iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Iowa Caucus 2012 Results: Vote-Counter Says Mistake Gave Mitt Romney 20 Extra Votes [UPDATED]

First Posted: 01/05/2012 8:37 pm Updated: 01/06/2012 9:02 am

WINDHAM, N.H. -- Former U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum said he was "not surprised to hear" that the vote total for ex-Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney may have been overcounted by 20 in the final tally of Iowa caucus-goers, but both he and his campaign were declining to weigh in on the story that broke Thursday night.

Speaking to a large gathering of New Hampshire voters at Windham High School, the Pennsylvania Republican said he was unaware that a local television station in Iowa had aired a report on a potential vote count discrepancy that would alter the winner of the caucus two days ago.

The station, KCCI, reported that in Appanoose County, a vote-counter had discovered an inconsistency between the number of the 50 votes he had monitored and what the Republican Party of Iowa had recorded.

"When Mitt Romney won Iowa by eight votes and I've got a 20-vote discrepancy here, that right there says Rick Santorum won Iowa," said the vote-counter, Edward True, 28. "Not Mitt Romney."

A spokeswoman with the Iowa Republican Party did not immediately address True's assertion, but stressed that he was not a precinct captain and was not authorized to discuss the vote. The 20-vote discrepancy remained, late Thursday, unconfirmed.

But by the time Santorum had left the stage, word had gotten to him and his aides that he may have been the winner of the Iowa caucus after all. Asked for reaction by the Huffington Post, he replied:

"We were ahead and they told us that 20 votes were undercounted for Romney and that's what changed it. So, I'm not surprised to hear that. We will see what happens."

[UPDATE - 11:59 p.m. ET] - Appearing Thursday night on Fox News' "On The Record with Greta Van Susteren," Santorum downplayed the significance of the potential vote-counting error:

VAN SUSTEREN: It's being reported a couple places, unconfirmed at this point, but everybody's talking and chatting about it, so I want to ask you, that there may have been a vote count problem in Iowa, and that perhaps it was not an eight-vote loss for you but that you may have come out number one. I'm not so sure how significant it is, but I'm curious what your reaction -- if, indeed, it does turn out to be true that you won by a handful of votes.

SANTORUM: Well, here's what I know. Having talked to the chairman of the -- Matt Strawn, who's the chairman of the Iowa -- Republican Party of Iowa, that all these counties are going to be reporting in. They're going to be certifying them, that there was one county where there was a 20-vote mistake in my favor, but there was a 21-vote mistake vote in Romney's favor. So it actually netted out to what I understand is a one-vote difference. But there will be, without question, given the lateness of the hour and the hectic-ness that comes with turning in these -- these numbers, there will be different -- there will be changes. And with eight votes, or now nine votes difference, there may be some. But that doesn't really matter to me. I mean, we -- you know, we -- this was a tie.

In addition, Iowa GOP Chairman Matt Strawn released the following statement on Thursday night:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

Contact: Nicole Sizemore - nsizemore@iowagop.org

January 5, 2011

Statement from Iowa GOP Chairman Matt Strawn Regarding Appanoose County Caucus Results

Des Moines -

Iowa GOP Chairman Matt Strawn statement regarding Appanoose County caucus results:

"Iowa GOP rules provide for a two-week certification process for each of the 1,774 precincts. The Iowa GOP will announce the final, certified results of the 2012 Iowa Causes following this process. Out of respect to the candidates involved, party officials we will not respond to every rumor, innuendo or allegation during the two week process. That said, Iowa GOP officials have been in contact with Appanoose County Republican officials tonight and do not have any reason to believe the final, certified results of Appanoose County will change the outcome of Tuesday's vote."

Paid for by the Republican Party of Iowa and Not Authorized by any Candidate or Candidate's Committee

621 East 9th Street, Des Moines, IA 50309 | www.iowagop.org | 515-282-8105

Also on HuffPost:



The GOP candidates on the issues:
Abortion
1  of  13
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
Gingrich: Platform calls for conservative judges and no subsidies for abortion but not a constitutional abortion ban.

Paul: Says federal government should have no authority either to legalize or ban abortion.

Perry: Now supports constitutional abortion ban after saying states should decide their own laws on such issues.

Romney: Says Roe v. Wade should be reversed by a future Supreme Court and states should decide their own abortion laws.

Santorum: Favors constitutional abortion ban and opposes abortion even in cases of rape.
FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6,005
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (128 total)
09:31 AM on 01/10/2012
The Iowa caucus tabulating is done by Voxeo, CEO Johnathon Taylor, based in Orlando, Florida. It is an Israel firm. Hello!
06:15 AM on 01/10/2012
I would not be suprise to hear this kind of information all the way till election eve.
10:56 AM on 01/09/2012
Which heavy contributor to Republicans owns the vote tabulating software that Iowa uses?
03:54 PM on 01/08/2012
For those of you who attended the Iowa caucus or are planning to attend your state caucus, remember the words of a once famous person who said...
"It is enough that the people know there is an election. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything."
My point is if votes are counted at an undisclosed site, how do we know it is accurate? Maybe I'm overly paranoid but I do remember Dubuque, Iowa in 1996, look it up,did it happen again?
10:55 AM on 01/22/2012
...and now I hear that there are eight precincts in Iowa that they will not count at all? (or are lost forever or something along those lines).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
joemensa
08:23 AM on 01/08/2012
at this point all of the bump or slump the candidates get from the results of the Iowa caucus is now a thing of the past...so who cares who had the most votes...the initial 8 vote "victory" was no victory at all...it was for all practical purposes a tie...and this new information about 20 votes changes nothing
photo
UTARebel
No one can win without the Independent Vote
02:32 AM on 01/08/2012
"Typo May Give Iowa Caucus Win to Santorum"\

Really? What kind of title is this for a miscount?

\
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Azentrius
04:07 PM on 01/07/2012
Mitt Romney should fade back into obscurity as the governor of the crime-ridden, overtaxed dump that is Massachusetts, and Santorum should go back to simply ranting about gays all the time because he probably IS gay.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
joemensa
08:29 AM on 01/08/2012
Azentrius...Massachusetts has some of the lowest per 1000 crime rates in the country and it is not a dump...it is however way over taxed but this is due to a single Democrat party control of this state....Mr. Santorum is the married father of several children...do you have any "facts" to support your scandalous and defamatory midnight sniping allegation that "he is probably gay"?...and if so, why wold his sexuality be a problem for you?...are you a homophobes?...and please do not say he is a hypocrite because I know many overweight people who agree that being overweight is not good...I know many people who drive 80 mph who say that speed kills...I know many Democrats who say that are compassionate but then proceed to give large sums o money to those in need and expect nothing in return, thus depriving them of the self worth, dignity and respect that comes from earning the money by way of a paycheck....my point is hypocrites abound.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Coyote50
"Taxes are the price we pay for civilization."
03:49 PM on 01/07/2012
There's no difference in any of them - saying the states should outlaw abortion instead of the federal government is really a difference without a distinction. So much for Ron Paul and freedom...
05:00 PM on 01/08/2012
Oh there's a difference. Some are worse. At least one is downright dangerous.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
TJ25
Mason
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
TJ25
Mason
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
TJ25
Mason
01:06 PM on 01/07/2012
I can't believe that Santorum's still in the running, and Mitt should go back to his private sector that he's so proud of. GO RON PAUL!!!!!!
http://www­.youtube.c­om/user/Th­eRevolutio­nPAC?v=8Rv­0Z5SNrF4&f­eature=pyv­&ad=821931­3610&kw=is­%20ron%20p­aul%20a%20­bigot”
06:14 AM on 01/07/2012
this is the funniest story ever!! - It was so rigged against Ron Paul, and they want to bring it up again??? - LMAO!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Tommygun264
2Q2BSTR8
02:25 PM on 01/08/2012
While it's. true the pubs judt want to ignore Ron Paul hoping he will go away, it doesn't change the fact that one of the reasons they all wish he'd just go away is because NOT ENOUGH OF HIS OWN PARTY LIKE HIM. Ron Paul can't win his own party's nomination, let alone the general election. But prove everyone wrong - let him run 3rd party and let's see how many votes he gets.
06:12 AM on 01/09/2012
Yea I don't get it...why doesn't ron paul run third party? He's clearly not a republican?
11:05 AM on 01/22/2012
Clearly Ron Paul has gone the short (and the sharp) end of the stick. I'm not sure that the caucuses are necessarily rigged specifcally against Ron Paul. More likely they are rigged for GOP drama, managed by media consultants for the "best t.v. possible." A few wins for Romney, a few for Gingrich, Santorum keeping his nose in the race. The back and forth dynamic makes for compelling viewing (and HP analysis of course). Someone at GOP HQ said, "we need to get America EXCITED about the GOP in order to take on Obama. Hey, I know, let's really get an exciting primary! Some sex, religion, and money to really steam up these mid-winter nights." How they will maintain the excitement AFTER the nomination remains a huge challenge. The only candidate people seem to be passionate about is Ron Paul. Over all, I think it's clear the GOP is a machine that has little regard for democracy, in spite of its rhetoric.
04:02 AM on 01/07/2012
Republicans cannot count votes, and want better voter laws? foolish? yep, republicans do not want non Republicans to vote and be counted.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
luvobama
Hospice volunteer...
03:19 AM on 01/07/2012
Who cares?
01:49 AM on 01/07/2012
Brings back memories, doesn't it Al Gore?