iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Ron Paul Makes Appeal To Iowa Moderates And Undecided Voters

Ron Paul 2012

First Posted: 12/28/11 08:40 PM ET Updated: 12/29/11 08:26 AM ET

WEST DES MOINES, Iowa -- As Ron Paul falls behind Mitt Romney in the polls, he is attempting to win over moderates and undecided voters, telling them he can create the coalitions needed to cut the deficit and change the government's priorities.

Rep. Paul (R-Texas) frequently tells likely voters he can't win in Iowa next week, or do what he wants to as president, without their support, whether Republican, independent or Democrat. At campaign events, his team points out to voters that they can register as Republicans at the door to caucus for Paul, regardless of previous party affiliations. And on a Wednesday campaign stop at a West Des Moines insurance company, GuideOne, Paul said he believes he can unite both parties in the election and in Congress.

"It's going to be more than me that it takes to" cut $1 trillion from the budget, he added. "If I'm to be elected, it's going to be because the people heard this message. ... There's a lot of members of Congress that aren't locked in to having very strong beliefs about anything. If they get the message that you want them to start cutting back and the momentum builds with an election, yes, this is going to go our way."

Though Paul's numbers improved among Iowa voters in a CNN/Time poll released Wednesday, Paul also placed second to former Massachusetts Gov. Romney, instead of the first-place position he has held in the "first in the nation" caucus state. In Paul's appearance at GuideOne, which was open only to employees of the company and their family members rather than his usual gatherings of committed supporters, he repeatedly said that his main principle, promoting freedom, could appeal to both sides of the aisle.

"This whole issue of freedom beings people together," he said. "I think that's what excites me about this message."

Some of those in attendance said they were compelled by what Paul said he could do to bring both sides together to get things done.

Steve Scott, a 45-year-old who works in information technology for the company, said after Paul's speech that the candidate piqued his interest, although he is still not sure who he will support next week. Scott considers himself a "pragmatic independent" -- he supported Democrats John Edwards, then Hillary Clinton in 2008, before eventually voting for Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.).

"He made a very good impression on me today," Scott said, adding that Paul's statements about appealing to the left and right "definitely resonated with me."

Tammie Icatar, 62, said she planned to support Paul even though she voted for Barack Obama in 2008. Icatar, whose husband, Tom, works for GuideOne, is a long-time Republican but said she generally votes for who she thinks is best rather than picking based on party.

She said she understands that Paul can't do everything right away, "especially if you've got that many family members you have to deal with there in Congress," but she thinks he has the ability to make major changes.

Tom Icatar, who generally votes Democrat, said if Paul does not win the Republican nomination, they hope he will run as an independent. He said Paul can appeal "a lot of people" and could possibly do well as an independent, if it goes that way.

"If you like at his record and what he talks about, it's not a Republican position, it's not a Democratic position, he's viewing it more from an economic and Constitutional position," Tom Icatar said. "He's asking people, let's go back to the basics."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WEST DES MOINES, Iowa -- As Ron Paul falls behind Mitt Romney in the polls, he is attempting to win over moderates and undecided voters, telling them he can create the coalitions needed to cut the def...
WEST DES MOINES, Iowa -- As Ron Paul falls behind Mitt Romney in the polls, he is attempting to win over moderates and undecided voters, telling them he can create the coalitions needed to cut the def...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 224
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
05:18 AM on 01/02/2012
I find it disgustion that they put a Michelle Bachman video on the same page whith Ron Paul. The republicans are scared to death he might actually win.
04:26 PM on 12/29/2011
When this government basically shredded our rights i said enough is enough.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fairiswhat
Break the False Left-Right Paradigm
03:35 PM on 12/29/2011
Its unfortunate that many MSM feeders think that Ron Paul is far to the "right". Listen to what Dennis Kucinich, (who people think is far "left") had to say about Paul back in 2007.

Some of the most important issues facing our country today are above the left right paradigm.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=py8cXlLyX18

...Basically, Kucinich's says his first choice for VP would have been Paul.

Go Ron Paul
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Querent
I say the things that have to be said.
12:47 PM on 12/29/2011
Ron Paul's going to be able to create coalitions in Congress, in spite of the fact that he's never been able to do that before, in his many years as a member of the House. That reminds me of a cartoon in which the words, ". . . and then, a miracle occurs . . ." appears in the middle of a physics proof on a chalkboard.
11:51 AM on 12/29/2011
"As Ron Paul falls behind Mitt Romney in the polls...." Which polls? The CNN poll that excluded independents and democrats? Read what Nate Silver says about that particular poll. You media people are so pathetic.
11:33 AM on 12/29/2011
He hasn't fallen behind Mitt Romney in the polls. He's tied. This morning's RCP poll put Paul at 22.5% and Mitt at 22%.
photo
uniquindividual
I'm unique and so are you
11:31 AM on 12/29/2011
Tami Icatar - voted for Obama and now supports Paul. WOW, mixed up, misinformed and unenlightened.
photo
halfpricefaustian
Voted for Obama. Waiting for Godot.
10:16 AM on 12/29/2011
If you like a government that does nothing for you, vote for Ron Paul, he's all for government staying out of things.
photo
Belle Starr
cattle rustler and horse thief
10:35 AM on 12/29/2011
yeah . . . like the government will readily recognize a "traditional" marriage, but not a same sex marriage

or like the government won't recognize a woman's right to autonomy over her own body

or the government won't recognize the equality of tax-paying, law-abiding citizens

or the government won't recognize industries that pollute the air and water
11:33 AM on 12/29/2011
I'm for a limited federal government. There is nothing wrong with that.
08:53 AM on 12/29/2011
He's the best choice on the GOP side and the least extreme. He's the only one who would end unecessary war, end bailouts to those who commit fraud, end the attack on civil liberties. But Romney was chosen by the corporate establishment and the corporate owned media is predictably busy taking him down with spin for the gullible.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:16 AM on 12/29/2011
Yes, he'd end bailouts to those who commit fraud - but more importantly, he won't do anything to prevent them committing fraud in the first place. Look up Austrian Economics - no regulations.

Sounds like you've fallen for the spin sweetie.
09:25 AM on 12/29/2011
I agree that his view on regulations does have its contradictions. However, his view is also that strong property rights would act as the regulation. In other words, financial executives who committed fraud and melted down businesses, pensions (and other people's property) would be liable and held accountable, which should prevent it from happening in the first place.

Ron Paul experts: help me out if I don't have this right.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Just logic
11:43 AM on 12/29/2011
What fraud is a crime. Ask why with all the regulations now nobody has been brought up on charges for the current economic crisis. Fraud has been proven yet nothing. In Austrian fraud gets pounded. There would be many arrests. And also there are regulations a lot more then now. The difference is they are natural not man made that just makes things worse.
photo
uniquindividual
I'm unique and so are you
11:34 AM on 12/29/2011
Not to mention ending Social Security, Medicare, Environmental protection, consumer protections and meritocracy (No student loans for those of us not born into aristocracy)
07:01 PM on 12/29/2011
But many on both sides are working to end much of this already!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:50 AM on 12/29/2011
If you are a moderate conservative you've got no time for the "every person for themselves" Libertarian nonsense. Undecided racist voters who have been exposed to Paul's old newsletters maybe.
08:48 AM on 12/29/2011
Mitt...the Bushes...the Clintons...Cheyney....Barrack....they all want to continue throwing out pennies to the public and keep them happy with NFL and American Idol so they can keep our eyes off of them while they spend all of our grandchildren money.....wait a minute there is no more money they give us plastic cards now and call it "convenience" while they watch every dime we spend. The is only one chance we have before we end up like the Romans or Soviets.........Congressman Paul
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blogger x
Both parties sold us out a long time ago.
03:41 AM on 12/29/2011
Don't believe the same MSM that gave us 9/11 lies, WMDs, the Iraq war, Iran hysteria and so much more.

The real Ron Paul:
http://www.youtu.be/8Rv0Z5SNrF4
.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pmoschetta
Where are the Jobs, Speaker Boehner?
08:34 AM on 12/29/2011
MSM didn't give us the 9-11 lies, WMD, the Iraq War and Iran hysteria

REPUBLICAN POLITICIANS DID!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bigmaddy
Retired Union, USN
08:47 AM on 12/29/2011
Ron Paul told you to put down the booze.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KikoJones
03:31 AM on 12/29/2011
The comments by folks who say they were swayed by Ron Paul's cheap and transparent pandering have finally made me understand how serial cheaters and liars are forgiven by their spouses: some folks are just that gullible.
11:35 AM on 12/29/2011
That is totally unfair. I have done a year of study on the man and his policies (baggage and all). I have done a great deal of soul-searching.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KikoJones
08:22 AM on 12/30/2011
I mean no disrespect to you, but I don't understand how Ron Paul expects to appeal to moderates when many of his key proposals--the dismantling of the DoE, EPA, for instance--stand in stark contrast to what they believe in. Is he going to change his tune? That would be disappointing and would render him as just another cheap politician, which I don't believe he is. Or does he think that his honesty and decisiveness alone will win them over when their respective views are not aligned with each other? Ron Paul might get praise from moderates who appreciate his candor but that doesn't translate into getting their votes if they are ideologically opposed.
photo
Bryan Boru
Engineer, Libertarian
03:08 AM on 12/29/2011
Statistically meaningless to say "first place" and "second place" with this poll. Scientific illiteracy is rampant. No wonder we're losing to China, India, and Brazil.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lisa SpomerKrasnoff
02:28 AM on 12/29/2011
"Going back to basics" you say?

Like the Gold Standard? LOL
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cvermeulen9
And you thought it could never happen!
09:44 AM on 12/29/2011
yea like we never should have decoupled from it! Ron Paul for PRESIDENT!
photo
uniquindividual
I'm unique and so are you
11:39 AM on 12/29/2011
The Great depression was exaserbated by Hoover's insistence that the gold standard be maintained.

Scroll downt to the chart and the paragraph below it if you are not a reader.

http://mises.org/daily/3778
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Just logic
11:49 AM on 12/29/2011
The market agrees with him and the mere fact that in 1964 paying people $1.25 a day in silver coin translates to $70,000 a year for minimum wage. Today its less then $25,000 and everything costs more. If you don’t understand then I would suggest you stop commenting on things you haven’t a clue. The only reason that you hear that some economists don’t agree with the gold standard is because they have to have the ability to print money and printing they did. We by the end of next year will be well over 16 trillion in debt. And you will be the first person to be upset when you go grocery shopping and you have to spend $500 dollars to get $100 worth today. Don’t believe me look up the history of Russia. Another fiat based economy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lisa SpomerKrasnoff
01:38 PM on 12/29/2011
Oh save us Ronald Paul...save us. Heard the same thing in my day, only it was Ronald Reagan the rightwing was screaming for,,,Ugh!