iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Major Pest May Be Resistant To Genetically Modified Corn

By RICK CALLAHAN   12/28/11 05:52 PM ET  AP

Gmo Corn
In this Oct. 31, 2005, file photo, a harvester works through a field of genetically modified corn near Santa Rosa, Calif. So-called Bt corn, genetically engineered to make its own insecticide, may be losing its distinctive ability to kill pests _ a possible result of careless farming practices that could give rise to resistant bugs and threaten the future of one of the nation's most widely planted crops. (AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli, File)

-- One of the nation's most widely planted crops – a genetically engineered corn plant that makes its own insecticide – may be losing its effectiveness because a major pest appears to be developing resistance more quickly than scientists expected.

The U.S. food supply is not in any immediate danger because the problem remains isolated. But scientists fear potentially risky farming practices could be blunting the hybrid's sophisticated weaponry.

When it was introduced in 2003, so-called Bt corn seemed like the answer to farmers' dreams: It would allow growers to bring in bountiful harvests using fewer chemicals because the corn naturally produces a toxin that poisons western corn rootworms. The hybrid was such a swift success that it and similar varieties now account for 65 percent of all U.S. corn acres – grain that ends up in thousands of everyday foods such as cereal, sweeteners and cooking oil.

But over the last few summers, rootworms have feasted on the roots of Bt corn in parts of four Midwestern states, suggesting that some of the insects are becoming resistant to the crop's pest-fighting powers.

Scientists say the problem could be partly the result of farmers who've planted Bt corn year after year in the same fields.

Most farmers rotate corn with other crops in a practice long used to curb the spread of pests, but some have abandoned rotation because they need extra grain for livestock or because they have grain contracts with ethanol producers. Other farmers have eschewed the practice to cash in on high corn prices, which hit a record in June.

"Right now, quite frankly, it's very profitable to grow corn," said Michael Gray, a University of Illinois crop sciences professor who's tracking Bt corn damage in that state.

A scientist recently sounded an alarm throughout the biotech industry when he published findings concluding that rootworms in a handful of Bt cornfields in Iowa had evolved an ability to survive the corn's formidable defenses.

Similar crop damage has been seen in parts of Illinois, Minnesota and Nebraska, but researchers are still investigating whether rootworms capable of surviving the Bt toxin were the cause.

University of Minnesota entomologist Kenneth Ostlie said the severity of rootworm damage to Bt fields in Minnesota has eased since the problem surfaced in 2009. Yet reports of damage have become more widespread, and he fears resistance could be spreading undetected because the damage rootworms inflict often isn't apparent.

Without strong winds, wet soil or both, plants can be damaged at the roots but remain upright, concealing the problem. He said the damage he observed in Minnesota came to light only because storms in 2009 toppled corn plants with damaged roots.

"The analogy I often use with growers is that we're looking at an iceberg and all we see is the tip of the problem," Ostlie said. "And it's a little bit like looking at an iceberg through fog because the only time we know we have a problem is when we get the right weather conditions."

Seed maker Monsanto Co. created the Bt strain by splicing a gene from a common soil organism called Bacillus thuringiensis into the plant. The natural insecticide it makes is considered harmless to people and livestock.

Scientists always expected rootworms to develop some resistance to the toxin produced by that gene. But the worrisome signs of possible resistance have emerged sooner than many expected.

The Environmental Protection Agency recently chided Monsanto, declaring in a Nov. 22 report that it wasn't doing enough to monitor suspected resistance among rootworm populations. The report urged a tougher approach, including expanding monitoring efforts to a total of seven states, including Colorado, South Dakota and Wisconsin. The agency also wanted to ensure farmers in areas of concern begin using insecticides and other methods to combat possible resistance.

Monsanto insists there's no conclusive proof that rootworms have become immune to the crop, but the company said it regards the situation seriously and has been taking steps that are "directly in line" with federal recommendations.

Some scientists fear it could already be too late to prevent the rise of resistance, in large part because of the way some farmers have been planting the crop.

They point to two factors: farmers who have abandoned crop rotation and others have neglected to plant non-Bt corn within Bt fields or in surrounding fields as a way to create a "refuge" for non-resistant rootworms in the hope they will mate with resistant rootworms and dilute their genes.

Experts worry that the actions of a few farmers could jeopardize an innovation that has significantly reduced pesticide use and saved growers billions of dollars in lost yields and chemical-control costs.

"This is a public good that should be protected for future generations and not squandered too quickly," said Gregory Jaffe, biotechnology director at the Center for Science and Public Policy.

Iowa State University entomologist Aaron Gassmann published research in July concluding that resistance had arisen among rootworms he collected in four Iowa fields. Those fields had been planted for three to six straight years with Bt corn – a practice that ensured any resistant rootworms could lay their eggs in an area that would offer plenty of food for the next generation.

For now, the rootworm resistance in Iowa appears isolated, but Gassmann said that could change if farmers don't quickly take action. For one, the rootworm larvae grow into adult beetles that can fly, meaning resistant beetles could easily spread to new areas.

"I think this provides an important early warning," Gassmann said.

Besides rotating crops, farmers can also fight resistance by switching between Bt corn varieties, which produce different toxins, or planting newer varieties with multiple toxins. They can also treat damaged fields with insecticides to kill any resistant rootworms – or employ a combination of all those approaches.

The EPA requires growers to devote 20 percent of their fields to non-Bt corn. After the crop was released in 2003, nine out of 10 farmers met that standard. Now it's only seven or eight, Jaffe said.

Seed companies are supposed to cut off farmers with a record of violating the planting rules, which are specified in seed-purchasing contracts. To improve compliance, companies are now introducing blends that have ordinary seed premixed with Bt seed.

Brian Schaumburg, who farms 1,400 acres near the north-central Illinois town of Chenoa, plants as much Bt corn as he can every spring.

But Schaumburg said he shifts his planting strategies every year – varying which Bt corn hybrids he plants and using pesticides when needed – to reduce the chances rootworm resistance might emerge in his fields.

Schaumburg said he always plants the required refuge fields and believes very few farmers defy the rule. Those who do put the valuable crop at risk, he said.

"If we don't do it right, we could lose these good tools," Schaumberg said.

If rootworms do become resistant to Bt corn, it "could become the most economically damaging example of insect resistance to a genetically modified crop in the U.S.," said Bruce Tabashnik, an entomologist at the University of Arizona. "It's a pest of great economic significance – a billion-dollar pest."

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST FOOD

-- One of the nation's most widely planted crops – a genetically engineered corn plant that makes its own insecticide – may be losing its effectiveness because a major pest appears to be ...
-- One of the nation's most widely planted crops – a genetically engineered corn plant that makes its own insecticide – may be losing its effectiveness because a major pest appears to be ...
Filed by Carey Polis  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 688
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
photo
view from the veranda
jus' trying to make sense of it all...
03:40 PM on 02/20/2012
Tread carefully, GMO Lobbyists in the house.....
03:15 PM on 02/14/2012
How about getting rid of the ridiculous subsidies that are given to farmers to grow BT corn? Think that would be a way to start eliminating the problem?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:24 AM on 01/03/2012
Looks like the "invisible" hand of the marketplace is giving us the finger again.
photo
farmilyman
everything is illusion
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
12:02 PM on 01/01/2012
2 trillion GMO meals eaten and you people still can't document anything scientifically about adverse health effects.
photo
farmilyman
everything is illusion
05:43 PM on 01/01/2012
Same thing was said about cigarettes years ago.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:13 AM on 01/09/2012
There are SO many things we do not understand about the effects of GMO's on our bodies and the environment.

I forgot though, Hazel, since some of the most powerful companies in the world say it is safe, along with industry insiders in the USDA and FDA, it must be safe.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:47 PM on 12/30/2011
Not to worry. The free ride for corn for ethanol subsidies end at midnight tomorrow as do the tariffs on foreign ethanol. Congress when home without renewing them. What will congress do when they come back though?
08:28 PM on 12/30/2011
We just sold two truck loads of corn to a local ethanol plant for 6.20 a bushel for jan delivery. The ethanol industry, at least here in Illinois, is alive and well even without the subsidy. The forward ethanol board price continues to trade under rbob gas futures making blending economical. So I say good riddance to the subsidy and congrats to our govt for supporting the industry in its infancy which is now competitive, employs tens of thousands of Americans, and displaced a large chunk of foreign oil. Ethanol is going to come in handy when iran tries to shut the straights of Hormuz.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:10 AM on 01/09/2012
Can you provide evidence that ethanol has displaced a large chunk of foreign oil?

If Iran shuts down Hormuz, it will be because of U.S. war mongering and imperialism.

Are you willing to support 'green' industry subsidies so that they can get off the ground?
Al Schrader
Don't limit your potential
04:40 PM on 12/30/2011
Insects are very similar to us humans. It's why they are so successful eating our food.
Something in the food that kills them would be unwise. Instead, figure out what insect is attacking and find its weakness.
photo
Earthling1125
Respect Nature - we are lost without her
01:25 PM on 12/30/2011
Let me try this again - the first time I tried to post this information it wound up in Never-never Land.

It has been shown that GMO crops with this type of systemic pesticide have contributed heavily to the recent bee die-off (Colony Collapse Disorder). Please watch the documentary "Vanishing of the Bees". A major American beekeeper conducted his own investigation into this huge problem. He was getting nowhere in the U.S., but then went to Europe to continue his research. It seems the Europeans were experiencing a bee die-off as well. The resulting investigation showed that GMO systemic pesticide crops were highly suspect in causing CCD. The Europeans banned these types of crops and their bee populations rebounded as a result.

Seriously, who thinks growing crops that conatin pesticides in their very genetic make-up is a good idea? Big Agriculture - that's who.
02:42 PM on 12/30/2011
Europe banned their use before they were every used. You may want to check your facts.
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
03:19 PM on 12/30/2011
Yeah...but in the alternative universe these anti-modern farming people live in it happened.

It's a very simple code they use: If I dream it....it happened.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dadoorsron
11:54 PM on 12/30/2011
The main scientific view is disease and insect are taking its toll on the bee population. I have read a few studies about the selective breeding of commercial bee keepers and the introduction of those bees into the wild bee population. Selective breeding can open up the population to disease.
12:38 PM on 12/30/2011
Wake up America, Monsanto wants to rule the world.
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
03:25 PM on 12/30/2011
Rule the world? Darn that Monsanto.

Where's James Bond when you need him? Darn you Spectre. I'll bet this is the work of Ernst Stavro Blofeld isn't it?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tbonepickins
11:33 AM on 12/30/2011
Monsanto needs to be sued out of existence. Damn Frankenstein corporation!
photo
farmilyman
everything is illusion
08:37 AM on 01/01/2012
Finally... Solo Farmer Fights Monsanto and Wins

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/12/25/percy-schmeiser-farmer-who-beat-monsanto.aspx

Cracks are beginning to form.
09:44 AM on 01/01/2012
Of I had a dollar every time someone on here said "cracks were forming" on Monsanto over the past few years I would be a rich man. Yet Monsanto reported a 20% increase in sales last time they reported. That hardly sounds like a business with cracks forming considering this is a fifty billion dollar company but what do I know I guess.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:26 PM on 01/01/2012
Yes they do !!!!!!!!!!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:03 AM on 12/30/2011
My former brother in law, a Viet Nam vet is dying a horrible, painful death from various forms of leukemia, linked directly to Agent Orange. Yesterday I read about genetically engineering corn and how certain bugs are becoming resistant. Now Dow Chemical (among others) is trying to get the okay to blanket America with a version of Agent Orange to combat those resistant insects. This must not happen. Please pick up the phones, write letters to editors, get this stopped. http://www.infowars.com/americas-farmlands-to-be-carpet-bombed-with-vietnam-era-agent-orange-chemical-if-dow-petition-approved/
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dadoorsron
11:55 AM on 12/30/2011
I'm sorry about your Brother in laws health issues. However, 2,4 D is not the cancer casuing agent in agent orange. Since that war and the Health issues linked to that cocktail of chemicals. It was found that the compound was contaminated by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzodioxin. 2,4 d is the most common herbicide in the world and is very safe. For 50 years 2,4 d has been tested and has been found safe. again sorry about your brother in law but the facts are out their.
photo
Earthling1125
Respect Nature - we are lost without her
01:28 PM on 12/30/2011
I'm going to guess, by the nature of your industry-defending replies, that you work for Monsanto, DuPont, Dow Chemical, or some other chemical giant. Your responses are no more than the "company line" and a lot of BS.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:44 AM on 01/02/2012
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic_acid
you re incrrect
10:58 AM on 12/30/2011
Franken-food
05:41 AM on 12/30/2011
It's safe because science says so? Yay! Well I guess Corps would never use science if it wasn't good for you..... Continue giving safe falidimide to pregnant women, from the safety of your asbestose house, and don't forget to spray your children with safe DDT! I feel soo much better because science knows ALL the ramifications of its discoveries! end sarcasm
When science learns to build something from genetic scratch, I MIGHT feel differently about someone deciding what genes are "safe" to change.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TaxpayingVoter
Support Marriage Equality
04:09 PM on 12/30/2011
That would be 'thalidomide'
02:20 AM on 12/31/2011
Thank you for the correction :)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
organicconnect
02:39 AM on 12/30/2011
It is interesting to watch how Monsanto is trying to deflect this by blaming the farmers, their own duped customers, by saying that farmers haven't used Bt Corn seeds properly. This is the typical practice of a criminal—deflect the blame and accuse someone else of their crime. If people really want to gut Monsanto, the best way to go about it is to start by getting the FDA to do its job and require foods that contain GMO ingredients to be labeled. This alone will cripple demand for Monsanto's products. The petition to the FDA to help bring this about is nearing 500,000 signatures. Don't just get pissed off, sign on! http://organicconnectmag.com/wp/gmo-right-2-know-petition-passed-the-400000-mark/
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dadoorsron
11:57 AM on 12/30/2011
I hate to say it but commerical farmers are to blame for alot of issues.
03:21 PM on 02/14/2012
It is so easy to blame farmers for the current state of agriculture without realizing that they, like us, had no knowledge of how harmful GM products could be and once the truth started to come out the damage had already been done.
11:31 PM on 12/29/2011
MONSANTO MUST BE SHUT DOWN!
Oginikwe
I think therefore I'm dangerous
01:05 AM on 12/30/2011
DO SEED COMPANIES CONTROL GM CROP RESEARCH?
Scientific American, Editorial, August 2009 edition, published 21 July 2009
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=do-seed-companies-control-gm-crop-research

*Scientists must ask corporations for permission before publishing independent research on genetically modified crops. That restriction must end

Fighting back:
http://www.nafwa.org/general-nutrition/alternative-nutrition/24918-good-news-evil-monsanto-finally-reaping-its-just-desserts.html?tmpl=component&print=1&layout=default&page=>

Global control of seeds:
http://www.worldseed.org/isf/associate.html
http://www.worldseed.org/isf/affiliate.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lastmanstanding99
"THE BANKS OWN EVERYTHING!"
02:33 AM on 12/31/2011
Who let Monsanto do this? I wonder........
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:55 PM on 12/29/2011
Any farmer who grows the same crop every year, wheat or corn or whatever, knows he will have all kinds of pest problems, from weeds to viruses. But he's just doing it for money and will use whatever means to try to make it work. In the end that farmer will fail. Fortunately most farmers know this and use proper crop rotations to break pest and disease cycles.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Saxton
07:47 AM on 12/30/2011
I'm willing to bet these a large corporate farms that have jumped into the market to make a quick profit. The decisions are being made in a board room far from where the crops are being grown. For a suit that doesn't understand agronomy or soil science, it's all about maximizing profits.

When Bt corn came out there were researchers who warned that there was a high probability of insect resistance happening, but their voices were muffled by land grant universities that receive a lot of research dollars from agri-business.
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
09:12 AM on 12/30/2011
what's a corporate farm?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dadoorsron
12:10 PM on 12/30/2011
Farming has gotten to the point where crop rotations is overlooked. The farmer test the soil adds the depleted nutrients then plants the crops. Then to prevent insects and disease issues the farmer uses a preventive application for a host of issues. As we know over a period of time the farmer sees damage even after the preventive application. Then the farmer goes attacks the issue with more spray to kill the issue so the econmical impact will be less. Farming through science has helped yet it has hurt just as much.