iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Medicaid Cuts By States Affect Patients And Providers

Medicaid Cuts Patients Providers

SHANNON McCAFFREY   12/27/11 10:27 AM ET   AP

ATLANTA — Just as Medicaid prepares for a vast expansion under the federal health care overhaul, the 47-year-old entitlement program for the poor is under increasing pressure as deficit-burdened states chip away at benefits and cut payments to doctors.

Nearly every state has proposed or implemented a plan in its current budget to rein in costs, and many are considering additional cuts in the year ahead.

For the tens of millions of poor and disabled who rely on the program – approaching nearly one in five Americans – the cuts translate into longer waits for doctors, restrictions on prescription drugs, a halt to vision and dental care, staff cuts at nursing homes and dwindling access to home health care.

Ruth Wohlforth, 70, is among those feeling the effects.

Her $700 monthly income qualifies her for both Medicare and Medicaid, but she says her benefits have been reduced, she's being forced her to make co-pays for the first time on prescription drugs, and she now has to drive about 30 minutes from her home near the southern tip of New Jersey to see a doctor. Some of her friends have been assigned to doctors in Philadelphia.

She said she feels lawmakers are not aware of the real-world consequences of their spending cuts.

"I've seen so many people in tears, and they don't know what to do," Wohlforth said. "People that are older than I am, and are in worse shape, they get befuddled by the whole thing. They don't know where to go for help; they just feel they're not being listened to."

States are reshaping the Medicaid landscape even as the need has grown along with joblessness during the recession.

The $427 billion-a-year program, a combination of state and federal funding, also had been targeted for additional cuts at the federal level this year as members of Congress sparred over how to reduce the nation's debt. But funding seems safe for now after a special committee failed last month to reach an agreement on how to cut overall spending.

Already, many changes at the state level have been dramatic and are testing the legal bounds of what Medicaid must provide:

_ Arizona, for a time, eliminated life-saving transplants for Medicaid patients, and hospital officials in the state blame at least one death on the halt in coverage. Gov. Jan Brewer restored transplants but is prohibiting thousands of low-income, childless adults from entering the program and has added fees on those who smoke and the obese.

_ New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie is pushing a plan under which only the poorest would qualify. A parent of two making more than $103 per week would no longer be eligible for coverage.

_ The U.S. Supreme Court will decide whether California has the right to continue cutting payments to physicians and other Medicaid providers to help close the state's ongoing budget deficit.

Cuts to provider fees, as in California, have been the most frequently used tactic by states to save Medicaid costs. A recent survey by the National Association of State Budget Officers found that 33 states wanted to reduce provider rates and another 16 sought to freeze them.

California was granted permission by federal officials to make broad cuts to reimbursement rates to its Medicaid program, known as Medi-Cal, in October. The cuts include a 10 percent reduction to payments for outpatient services for doctors, clinics, optometrists, dental services, medical equipment and pharmacy. They are intended to save the state an estimated $623 million.

A coalition of trade associations representing doctors, pharmacists and chain drug stores has filed a lawsuit seeking to stop the cuts. Doctors who care for Medi-Cal patients say they already have been subjected to multiple pay cuts, and some say they no longer will be able to serve the state's neediest patients.

About 70 percent of Dr. Douglas Tolley's practice in Yuba County is covered by Medi-Cal. The 64-year-old obstetrician, who practices in a largely agricultural region about 40 minutes north of the state capital, said he is the old-school sort of doctor who "was brought up in a time when doctors took care of all comers."

Yet he has seen his income steadily drop over the last 18 years – down one-third from what it was when he started.

"Everybody understands that doctors are basically small business people, and we have to meet our cost plus make a living." Tolley said. "Just meeting our cost doesn't mean staying in business."

Even more state cuts could be on the horizon. In Maine, Gov. Paul LePage recently proposed removing 65,000 residents from the program, citing a state Medicaid shortfall estimated to reach $221 million through mid-2013. The Republican governor says he will not consider tax increases to make up the difference.

State officials, who are required to balance their budgets, argue they have no choice but to cut into Medicaid after four straight years of budget deficits. With state and federal funds combined, Medicaid makes up 22 percent of total state spending, the largest single portion of most state budgets, according to the National Association of State Budget Officers.

Critics say the moves are shortsighted.

Joan Alker, co-executive director of the Center for Children and Families at Georgetown University, said slashing Medicaid will not stop the sick from seeking care, sending them to emergency rooms and ultimately inflating private medical insurance premiums.

"At the end of the day, for the children, the individuals with disabilities, the seniors in nursing homes, their health care needs are not going to go away just because someone cuts the Medicaid program," Alker said.

Jerry Kemmer, a former Democratic state assemblyman in New York, said Medicaid has long been an issue lawmakers did not want to touch. Now, they simply have no choice.

"It's ballooned to the extent that it's just become a budget-buster," he said.

Six million people have joined the Medicaid rolls since the recession began in late 2007. Enrollment nationally topped 50 million for the first time in June 2010, a number that is projected to keep rising, especially as the nation's unemployment rate remains high.

Billions of dollars from the federal stimulus program helped avoid deep Medicaid cuts through the worst of the recession, but the last of that money dried up this year.

In Florida, Medicaid reimbursement rates were reduced this year by 12 percent for most hospitals, although rural and children's hospitals were cut just 3 percent, and rates for nursing homes were cut 6.5 percent.

But the start of the next legislative session in January already has some people worried about additional cuts.

Debra St. Fleur, 25, of Miami, is covered by Medicaid, along with her 1-year-old son. Many of her neighbors in the city's Little Haiti section are on Medicaid, too, and she worries what would happen if services continue to be eroded.

"It's really scary," she said. "If they can't get their medicine, what's going to happen? They're going to die."

The Obama administration is concerned enough about the widespread Medicaid provider cuts that it has introduced a rule that would make it harder for states to slash the rates. The move is designed to ensure that those eligible for Medicaid are not denied access due to a shortage of health care resources.

Medicaid reimbursement rates already trail those physicians receive for treating Medicare patients and those with private insurance. A study by the nonpartisan Center for Studying Health System Change found that on, average, Medicaid would reimburse a doctor $39 for 45 minutes for a new patient hospital visit, compared to $63 for Medicare.

Physician groups say that has left more and more doctors declining to see Medicaid clients. Some providers are trying to find other ways to make up for the cuts.

In Columbia, S.C., Julie Ann Avin, executive director of the private, nonprofit Mental Illness Recovery Center Inc., has decided not to fill staff vacancies and also cut back on some rehab services because of Medicaid's new authorization process. The center serves about 650 people annually, close to 60 percent of whom are on Medicaid.

"We accept folks regardless," Avin said. "Everything that we do is not based just on a reimbursement."

Molly Collins Offner, director of policy development for the American Hospital Association, said emergency rooms must accept Medicaid clients, as well as those without insurance.

"More and more, you are seeing ER's becoming primary care docs," she said.

She said deep cuts rippling through the Medicaid system will only exacerbate that.

___

Associated Press writers Samantha Henry in Newark, N.J., Meg Kinnard in Columbia, S.C., Shaya Tayefe Mohajer in Los Angeles and Matt Sedensky in Miami contributed to this report.

___

Follow Shannon McCaffrey at http://www.twitter.com(backslash)smccaffrey13

Earlier on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
ATLANTA — Just as Medicaid prepares for a vast expansion under the federal health care overhaul, the 47-year-old entitlement program for the poor is under increasing pressure as deficit-burdened...
ATLANTA — Just as Medicaid prepares for a vast expansion under the federal health care overhaul, the 47-year-old entitlement program for the poor is under increasing pressure as deficit-burdened...
Filed by Luke Johnson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,304
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (47 total)
photo
bettybp
we're old too soon & wise too late
02:30 PM on 01/03/2012
This from NEW YORK and Governor Cuomo, who is planning yet ANOTHER medicaid task force, designed to creatively cut funds to the most vulnerable among us - our disabled, elderly, Vets and those recuperating from serious illnesses in Nursing Homes funded by Medicaid. Medicaid has been eviscerated by severe cuts for years now (remember the Berger Commission?)

Quoting from our local newspaper, Cuomo's new "Task Force" is "to Study Care for the Poor and Disabled" recommends:

"PUT all the NEARLY 5 MILLION POOR AND DISABLED PEOPLE... INTO A CHEAPER, MANAGED CARE SYSTEM within the next three to five years."

QUESTION: "CHEAPER" than they already have? Which has been cut to the bone already?
What kind of solution is this supposed to be? Does it involve dying, or rehabs recovering, in some sort of Warehouse situation - often far from loved ones? (there have been many exposes of Warehouse facilities, including Willowbrook, unbelievable conditions). Is this a Final Solution?

Are we a civilized country in the 21st century - or we going back in time to a society such as the ancient spartans had which literally threw human beings out to be eaten by wolves?
photo
ihatepeople0 1
at caput asini ex tuo
08:37 PM on 01/03/2012
"A Cheaper System"...What does that mean, exactly? G@sChambers, cattle pens?
photo
bettybp
we're old too soon & wise too late
08:43 PM on 01/03/2012
that's what a lot of people are wondering! Fav'd.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EHenry
Author of the new book - How We Got Swindled by Wa
07:12 PM on 12/29/2011
Medicaid is not just for the poor!! It is for the millions upon millions who live with parents in Alzheimer's nursing (care-taking facilities) homes for $7,000 per month. That's $84,000 annually for keeping alive people who are virtual vegetables. My father-in-law was a successful Postal Inspector, who has a significant pension, but not enough to pay for his assisted living expenses as well as his wife of 57 years. So all of his assets now belong to the government and Medicaid will take over, because he has used up his assets paying to maintain her life, or more accurately - sustain her condition until her heart stops beating - which would be considered in humane treatment for a pet. This is not unusual and many families across the US understand and bear the pain of seeing parents, relatives and friends live in an humane existence. I am tired of the word entitlement being a perk. And aren't you tired of the in humane treatment of humans who have lost the ability to be connected to life? In stead of decreasing Medicaid, why not do something about all the waste, all the money down the drain that could have been spent on the living - on the families left behind - on education - on repaying student loans - spent on anything with a positive pay back. Seniors in nursing homes are not the same as all the people who can't be people any more.
photo
bettybp
we're old too soon & wise too late
02:38 PM on 01/03/2012
what is it you're suggesting here as the solution to the problem of your mother in law? how does your father-in-law feel about these issues?
And just who are you to determine whether anyone is a "Virtual Vegetable"?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EHenry
Author of the new book - How We Got Swindled by Wa
03:20 PM on 01/03/2012
thanks for the rhetorical question - because the answer is self-evident with the exception that religions interfere with making sense. What if your dog could not eat, remember to not go on the living room carpet, could not walk, bark or remember anything - including YOU! And what if the dog cost your family $7,000 per month to water like a weed. Money most families do not have! We have not addressed this yet, but it is a devastating problem for millions and is only getting worse. Who are we to decide that public nudity is wrong? Don't you know when someone has outlived being a human being and is alive in name only? In a comatose-like state without wisdom or memory or ability to live without caretakers? The solution to the problem of ADVANCED ALZHEIMER'S is to recognize the futility and emotional pain to attempt to preserve a vegetative state - which is recognized as such by modern medicine - not religion - especially not those who JUDGMENTALLY felt/determined that Terry Schiavo, whose diagnosis was: "vegetative state," should have not been allowed to die! So what's your problem with understanding vegetative.
12:17 AM on 12/29/2011
The design of Medicaid (regardless of the State-sponsored name applied to it) promotes the incomes of state politicians (via, e.g., campaign finance dollars) and insurance companies (via mandated coverage and denied payments to doctors and hospitals) far more than it supports healthcare to the medically indigent. Doctors and hospitals are rarely reimbursed what it costs to treat Medicaid patients (and increasingly less for patients under Medicare). This is because Medicaid is co-financed with (tax-averse) state revenues and Medicare patients are getting older and sicker. Politicians (whether State or Federal) rarely do ANYTHING valuable for anyone who has not paid them first. The medically indigent are sickest because they are the least protected, most neglected; and politically (i.e., financially) "voiceless".

Paraphrasing the late president, Thomas Jefferson: "Government does less for you than it does to you;" i.e., "Santa Clause" never gives you more than what he steals from your neighbors and gives them only some of what he steals from you. Banks, Finance Corporations and Insurance companies, e.g. and their Government proxies are not benevolent entities. Americans are poorer; not better off because of them. They take less from the rich than from you by coercing you into debt you can’t afford, keeping you there; and then making you work for nothing the rest of your life. Health Insurance is Not Health Care; medical treatments that are provided for less than what it costs to provide them rarely lead to cures.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Max is Back
Caiu na roda, ou acorda ou vai rodar!
04:18 PM on 12/28/2011
Why do the T-baggers hate the elderly? Why is the Crypt-keeper celebrating stabbing them in the back after they were scared into voting for her and the other grim reapers of the GOP...
09:37 PM on 12/28/2011
Oh the drama.
03:35 PM on 12/28/2011
Similar t another comment I made on another thread - these same people are "pro-life"! Very weird position to say the least.
photo
bettybp
we're old too soon & wise too late
02:40 PM on 01/03/2012
before birth, pro-life. After, not so much.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
scooter1
Bias is irrelevant to truth
03:34 PM on 12/28/2011
How about raising taxes on the rich?
09:47 PM on 12/28/2011
Anyone but you, right?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
scooter1
Bias is irrelevant to truth
09:49 PM on 12/28/2011
No, just the rich.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GeoffreyF
Pragmatic Liberal in Massachusetts
11:02 PM on 12/28/2011
The Middle class is paying more than its share by percent. It is a disgrace. The rich are paying less by percent than any time in 80 years.

You are a disgrace with your ignorance and thoughtlessness.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hugo Stiglitz1
03:17 PM on 01/28/2012
to hell with that, I say pillage and torture them
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TOCB
Both major parties are married to money
03:24 PM on 12/28/2011
So if 50 million people are covered by medicade and 48 million are covered by medicare, that translates to roughly 32% of our population currently covered by government healthcare, not accounting for overlap. Almost 40 million of these people are 65 and over, and over 50% of the nations healthcare cost goes to this group. Now these people paid premiums to private insuracne companies until they reached 65. But guess who will end up paying the bulk of their healthcare cost over their lifetime. The government. So we effective have a government healthcare system currently. The problem is it is very inefficiently funded as pirvate insurance companies get over like bandits since they dump the cost of caring for the elderly on the government. REAL SMART, REPUBLICANS!
mavpay
I am WE THE PEOPLE
03:24 PM on 12/28/2011
The anti-safety-net free-market cult is continuing to push Corporate and Republican legislation through their states using the Koch/Corporate funded American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC). Jan Brewer is under Federal investigation regarding Social Security benefits which may have been overpaid to her son while she was his court appointed "representative payee." He was receivng benefits while in a mental hospital for over a decade when he was charged with sexual assault and kidnapping and found not guilty for reasons of insanity. The laws changed while he was in the mental hospital and payments to individuals found not guilty for reasons of insanity should have been discontinued. As payee, Jan Brewer was supposed to have signed and returned papers updating the Social Security Administration regarding her son's status. The paperwork and overpayment are in question. The alleged overpayment was for $75,000. She has retained an attorney regarding this matter.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
B Kleitz
ghost hunter grammy DeadHead
03:16 AM on 12/29/2011
Wow...thanks for posting this...I had not heard about this, and will be googling it shortly!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
B Kleitz
ghost hunter grammy DeadHead
11:31 AM on 12/29/2011
Funny...they removed your post giving the web address...I guess we know who's side the moderators are on...................................
(after all, Ms. Huffington IS one of the 1%....)
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Red45
We can turn the tide
03:16 PM on 12/28/2011
Take health care from the poor, most of whom are children. Not very smart. Very evil.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NeoConsAreFinished
Fight the Ah mer I cun talibanned
03:26 PM on 12/28/2011
The Theocracy Party only cares about those still in the womb.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Red45
We can turn the tide
03:39 PM on 12/28/2011
Right. But not enough to care for them once they're born. Hypocrites.
09:41 PM on 12/28/2011
There's not a problem helping those who are trying to help themselves. There is a problem helping those who refuse to help themselves.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GeoffreyF
Pragmatic Liberal in Massachusetts
11:04 PM on 12/28/2011
yeah, like older people who spent their lives working and paying taxes and now need what was promised them.

And lose that bigoted moniker. You are grotesque. Only someone without anything intelligent to say resorts to silly quips.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Red45
We can turn the tide
12:56 PM on 12/29/2011
You mean like elderly people who want food once in a while--refusing to help themselves? You mean like children in poor families (and there are millions of them in America, to our great shame) who want shoes, food, and a warm place to sleep at night---refusing to help themselves? If that's where you're headed, keep going. You'll end up with a sick and twisted view of the world like Ron Paul's. If not, please clarify what you're saying.
03:00 PM on 12/28/2011
Medicaid disproportionately affects poor children. Good job republicans, you are really punishing those kids.
09:43 PM on 12/28/2011
So how much are you going to donate out of your check to help them?
09:47 PM on 12/28/2011
im actually studying to be a doctor for that reason and I donate to do just that and I also teach for free. But this isnt about me. This is about a policy that hurts children which you support, but try to deflect the blame on someone else rather than doing something that actually works.
09:51 PM on 12/28/2011
the policy saves the lives of poor children. Rather than supporting that policy you are trying to deflect attention from it, hoping that I don't donate any money to the cause I support. Shame on you.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Justdontgetit
Don't screw with old people, they will mess you up
02:59 PM on 12/28/2011
Wonder how much she cut for her own son?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rgilley
Question Authority!
02:15 PM on 12/28/2011
Vote these right wing Fascist Republican back into power and medicaid medicare, soc sec will ALL be a thing of the past! But the corporate elites who buy these Teapublicans their seats will Still demand their Bush era tax cuts ...they are afterall the "job creators". So Where Are the Jobs Teabaggers!!
BeerRun
GOP = Grand Oligarch Party
02:44 PM on 12/28/2011
In China.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rgilley
Question Authority!
03:11 PM on 12/28/2011
Exactly!! All those extended Bush tax cuts have been invested in businesses and Jobs IN CHINA!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dgjewel
03:14 PM on 12/28/2011
All Dems must vote !!!!!!!! We cannot let them in!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Edy Kel
01:46 PM on 12/28/2011
Why does the Grinch song play in my head whenever I see her.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Red45
We can turn the tide
03:17 PM on 12/28/2011
She's kind of scary looking like the Grinch.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Gidster
Not so much Liberal as I am anti evil.
01:43 PM on 12/28/2011
The GOP feels that as long at it is mainly poor folk, who cares? Never understanding that their policies have created more poor folk than ever! If you can still vote for a Repub, go have your head examined!
09:44 PM on 12/28/2011
So how much of your check are you going to donate to help the poor?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GeoffreyF
Pragmatic Liberal in Massachusetts
11:05 PM on 12/28/2011
The government and the american people are not a charity.

I don't mind taxes. 1/2 the budget is the military. Why not that?
01:24 PM on 12/28/2011
I pay 1398.00 a month for my health care.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rgilley
Question Authority!
02:18 PM on 12/28/2011
Well, if Obamacare was expanded so that it was medicare for ALL Americans you would pay baout 1% of that!! We are the ONLY industrialized nation WITHOUT a national healthcare plan. AND we are number ONE in cost AND number 37 in outcomes!!
Costa Rica is below us still though. However Cuba has better health outcomes than America and for less than 5% of the cost! This is a national disgrace and its based purely in the Greed of the corporate elites!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Red45
We can turn the tide
03:17 PM on 12/28/2011
Quite right. faved. already a fan.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Common Sense 11
Common sense---so rare it should be a super power
04:59 PM on 12/28/2011
Okay---it's not called Obamacare, so let's stop calling it that. It's called Affordable Healthcare.

Secondly, you are quite right---greed is the common denominator here.

Think about it---insurance is the only thing that unless you actually need it, you'll never see it.

Dunno about you, but I cannot afford to literally throw money away like that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rolor
'round and 'round we go
06:10 PM on 12/28/2011
You're being ripped off by the 1% who pocket billions in insurance scam money and it will cost you an early grave.
09:45 PM on 12/28/2011
Oh please...medicaid already has agents who deny tests, treatments and pharmaceuticals.