iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Newt Gingrich Blasts Ron Paul, Mitt Romney

SHANNON McCAFFREY   12/27/11 08:13 PM ET  AP

Republican presidential candidate former House Speaker Newt Gingrich speaks during a campaign stop, Friday, Dec. 23, 2011, in Columbia, S.C. (AP Photo/Rainier Ehrhardt)

DES MOINES, Iowa — No more Mr. Nice Guy. Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich lambasted two of his top GOP rivals on Tuesday, despite his claim that he's sticking to a positive campaign.

Gingrich said he couldn't vote for Ron Paul if he were to become the GOP nominee and called the Texas congressman's views "totally outside the mainstream of every decent American."

In the same interview on CNN, Gingrich also offered a testy rebuke to Mitt Romney, saying that if Romney wants to run a negative campaign attacking Gingrich he should at least be "man enough to own it."

The sharp comments come as the former House speaker has seen his support slip in Iowa amid a barrage of attack ads that have cast him as an ethically challenged Washington insider.

Scrambling to regain momentum, Gingrich and a political action committee supporting him each took the wraps off television spots that will run statewide in Iowa.

The PAC Winning the Future is composed of former Gingrich staffers. The ad, its first, includes a broadside at Romney, although the former Massachusetts governor is never named.

"The Republican establishment wants to pick our candidate," the ad says. "When a principled conservative took the lead, they outspent Newt Gingrich 20 to 1, attacking him with falsehoods. ... Don't let the liberal Republican establishment pick our candidate."

Gingrich has said he will disavow any independent political action committee that spends money on negative ads. His own spot, funded by his campaign coffers, focuses on jobs and economic growth.

The former Georgia congressman launched a 22-stop "Jobs and Prosperity" bus tour, which kicked off Tuesday in Dubuque, in the northeast corner of Iowa. But he found himself on the defensive again on health care as a new memo surfaces that showed he had once praised the law enacted in Massachusetts when Romney was governor.

In an April 2006 memo from Gingrich's Atlanta-based Center for Health Transformation, he called it "the most exciting development of the past few weeks." He also said the law had "tremendous potential to effect major change in the American health system."

The memo also noted shortcomings in the Massachusetts law. Gingrich said the state's many regulations prohibited insurers from offering cheaper plans that would make coverage affordable. But he went on to note that that "we agree entirely with Gov. Romney and Massachusetts legislators that our goal should be 100 percent insurance coverage for all Americans."

Gingrich and others have argued that the Massachusetts law, widely seen as the model for President Barack Obama's national health overhaul, undercuts Romney's conservative credentials. Gingrich also has faced questions about his past support for an individual health care mandate, anathema to conservatives.

A Gingrich spokesman said Gingrich's comments are "old news that has been covered already."

"Newt previously supported a mandate for health insurance and changed his mind after seeing its effects," said the spokesman, R.C. Hammond. "The real question is why `Mitt the Massachusetts Moderate' won't admit that health insurance mandates don't work."

The Gingrich memo was first reported Tuesday by The Wall Street Journal.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Filed by Adam Goldberg  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,253
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (72 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
solarenergy
07:37 PM on 12/28/2011
Look, Ron Paul is right about foreign wars and drugs, but wrong on social security, medicare, abortion, and racism.

Newt is just a socio-path.

Neither one will survive a general election.
05:10 PM on 12/28/2011
In other words, he was for it before he was against it.
Clevelandinwi
Progressive is good; regressive, not so much.
03:21 PM on 12/28/2011
The most amazing thing is that a real voter might be listening to these lies and distortions. I hope they're at least a little smart.
03:08 PM on 12/28/2011
The "liberal Republican establishment."

Hahahahahaaa hhaaha hahahah ....
08:19 PM on 12/28/2011
Oxymoron (plural oxymorons or oxymora) (from Greek ὀξύμωρον, "sharp dull") is a figure of speech that combines contradictory terms.

Examples: "liberal Republican establishm­ent", government intelligence, honest Republican, albino blackbird...
02:46 PM on 12/28/2011
I can live with the Barney Rubble haircut but why would anybody want to be named after a slimey little salamander?
ricnaustin
Liberal in the "heart" of Texas
05:18 PM on 12/28/2011
The mating habits: captures the female with his front legs.� he rides on her back holding her with all four limbs.� the male rubs his chin on the female's nose � the female may signal to the male that she is not ready to mate by holding her head down.� If she persists with this signal, the male may dismount and search for another female.
06:26 PM on 12/28/2011
OHHHHHHHH. Gotcha.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ItAintNoRocketScience
"Zat's not my department," says Wernher Von Braun.
02:35 PM on 12/28/2011
I guess that "run a positive campaign" thing didn't last too long, eh? Why, oh why am I not surprised?
02:31 PM on 12/28/2011
Let them keep blasting away-great sound bites for Obama commercials.
02:26 PM on 12/28/2011
OMG...I miss the old ways of settling things. How about an old fashioned DUAL with a choice of weapons ? Failing that, lets move forward to the 'Old West'. Newt would waddle off to Main Street, just before high noon with his $5,000 suit dust stained, and now a bit rumpled. Enter the TEXAN, Ron Paul, walking a tad sideways as he does, (a slimmer target don't you know). Squinting in the noonday sun, he stops at 50 paces, takes off his Western hat and spins it off like a frisbee, then he squares his shoulders. They both start flexing their fingers and begin staring each other down like mad dogs. The crowd cowers in the store windows. Newt goes for his gun, but OMG, he didn't loosen the holster strap. Ron Paul spreads his feet wide apart, slowly draws his gun and shoots Newt TWICE, once in the nuts, and then in the head.
The crowd goes wild and heads for the saloon. Ron walks up to Newt, and say's, 'any final words Mr Speaker' ?
Newt blinks twice (which is always a 'yes') and croaked out, 'you didn't have to do that, I already had a visectomy'. Ron gave his wan smile, and headed for the saloon.
Maybe I watch too many Western's, but one can dream, can't one.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realwoman8
Curioser and curioser
03:32 PM on 12/28/2011
While Perry reaches for his empty holster and says, "Oops!" lol
04:02 PM on 12/28/2011
A nice final touch. lol..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dannygarciany
Good Karma comes back...
05:09 PM on 12/28/2011
Ahhhhhh, Duels..... the good old days.......
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
LMKay66
Obama. There is no substitute.
02:23 PM on 12/28/2011
Yep, we knew he couldn't stay positive for long.  It's in his nature to be nasty, divisive and negative.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Master Bates
02:02 PM on 12/28/2011
Mr. Newt...Pot meet kettle!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lola Harrison
02:25 PM on 12/28/2011
Well the REAL Newt has finally stood up !!! and its nothing nice ..........
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
EspritDeVoltaire
K Street PR firm board member
01:55 PM on 12/28/2011
Definite flop sweat meltdown in progress
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kennethlross
01:48 PM on 12/28/2011
Boy you just wait, Newt is getting really serious now! Look out! He's gonna blow!
photo
santafesam
smart&snarky
01:42 PM on 12/28/2011
Newt Gingrich..sounds like a fungal infection - don't they have a cream for that?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
James Ortegard
If we can't agree then let's at least be civil
01:36 PM on 12/28/2011
I would say,vote your pocketbook!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThePelton
Never underestimate the power of Human stupidity.
02:26 PM on 12/28/2011
I would say, vote based on whose lives would be risked in the next war that they want.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
James Ortegard
If we can't agree then let's at least be civil
08:14 PM on 12/28/2011
It seems that maybe Paul would be a good choice to avoid wars,however how electable is he ....really?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The ORF in Largo
Louder than a fart a hurricane
01:34 PM on 12/28/2011
The timer on the Newtron Bomb is ticking and critical mass should be attained by 1/4/12 . His
pending implosion should cause considerable collateral damage to the GOP
01:56 PM on 12/28/2011
I tend to agree with you on Newts eventual decline in his ratings but the GOPs do have a goal and there is a stronger man to fill the present Presidents shoes. Only thing is where is he.
madisgp
All we-we'd up.
03:00 PM on 12/28/2011
Easy one. He's (or more likely she's) a Democrat.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Patrick Moore Wilkins
I go Pogo
04:20 PM on 12/28/2011
Not amongst the GOP that's for sure.