More

Regulators Have Missed Three-Fourths Of Dodd-Frank Deadlines So Far

Sec

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 01/ 4/2012 3:32 pm Updated: 01/ 4/2012 3:32 pm

When the Dodd-Frank financial reform law became official in 2010, supporters hoped it would herald in a new era of sobriety and transparency for the financial sector -- largely through the implementation of hundreds of rules meant to prevent another crisis like the one that rattled the economy in 2008.

But for the most part, this has yet to come to pass. Only one-quarter of the rules that regulators were supposed to have written by now have actually been devised.

As of New Year's Day, two hundred deadlines for writing rules based on Dodd-Frank have come and gone, according to a report from the law firm Davis Polk. Regulators have missed 149 of these, meaning they've only met about one out of every four deadlines so far.

All told, the Dodd-Frank law contains 400 rule-making requirements. Only 286 have time-specific deadlines, meaning that most of those have already passed.

The Davis Polk report provides evidence for a common criticism among financial reform advocates -- namely, that the government, many of whose members have close ties to the banking sector is dragging its feet on formulating rules that would place checks on financial institutions and force them to adopt safer positions in case of another systemic shock.

Financial lobbyists have come out strongly against Dodd-Frank, as have a number of conservative politicians, including virtually all of the Republican presidential candidates.

On Wall Street, where profits fell by about $3 billion in the third quarter of 2011, opponents of Dodd-Frank say the planned regulations will further stifle firms' performance. On the campaign trail, a common refrain for Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich and other candidates has been that the rules outlined in Dodd-Frank will discourage lending, smother small businesses and worsen the nation's unemployment problem.

The Hill notes that such strenuous political opposition to Dodd-Frank has probably contributed to the lag in regulators writing rules. Regulatory agencies like the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, which has missed 31 deadlines out of 54 so far, and the Securities and Exchange Commission, which has missed 59 deadlines of 73, have not gotten the budgets from Congress that the White House has requested for them, largely due to opposition from some lawmakers. In November, Congress approved a budget for the CFTC that was about $100 million less than what President Obama had sought.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
When the Dodd-Frank financial reform law became official in 2010, supporters hoped it would herald in a new era of sobriety and transparency for the financial sector -- largely through the implementat...
When the Dodd-Frank financial reform law became official in 2010, supporters hoped it would herald in a new era of sobriety and transparency for the financial sector -- largely through the implementat...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 162
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
UberdanSounds
I make music(al), funnies.
11:15 PM on 01/05/2012
If we just did one thing only right now, it would be to Re-Instate the Glass-Steagall Act, which had previously separated the Commercial Banking from Investment Banking. Doing this one thing would fix half of the problems we have. We wouldn't have to sit here & jack around with 'Oh Congress won't finish writing the laws, they won't fund our new Regulatory agencies whaaa!'

The whole production is a sham. It's not Obama's fault either, this thing was going down way before he ever had a chance. Congress is nothing but gridlock & wall st cronyism.
10:55 AM on 01/05/2012
Congress and governmental agencies are rigged with WS NY bankers alumni and money. Start by cleaning the SEC and get rid of Mary Shapiro and her acolytes
photo
1oldhippie
yes, WE can!
09:48 AM on 01/05/2012
Since Congress (mainly the GOP) insists on dragging its feet and creating obstructions, please explain to me why they aren't pepper sprayed and arrested...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
becky bradshaw
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth
08:48 AM on 01/05/2012
The headline could have been much more informative, something like "Anti-Wall Street Reformers Obstruct Progress on Dodd-Frank".

Key point, "In November, Congress approved a budget for the CFTC that was about $100 million less than what President Obama had sought."

Note that the SEC and the IRS have also been underfunded by the same Congress with similar justifications, even though every dollar invested in these operations returns several dollars in otherwise absconded funds.

Reference: http://whistleblowersupporter.typepad.com/my_weblog/corporate-and-government-corruption/
photo
bikerdude
On the left side of progressive
08:33 AM on 01/05/2012
I love the "balance between the interest they are paying as opposed to the interest they are collecting. Almost like the wealth distribution in America today... Put ONE of these thieves in prison for a long stretch, Please.... Show the rest of us that Washington is on our side at least once. This is a federal crime and the President, Congress and the "justice" system needs to be held accountable for their incompetence and their refusal to obey the laws they themselves wrote!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Mikeeee
conservatism = "low-effort" thinking.
09:28 AM on 01/05/2012
If a couple of them were sent to jail for a long stretch, it would amazing to see how fast things would change, but right now they act with impunity.
03:55 PM on 01/05/2012
Maybe we should start by looking at the previous administration. For example, Vice President Dick Cheney either gave contracts, or contracts with very few bids, no open bids, or exclusive contracts to his former employer.

That should definitely be investigated.
photo
bikerdude
On the left side of progressive
07:11 PM on 01/05/2012
Now you're talkin'.....Your post smacks of truthiness...
photo
kokobell616
Your micro-bio is pending approval
07:44 AM on 01/05/2012
So basically there are concerns over intent. As there have been few regulations actually written there can be little concern over regulations. I have come to the conclusion that regulators and law makers and financial sector insiders publish outlandish claims to effect public opposition to any regulation that might curtail mammoth profits. This is the world we live in. Public display of seemingly oppressed private sector capitalists is cause for rebellion of any management of our savings, 401k's, pensions, other forms of retirement or security.
photo
bikerdude
On the left side of progressive
08:36 AM on 01/05/2012
Intent? Do you mean like attempted murder? Aiding and abetting a crime? Failure to report a crime? All of these are punishable by prison sentences. It looks like a slick'a$$ed scam to me.
07:42 AM on 01/05/2012
Did anyone expect anything else. Frankly I am surprised that any of the bill is still active. This is the United States where we, unlike most countries, have legalized corruption and call it campaign finance. It is Washington DC the capitol of greed where good intentions come to die a sudden and final death. I could never lower myself to become a politician. They have reverted to the lowest of the low.
photo
bikerdude
On the left side of progressive
08:37 AM on 01/05/2012
Yes, I expect "else". I expect criminals to be held accountable through prosecution in the court. I think we are still operating under the rule of law. Lets hold the bankster as accountable as we do the gangster...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:11 AM on 01/05/2012
If I don't show up for work, I get fired. How is it for the rest of you?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nkurland
I'm going to leave this planet alive
06:20 AM on 01/05/2012
This was by design. Dodd-Frank as written commissioned over 70 studies touching on virtually every major area of reform, meaning each study has an affect on multiple rules. Not surprisingly, the SEC and CFTC, tasked with regulating asset backed securities, credit default swaps, derivatives exchanges and position limits have together accounted for 60% of the missed deadlines.

To recap:
-The banks tanked the economy through predatory lending and high risk financial products.
-Fought tooth and nail to prevent any reregulation of finance.
-Are now obstructing a recovery by pushing for austerity.

What purpose do they serve, exactly?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kruggerX
trying to balance life in these times
06:41 AM on 01/05/2012
Money for themselves PERIOD.
photo
bikerdude
On the left side of progressive
08:30 AM on 01/05/2012
What else can be expected? We have the criminals writing the laws and NO ONE enforcing them. What other "industry, including organized crime, gets to write and enforce their own rules.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhilipTaylor
Legalized Bribery is an Oxymoron - must END
03:35 AM on 01/05/2012
“The Banks own the Senate.  The Banks Own Washington and Are Blocking Bankruptcy & Credit Card Reform.  And the banks -- hard to believe in a time when we're facing a banking crisis that many of the banks created -- are still the most powerful lobby on Capitol Hill. And they frankly own the place."
 
 -- Senator Durban (D-IL)
 
G00GLE VIDEO:  v=AOJk11rTwDw
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhilipTaylor
Legalized Bribery is an Oxymoron - must END
03:33 AM on 01/05/2012
"BANKSTERS OWN THE PLACE"  


 --  CURRENT US SENATOR
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bobbythompson3333
GOP President Jan 2013
03:21 AM on 01/05/2012
D-f was horrible legislation. It's no wonder both these pols hung their head in shame and didn't run again.
photo
carburetor
Because money isn't everything!
03:27 AM on 01/05/2012
The intent was good, but who in Washington has the guts to enforce it?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kruggerX
trying to balance life in these times
06:05 AM on 01/05/2012
The only guts in Wasington is at the pentagon.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nkurland
I'm going to leave this planet alive
06:25 AM on 01/05/2012
Frank won reelection in 2010. Look it up.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bobbythompson3333
GOP President Jan 2013
06:28 AM on 01/05/2012
he's not running next election...try to keep up with the news junior
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carl Crooks
Eventually the problem will solve itself...right?
02:38 AM on 01/05/2012
Not surprised,Teapubs have done everything in their power short of an armed revolution to prevent dodd-frank from coming to fruition,It prevents corruption,fraud and holds accountability to financial institutions who practice predatory lending to prevent a repeat of the great recession of 2008 that we are still suffering from.

Everything about this bill is to protect American consumers from corporate loan sharks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cadawa
02:16 AM on 01/05/2012
Here's the problem "Why is a first term Senator pulling down almost $300,000 a year from Goldman Sachs, Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, AIG, Countrywide Financial, and Washington Mutual? He has not even completed his fourth year in the Senate and received a total of $1,093,329.00 from these eight companies and their employees. (all data from OpenSecrets.org)."
Obama was in the pockets of Wall Street before he ever began campaigning. http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4939/baracks-wall-street-problem-is-now-americas/
photo
carburetor
Because money isn't everything!
03:24 AM on 01/05/2012
Funny, since Obama has come out strongly against the "fat cats" as he put it and lost quite a bit of that support. He's not so closely connected to Wall Street as he once was. In fact, Wall Street is backing Mitt Romney for 2012, so your suspicions need to be redirected to Romney's campaign.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kruggerX
trying to balance life in these times
06:45 AM on 01/05/2012
Please find a politician thats NOT.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
UberdanSounds
I make music(al), funnies.
11:07 PM on 01/05/2012
Ron Paul, Bernie Sanders.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
theshadowdo
who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men?
01:20 AM on 01/05/2012
they whine and whine about regulation stifling productivity and then when financial institutions are given any leeway, the commit fraud on such an extreme level that our country is forced to bankruptcy.
06:58 PM on 01/06/2012
It is distasteful when you paint with broad strokes. All financial institutions did not create or participate in the "fraud" you claim. The vast majority did not participate, as there are far more smaller financial institutions versus the "too big to fail" institutions.

By the way, the regulations are stifling to the smaller financial institutions that did not participate in the very debacle that the regulations are claiming to prevent. However, everything flows downhill and the smaller institutions will bear a disproportional amount.

I am not against regulation, but I am against flawed regulation. Instead of creating more and more (and more and more) rules, let's cut out the unnecessary and make some meaningful ones. No need for a new CFPB, just give the Federal Reserve the responsibility. And by all means, reinstitute Glass/Steagall and forever prevent investment firms from having access to FDIC insurance!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
theshadowdo
who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men?
09:37 PM on 01/06/2012
It is distasteful to own a house that has lost almost half its value. It is also distasteful to have lost insurance (having been a cancer survivor) because of the downturn and now be unable to obtain insurance My suggestion cuts out most regulations. How's that for a broad stroke?

Of course I am being facetious, and of course there are many business models that are sterling and should be followed. They are, for the most part, not followed because they don't allow for the volatile ups and downs and manic energy that the "too big to fail" companies crave at times. I agree that the reinstitution of Glass/Steagall is paramount as is the suggestion that investment firms be prevented from having access to FDIC insurance. I may be wrong but my understanding is that not a single CEO (perhaps you're one of them) of any of these 'too big to fail companies' has been fined or gone to jail - as they should. They knew they were bundling bad mortgages with good ones, they knew that derivatives were too volatile to be standard or safe investments but they sold them anyway because the money was too easy and the profit was made win or lose.