iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Science And Religion Quotes: What World's Greatest Scientists Say About God

The Huffington Post   Tavish Nanda   First Posted: 02/11/2012 4:46 am   Updated: 02/11/2012 4:46 am

Figuring God into the world of science is a nebulous task. What happens when observers of the fact-based natural world must come to terms with the faith-based spirituality of the mystical world?

Over the centuries, scientists' opinions have varied—from a reconciliation of the two to a complete rejection of one or the other. These days, many scientists span a middle ground—admitting the possibility of an omnipotent force, but refusing to assert one exists because, well, "we just don't know."

Below are science and religion quotes from 20 top scientists, ranging from the founding fathers of science to modern researchers who chose to speak out about their religious beliefs.

And if you just can't get enough, here's footage of 50 more famous scientists talking about God.

Loading Slideshow...
  • Charles Darwin (1809-1882)

    "The impossibility of conceiving that this grand and wondrous universe, with our conscious selves, arose through chance, seems to me the chief argument for 
the existence of God." <strong>Clarification</strong>: <em>The full quote, from <a href="http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/entry-8837" target="_hplink">one of Darwin's letters</a>, carries a different sentiment. A young admirer <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16949157" target="_hplink">asked Darwin about his religious views</a> (the original inquiry is lost), and the great naturalist answered: "It is impossible to answer your question briefly; and I am not sure that I could do so, even if I wrote at some length. But I may say that the impossibility of conceiving that this grand and wondrous universe, with our conscious selves, arose through chance, seems to me the chief argument for the existence of God; but whether this is an argument of real value, I have never been able to decide."</em>

  • Neil deGrasse Tyson (1958-

    "So you're made of detritus [from exploded stars]. Get over it. Or better yet, celebrate it. After all, what nobler thought can one cherish than that the universe lives within us all?" --American astrophysicist and science commentator

  • Stephen Hawking (1942-)

    "What I have done is to show that it is possible for the way the universe began to be determined by the laws of science. In that case, it would not be necessary to appeal to God to decide how the universe began. This doesn't prove that there is no God, only that God is not necessary." --English physicist and cosmologist

  • Carl Sagan (1934-1996)

    "Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality. When we recognize our place in an immensity of light-years and in the passage of ages, when we grasp the intricacy, beauty, and subtlety of life, then that soaring feeling, that sense of elation and humility combined, is surely spiritual...The notion that science and spirituality are somehow mutually exclusive does a disservice to both." --American astrophysicist

  • Francis Collins (1950-)

    "Science is...a powerful way, indeed - to study the natural world. Science is not particularly effective...in making commentary about the supernatural world. Both worlds, for me, are quite real and quite important. They are investigated in different ways. They coexist. They illuminate each other." --American physician-geneticist and director of the National Human Genome Research Institute

  • Isaac Asimov (1920-1992)

    "Emotionally, I am an atheist. I don't have the evidence to prove that God doesn't exist, but I so strongly suspect he doesn't that I don't want to waste my time" --American biochemist and science fiction writer

  • Albert Einstein (1879-1955)

    <strong>Clarification</strong>: <em>While the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/17/science/17einsteinw.html" target="_hplink">New York Times noted</a> that "Einstein consistently characterized the idea of a personal God who answers prayers as naive, and life after death as wishful thinking," he also "described himself as an 'agnostic' and 'not an atheist.'" One ambiguous quote, from <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=58HQXMp1ESwC&pg=PA92&lpg=PA92&dq=einstein+phyllis+wright&source=bl&ots=zn6BlmXlY4&sig=DxDgqkMMwMaJ9pgUVmgwih4WbQE&hl=en&sa=X&ei=2NY6T6euHIbr0gHC4PivCw&ved=0CCwQ6AEwAjgK#v=onepage&q=einstein phyllis wright&f=false" target="_hplink">Einstein's response to a letter from a sixth-grade student named Phyllis Wright</a>, reads "Everyone who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the universe - a spirit vastly superior to that of man, and one in the face of which we with our modest powers must feel humble. In this way the pursuit of science leads to a religious feeling of a special sort, which is indeed quite different from the religiosity of someone more naive."</em> --German physicist, created theory of general relativity.

  • Max Planck (1858-1947)

    "It was not by accident that the greatest thinkers of all ages were deeply religious souls." --German physicist, noted for work on quantum theory

  • Erwin Schroedinger (1887-1961)

    "I am very astonished that the scientific picture of the real world around me is very deficient. It gives a lot of factual information, puts all our experiences in a magnificently consistent order, but is ghastly silent about all and sundry that is really near to our heart, that really matters to us. It cannot tell us a word about red and blue, bitter and sweet, physical pain and physical delight; it knows nothing of beautiful and ugly, good or bad, god and eternity." --Austrian physicist, awarded Nobel prize in 1933

  • Rosalind Franklin (1920-1958)

    "In my view, all that is necessary for faith is the belief that by doing our best we shall come nearer to success and that success in our aims (the improvement of the lot of mankind, present and future) is worth attaining...I maintain that faith in this world is perfectly possible without faith in another world." --British biophysicist renowned for her work on X-ray diffraction.

  • William H. Bragg (1862-1942)

    "From religion comes a man's purpose; from science, his power to achieve it. Sometimes people ask if religion and science are not opposed to one another. They are: in the sense that the thumb and fingers of my hands are opposed to one another. It is an opposition by means of which anything can be grasped." --British physicist, chemist, and mathematician. Awarded Nobel Prize in 1915

  • Richard Feynman (1918-1988)

    "God was invented to explain mystery. God is always invented to explain those things that you do not understand." --American physicist, awarded Nobel Prize in 1965

  • Wernher Von Braun (1912-1977)

    "I find it as difficult to understand a scientist who does not acknowledge the presence of a superior rationality behind the existence of the universe as it is to comprehend a theologian who would deny the advances of science." --German-American rocket scientist

  • Richard Dawkins (1941-)

    "The more you understand the significance of evolution, the more you are pushed away from the agnostic position and towards atheism. Complex, statistically improbable things are by their nature more difficult to explain than simple, statistically probable things." --British evolutionary biologist

  • Nevill Mott (1905-1996)

    "Science can have a purifying effect on religion, freeing it from beliefs of a pre-scientific age and helping us to a truer conception of God. At the same time, I am far from believing that science will ever give us the answers to all our questions." --English physicist, awarded Nobel Prize in 1977

  • Fred Hoyle (1915-2001)

    "A commonsense interpretation of the facts suggests that a superintellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as with chemistry and biology, and that there are no blind forces worth speaking about in nature. The numbers one calculates from the facts seem to me so overwhelming as to put this conclusion almost beyond question." --English mathematician and astronomer.

  • Sir Arthur C. Clarke (1917-2008)

    "Science can destroy religion by ignoring it as well as by disproving its tenets. No one ever demonstrated, so far as I am aware, the nonexistence of Zeus or Thor - but they have few followers now" --British science fiction author and inventor

  • Walter Kohn (1923-)

    "I am very much a scientist, and so I naturally have thought about religion also through the eyes of a scientist. When I do that, I see religion not denominationally, but in a more, let us say, deistic sense. I have been influence in my thinking by the writing of Einstein who has made remarks to the effect that when he contemplated the world he sensed an underlying Force much greater than any human force. I feel very much the same. There is a sense of awe, a sense of reverence, and a sense of great mystery." --American theoretical physicist, awarded Nobel Prize in 1998

  • Sam Harris (1967-)

    "Atheism is not a philosophy; it is not even a view of the world; it is simply a refusal to deny the obvious." --American neuroscientist

  • Victor J. Stenger (1935-)

    "With pantheism...the deity is associated with the order of nature or the universe itself...when modern scientists such as Einstein and Stephen Hawking mention 'God' in their writing, this is what they seem to mean: that God is Nature." --American physicist

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST SCIENCE

Figuring God into the world of science is a nebulous task. What happens when observers of the fact-based natural world must come to terms with the faith-based spirituality of the mystical world? O...
Figuring God into the world of science is a nebulous task. What happens when observers of the fact-based natural world must come to terms with the faith-based spirituality of the mystical world? O...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5,316
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (42 total)
25 minutes ago (11:02 PM)
Okay, but I totally take offense to: "If you're too stupid to understand science, try religion" - excuse me, but I DO understand science - I've studied science and I've come to realize that science is flawed - what we know and understand now will change in 10 or 20 years. Rather to me, science is a means by which we can understand the creations of God and perhaps see into His mind a little bit. But to really get into His mind, study the Bible - unchanging, eternal, unflawed - TRUTH!
(I do not come back to check comments - any replies will remain unread.)
photo
bobdob
Chug-a-lug, chug-a-lug
12 hours ago (11:31 AM)
FYI: Richard Dawkins is not a scientist. He's an author and a lecturer and he once appeared in an episode of Dr. Who.
5 hours ago ( 6:36 PM)
Excuse me? Dr. Richard Dawkins is indeed a scientist....specifically in the field of Evolutionary Biology. Your statement, other than an appearance on Dr. Who, couldn't be more factually inaccurate.
photo
bobdob
Chug-a-lug, chug-a-lug
1 hour ago (10:13 PM)
Can you point me to a single piece of peer-reviewed research he's accomplished?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:12 PM on 06/17/2013
People who say there could be some intelligent divine being forget that the very origins of so-called divine beings or creators rest on ancient superstitions and "holy books" that are nothing but the products of the primitive peoples who made them up. If there really is some "divine being" I don't care because it isn't doing anything for humanity - we are doing it all by ourselves. We are making advances to better ourselves, cure diseases and to live longer and one day we will overcome death. I think that when we reach that point, religion and superstition will have a serious population crash.
05:19 PM on 06/17/2013
Science could eventually prove the existence of god as a highly evolved and highly intelligent physicist. It's not that hard to accept as a possibility when you believe that the universe is almost infinite and has existed forever. That means that there is infinite possibilities for something similar to a human to exist, and that over eons of evolution this creature attained the intelligence to be able to create entire galaxies. This creature of course would be seen as god to those who were primitively capable of understanding its presence. Btw, I am a negative atheist (I don't believe there is a god, but I don't deny his existence).
04:17 PM on 06/17/2013
If there is a God, he really needs to get a new PR guy.
researcher
researcher
02:03 AM on 06/17/2013
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mtPuKSwP1mo&feature=player_embedded

An interesting you tube video from someone that has dialog with Dawkins.

Atheists think priests and preachers take advantage of their flock people like Dawkins use the term science to take advantage of their followers.

I am still looking for an atheist that will spend the money to have a blind watchmaker make them a mechanical watch from scratch. any takers?????

Then we have selfish genes that just want more of themselves in the world. bye bye logic 101.

Then we have consciousness and awareness. that darn hard problem but have faith someday a materialist will figure out where in the brain is the origin of that consciousness. faith the bounty of religion.

Then we have religion. OK that for another time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dan Cheshire
You are a risen ape, not a fallen angel.
12:16 PM on 06/16/2013
The people who pay their 10% to the church every week should ask for a refund. The religious love to say that my beliefs are nothing but it is they who worship nothing. I worship nobody. I respect and cooperate with my government, my school, my place of employment and my friends. I do not have to worship them. If there really was an all powerful God, I fail to see why he would be so egotistical as to want us to worship him. Over ego is a fault of our species. Why would egotism, that is considered a fault in our own species, be an attribute to a superior being? That is illogical. It makes no sense. If there was an all powerful God it would care not that we worshiped. It would only care that there was peace and evolution for mankind. Either way, the false segregation of organized religion is destroying our species and our planet. Religion has failed to bring humankind together in over 2000 years of trying. How about we put all of that in a back drawer and come out to offer a hand and say welcome and hello? How about we say that if there are gods, that they can be left at home while we try to come to agreement with our fellow man about a logical way to orchestrate peace and feed the world?
“A closed mouth gathers no foot.” – Confucius.
01:10 AM on 06/07/2013
"The Lord, He is subtle"

~Einstein
photo
plantbasedpunk
live from the PHX
07:29 PM on 06/04/2013
Some real gems here. Esp. Clarke, Feynman and Asimov.
04:02 PM on 06/04/2013
The approach to this subject seems biased from a Western perspective. Not all religions require 'faith' and not all religions have a belief in an 'omnipotent force'.

Trying to find proof of the mystical experience is like trying to find proof of anger or joy. A lot of people have mystical or spiritual experiences, even atheists would agree though many atheists would call them delusional experiences and sometimes they probably are. On the other hand, these experiences often help the human psyche. There are therapists using shamanistic techniques to access the subconscious because these techniques work. Anyway, it's best approached from the science of psychology, not physics or astronomy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ruby Davis
10:57 PM on 05/31/2013
God is Self-Existent
When God revealed Himself to Moses in the burning bush, He identified Himself as “I AM” (Exodus 3:14). This designation for God encompasses the idea of god existing eternally and without creation by another; the self-existent One.

God is Self-Revealing
Through the centuries, mankind has devised all manner of ideas concerning the nature of God. Usually the concepts of individuals were at best skewed and more often absolutely wrong!!! But God has revealed Himself through nature, Theophanies, the written Word of God, the Incarnation and the infilling of His Spirit!!!

God is Self-Sustaining
God does not need anyone or anything (See Psalms 50:12). He is the creator and owner of everything. There is nothing that any individual or all individuals can add to Him. Further, if He had a need, it would be futile for Him to ask us for assistance!!! Anything we could provide Him is already his for the taking and using!!!

“For every beast of the forest is mine, and the cattle upon a thousand hills. I know all the fowls of the mountains: and the wild beasts of the field are mine. If I were hungry, I would not tell thee: for the world is mine, and the fullness thereof” (Psalms 50:10-12)
12:35 PM on 06/04/2013
If we approach the problem a different way, we will see that cooperation and empathy is an emergent phenomenon of an aware individual that maximizes the freedom for oneself and everyone / everything else. There is no need for a revelation or proof of existence. We can live right now without the dependence on an uncertainty, such as those beliefs in god (where there is belief, there is simultaneously doubt).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ray Campbell
It's called Faith, because it's not Knowledge
02:49 PM on 06/04/2013
Oh, please.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ruby Davis
02:52 PM on 06/04/2013
Try "pleasing" God, not me!!!  :)
photo
Nanetha
Get a grip...He won it hands down!
09:46 AM on 05/27/2013
Why is it?...Humans keep killing each other in the name of religion, yet most of the devout, at deeper levels, believe in the same thing....!!
11:16 PM on 05/26/2013
It's sad what religion has done over the years. I agree that organized religion as a whole has not done much to help it's own cause. It's good that the Bible mentions that false religions will exist and harm the very name of truth.

Obviously, the study of the physical world around us, science, should never be at odds with the one who created the physcial world. It is man's understanding of both God and the world around us that has so many with their backs to the Bible.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:16 PM on 05/23/2013
Dawkins blaming GOD for evil shows his lack of biblical understanding. Man is responsible for evil in the world. He rejects a priori the idea of GOD in his book the god delusion.It took science 1700 years to realize what was meant by GOD saying he laid the foudations of the earth and it shall not be moved. Wonder how long it will take them to understand GOD created the animals and they breed each after their kind?
11:16 PM on 05/26/2013
Forget biblical understanding, I think you lack logical understanding. He doesn't blame a god for evil because he doesn't believe a god exists. This is about as absurd as saying atheists hate god.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:52 AM on 05/28/2013
When I said blaming GOD I meant the idea of a supreme being. We all know he is an atheist. For him neither good nor evil exist.And YES they do hate the idea of a supreme being.
photo
plantbasedpunk
live from the PHX
07:32 PM on 06/04/2013
Writing "god" in all caps won't make him any less fake. Sorry.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:35 PM on 06/04/2013
Reading Dawkins book doesn't make it less STUPID.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
careym46
michigan state alumnus and fan
08:16 PM on 05/20/2013
there may be a god but the self proclaimed jealous,vengeful.vindictive and murderous diety invented by the hebrews and embraced by christianity and islam doesn't fit the concept of an all powerful,ever-present,all knowing and loving entity that made the entire universe. it falls way short.
11:13 PM on 05/26/2013
You quoting Dawkings?