iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Iowa Caucus Final Poll Snapshot: Close, But Romney's Ahead

Santorum Romney Paul

Posted: 01/03/2012 7:44 am

WASHINGTON -- With Iowa's Republican presidential caucuses just hours away, the final polling snapshot shows a close race, but the surveys are also reasonably consistent about where things currently stand: former Mass. Governor Mitt Romney leads Representative Ron Paul by a slim margin, followed by former Representative Rick Santorum, whose support has increased rapidly over the last week.

The limitation of a polling snapshot is that, as a snapshot, it is subject both to late shifts in support and errors in predicting precisely, in this case, which of Iowa's 2.3 million eligible voters will turn out for an event that typically draws just over a hundred thousand.

Two new surveys released on Monday altered the final polling picture only slightly. HuffPost Pollster's chart, based on all public polls in Iowa, currently shows Romney leading with 22.2 percent, Paul in second but fading slightly over the last two weeks to 19.4 percent, Santorum rising fast to 17.1 percent, and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich still falling and now at 12.9 percent. Texas Governor Rick Perry (10.1 percent), Representative Michele Bachmann (7.5 percent) and former Utah Governor Jon Huntsman (3.1 percent) all show very slight declines over the last week.

2012-01-03-Blumenthal-IAchart20120103.png

Or consider the 11 individual recent polls fielded within a week of the caucuses: Eight of 11 show Romney leading by at least a single percentage point. Ten of 11 show Santorum running third or lower. While the differences may not be large enough to attain statistical significance in any one poll, the consistency across polls indicates that Romney's lead is real.

2012-01-03-Blumenthal-IAFinalpolls.png

To confirm that Romney is really ahead, we could run a sophisticated statistical model -- or just calculate the odds of flipping a coin and having it come up heads 8 times out of 11. If Romney and Paul were really tied, the odds that at least 8 of 11 polls would show Romney in the lead is just 11 percent.

Of course that math assumes two things that may not turn out to be true: First, that the polls are collectively free of statistical bias, and that any shortcomings in the way they identify the likely electorate are not skewing the snapshot in some meaningful way. Second, it assumes that any surges in support for a particular candidate are over and have not changed the standings over the final days of the campaign. The history of polls conducted before Iowa's caucuses says both assumptions are questionable.

However, if political polling is always some combination of science and art, the process of interpreting the current snapshot and trying to guess at its potential flaws and any future trends is mostly art. That process can be informed by empirical evidence, but it still relies on a heavy dose of subjective judgment.

With that qualification in mind, consider the evidence for whether the current polling snapshot might change or be in error:

First, the case for a Ron Paul win, given the current snapshot and trends, is not strong. Paul's support has been in decline for the last two weeks, and his negatives have been rising. On the Des Moines Register Iowa Poll, for example, the percentage who say they like Paul least among the candidates increased from 13 in late November to 21 percent last week. Again, it's a matter of judgment, but the evidence that polls are sampling too many, rather than too few, of Paul's typically younger supporters is strong.

Second, what evidence suggests that Santorum's surge could translate into a stunning upset win?

  • Santorum has clearly seen a recent surge of support, gaining nearly four percentage points on the trend line over the last five days.
  • Santorum's support has been strongest among self-identified evangelical Christians, and polling averages from prior Iowa caucuses have often significantly understated support for candidates with similar bases of support, such as Pat Robertson in 1988, Pat Buchanan in 1996 and (to a lesser degree) Mike Huckabee in 2008.
  • Conditions seem ripe for the sort of tactical voting that could accelerate Santorum's recent rise, as Tea Party Republicans have already demonstrated a willingness to support a series of candidates to avoid supporting Romney. Santorum's surge in the polls might spark a last-minute collapse of support for candidates like Bachmann and Perry in favor of Santorum.

So, although there are strong arguments for a potential Santorum upset, the arguments for a Romney victory may be stronger.

  • Romney's support has also been rising, not as quickly as Santorum's, but still more than five percentage points since bottoming out in late November.
  • Santorum's impressive momentum may not be enough. The epicenter of the current polling average was roughly this past weekend and, as such, Santorum's current pace, gaining 0.78 percentage points per day, will not be sufficient to close Romney's roughly five-point lead without significant acceleration.
  • While plausible argument exists that polls have been under-sampling evangelical voters this year compared to past caucuses, an equally compelling case can be made that Iowa polls are understating potential participation by older Republicans, who heavily favor Romney.
  • Romney has been steadily gaining support from Republican "party actors" in November and December, among both senior Republican officeholders nationwide and local activists and officials in Iowa and other early primary states. Political scientists have found that endorsements by prominent party members are often a better leading indicator of the ultimate nominee than polls.
  • Finally, both Iowa activists and likely caucus-goers think Romney is going to win the caucuses. Economist David Rothschild has found evidence that such expectations often predict the outcome of elections more accurately than traditional trial-heat questions, particularly in low-turnout primary elections where likely voters are hard to sample.

Yes, the recent surge of support for Rick Santorum is real and could conceivably produce a surprise result Tuesday night. It is also possible that Ron Paul could pull off an upset, particularly if polls have been under-sampling his supporters. But for now, the best evidence available says that Romney is ahead in Iowa and is likely to stay ahead once all the votes are counted.

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- With Iowa's Republican presidential caucuses just hours away, the final polling snapshot shows a close race, but the surveys are also reasonably consistent about where things currently s...
WASHINGTON -- With Iowa's Republican presidential caucuses just hours away, the final polling snapshot shows a close race, but the surveys are also reasonably consistent about where things currently s...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 452
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
11:17 AM on 02/05/2012
Beware, Beware, the end is near:!) The end is near:!)
I couldn’t resist that, but really
The lawless men are upon this land. They take by force instead of asking,
the unalienable rights of free people, to privacy...
and sell them to the servants of Mammon.
The Kingdom of Heaven expects us to pay tribute to our governments.
However, if you pay tribute to Mammon while placing your faith in GOD,
You bring Mammon before GOD and you will surely die.
It is time for those who would truly follow Christ
The people who love their neighbors as themselves,
To run, or to go sit in the prisons of the people
who love themselves more and disparage the value of their neighbors.
Ironically it is to be the legacy of the Black men
That they brought down the people who set them free, And sent them straight to Hell.
10:42 PM on 01/12/2012
Let me say something about polls, they are all biased by the party that is taking the poll. Tonight, my phone rang and it was an automated voice asking me to take the political poll, so I pressed 1 to agree. It stated they were going to ask me 5 questions regarding how I felt the Democrat party was handling 5 major issues. I was instructed to answer the questions by pressing a number between 1 and 5 with 5 being the highest rating and 1 being the lowest. The 1st question was "How I felt the Democratic Party was handling the economic problems facing the Nation today" So, I pressed 1. My call was then disconnected. Two minutes later the call came again. I answered the question again by pressing 1 and was again disconnected. Two minutes later my phone rang again with the same Poll and question, so this time I pressed 3. Well, I guess that was better, so then it took me to question #2. "How do I feel the Democratic Party is handling the unemployment issue'? I again pressed 1 and was disconnected.. WOW so if I didn't give an answer they wanted to hear, they disconnected. POLLS are BS is all I have to say.
02:40 PM on 01/04/2012
oh okay buddy, okay buddy lets go. Now that michelle Bachmann has dropped out, shes' left the voters in a similar position as the former NOW voters strategies? Not sure. I do know that the popularity and educational rhetoric, simplified or glorified seems to have been onto Perrys side, in my opinion.
My opinion doesn't count much, and i would have a lot of explaining to do. So far...like some commercials that I have seen ......it won't work. Orlando Weekly has a tom tomorrow cartoon that has a talking beaver alongside a liberal spokesman.for this week...it sounds good.
12:18 AM on 01/04/2012
THIS BUNCH IF LOSERS ARE NO THREAT TO OBAMA-----THEY ARE ALL COMPLETE LOSERS IN SOME REGIONS AND SOME IN ALL REGIONS---EX. ROMNEY(morman) IN THE SOUTH--PAUL{OUT IN LA LA LAND}--SANTORUM RELIGIOUS FANATIC---BRING THEM ON.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oneman689
hard to see the picture from inside the frame
01:17 AM on 01/04/2012
benshere - You sound a little frantic - I don't blame you for being worried - Almost 19% real unemployment....and the ObamaCare disaster blocking growth...yikes
02:41 PM on 01/04/2012
total obama gay guy that benshere
11:44 PM on 01/03/2012
You report that Romney is in First Place, but your photo shows portrays him in third place!
10:45 PM on 01/12/2012
Any Republican in 1st or 10th is still in FIRST PLACE over Obama.
10:38 PM on 01/03/2012
Ok New Hampshire let's see what you think?
02:43 PM on 01/04/2012
nice cnn coverage last night...a little lengthy and repetitive
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joan Simon
10:38 PM on 01/03/2012
If you are disgusted with the current economy(another 5 trillion spent) or you might be out of work, imagine what it will be like four years from now if bam bam gets back in and continues his spending spree? Enjoy.
11:13 PM on 01/03/2012
You suffer from short term memory loss. Let me refresh your memory.

At the end of the last administra­tion we were shedding several hundred thousand jobs a month (hemorrhag­ing was a standard term used for the losses). We now have, albeit, anemic job growth. You want to say now is worse than that?

In the last administra­tion, the DOW lost half of its value in 2008. Since the inaugurati­on of 2009, the market is up 2500 points even after the drop of this week. You want to say now is worse than that?

Corporatio­ns are reporting record profits, something that should make capitalist­s of all stripes happy. You want to say now is worse than 2008?

Yes, there is large amount of unemployme­nt. It is a function of businesses­, despite having a couple of trillions in capital reserves, not hiring but rather using those capital reserves to buy back stock and pay bonuses to their upper management­. That after 10 years of tax cuts that we were told would spur job creation.

So, to claim that we are worse off than Oct 2008 is to have a memory block. I hope I was able to pierce that memory block for you.
10:48 PM on 01/12/2012
It all stated in 2006 when the LIBS got control of congress. Go figure. Remember when Clinton was in Office? Which political party was in control of the Congress?? WHO?? It was NOT the LIBS that's for sure.
10:37 PM on 01/03/2012
Ron Paul will end up pulling this one out at the very end. He is just a spoiler for the Republicans.
He is probably paid by Romney to divide the votes for the other candidates.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
interject
10:10 PM on 01/03/2012
All for naught.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dr Juan
We built America without BO
09:49 PM on 01/03/2012
Diebold has the election it in the bag for Mitt:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cy1IlAXeV30
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dr Juan
We built America without BO
09:31 PM on 01/03/2012
Yah but but there is only one guy who's got the voting record to back up the conservative talk !
Mitt has to buy all his votes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
v98max
Businesses create jobs like DJs create records.
09:30 PM on 01/03/2012
My prediction is that the system will work as intended 6 out of 7 times.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ronju01
Live and let Live
09:24 PM on 01/03/2012
Romney offered a list of his favorite funnymen to Wolf Blitzer of CNN that featured "Laurel and Hardy, the Three Stooges ... even the Keystone Kops!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alan626
Beliefs are not facts
09:24 PM on 01/03/2012
Ron Paul will end up pulling this one out at the very end. Many of his supporters were just a little late getting to the polls. They lost track of time while cleaning their bongs.
10:40 PM on 01/03/2012
Who supports him? those under 30 many who have never been out of the US or involved themselves in foreign affairs. Paul spews ideology not reality. Libertarianism looks great on paper but the US is the most powerful country in the world and with that power comes responsibilities whether we want them or not. Granted our congress has failed us but Paul? I think not.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sallie Fajardo
Blessed is the man that trusts in the Lord.
09:22 PM on 01/03/2012
Santorum wants to force people to live morally.That's ungodly.Hosea 6:6 I desire mercy not sacrifice.