More

Gay And Lesbian Couples Pay Thousands More In Taxes, Study Says

Gay Couple Taxes

First Posted: 12/28/11 12:32 PM ET Updated: 12/28/11 05:34 PM ET

Gay and lesbian couples are paying as much as $6,000 more at tax time than their heterosexual counterparts because the government disallows them from filing together on federal tax returns, a joint study between CNN Money and H&R Block has found.

The disparity between tax costs for same-sex and heterosexual couples stems from the 1996 "Defense of Marriage Age Act," which ruled that even if individual states decide to recognize same-sex marriages, those unions will not be recognized for all federal purposes including family insurance benefits, veterans' rights, and federal taxes. As a result, married gay and lesbian couples living in one of the few states that recognizes same-sex marriage may receive all the benefits of filing joint state returns, but when it comes to federal taxes, each partner must file individually.

"This means they can't combine their income and deductions to take advantage of lower tax rates," CNN Money explained in its analysis of the study. "It's also harder for them to qualify for certain tax breaks because the credits phase out sooner for single filers."

To figure out exactly how much money the government's irrecognition of same-sex marriage is costing couples at tax time, CNN Money presented H&R Block with a variety of financial scenarios and asked them to compare what the tax bills would be in the case of same-sex couples and heterosexual couples.

One scenario considered a family of four with one working parent earning $100,000 per year. H&R Block calculated that a straight couple filing jointly on federal fax returns would end up with federal tax bill of $10,656. If the couple were same-sex, however, the bill would be $15,199, or $4,543 higher. That's because instead of filing jointly, one parent would be required to file as "head of household" and the other would be considered a "qualifying relative."

According to CNN Money:

Filing as "head of household" instead of "married filing jointly" exposes more income to a higher tax bracket. Plus, standard deductions, which are given based on the filing status to taxpayers who don't itemize deductions, are lower for a head of household than they are for married couples filing jointly.

Another challenge is the amount of extra time and money same-sex couples often need to spend simply preparing taxes, according to MSNBC. State tax returns are based on federal returns, so if the couple were legally married and living in a state like Massachusetts, they would need to prepare a joint state return, a "dummy" joint federal return for the Massachusetts Department of Revenue, and two individual returns. That's four total returns instead of one.

Luckily, more and more employers around the nation are reimbursing employees in same-sex unions for additional taxes they incurred due to federal laws. Starting on Jan. 1, 2012, Yale University and Columbia University will begin reimbursing employees for the extra taxes they must pay on partner's health insurance, The New York Times reported.

Google, Facebook, and Teach For America have all adopted similar policies aimed at providing equal benefits to opposite- and same-sex employees, The New York Times reported.

As for the Defense of Marriage Act, the Senate Judiciary Committee has voted for its repeal, but strong opposition in the House means overturning the bill is a long way off.

Check out CNN Money for the full results of the study and methodology and check out the New York Times' series "The Cost of Being Gay" for more information on costs incurred by same-sex couples.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GAY VOICES

Gay and lesbian couples are paying as much as $6,000 more at tax time than their heterosexual counterparts because the government disallows them from filing together on federal tax returns, a joint st...
Gay and lesbian couples are paying as much as $6,000 more at tax time than their heterosexual counterparts because the government disallows them from filing together on federal tax returns, a joint st...
Filed by Jocelyn Richard  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 90
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
Nadine Smith
Human Rights Activist
05:05 PM on 02/08/2012
A movement is building across the country as more and more gay people get legally married in the U.S. or abroad. Whether on tax returns or customs forms, in the muddle of contradictory, nonsensical, and infuriating laws, married gay couples are refusing to identify as "single." Quietly, from California to New York, from Alaska to Florida, couples are refusing to deny their spouses and are willing to enter legally murky territory to take a stand. Check out RefuseToLie.org

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nadine-smith/gay-couples-taxes-refuse-to-lie_b_1254807.html
10:21 AM on 01/01/2012
No tax brake this year, just like last year and the year before that and so on. The system stinks anyway, it's a joke.
09:14 AM on 12/30/2011
Happens to us every year. We could have a down payment on a house with all the money we lost over the last 5 years.
photo
Nadine Smith
Human Rights Activist
05:06 PM on 02/08/2012
Consider sharing your story at www.RefuseToLie.org
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hontas Farmer
Stargazer
10:03 PM on 12/29/2011
Simple solution. Get rid of the IRS and the whole rotten system we have now and just have a basically flat tax. People in or near poverty pay nothing. People who make less than 250,000 pay 5% and all those above pay 30% - 50% (as needed).

So much of what's unfair about America is our tax system.
03:38 PM on 12/29/2011
You could just move to a place that doesn't discriminate... NY, MA, CT, VT, NH, DC. At least there you wouldn't be ripped off on state tax and insurance.

Why are the simplest solutions always overlooked?

Living in the south and complaining about the discrimination is like going to the beach and complaining about the sand.
photo
TXanimal
Somewhere between Occam's Razor & Murphy's Law
04:09 PM on 12/29/2011
If it were that simple, we'd just up and do it.

Put some thought into this first.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DanaRuns
6' blonde, liberal, lesbian, lawyer with a brain.
07:16 PM on 12/29/2011
So much wrong with your post I don't know where to start. I'll just note that you forgot the federal tax issue, which was the point of the article. And since you missed the whole point of the article, it seems useless to discuss the other problems with your post.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tosc
12:14 PM on 12/29/2011
so I have to pay more to support the social programs that support student programs, elderly programs, religious federal tax incentives? And those my additional taxes support are then permitted to persecute and belittle me for being born a gay man?????? WTH
photo
chaya
Another proud veteran
12:11 PM on 12/29/2011
Yes, we pay more taxes. And receive less services.

I guess it's just another of our "special rights."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mimi66
12:06 PM on 12/29/2011
I think this might be true if one member of a same sex couple has a significantly higher income, but when my boyfriend and I did the math (we are heterosexual) we determined that we would pay more in taxes if we got married. So, we did not get married and we each file as single with one of our children. I am not saying a civil union is right, because its not, it did not equalize anything, but I think the marriage tax is generally a penalty, not a break. Also, someone mentioned it would cost $10,000 to do marriage type paperwork for a couple, but it absolutely shouldn't cost $10,000 to do the paperwork such as powers of attorney, wills, etc., we live in a major city, and we paid $1,800.
12:55 PM on 12/29/2011
the point is you would have the option of filing as a married couple, married gays do not.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DanaRuns
6' blonde, liberal, lesbian, lawyer with a brain.
07:19 PM on 12/29/2011
I'd love to hear more about a relationship that bases its decision to avoid marriage on income taxes. Sounds like true love!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Flip75
What's wrong with my micro-bio?
09:43 PM on 12/29/2011
My thoughts exactly! "I love you, but you'd cost too much to marry." Oy!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mimi66
04:12 PM on 01/04/2012
well I certainly believe that everyone should have the option of marriage if they want it and that denying that right to gays is a violation of the equal protection clause, but that doesn't mean everyone has to do it, or risk be told they don't love someone. Our relationship is based on love and committment. The only practical decision was whether we needed to memorialize it with a written contract. We decided we didn't, because it would hurt us financially and it wouldn't otherwise benefit our family in any way. I am friends with a few same sex couples with children and even though we have civil unions here now, none of our friends has indicated any desire to enter into one. With domestic partner benefits and important documents already in place, maybe they don't feel they need it either. Some people need or want the affirmation, and some don't.
TheAntiOkie
Saying you're Christian doesn't prove anything
11:23 AM on 12/29/2011
I just LOVe how every once in a while I'm trying to reply to someone or post a comment and the entire site just flips out and shuts down the page I'm on and erases everything I've done. SO CLASSY HP. If your code writers can not figure out how to make this site work on Firefox you need to get QUALIFIED code writers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LelioRisen
Carpe diem!
11:26 PM on 12/28/2011
This is why my fellow gay citizens cannot stop our fight for civil rights. DOMA needs to be repealed and we will not rest until are marriages are recognized as legal by the federal government,.

As a taxpayer, I resent that my tax dollars do not entitle me to first-class citizenship, because of who I choose to love.

My partner and I live in New York, and we do plan on marrying here. But it is just a first step.

Thanks to everyone who is actually doing their part to help work towards the goals of getting the equality we deserve.
TheAntiOkie
Saying you're Christian doesn't prove anything
11:14 AM on 12/29/2011
As a straight person and taxpayer I resent that you are discriminated against as well. It's pure hate and arrogance on the part of the people who believe THEY are superior to everyone else and that anyone even remotely different from them needs to suffer SOME sort of punishment in whatever form they can devise. It may not be jail but it will not be fun and they will revel in it.
11:39 AM on 12/29/2011
Good for you. I feel the same.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:05 PM on 12/28/2011
DOMA must be repealed. Why do We allow homophobic religious institutions to be Tax Exempt? Churches Like Mormons, Catholics & Westbroro Baptist donate to Political Parties pushing religion as policy; they should lose their tax exempt status. Corporations and Churches are treated like privileged "individuals"... while Gay people get penalized for being "human"...
TheAntiOkie
Saying you're Christian doesn't prove anything
11:16 AM on 12/29/2011
There are so few real Christians left in this world - it's hard to find them any more. The more they claim they are the more you know they are not.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bluefalcon06
Conservative Libertarian
06:28 PM on 01/02/2012
The only people that aren't Christian that claim they are, are the ones who use their "religion" as a reason to hate someone for being different. People forget what Jesus taught and think because something is considered a sin, that it will allow their hate to be justified. I believe in God and Jesus, but I would never stop someone from living the life that they choose to live, just because I think it could be considered wrong in God's eye. It's his job to judge, not mine. Lord knows I am far from perfect, even though I am a straight male, so I have no room to throw stones, as I probably live in one of the biggest glass houses out there.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bluefalcon06
Conservative Libertarian
06:23 PM on 01/02/2012
I think the tax exempt thing for churches, is due to the fact that the government can't interfere with religion, but I could be wrong.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atwill
Proud Father of a gay son.
08:46 PM on 12/28/2011
and this is why DOMA needs to die. It is a crime that gay couples are not allowed to file the same as straight couples, exspecially when many straight couples are just popping out kids left and right and getting big tax breaks for it.
photo
chaya
Another proud veteran
12:12 PM on 12/29/2011
I guess DOMA is necessary so we can keep paying for other peoples' children.

Or something.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atwill
Proud Father of a gay son.
08:02 PM on 12/29/2011
I can pay for my own. and have. if my kid and his boyfriend adopt, they will pay for their own. any gay couples have kids. and the kids cost the same as straight couples.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zariana
For SCIENCE!!!
06:14 PM on 12/28/2011
A financial advisor told me that the cost to put together the legal documents that are the closest approximation of a marriage that a same-sex couple can have is about $10,000...

Top that off with loss of Social Security upon death of your spouse that no contract can fix...

And that many employers don't provide benefits to partners...

Those of you who claim you are fine with legal equality but dont like the use of the word "marriage" really need to pull your heads out of the sand and know the damage you are doing to real human beings. It's full marriage or nothing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atwill
Proud Father of a gay son.
08:48 PM on 12/28/2011
I agree. A marriage license cost only a few $. it is marriage or nothing,
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zariana
For SCIENCE!!!
09:51 PM on 12/28/2011
I was once in the "Civil Union" camp. It took me awhile to connect the dots on the idea that it's really a disguise for a "separate but equal" kind of marriage. Which is really a smokescreen for less than equal.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
midknightryder13
10:51 PM on 12/28/2011
No, it's NOT "it is marriage or nothing", rather "it's marriage -- period." Nothing else will work or do legally -- and emotionally, for that matter. And, again, I have YET to hear a rational, non-religion, non-"well, it's always been that way" argument against marriage equality.
(I REALLY have problems with the "well, it's always been that way" argument. ESPECIALLY since the courts have held time and again that postiion is not legally valid -- because it cannot stand on those merits. In other words, there is no there there. You simply cannot say that because something has always been that way it should remain so. It's entirely possible that it's always BEEN WRONG!)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
James v Morris
06:09 PM on 12/28/2011
I've been saying this for years. What's fair about this? Nothing. People who defend DOMA should be ashamed of themselves.
photo
pdxist
Feel free to copy my avatar! (Or ask me how.)
05:33 PM on 12/28/2011
It's the Defense of Marriage Act, not the Defense of Marriage Age Act.