iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Earth Usually Has Second Tiny, Temporary 'Moon'


First Posted: 12/28/11 12:58 PM ET Updated: 12/28/11 12:58 PM ET

By John Matson
(Click here for original article.)

The moon has been with us for billions of years, almost since the formation of Earth. From then on, Earth has also had countless other satellite companions. In fact, we probably have one right now.

But these objects are not full-fledged moons. They're more like temporary, extremely small moons. Called irregular natural satellites, they’re boulders from the large population of near-Earth asteroids that get snagged by our gravity. They orbit the Earth for a few months, then escape and move on.

A new study on the Web site arXiv.org says that such satellites should be very common. [Mikael Granvik, Jeremie Vaubaillon and Robert Jedicke, The population of natural Earth satellites] At any given time we probably have one temporarily captured orbiter of about a meter in size.

These space rocks are awfully hard to see. But astronomers seem to have spotted one such transient satellite in 2006. The asteroid, dubbed 2006 RH120, was a few meters in diameter. It was captured by Earth for about a year and then broke away back to interplanetary space.

But not all temporary orbiters escape. About one percent of them actually impact Earth during their captivity, according to the study. Fortunately, the real moon keeps a respectful distance.

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast]

FOLLOW HUFFPOST SCIENCE

By John Matson (Click here for original article.) The moon has been with us for billions of years, almost since the formation of Earth. From then on, Earth has also had countless other satellite c...
By John Matson (Click here for original article.) The moon has been with us for billions of years, almost since the formation of Earth. From then on, Earth has also had countless other satellite c...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 19
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:46 PM on 12/29/2011
Dear NASA,
Why not attach some equipment to one of these. When it leaves orbit and begins its interstellar journey, you only need to power the devices, not propulsion. Imagine how long they could last. (think Voyager I & II)
11:31 PM on 12/29/2011
They're always very loosely-bound, which means they're already traveling extremely fast. Matching velocity with one of these would require nearly as much effort as reaching escape speed.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:36 PM on 12/30/2011
It looks like HP is going to start a science page now doesn't it? When I try the "science" link above it gets me to a login page like its under construction with limited access.
04:53 AM on 12/30/2011
The thing about Voyager I and II is that we got to point them somewhere. This kind of equipment is much too expensive to shoot out randomly into space.
05:28 AM on 12/30/2011
I see your point. But don't you think they could predict its probable trajectory? Besides, any direction other than a solid body, would yeild results.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carbon Forteetoo
Not enough characters to say anything clev
09:10 PM on 12/29/2011
Your Momma so fat, she needs the Van Allen Belt to hold up her pants.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
J242
Micro-bio? We don't need no stinkin' micro-bio!
10:47 PM on 12/29/2011
Yo momma so fat she's got 12 small people named "Cordelia", "Ophelia" and "their 10 dwarves" trapped around her screaming "We can't escape the gravity of Uranus!"...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carbon Forteetoo
Not enough characters to say anything clev
12:20 AM on 12/30/2011
HA HA! Nerd! ....oh, wait....
07:08 PM on 12/29/2011
Here is the very coolest of such occasional satellites -- read it and you'll be amazed!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J002E3
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:38 AM on 12/29/2011
OK. I admit it. I've read WAY too much sci-fi. But has there ever been a study of the Earth/Moon LaGrange points? I'll bet that there's a heap of trash out there.
04:27 PM on 12/29/2011
There is. In fact they are going to park the next generation space telescope in one of the more stable LaGrange points.
07:10 PM on 12/29/2011
It's going into an earth-sun LaGrange point, out beyond the earth. The Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe was there too.
07:06 PM on 12/29/2011
An old friend of mine did a search for stuff in the LaGrange points way back in the 70s. Given what he had to work with, it couldn't have been very sensitive, but the did look. This guy was (and is) quite brilliant, and he did what he thought were better calculations of the expected orbit, so he could track time exposures more accurately with the expected motion of the object.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:48 PM on 12/29/2011
A quick Google search doesn't reveal that much has been discovered - a small asteroid and some dust in one of the Earth/Moon points. Oh well. Maybe we just can't penetrate the Klingon cloaking devices.
photo
oneyippie
Leaning far to your left
10:02 AM on 12/29/2011
They're really alien satellites spying on us, waiting to see when we are ready to eat.
photo
webwzrd
Reality is liberal indoctrination
01:46 PM on 12/30/2011
Almost there. We will be cooking ourselves shortly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cdub1991
Seek first to understand, then to be understood
01:51 PM on 12/30/2011
Maybe the aliens just want to serve us.