iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Jon Huntsman Column: Modernize U.S. Education With Local Power, Increased Teacher Pay

Jon Huntsman

First Posted: 01/03/12 02:44 PM ET Updated: 01/03/12 03:01 PM ET

Jon Huntsman, like his GOP opponents, wants to localize education, and he's taken to the presses to hash out his educational platform.

In a Sunday column for the Concord Monitor, the former Utah governor drew on his past political moves -- like rejecting "the unnecessary federal overreach of No Child Left Behind" -- to emphasize restoring school control to localities, reducing the role of the Department of Education with the goal of removing it from Cabinet-rank and increasing teacher salaries to encourage quality teaching.

"My administration will seek to transform and modernize our education system by ending the current one-size-fits-all approach and instead focusing our efforts on how best to serve individual communities, individual schools and individual students," Huntsman writes.

This year, nearly half of America's public schools failed to meet federal achievement standards, the worst achievement rate since the inception of what many call the "broken" and "defective" No Child Left Behind law 10 years ago.

By November, 11 states had filed for waivers from key provisions of the law, following President Barack Obama's September announcement that the administration would offer a "flexibility package" to states if they demonstrate a true commitment to reform, unleashing "energy to improve our schools at the local level." More states are expected to apply in later rounds -- through next spring -- but some like California may be shying away from the option because of the high costs associated with the waivers.

In his Sunday column, Huntsman says he looks to expand Common Core Standards and offer funding specifically for "vital national priorities" like advanced math, science and foreign languages. Forty-four states and U.S. territories stated intentions to adopt Common Core curriculum standards last April, which standardize performance benchmarks nationally in an effort to uniformly prepare public school students for college admissions standards.

"Reforming our education system so that every child has an equal opportunity to succeed is the civil rights issue of our time, and an economic imperative for our country's future," Huntsman writes.

The candidate also pledges in to block Head Start funds to states so that local early education programs can be created, noting, "The Head Start program has failed to meet its laudable goals."

"If you can lock in the pillars of cognitive development around reading and math before age six, you are giving those kids the best gift possible as they then proceed through education," Huntsman said during a Republican presidential debate in September.

Last month, nine states won a collective $500 million from the federal government under the Race To The Top Early Learning Challenge, aimed to increase access to early education programs as well as aid those programs to narrow the achievement gap between kindergarteners who do and do not have pre-K experience.

In a separate report last month by the Department of Health and Human Services, safety violations -- like a machete near a play area and instructors teaching without a criminal background check -- were discovered in Head Start centers across the country.

The presidential candidate's brief mention of increasing teacher salaries as a performance incentive draws on the long-debated issue of merit pay's effectiveness. At a teaching conference in July, U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan told educators that teachers should have salaries starting at $60,000 and the opportunity to earn up to $150,000 based on performance.

But critics of merit pay have argued that monetary incentives don't inspire better teaching. New York City dropped its merit pay plan over the summer after a study by nonprofit research group RAND Corporation found that teachers who receive cash incentives don't prove to have more positive attitudes toward their work, nor do they yield better performing students.

The concept has received further skepticism following the Atlanta cheating scandal, in which an investigation concluded that a high-stakes, high-pressure environment that emphasized test scores as part of a teacher pay scheme led educators to partake in dishonest test administration and answer sheet alterations.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

Jon Huntsman, like his GOP opponents, wants to localize education, and he's taken to the presses to hash out his educational platform. ...
Jon Huntsman, like his GOP opponents, wants to localize education, and he's taken to the presses to hash out his educational platform. ...
Filed by Emmeline Zhao  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 103
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
10:10 AM on 01/06/2012
Both my husband and I are teachers- working for almost 10 years. Neither of us make close to 60K. We struggle to pay our mortgage for a tiny condo- we thank god we don't have student loans or a current car payment. We are two highly qualified teachers (masters degrees and experience) contemplating leaving teaching, only because we cant make ends meet. Our son will be an only child, because we just can't afford another baby. How can anyone talk about paying teacher less? I am looking for candidate willing to invest in our children's futures.
01:04 PM on 01/05/2012
Head Start is only one part of the equation to close the achievement gap, and has its flaws no doubt, but its importance is in improving NON-cognitive skills.

Studies show that academic gains fade over time, but its children have less need for special ed, less grade retention, have better health, higher earnings, lower rates of delinquency, higher grad rates in HS and college, even for siblings of Head Start participants. These long-term benefits are just as important as its academic benefits.

I'm less concerned if Huntsman wants to block Head Start funds in order to create more local early ed, as long as there is more investment in early childhood. That is where the achievement gap begins.

http://TheEducatedSociety.com/
04:07 AM on 01/05/2012
Nearly one half of children don't meet progress standards...so let's lower the standards.

We deserve third world status....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andrea Claxton
Christian Liberal Libertarian Genius.
09:57 AM on 01/05/2012
My favorite education reform joke: Congressman Whathisname stands up in the middle of a debate about education reform demanding to be heard. "I have something very important to say! I just learned that HALF! Fully HALF! of America's school children are below average! We must do something to correct this terrible statistic!" ROFLMBO!!!!
photo
mlaiuppa
Pres. Sarcasm Society. Like we need your approval.
02:33 AM on 01/05/2012
As long as that commitment to reform is dismantling teacher associations and that increased pay is tied to test scores.

That's not modern.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
snesich
07:42 PM on 01/04/2012
Generally when a conservative says he or she wants to "modernize" something, it means 1) Get rid of the remaining unions, 2) Severely cut pay and benefits, 3) Offer the illusion of "choice"---as if we're buying toilet tissue or soda pop---and substituting a Shopping Mall Mentality in place of the idea of a Representative Democracy with free, universal education as its foundation.

"Modernize"...I don't think so. "Privatize" on behalf of my wealthy friends and campaign benefactors who run "Educational Companies" is more like it.

Ultimately, these "Education Reformers" want to phase out the public schools and replace them with a bunch of "private schools" we can choose from---all of which will stink...unless you're wealthy, and then you can have the best of everything for YOUR kids, with our tax dollars subsidizing your otherwise expensive tuitions, while we go to the broken down "private" school on the other side of the tracks.

As a concerned parent, I say...over my dead body.
06:16 PM on 01/04/2012
I'm not agreeing with Huntsman's assessment of Head Start, but I do agree with the strategy of checking to see if we (tax payers) are getting what we pay for.
As a teacher, I disagree with Duncan's statement that teachers should have $60,000 starting salaries. It won't do any good, just like performance pay is bound to fail.
In Florida, the voters over-ruled the politicians and voted in class size limits. It has been a painful process (because the politicians want more for less, naturally) but it has had positive impacts.
The penalties placed on teachers (no raises in five years and elimination of any job security) have offset some of the gains, but we really just want to earn a fair and decent living while dealing with a manageable workload. Most of us are here to do the best we can. Don't try to bribe us to do our job though, just treat us fairly. Just sayin'...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mickey Ellis
01:50 PM on 01/04/2012
Finally, someone actually talking about education. Good luck with that.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RetiredVET6576
01:07 PM on 01/04/2012
The idea of getting the Department of Education out of business is great. The people in that department could be retired or shuffled off to other areas in government where they take positions vacated by those who are retiring or need to retire. IT would save several billions of dollars. Huntsman however is another problem. He needs to get out of politics altogether.

The states need to make sure the teachers and administrators have criminal background checks and the states should handle the aspect of Health and Safety on and around campuses not the federal government.

We need to eliminate as many Cabinet positions as possible thereby reducing the number of heads and sub-heads and their accompanying salaries.

We need to eliminate the EPA and allow the states to handle the problems and not the federal government who appears to have a one track mind with "one plan fits all problems" in all cases.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marine3314
Take the red pill
09:58 PM on 01/04/2012
Deep thinking and problem solving not your strong area I guess. These agencies were created as a result of abuse and public safety. Eliminating govt oversight means abuses will return, usually to your detriment. I can remember when the air, water and the landscape were much more polluted. Things have gotton much better since EPA was created. The Dept of Education oversees the states so that children nationally meet the same education standards. I guess in the case of Sarah Palin, Michelle Bachman and Rich Perry the education system failed miserably but hey, some will always fall through the cracks.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RetiredVET6576
10:46 AM on 01/05/2012
You assume to damn much as all liberals and Conservative evangelistic people do. THE Department of Education cost our state a lot of money to "LEAVE NO CHILD BEHIND". Breaking the color barrier in Texas is still going on not because integration is terrible. When a people decide to live in one particular area the people automatically segregate themselves form the rest of the community. The Head Start program was developed to assist children to learn English in our area, when it should have been set up to teach the parents to learn English so their children would not be handicapped. The national program has not improved or removed the problem. You want the same standards then you need to present a better argument for the Department of Education. Let the states have the right to set their own standards. AND before you say I am a republican..... I am not. There are people I will not vote for for any reason.
photo
mlaiuppa
Pres. Sarcasm Society. Like we need your approval.
02:35 AM on 01/05/2012
I don't know about your state, but in mine all teachers are fingerprinted and background checks are run. If you are convicted of a felony you lose your credential and cannot teach in a public school.

Of course, you don't need a credential or a background check to teach in a private school or even some Charters.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RetiredVET6576
10:37 AM on 01/05/2012
I have nothing to say in my initial response indicating I did not want the schools to not check the background of the teachers and administrators. I think the "States" can do teh job without a National Department of Education. Our state requires all schools private,charter or public to do background checks.
01:01 PM on 01/04/2012
I don't agree with everything he is proposing, but it's more informative than "I'd eliminate the Department of Education" as an actual policy position. You can reason with a "thinking" person as opposed to someone who simply parrots dogmatic slogans. I guess this explains why he is in last place in the GOP race. I would rather have Huntsman as the GOP nominee, that way if Obama does lose I would at least feel a lot safer that a "thinking" person is in the White House.
12:53 PM on 01/05/2012
agreed.
12:47 PM on 01/04/2012
Teachers like the Police should live in the neighborhood where they work. If you can't stand the heat get out of the kitchen.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PAposter
Radical Progressive
12:54 PM on 01/04/2012
Then kids living in poor neighborhoods wouldn't have any teachers.
01:11 PM on 01/04/2012
Perhaps the stupidest comment I've ever read.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mickey Ellis
01:51 PM on 01/04/2012
No teachers in poor neighborhoods? The teachers ARE poor. Haven't you seen how little they are paid for their work?
12:27 PM on 01/04/2012
How do you remove the Education Department and then have any control over Teachers' salaries? How can you say you are going to turn Education over to the States and think you have any say on how much they pay or what benefits they receive? Seems to me that most states are already facing bankruptcy, so how are they supposed to pick up this added expense? My property taxes are already outrageous in Texas because of the school appropriations -- and Huntsman thinks his actions would not have a negative affect on property owners?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kandis SupaStar Hill
There is no such thing as two sets of facts
12:23 PM on 01/04/2012
From what I know, just in my own city headstart actually works. However, it's all negated with that no child left behind madness. The fact of the matter is, more children have been "left behind" since that stupid act was passed. No child left behind can go, headstart should stay.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
I think I think
And I fear that it is later than we think.
12:11 PM on 01/04/2012
No Child left behind (NCLB) was a GW Bush program, which might have been a good program except that it was entirely unfunded. But don't worry, the Repubs will find a waay to blame it all on President Obama.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Blair Epps
12:08 PM on 01/04/2012
I dont see how cutting Head start would help.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PAposter
Radical Progressive
12:34 PM on 01/04/2012
That's because it wouldn't.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PrairieGayCompanion
To improve is to change
12:08 PM on 01/04/2012
Oh, I forgot Huntsman was running for president.