More

BP Oil Spill: Oil Giant Says It's Entitled To Payment From Halliburton

Bp Oil Spill Halliburton

KEVIN McGILL   01/ 3/12 11:10 AM ET   AP

NEW ORLEANS — BP is reiterating claims first made last April that it is entitled to payment from contractor Halliburton Energy Services for expenses and lost profits resulting from the 2010 Deepwater Horizon offshore oil well disaster.

BP's latest filing was made Monday in federal court in New Orleans, where complex litigation involving various companies involved in the disaster is playing out.

BP has accused Houston-based Halliburton of botching the cement job meant to seal the well. Halliburton says BP is trying to saddle Halliburton with far more than its share of the legal burden.

In Monday's filing, BP said Halliburton has made inaccurate statements about BP's legal claims. And BP, quoting from its own filing made last April, emphasized it is seeking damages from Halliburton, including costs and expenses for oil cleanup and remediation, lost profits and other costs.

The April 20, 2010, explosion off Louisiana killed 11 rig workers and led to more than 200 million gallons of oil spewing from a well a mile beneath the sea, according to government estimates. London-based BP PLC owned the well and was leasing the Deepwater Horizon rig from Swiss-based Transocean Ltd.

Amid numerous claims and counter-claims made by various parties since the well blew out, a federal civil trial in the case is set to begin in February to assign shares of fault to the companies involved in the worst offshore oil spill in U.S. history.

Monday's filing comes as Halliburton and BP argue over the extent of BP's indemnification of Halliburton. The Houston-based company says BP wants to avoid its legal responsibility to cover costs related to the spill. BP argues that "gross negligence" by Halliburton eliminates BP's indemnity obligation.

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
NEW ORLEANS — BP is reiterating claims first made last April that it is entitled to payment from contractor Halliburton Energy Services for expenses and lost profits resulting from the 2010 Deep...
NEW ORLEANS — BP is reiterating claims first made last April that it is entitled to payment from contractor Halliburton Energy Services for expenses and lost profits resulting from the 2010 Deep...
Filed by Jillian Berman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 45
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wtf is this
we are part of society -- make it better for all!
10:55 PM on 01/04/2012
It's BP's well. They're ultimately responsible. If they choose shoddy contractors, they're responsible for that. They need to pay the claims regardless of whether they ever collect from Haliburton.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RitaS
04:08 AM on 01/04/2012
....BP... entitled to payment from contractor Halliburton.....

HOW about what the US People are entitled to for the cr*p you BOTH inflicted upon the US & it's people???
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RitaS
02:59 AM on 01/04/2012
Although it may be fun to watch one corporate dog trying to eat another corporate dog & vs the American people, in the end, I hope the American PEOPLE win.....
12:10 AM on 01/04/2012
If I hire a contractor to fix my neighbor's roof, and realize the roof's going to collapse based on specifications my architect husband has reviewed, I'm as culpable as the contractor. I'm just saying.
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
01:40 AM on 01/04/2012
Halliburton cemented the well, BP made all the decisions on the casing and the testing.
They didn't run a bond log, they ignored the pressure tests that showed the well was not isolated from the hydrocarbon resevoir, and they removed the primary well control device, the mud, when it was obviously dangerous to do so.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:01 PM on 01/03/2012
Just gotta love the big multinational corps suing each other. As far as malfeasance I would guess Halliburton is near the top of the list. But lawyers always win, one way or the other. But I'd bet BP and Halliburton are still in business together, after all, it's just business.
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
08:44 PM on 01/03/2012
It doesn't matter one whit that the cement job went bad, cement jobs have problems all the time which is why it is imperative that you test the cement job and react accordingly.

The tests clearly showed problems with the well but BP ignored that and displaced the heavy mud with light seawater which caused the well to kick.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rottnkid
Do as I say, not as I do-Oh wait that's the 1%
06:06 PM on 01/03/2012
Stand in line BP, they owe the US Citizens first.

Hey BP, don't you owe the US Citizens some cash too?
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
05:09 PM on 01/03/2012
Halliburton did a bad job. BP did and oversaw a bad job. There's plenty of blame to go around.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Max Load
Bailouts subvert survival of the fittest.
03:57 PM on 01/03/2012
Welcome to the world of modern business.

It's no longer about bringing the best ideas and products to market.

It's about who has the best lawyers to instigate and survive the lawsuits.
04:57 PM on 01/03/2012
That's nothing new. It's always been about who has the best lawyers.
photo
George Cummings
Warning: Moderate. Future posts unpredictable
03:51 PM on 01/03/2012
LOL wow..it's a real world game of Spy vs. Spy. you dont care who wins as long as they both get hurt.
03:44 PM on 01/03/2012
Bottom line: BP is responsible for everything that happens on a drilling rig they have leased. No program, no procedure, no action is carried out without BP's approval.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
05:08 PM on 01/03/2012
And if the information given to BP, on the basis of which they made their decisions, is deceptive?
05:51 PM on 01/03/2012
BP provided Halliburton with downhole conditions which aren't always accurately recreated for lab samples. BP chose not to run a cement bond log after the cement was in place which would have indicated a poor job. It's my understanding they chose not to install cast iron bridge plugs in the casing along with cement plugs, a standard practice.
photo
freethinkergirl
No Teapublican will ever define who I am..
03:29 PM on 01/03/2012
$heney sold w.a.r to our country for Haliburton.

As Defense Secretary,he became CEO of Halliburton, the principal beneficiary of privatization for m!litary logistical support.

$heney was paid $44 million over five years, then became VP.

He dished out lucrative reconstruction contracts in Iraq to favoring Haliburton.
Halliburton outdid Enron with 58 offshore subsidiaries tax shelters to hide profits and bilk U.S. taxpayers.

Halliburton used off-shore subsidiaries to sell banned equipment to r0gue states like !ran, !raq and L!bya. !llegal if done directly by Halliburton.

Tax payments went from $302 million in 1998 to zero in 1999, Yet receiving an IRS refund of $85 million. 
photo
freethinkergirl
No Teapublican will ever define who I am..
03:25 PM on 01/03/2012
Haliburton owes the taxpayers millions and millions....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
offred
A biocitizen is 3/5 of a corporate citizen
03:24 PM on 01/03/2012
Hah!

The big dogs are turning on each other.

I'm surprised Halliburton doesn't just change its name and make Halliburton a subsidiary, so the parent company can't be sued. Isn't that why Halliburton ended its affiliation with KBR?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
02:39 PM on 01/03/2012
Maybe the Minerals Management Service (MMS), a department within the U.S. Department of the Interior that was supposed to regulate and inspect oil rigs including the BP rig for environmental safety issues, instead of watching porno in their Washington offices on their government computers, should also bear some responsibility for that oil spill.

At least the Obama administration fired their political appointed MMA boss who probably knew almost nothing about offshore drilling, and did not even monitor the activities of her bureaucrat employees who were supposed to be enforcing the BP offshore drilling instead of watching internet pornography on government computers in Washington.

Why did the Obama administration appoint this person to that job in the beginning? Are there any more unqualified people serving in appointed jobs that should be fired?

The Republicans are equally guilty of appointing unqualified people to administrate federal government functions.

Maybe all positions below Cabinet level should not be political appointments.