NYR More

David Petraeus Almost Resigned Over Obama's Decision To Withdraw Surge Forces From Afghanistan, New Book Claims

Petraeus Almost Quit Over Afghan Drawdown

KIMBERLY DOZIER   12/29/11 11:04 AM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — Four-star general-turned-CIA director David Petraeus was urged to resign as Afghanistan war commander over President Barack Obama's decision to quickly draw down surge forces, according to a new insider's look at Petraeus' 37-year Army career.

Conservative writer Max Boot had urged he take that course of action, but Petraeus decided that resigning would be a "selfish, grandstanding move with huge political ramifications" and that now was "time to salute and carry on," according to a forthcoming biography.

"Director Petraeus has publicly stated that he never contemplated resignation," CIA spokeswoman Jennifer Youngblood said Thursday.

Author and Petraeus confidante Paula Broadwell had extensive access to the general in Afghanistan and Washington for "All In: The Education of General David Petraeus," due from Penguin Press in January. The Associated Press was given an advance copy.

The account traces Petraeus' career from West Point cadet to his command of two wars deemed unwinnable: Iraq and Afghanistan. Co-authored with The Washington Post's Vernon Loeb, the nearly 400-page biography is part history lesson through Petraeus' eyes, part hagiography and part defense of the counterinsurgency strategy he applied in both wars.

Critics of counterinsurgency argue the strategy has not yet proved a success, with violence spiking in Iraq after the departure of U.S. troops, and Afghan local forces deemed ill-prepared to take over by the 2014 deadline.

The book unapologetically casts Petraeus in the hero's role, as in this description of the Afghanistan campaign: "There was a new strategic force released on Kabul: Petraeus' will."

Broadwell does acknowledge that Petraeus rubs some people the wrong way.

"His critics fault him for ambition and self-promotion," she writes. But she adds that "his energy, optimism and will to win stand out more for me."

The book also is peppered with Petraeus quotes that sound like olive branches meant to soothe Obama aides who feared Petraeus would challenge their boss for the White House.

"Petraeus tried to make clear that he and Obama were in synch," Broadwell writes of Petraeus' Senate testimony on the Afghan war.

The book describes Petraeus' frustration at still being labeled an outsider from the Obama administration, even as he retired from the military at Obama's request before taking the job last summer as the CIA's 20th director.

The book depicts Petraeus' rise at an unrelenting, near-superhuman pace. He starts his career as a fiercely competitive West Point cadet known as "Peaches," where he famously wooed the school superintendent's daughter, Holly Knowlton. He went on to command the 101st Airborne Division as part of the invasion of Iraq, then masterminded the rewrite of the Army and Marine Corps' counterinsurgency training manual before returning to command the surge in Baghdad. He was then appointed to head Central Command, overseeing the campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan as well as military affairs across much of the Gulf and the Mideast.

He accepted a cut in authority and pay to lead the Afghanistan war campaign when Gen. Stanley McChrystal was forced to resign after a Rolling Stone article that "scorched the general (McChrystal) and his aides, caricaturing them as testosterone-addled frat boys as they insulted Obama" and other officials, Broadwell writes.

She describes how Petraeus' first act was to lift McChrystal's restrictions on the use of force – especially on airstrikes – if civilians were nearby.

"There is no question about our commitment to reducing civilian loss of life," Petraeus told his staff. There was, however, "a clear moral imperative to make sure we are fully supporting our troops in combat."

Broadwell adds that the problem, according to Petraeus, was less McChrystal's order than how it was even more strictly re-interpreted by lower commanders.

In her account, Petraeus also faults McChrystal for overpromising and underdelivering in places like Taliban-riddled Marjah in the south, producing months of embarrassing headlines that hurt the war effort back in Washington.

But the book also includes Petraeus' own Rolling Stone-esque moment, when he was quoted badmouthing the White House in Bob Woodward's latest book, "Obama's Wars." A frustrated Petraeus is described as telling his inner circle, on a flight after a glass of wine, that "the administration was (expletive) with the wrong guy."

"Petraeus later expressed his displeasure to all of them for betraying his confidence," Broadwell wrote. "But he knew he was ultimately responsible for making the intemperate remark," a candid admission, through Broadwell, of his lapse in judgment.

He also concedes the Afghan war is not yet won.

"He had wanted to hand (Marine Corps Gen. John) Allen ... a war that had taken a decisive turn," Broadwell writes of what had been Petraeus' goal for his successor. "He knew that, despite the hard-fought progress, that wasn't yet the case."

Yet that admission also presents a get-out clause when combined with the book's account that he considered resigning over the rapid drawdown of troops, neatly removing Petraeus from responsibility if the war goes wrong.

And the account does nothing to puncture the mythology his troops built up around him, something an early mentor, retired Gen. Jack Galvin, told Petraeus to embrace.

"They want you to be bigger than you are, so they magnify you," Galvin said in an interview with Broadwell. "Live up to it all with the highest standards of integrity. You become part of a legend."

"All In" fits neatly into that.

___

Online:

www.paulabroadwell.com

___

Kimberly Dozier can be followed on Twitter (at)kimberlydozier.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BOOKS

WASHINGTON — Four-star general-turned-CIA director David Petraeus was urged to resign as Afghanistan war commander over President Barack Obama's decision to quickly draw down surge forces, accor...
WASHINGTON — Four-star general-turned-CIA director David Petraeus was urged to resign as Afghanistan war commander over President Barack Obama's decision to quickly draw down surge forces, accor...
Filed by Jade Walker  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,864
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (49 total)
  1 of 1  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
Beatriz09 08:38 AM on 12/29/2011
If he would run for president, he'd run as a Republican. So he remains an "outsider" in the Obama administration. He'd probably even be the only serious GOP candidate, and in that sense, I'd almost wish that he would run in 2012. 

As to the withdrawal of the troops in Afghanistan: I'm a progressive, but I do think that he's right on this one. Obama started the withdrawal for political reasons,  Read More...
10:40 PM on 01/04/2012
The Generals biggest mistake was continuing to work for that creepy undermining Obama!

Vote Obama out in 12!
07:48 PM on 01/02/2012
Howard the Duck is a General?
03:59 PM on 01/02/2012
Mr. Betray-us just doesn't get it. Time for him to move to pasture.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JACK DOYLE
03:21 PM on 01/02/2012
Peteaus's surge consisted of sending millions of dollars in fifties to the gangs of thugs that run THE"TRIBES' IN THE SLUMS OF iRAQ with orders not to shoot American soldiers who in turn were told to stay in protected areas and not to stray into a fire fight.So insurgent activity centered on fights that were internecine rather than he Us who weredoing little good anyway.Iraqis were dying 200 per week.And still may be.
Afgoinonagain will produce the same result and we are just sitting ducks for nutcases who have been killing each other for centuries.Screw Petreaus and get out-GET OUT OBAMA
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JACK DOYLE
04:00 PM on 01/02/2012
So what good did the General and his surge do? We lost and We pulled out per agreement signed years ago by bush and there are still 200 Iraqis being blown up every few weeks, look in the newspapers
.Afghanistan is still growing poppys by the ton and Taliban killings are prevalent.The only thing Ron PAUL HAS BEEN CORRECT ABOUT IS GET OUT!
02:59 PM on 01/02/2012
How can did Petraeus almost resign if he never considered it? Cheap title to get attention
01:46 PM on 01/02/2012
This Neo-Con puppet, posing as a General, is a disgrace to America. He should be court martial-ed and charged with treason, for incompetence, and for pushing an Israel-first, Neo-Con agenda.
01:02 PM on 01/02/2012
In the right wing world, Generals outrank the President.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SteveMD2
02:13 PM on 01/02/2012
Not when Bush started his war of lies against Iraq. A war based on BS from an iraqi properly named "curve ball", although that name was because he was a spy for the USA.

BTW the Bush family are billionaires due to the oil business, and Cheney cheney similar due to Halliburton - in the oil services, eg platform/ drilling rig biz, and also mfrs of those disposable (with our soldiers inside) mini-tanks called APCs

Which any hand held rocket launcher can turn into swiss cheese.
08:57 AM on 01/02/2012
Resign. Please.
11:51 PM on 01/01/2012
The difference between Petraeus and Obama is that Obama is not particularly fond of the Demon-o-cratic MKULTRA CIARMS set of Phagot Lip's that exacerbated the global populate since the early 1970's that started all these war's. Petraeus's career in being military and a general seeing things as a commerce on war, surely he will over look the exacetbation tactics that have needlessly caused all these wars. I think I see in Obama that he is wisely against that cacodoxic Paromology aiding and abetting perduellious private defense manufacturer's and contractors, petraeus act's surprised even after Obama promised the people he would bring the troops home late 2011. why would anyone come up perturbed about it now when they knew about it for over a year and said nothing in that year. I think I answered this question earlier in this comment.
06:22 PM on 01/01/2012
Those that have never gone to war - Bush, Cheney, the neocons - led us into a war based on a lie about a nuke cloud over the US if Iraq is not stopped in Iraq, rejecting the consensus of the advice of the military that had been in wars - instead cherry picking those Generals that put self-promotion over the nations best interests.

To say that Patraeus over estimates his own value and his own ability is to ignore all the other character faults that current PR may erase, but which history will note. Read the somethings a little more objective of the subject: http://www.democracyarsenal.org/2011/08/the-real-legacy-of-david-petraeus.html

As Bob Woodward has warned: “Another 9-11 … could happen, and if it does, we will become a police state.”
http://www­.salon.com­/topic/dav­id_petraeu­s/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
brian464
world peace thru world wide disarmament
04:20 AM on 01/01/2012
General Patraeus needs to concentrate on the "elephant in the room" instead of an empire that cannot sustain itself.

After the primaries are over, Dr Ron Paul needs to go independent and challenge President Obama and the Republican nominee directly with the following message :

You and your loved ones health, wealth, security and well being is in jeopardy.

Click on the link below to the Intercollegiate Studies Institute forum which will give everybody an idea about the "elephant in the room"

because time is running out for our government which eventually will affect the health, wealth, security and well being of you and your loved ones

( when you click on the link below, you might have to scroll down the page to get to the relevant article on why time is running out for our government ):

http://forum.isi.org/eve/forums?a=tpc&s=5270060552&f=9310035552&m=4280031492&r=5221044036#5221044036
photo
ntr721
Democrat for the people.
08:35 PM on 12/31/2011
I am a USMC vet of the Korean "conflict. I am also a military history buff, haveing done much reading and research on our military generals since WW2. In a ranking of 1 to 10, 10 being the higest I would personally rank Gen.Petraeus as a 2. I think Obama made a mistake in selecting him for his current position. This is a man who believes he is more knowledgeable about military strategy than any other Generals Past or Present
09:10 PM on 12/31/2011
20 year Marine, I agree!
01:32 AM on 01/01/2012
I don't know whether that is a fact or just your opinion, but remember that George Patton did have that opinion of himself and that wasn't so bad. Blood & Guts ranks a 10 as a Field General and Eisenhower a 10 as an Administrative General that was an excellent facilitator. General Petraeus is a combination of both a Field General and an Administrative General. Maybe it's oo early to rank him.
06:10 PM on 12/31/2011
Max Boot is political operative with no credibility.
05:48 PM on 12/31/2011
The fools who support Petraeus probably never lived through the Vietnam War. Certainly, they have never learned from its mistakes. The real enemies here are Bush, Cheney, the neocons and Likudniks and oil and gas company executives who conceived and have practically destroyed this country trying to execute a draconian Middle East policy that was always doomed to failure. Unfortunately, they are continuing to try to do so with Iran, and the Eastern Mediterranean.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
godipo
06:57 PM on 12/31/2011
Why can't we approach globalization with some maturity? Maybe all the enemies you mention are unified by the fact that they are each driven to preserve the patriarchy, hence they bring little subtlety to the process, they thrive on the apparatus of war more than on victory or certainly more than on harmony. Very old fashioned! Fanned and thanks.
12:40 AM on 01/01/2012
Uh, I haven't seen much in the way of change from the current administration - when are you people going to realize who really runs this country - all presidents are just lackeys for the power elite...including this one.
05:40 PM on 12/31/2011
Petraeus was not much better than Gen. Westmoreland during the Vietnam War, and should never have been appointed to head the CIA. He can't step down too soon if one wants to see the Agency reformed by someone who has moral backbone and is willing to tell it like it is, instead of toadying to the neocon agenda. Unfortunately, if he resigned now, he would turn around and advise one or more of the jingoistic charlatans running for the Republican nomination.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SteveMD2
02:33 PM on 01/02/2012
Yes - vietnam was a tragedy of 58000 Americans killed and probably a million N. Vietnamese

The problem was that vietnam was seen through the lense of the cold war. Vietnam was actually a war of nationalism to put the country back together again after centuries of French colonialism ended at Dien Bien Phu.

Ho chi Minh, commie or not had sent to our govt 7-8 letters to eg Eisenhower, asking for help to reassemble his country. Which in the south (as well as the north) was seen as very corrupt.

If we had understood what Vietname was about, we would have had a different lense to see through - the N. Vietnamese actually hated the Commies in China, who had invaded them many times in the past.

We would have had a :nominal friend", commie or not who would have told us what was going on in red china. Just like - the abject lesson btw - Tito. he may have been a commie but he did tell us what was going in in the communist part his world. EG a spy for America.