More

California Child Care Cuts Force Hard Choice On Parents

California Child Care Cuts

By AMY TAXIN   12/29/11 02:45 PM ET   AP

OXNARD, Calif. -- Sarah Comito rolls out of bed before dawn most days and slips quietly out of her house. Before her rambunctious toddler wakes up, she heads off to work as a waitress in an upscale weight-loss resort in Malibu.

The hour-long commute is exhausting, but the 33-year-old is thankful to make the trip when she remembers where she and her husband were four years ago: living in a tent in a nearby river bottom, strung out on methamphetamine.

Now Comito fears the progress they have made since then could be lost as California cuts her from a vital child care assistance program, more than doubling the cost of her son's day care to $600 a month. On a $10 hourly wage, she said she'd be better off quitting her job and staying home with her son while her husband works as a professional tree cutter. But if she stops working, they can't make rent.

"The only thing I can do is attempt to prepare for the worst," Comito said, while watching 3-year-old Matthew dart across the yard at the couple's working-class apartment complex in Oxnard.

For years, child care assistance programs offered low-income parents such as Comito a lifeline. But state legislatures dealing with multibillion dollar budget deficits during the recession have been targeting child care subsidies as one way to help balance their state budgets.

The cuts have come at just the time many parents need that help the most because full-time, well-paying jobs are in such short supply.

In the last fiscal year, combined state and federal funding for child care assistance fell by 2 percent to $12 billion, according to a 46-state analysis by the National Conference of State Legislatures. Federal stimulus money gave a temporary boost to the subsidies, but nearly all that money stopped in 2011.

At the same time, states reduced their general fund spending for child care programs by 7 percent during the current fiscal year, including a 25 percent decline in California, 30 percent in Hawaii and 10 percent in Michigan. In the fiscal year that ended June 30, 22 states reported declines in their budgets for child care subsidies, according to the state legislative group.

But providing child care assistance to low-income families, a central tenet of the country's 1996 welfare overhaul, is seen as critical to getting people back to work at a time when the country is struggling to reduce unemployment. The goal of the programs is to subsidize the cost of day care to help keep poor parents, many of them single mothers, working. Over time, the subsidy is scaled back as parents advance in the labor force and wean themselves off government assistance.

Some parents give up jobs and turn to the welfare system if they can't find affordable child care, but that isn't an option for those who have already used up their entitlements, said Danielle Ewen, a past director of child care and early education for the Center for Law and Social Policy.

"For those families, there is absolutely no safety net and we don't know what is happening to their kids, but it is absolutely scary to think," Ewen said. "It becomes a very desperate, horrible cycle for poor families who are doing everything they can possibly do to become self-sufficient."

The cuts have taken different forms. Some states have lowered the income ceiling to determine child care eligibility. Others have capped the number of families that receive assistance – and created endless waiting lists – or slashed the reimbursement rate paid to day care providers who accept poor children.

Parents are coping in different ways. Some have asked their bosses to cut their wages so they continue to qualify for subsidized care. Others have scaled back hours to reduce the time their children are in day care. Some say they are thinking about quitting and going onto welfare.

Grace Dixon, a service manager for affordable housing in the eastern San Francisco Bay area city of Alameda, said she has paid as much as she can to day care providers for her 1-year-old daughter and 4-year-old son since she was cut off from assistance in July and saw her child care charges nearly triple to $1,500 a month.

"What do they want us to do – not to work and to get on welfare? Would that be better? And then their taxes are paying for me to sit at home and be on the couch?" the 29-year-old college graduate asked.

Advocates say some parents will leave their children in dangerous, unsupervised settings when they feel they have no other choice.

"What you see are very stressed and desperate moms," said Helen Blank, director of leadership and public policy at the National Women's Law Center. "Some of them pay huge amounts for child care, and they can't afford to pay enough for food or they lose their house."

The scenario plays out differently in different states. In Michigan, the state reduced its budget for subsidized child care this year by lowering the reimbursement rate paid to day care providers.

Advocates say the change has made it tough for low-income parents to find day-care providers willing to take them.

"Some providers have no incentive to participate – especially the high-quality providers," said Pat Sorensen, vice president for policy at Michigan's Children, an advocacy group.

In North Carolina, officials have extended a waiting list for subsidized child care. The state reduced its funding for child care subsidies by 15 percent this year and has seen the list grow to 50,000 children this year, up from 27,000 children four years ago, according to the state Division of Child Development and Early Education.

"With this year's budget cuts, those numbers have just gone crazy," said Sheila Hoyle, executive director of the Southwestern Child Development Commission, which manages a 600 child-waiting list for seven western North Carolina counties.

The cuts to child care subsidies come as cash-strapped states pare back spending in many areas, including education and health services.

"We've been going in the right direction to raise the quality of our day care centers and early childhood education, and I think those programs are important. But you have to balance in your budget the money you have," said Nelson Dollar, a Republican state representative in North Carolina who is co-chairman of an appropriations committee.

For children, the cuts can mean the difference between a stable, educational child care experience and being shuttled among different providers, family and friends with little consistency.

When parents cannot find affordable care, they often leave children with a neighbor or friend even if they don't trust them. Or they might leave them at home with an older sibling.

"There's an impact on that child's development," said Bruce Liggett, executive director of Arizona's Child Care Association, which represents the state's licensed providers. "They're not learning as they would in a child care center and they're not going to get to kindergarten ready to learn."

It's hard to know how many children have been affected by the recent cuts and in what ways.

In Arizona, more than 48,000 children were covered by child care subsidies at the beginning of this year. Now, fewer than 29,000 are, Liggett said.

Many in Arizona are on a waiting list. Ann Herron, 25, said she signed up as soon as her son was born 2 1/2 years ago, but assistance is nowhere in sight.

A single mother, Herron said she can't afford to send her son to a day care center, so she has different friends watch him for minimal pay while she works as caregiver at a group home.

It's hard on her not knowing who will look after him a month from now. But the Phoenix woman said it's also hard on her son, who has little, if any, contact with other children.

"When he is around kids – because he hasn't been around kids – he acts crazy. He's hitting and stuff," Herron said. "It is just me and him."

___

Associated Press writers Jennifer Sinco Kelleher in Honolulu, Tim Martin in Lansing, Mich., and Gary Robertson in Raleigh, N.C., contributed to this report

FOLLOW HUFFPOST LOS ANGELES

OXNARD, Calif. -- Sarah Comito rolls out of bed before dawn most days and slips quietly out of her house. Before her rambunctious toddler wakes up, she heads off to work as a waitress in an upscale we...
OXNARD, Calif. -- Sarah Comito rolls out of bed before dawn most days and slips quietly out of her house. Before her rambunctious toddler wakes up, she heads off to work as a waitress in an upscale we...
Filed by Anna Almendrala  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 36
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
04:23 PM on 01/10/2012
All of the money goes to dictators, wars, bailing out the banks and such. Welcome to the caste system USA-if you are not of the elite-you do not count.
08:30 PM on 12/31/2011
forget jobs, forget helping poor families with childcare, we have obamacare and im glad its worth every penny.
01:48 PM on 12/31/2011
Fantastic! What a progressive idea! I'm sure it will bring great results.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
xenubarb
Nebulon V
01:40 PM on 12/31/2011
Since our current culture seems to hate poor people to the point of making their lives more miserable than they already are, I am a bit surprised there's not an attendant campaign like Mexico ran some years back; reminders to families "don't have children you cannot afford."

For many people, kids are the cause of financial problems, so why not urge them to hold off?
Oh, right. I plumb forgot about the military-industrial complex needing cannon fodder for future wars.
11:20 AM on 12/31/2011
In my area we are seeing lots more grandparents as full time babysitters. Its how I spend my summers, babysitting the grandkids, but I enjoy it.
11:26 AM on 12/30/2011
Man these people really need to get it together. First Low-income people had to take the stereotype of being lazy,not wanting anything in life, just wanting to live off of welfare, then it went to can't help you find a job because you have to have this training and that training then it went to can't help you because you don't have transportation, now it's we can't help you because we cannot afford childcare and that just put the icing on the cake. I was lucky because I had my mother (thank God) to help me out with childcare so I really never needed that assitance, and now my children are almost grown but I have seen people put their children in danger and so on and so on and it's nerve wrecking for both the Parent and the children. What do you want them to do? I think somewhere up the Political chain somebody likes to see the Poor suffer for the thrill of seeing someone holding on by a string.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
xenubarb
Nebulon V
01:41 PM on 12/31/2011
Get this: my sister was on welfare briefly. She couldn't take a part time job because they'd decrease her benefits, forcing her to work full time and...
HIRE A BABY SITTER!

Unbelievable.
photo
socalcde
My micro-bio is empty.
10:01 AM on 12/30/2011
I realize that child care is essential in our society, especially for those who can least afford it, but the picture used for this article looks like a prison yard for kids and I would hate the idea of my kids ever having to spend time there.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:30 AM on 12/30/2011
Today I read an article saying the USA gives Egypt $ 1.3 Billion dollars annually to help fund their military. I also read that the USA gives a committee in the UN ( Just the committee alone ) 80 Million dollars which funds 23% of the 285 member group. Only two examples of how our government is spending tax payer dollars. I read articles such as this and wonder why the citizens of our country must pay such a high price.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ariel Bonzai
Naked is the best disguise.
10:13 PM on 12/29/2011
What happened to First Five? All this money is being used to finance the early education stuff that Rob Riener was so hung no about. How do these political interests get away with this? You want poole to work so they aren't dependent on the food stamps and welfare benefits, but they do so and go without healthcare, without enough money for shelter and now no where to place their children while they pull 39 hours at Walmart where Walton will not cover healthcare, taxpayers do. I pay taxes. He doesn't. What I want is for this lady and her kids to have solid child care and education available. I also want my money to house and feed guys like Waltin in the state penitentiary. While they're at it seize his assets and use them on schools, housing, training and creating laws that serve the people. Not the rich.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Foodgrade
Learn to grow banannas
09:36 PM on 12/29/2011
I'm kinda curious. I know for a fact that many union members are Republicans, I spoke with them on picket lines when I was doing voter registration there. Step up now, don't be shy. Step up and volunteer to take a reduction in pay to minimum wage and waive all benefits as your patriotic duty to help the country compete with Chinese 8 buck a day labor.

No? Then shadup and let the rest of us try to mitigate some of the damage that your masters the corporatists are doing to these children.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Foodgrade
Learn to grow banannas
09:20 PM on 12/29/2011
Not a word about corporate hand outs, and not a penny taken from the prisons.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Patricia Russell
We are sorry, your micro-bio did not meet our guid
08:21 PM on 12/29/2011
kids can't vote.......
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mountainweb
Conservative Commonsense
08:10 PM on 12/29/2011
Bottom line, California has been working on being anti-business for years and has successfully driven businesses(and the jobs that went with them) out of the state. Now they are working on driving the average worker out of the state. People in Europe have been used to working in foreign countries for years, may be time for the "29-year-old college graduate" to look some place else other than California for a living.
photo
mlaiuppa
Pres. Sarcasm Society. Like we need your approval.
08:50 PM on 12/29/2011
The average worker is a waitress? Janitor? Cashier?

There were plenty of jobs in California before they were outsourced overseas.

Or perhaps you'd like Americans to compete with cheap political prisoner labor in China? Then everyone will be equal, living in cardboard boxes under bridges. Will that be the new "average"?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Foodgrade
Learn to grow banannas
09:30 PM on 12/29/2011
I have no idea. These corporate apologists are going to get it in the neck just like everyone else, but they still believe some of the money will rub off on them, trickle down is reality and the tooth fairy will visit them.
08:36 AM on 12/30/2011
Diffidently, I have to poit out a couple of facts.(FActual info isn't actually forbidden at HP.It's just in bad taste.)
1)A lot of jobs have been outsourced to 'Tejas".And Utah Nebraska.etc.
2)California has either the worst or second worst business climate in the country. If you were a Smart Person (I know,but just pretend for a moment.) ,would you invest your time ,money and dreams into a place that thought Smart People had to work for Non Smart people's benefit.
3)Loopie,it might be easier if you thought of it as Evolution in Action.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Foodgrade
Learn to grow banannas
09:22 PM on 12/29/2011
Ok, that's 1. Please explain the unemployment in the rest of the states? I also wonder why you make no mention of outsourcing. It's pretty hard to hide something as large as the Bay Bridge.
07:04 PM on 12/29/2011
The solution is easy.....do what my wife and I did...WE DID NOT HAVE CHILDREN WE COULD NOT AFFORD!....there..problem solved.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Foodgrade
Learn to grow banannas
09:25 PM on 12/29/2011
I shiver when I see people like you hang their necks out in that self righteous wind. Find some wood to knock on or something.
10:06 PM on 12/29/2011
Self righteous?..nope... Folks shouldnt expect others to afford their luxuries and children are a luxury ,not a necessity. I have seen with my own eyes these selfish pricks that have children they obviously cant afford. I am not saying that folks of little means dont make good parents most do. but those folks work their butts off and sacrifice everything for their kids. Folks like you need to wake up to the very real emergency of the under educated having children they cant afford. ...in my book YOU are the self righteous "person". You obviously feel that the rest of us should pay because others make poor life choices.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Penny Ford
01:13 PM on 12/31/2011
OK, I understand where you're coming from, but what about the people who had a great job, pay, benefits etc, and they had kid because they could afford them, then they lose their job, or whatever then they can no longer afford the kids, so what do you do then? Adoption is out the question, they have no family close by/
06:13 PM on 12/29/2011
Diffidently, I have to note, her statements say the increase of 300 bucks/month is more than she makes at her job. (Forty hrs/week for 4.2 weeks/month are about 1.7 K /month.) Of course minus Cal state income tax.And 7% FICA. Still, it does not compute
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Drew Puli Wolf
There is no Dog but Drew Doggie Dog
07:14 PM on 12/29/2011
She did not say that (she would lose money working), she said it was almost not worth working. You forgot other expenses like the 1 hour each way commute, and the cost having a car to make the commute. She did say that she netted more money working (she needed to work to make the rent) Using your math she make $1680 per month - $117 for FICA - $600 for child care = net of $962 (and this does not subtract transportation cost). Adding the 2 hour commute she works 50 hours a week = 210 a month. Divide $962 by 210 and you get $4.58 per hour - again transportation cost would make it less. The question in someone's mind is it worth it to drive 2 hours a day to make $4.58 an hour? The only thing you comment proves is not that the woman's math skills are impaired, but your reading comprehension skills are lousy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Foodgrade
Learn to grow banannas
09:27 PM on 12/29/2011
fanned. Few will help someone up, but they'll flock to help someone down.
photo
mlaiuppa
Pres. Sarcasm Society. Like we need your approval.
08:53 PM on 12/29/2011
What are you using for your calculations. Are you assuming she makes minimum wage?

Don't.

Often tips are deducted from wages, shared or serving staff are paid less than minimum wages assuming that tips will make up the difference. I've also heard that some managers take a healthy cut of the tips.

And even after taxes, she doesn't get to keep it all. There's the gas, insurance and maintenance on the car she needs for that two hour commute. Uniforms and shoes. They're not supplied and you can't just wear anything, not even shoes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ariel Bonzai
Naked is the best disguise.
10:34 PM on 12/29/2011
California does pay waitresses min. Wage and no state has better tippers. In most states there is $2 an hour for waitresses and far less tips, you can go home owing money after a six hour shift. Wait staff tip busboys,bartenders, hostesses, and it's not mandatory but they also tip cooks abpnd dishwashers to assure the best service.
The lady probably cannot count on anything but her hourly wage and even this is subject to change as seasonal tourism is part of the area's economic resources. Oxnard Anne Ventura have many migrant workers and even the middle class is pretty low key. In this economy, she probably gets fewer hours, fewer tips and fewer reasons to go into work . I think she has to find an online job or home business to make life work for her. Mom in some sort of classes or vocational training may qualify for the CC benefits, grants and section 8, which is often abused by grifters. She can probaly find a daycare or sitter for 100 a week or work nights so her husband can stay with the baby. It sucks but she has options.