb the value ladder and build their domestic market share.

"Ultimately, Chinese companies have to become true multinationals, like Japanese and Korean firms before them," he said. "Over the longer term, there's no reason to believe that China is going to take a different path."

But he was skeptical whether most Chinese companies would be able to seize the opportunities that were likely to crop up in the coming year. To do so, they would have to manage public perceptions in Europe and obtain quick regulatory approval at home.

"There are a lot of deals that the Chinese cannot take on. If the Chinese government sees a company making a bid for troubled assets that risks provoking a political backlash in Europe, I think they'd step in to make sure there's no embarrassment for the Chinese side."

POLITICAL OVERLAY

The failure of Chinese firms to buy Saab, the Swedish car maker that was declared bankrupt last week, was a telling example of the difficulties facing Chinese investors, Hanemann said.

But the picture is not black and white. After all, Volvo, another Swedish car maker, was successfully acquired by a Chinese rival from Ford Motor Co in 2010.

Christine Lambert-Goue, managing director in Beijing at Invest Securities China, said companies were not looking mainly for outright acquisitions but for brands, patents and technology that would bolster their position at home.

"Companies are only ready to pay for assets from Europe that will enable them to gain market share in China," she said.

Investment in Europe will take off eventually, but a deteriorating political climate represents an obstacle in the short term, said Jonathan Holslag of the Brussels Institute of Contemporary China Studies.

The EU, like the United States, is talking tough about Chinese "state capitalism" and is crafting a more assertive trade policy to counter what it sees as a playing field tilted against foreign companies.

For its part, Beijing smells protectionism in the air in response to its growing economic clout.

"The European Union is disappointed with the reluctance of Beijing to open its economy further, whereas Beijing complains about Europe being too reluctant to share its knowledge or to allow Chinese investors to expand their presence in important sectors like infrastructure," Holslag said.

And if Europe fails to snap out of its economic malaise, the risk is that a super-competitive China will be made a scapegoat.

"The more governments are confronted with high unemployment figures, the more we will start to see China as a challenger rather than as a savior," Holslag said.

Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
VENICE (Reuters) - The sign in a boutique selling glass hand-crafted on the Venetian island of Murano betrays an uncertain grasp of English. But the owner is very sure who is to blame for the toug...
VENICE (Reuters) - The sign in a boutique selling glass hand-crafted on the Venetian island of Murano betrays an uncertain grasp of English. But the owner is very sure who is to blame for the toug...
Filed by Jillian Berman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 42
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
uniquindividual
I'm unique and so are you
10:38 AM on 12/28/2011
Corporations aren't people in europe at this time, tougher for foreign governments to influence policy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RitaS
09:35 PM on 12/27/2011
Perhaps because Europe has the for cite to realize when China takes control of 'products' they own that/those Countries??

Too bad the US learned too late.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
munki
Global to Local now Local to Global
08:41 PM on 12/27/2011
Eurozone need to be reorganized !
It is absolutely not attractive for investors the way it is today...
Disparity!
I often wonder how people are surviving... in Paris where I saw big Mac this summer for 7+Euro or over $10+ US... with coke and french fry... way above $15US!!!

China will not be in hurry to invest in Europe...
African nations are not only friendlier to China, but also... are richer in natural resources than in Europe. Any investor(s) will look at it before putting their money... wouldn't you say?
creed840
Boiling water to weaken the tea.
06:00 PM on 12/27/2011
Because it's still in the process of buying the USA. Once that sale is final, China will move on to Europe. China is in no hurry to cover the disaster in Greece just yet.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
munki
Global to Local now Local to Global
08:42 PM on 12/27/2011
US is not the only market... in N. America for them...
Canadian coal, petro...
oh well...
03:37 AM on 12/27/2011
You can thank Bush and the GOP for China's financial prestige. After all, they helped pay for our two wars. Now the middle class has to pay them back while the wealthy find other ways to make more money through back door deals. I can't wait to see the GOP's new scare tactic to get Americans to vote for them and then extend the Bush tax cuts and immediately start borrowing from China again for the Iran War.
photo
Protocolor
Have maths, will travel.
08:36 AM on 12/27/2011
Would America have invested in America had you not fought two+ wars?

Look at it this way: If/when America decides to go to war with Iran, it will cost another $trillion and Congress will certainly raise that money somehow. If Americans can avoid war, will that $trillion still be raised and spent, but on domestic development? Of course not.

China has been spending about $100 billion per year on developing high speed rail infrastructure alone. That doesn't include the many $100 billions being spent to build and improve the highway and road systems, transit, airports, education, flood control, public housing, power distribution, ports, urban infrastructure, water treatment, hospitals, etc.

America lacks the will to spend on America the way China spends on China. That's why America spends on wars.
photo
guveqzero
Inventor and Innovator
02:18 AM on 12/27/2011
Communism has won. We have lost. What have you learned? Are you going to let it stand? If so, we've spent the last fifty years fighting for nothing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
munki
Global to Local now Local to Global
08:44 PM on 12/27/2011
Communism did not win. They are the history.
China today is a true CAPITALISTIC nation with SOCIALIST government...
The definition will not be in old school book... check the new ones...
if they updated...
01:46 AM on 12/27/2011
And I'm not very likely to be buying the Brooklyn Bridge.
photo
Sabrae
Talk to the paws.
01:44 AM on 12/27/2011
Analysis: 'We're Not Going To See China Buying Europe'

We didn't see it here until it was too late.
photo
Protocolor
Have maths, will travel.
08:42 AM on 12/27/2011
I think you missed the tone of the article. Despite the standard anti-"Made in China" boilerplate in the beginning of the article, Europeans are despairing over the lack of Chinese investment to help mitigate the damage that capitalism has inflicted on itself there.
photo
JJenius
Being lucky is often forgotten!
01:14 AM on 12/27/2011
While China invests and buys the world, the U.S. goes deeper and deeper into debt. A $15 trillion dollar debt that is growing astronomically. And CONGRESS has no answers but to feed the international corporations that will laugh after the eventual collapse.
frank1946
Tell the Truth
01:01 AM on 12/27/2011
Paper Currencies always Fail, always !

Ask China, Germany and Japan. They own large part of Civilization now.

USA and PIIGS are now Slaves to the Lords of the Manor !
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
becky bradshaw
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth
11:16 PM on 12/26/2011
4/10 of all people live in China or India. The average worker in the prosperous areas, earns about $200 per month ($2400 per year). Eventually, maybe a 100-130 years, wages in these countries will rise to levels similar to Europe (or the USA).
photo
Sabrae
Talk to the paws.
12:48 AM on 12/27/2011
Or ours will drop their level as we are forced to compete for jobs.
photo
Protocolor
Have maths, will travel.
08:59 AM on 12/27/2011
"The average worker in the prosperous areas, earns about $200 per month ($2400 per year)."

Wrong. The minimum wage itself in most prosperous parts of China is higher than that. See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_minimum_wages_in_China_(PRC)

Professionals in China make dramatically more than that. In addition, wages are increasing by between 10% and 40% (depending upon profession, region, etc) each year.

It may make you feel better to believe that Chinese people are all living in mud huts, but the reality is that many would never be caught dead wearing the garbage that they send to the US for sale in Walmart. Snobby? Perhaps, but their standards and expectations are raising along with their incomes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
becky bradshaw
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth
10:13 AM on 12/27/2011
Did you read your own link? It does not contradict "an average worker wage of $200 per month in prosperous areas".

Wages in China are increasing, especially in a few isolated factories (FoxConn and Honda for example), but the general wage scale is not increasing very fast. Chinese worker wages are under pressure from even lower wage locales like Vietnam and Malaysia. (1)

The Chinese who work in the factories don't live in mud huts, they live in huge dormitories sharing a room with strangers. (2) Also, there is a bit of dramatic fiction in your post concerning Chinese attitudes. You missed your calling. You could write for the National Enquirer.

Reference:
1. Vietnam: http://www.business-in-asia.com/vietnam_workers.html
2. Dormitories: http://www.electronista.com/articles/10/11/02/cramped.dorms.suicide.nets/
photo
William1950
everything I say could be wrong
11:00 PM on 12/26/2011
sooner or later the chineese people are going to want a share of the pie for their labor too... we are on this planet together.. get that? technology is wonderful, it is also contributing to massive unemployment worldwide....... and again, sooner or later we will either rise together or we will fall together.
photo
Erikhuffpost
Anything can happen within the next 5 minutes
08:23 PM on 12/26/2011
="The European Union is disappointed with the reluctance of Beijing to open its economy further, whereas Beijing complains about Europe being too reluctant to share its knowledge or to allow Chinese investors to expand their presence in important sectors like infrastructure," Holslag said.=

Plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose, car l'histoire se repete, I guess.

This is comparable to the tension between Europe and Japan in the '80s.

The rise of Japan as an economic super power was pretty much feared and especially from the conservative right, there were many calls about protectionism, lest Japan would take over the entire economy. In the long run, however, a policy of reciprocity saved the day.

This is basically with China wants: "you scratch my back, and I scratch yours". It does not want to be taken for granted anymore, but be considered as a global player.

It will take negotiations to sort this one out.
nothingchanges
too soon old, too late smart
06:34 PM on 12/26/2011
You know those terrible "socialists" countries? The one's Fox is on about all the time?

Like many of those that make up Europe?

Their election campaigns are funded by the government, so "buying" congress is not an option there.

As compared to the US where the Supreme Court has ruled that even foreign corporations can in large part determine who we vote for, by means of political advertising.

Must be terrible living in a country like that......................imagine, where politicians have to work for the people that elected them instead of just the 1%, or corporate patrons, who fund their campaigns.

Must be tough.
photo
Erikhuffpost
Anything can happen within the next 5 minutes
08:19 PM on 12/26/2011
I'm Dutch, and so live in one of those "socialist" countries.

In the Netherlands, political parties are only allowed a limited time for election campaining (4 months max), with a moratorium one month prior to general elections. Also, campaigns are funded by the parties themselves from paid membership and grants.

Presently we have 15 political parties.
photo
Erikhuffpost
Anything can happen within the next 5 minutes
08:24 PM on 12/26/2011
(continued)
The most important ones being:

Right wing:
VVD: pro business liberal party. Strong emphasis on neocapitalism and small government. At present in government, loathed by many Dutch as a pro-austerity "rich man's" party.
CDA: christian democrats (centrist conservative, merger of protestant and catholic parties) At present in government, considered by many Dutch as the weakest link in the present Cabinet, due to strong emphasis on Catholicism, contrary to Dutch tradition of calvinism.
PVV: freedom party. Anti Islam, pro Israel neoconservative party. At present in government, considered by many Dutch as a liability to democracy, owing to incidents of fysical violence by its members. Sometimes compared to prewar National-Socialists.
SGP: christian "fundamentalists" strong emphasis on calvinist-christian conservatism. Aka Dutch "taliban" for wanting to curtailing the role of women. At present "coalition partner" in the Senate.

Left wing:
PvdA: Labour Party: Social democrats. Considered by many Dutch as technocratic and out of touch with society.
D'66: liberal democrats, left wing libertarian views. Sometimes considered as "elitist yuppie party"
GL: environmentalists, left wing liberal, also considered as "elitist yuppie party" or "girls only party", due to strong views on feminism.
SP: Socialist party: democratic socialists with (negative) utilitarian views on government, strong emphasis on grass roots organizing, (bottom up democracy) Considered as "extreme left" or "neomarxist" by the Labour Party.

Centrist:
CU: Christian unionists. Evangelicals, pro life, environment, and charity. Anti neocapitalism.
PvdD: animal rights party (environmentalism with christian/socialist views)
nothingchanges
too soon old, too late smart
08:32 PM on 12/26/2011
Nice to hear from a representative of a "civilized' country. I'm curious, What is your government's approval rating amongst it's citizenry. I tried to find it today, on the net, and got a lot of conflicting information. I suspect it can't be worse then America's 11% approval rating for Congress.

We have the "Best Congress money can buy".....................and it shows.
04:18 PM on 12/26/2011
They basically own the US now so why buy Europe at the current price, all China has to do is wait a year or so when the price to buy Europe will be half what it is today.