More

China Is The Latest Country To Challenge EU Carbon Tax

China Opposes Carbon Charge

By JOE McDONALD   01/ 5/12 11:08 AM ET   AP

BEIJING -- China urged the European Union on Thursday to heed objections to its plans to charge airlines for carbon emissions and to hold talks with opponents.

The charges, which took effect Sunday, are aimed at curbing emissions of climate-changing gases but airlines oppose them as an improper tax. The ratings agency Fitch warned last month the conflict could spiral into a global trade dispute.

"China opposes the EU forcing through unilateral legislation," said a foreign ministry spokesman, Hong Lei. "We hope the EU side will be prudent and practical and deal with this issue through consultations with all relevant parties."

The appeal came even after a European court last month rejected a lawsuit brought by U.S. airlines and supported by governments including China and India.

Beijing could have unusually strong leverage in a possible dispute because its state-owned airlines carry large numbers of Chinese and other Asian tourists to Europe. Any disruption would hurt Europe's travel industry when the continent is struggling with a debt crisis and high unemployment.

Under the European system, airlines flying to or from Europe must obtain certificates for carbon dioxide emissions. They will get free credits to cover most flights this year but must buy or trade for credits to cover the rest.

Last month's ruling by the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg dismissed arguments that the system infringes national sovereignty or violates aviation treaties.

The International Air Transport Association has argued the EU should negotiate through the International Civil Aviation Organization to reach a global agreement on the issue.

IATA, which represents about 240 airlines comprising 84 percent of global air traffic, estimates the new emissions rules will cost airlines up to (EURO)900 million ($1.17 billion) this year and rise to (EURO)2.8 billion in 2020.

"Unilateral, extra-territorial and market distorting initiatives such as the E.U. emissions trading scheme are not the way forward," IATA said in a statement last month. "There's growing global opposition."

The emissions fees are another blow to airline profits, which IATA expects to fall to $3.5 billion this year from about $6.9 billion in 2011 amid high fuel costs and a slowing global economy.

Environmentalists welcomed the program, one of the most far-reaching measures adopted by any government to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. Although only 3 percent of total human-caused carbon emissions come from aircraft, aviation is the fastest-growing source of carbon pollution.

The European Union has said the added costs would amount to a few dollars per ticket and would open the way for efficient airlines to make money rather than lose it.

Already this week, Delta Air Lines Inc. added a $6 charge per round trip on tickets sold in the U.S. for travel to Europe and Deutsche Lufthansa AG said it will raise prices but not right away.

Fitch Ratings warned last month that possible retaliation "will pose growing threats to aviation market access" in both developed and emerging markets. It said that might affect authorizations for routes and landing slots.

Chinese airlines have not decided whether to add a ticket surcharge, said Chai Haibo, deputy secretary-general of China Air Transport Association, an industry group.

Asked whether Chinese carriers might refuse to pay the charges, Chai said, "It has not come to that stage yet."

A trade group for U.S. carriers, Airlines for America, has said its members would comply "under protest," while reviewing legal options.

___

AP researcher Zhao Liang and AP writer Christopher Bodeen contributed from Beijing. AP writer Alex Kennedy contributed from Singapore.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TRAVEL

BEIJING -- China urged the European Union on Thursday to heed objections to its plans to charge airlines for carbon emissions and to hold talks with opponents. The charges, which took effect Sunday, ...
BEIJING -- China urged the European Union on Thursday to heed objections to its plans to charge airlines for carbon emissions and to hold talks with opponents. The charges, which took effect Sunday, ...
Filed by Rebecca Dolan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 13
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
08:53 PM on 01/06/2012
How exactly is this going to benefit the environment?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KIVPossum
Moldova Marsupial
01:37 AM on 01/06/2012
The EU has every right to charge for carbon emission OVER the EU. It does not have the right to charge airlines for emissions somewhere else. On an 11 hour flight from Beijing to Frankfurt you have only two hours over the EU. The airlines should not pay for what occurs the other 9 hours
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
11:24 PM on 01/05/2012
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!

Wow, I never saw that coming!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Fanney
Scribbler
11:10 PM on 01/05/2012
The EU should go forward. Forget the Chinese. They need to deal with their 600 gigawatts worth of coal plants...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mhh310351
Roosevelt Democrat
10:31 PM on 01/05/2012
China last year consumed 49% of all the coal burnt on the planet. With this cheap fossil fuel advantage they forced the closing bankruptcy of 3 solar cell manufactures in the U.S.

If we truly have man-made climate change, Rio, Kyoto, Copenhagen, Cancun, and Durban have all proven to be ineffective!

Tariffs and taxes based on environmental impacts are the only tools responsible nations have!

It's the truly pay me now or pay me much more later scenario!
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
11:25 PM on 01/05/2012
Their dumb treaties increase C02 emissions and real pollution.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mhh310351
Roosevelt Democrat
10:58 AM on 01/06/2012
Seems we exported jobs and doubled in the process our CO2 emissions & real pollution!

So you can see why Rio, Kyoto, Copenhagen­, Cancun, and Durban have been failures!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
worker beenumbed
09:05 PM on 01/05/2012
The fee is tiny.The opponents say it is unilateral but the EU could say the small amount means it is for the fuel consumed over EU territory.Therefore trade treaties have no jourisdiction.Such as with ships which are now required to lower their sulfer emissions within 200 miles of theEU and the USA.....Carbon has to legally be cosidered a pollutant I guess......EU is taking a lead..The tax removes the hidden subsidy .That subsidy being the waiver which has allowed climate damage by planes without a charge..
04:50 PM on 01/05/2012
I applaud the EU's effort. If other countries won't enact reasonable carbon limits, the EU has the right to do it for anyone that they trade with or goes to Europe. Hopefully this money will be used for research into ways to further remove pollution.
01:58 PM on 01/05/2012
So we should expect new fees and taxes on airline tickets to pay for this, right?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beckjr2000
been there done that & tired of it
02:58 PM on 01/05/2012
You know it!