iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

U.S. Economy Adds 200,000 Jobs In December As Jobless Rate Falls To 8.5 Percent

Unemployment Rate

First Posted: 01/06/12 08:32 AM ET Updated: 01/07/12 09:35 AM ET

After months of reports suggesting that the U.S. labor market might never change, the latest jobs picture is giving Americans something they haven't had for some time: a reason to hope.

In December, the U.S. added 200,000 jobs -- beating economists' expectations -- while the unemployment rate dipped to 8.5 percent, the government reported on Friday.

Although part of the drop in the unemployment rate came from some 50,000 Americans leaving the labor force -- once a person gives up looking for work, they are no longer counted as unemployed -- most of it came from real progress: more jobs. And while many economists say that 300 or 400 thousand jobs per month, month after month, are needed to dig America out of the massive jobs hole the recession created, on Friday morning, labor market watchers were celebrating.

"I think it's a very positive report, unambiguously," said Mark Zandi, Chief Economist of Moody's Analytics. "Generally you have a lot of cross currents, but this suggests that the job market and the economy are gaining broader traction."

Average hourly earnings also rose by 4 cents, while the average workweek ticked up by .1 hours to 34.4.

"I thought the numbers were pretty darn good," said Stuart Hoffman, chief economist for The PNC Financial Services Group. Hoffman sees this report as the resumption of a trend in growth that began at the beginning of last year, but flattened out over the summer, slowed by rising oil prices, uncertainty in Washington, the tsunami in Japan and other threatening global forces.

"All of these new signs send the same positive signal about a real improvement." Hoffman said.

Job gains came in retail, a steady winner in the post-recession days, along with manufacturing, mining, health care and leisure and hospitality. Government employment, which shed 280,000 positions over the past year, slowed its losses to 12,000 fewer positions in December.

If there is one dark spot, it is the continued decline of the labor force -- which has been an increasing worry throughout the post-recession days.

Plus, there are still over five and a half million Americans who have been out of work for six months or more -- some 42.5 percent of all unemployed. Of those, 1.9 million have been out of a job for 99 weeks or longer. And for those folks, such signs of improvement may not translate to new hope.

And these figures don't even capture the complete picture, some economists say. While long-term unemployment rates have been stuck at record highs for two years, the government numbers don't tell the full story of those suffering in the labor market. In order to be counted as officially long-term unemployed, a person must be out of a job for 6 consecutive months and consistently looking for work.

In a new paper co-authored by John Schmitt, a senior economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research, he examines a definition of long-term unemployment that casts a wider net to include not just those who can't find work, but also those who can only find part-time work, have given up looking, or have finally found something steady but the work just isn't good. He calls it "long-term hardship."

"Let's say you were a long-term unemployed steel worker from Ohio and you buckled under and said, 'Okay, I'm going to work for Walmart for 9 dollars an hour' -- have your problems been solved?" Schmitt said. "Are you no longer experiencing hardship in the labor market?"

By Schmitt's count, from 2007 to 2010, the number of unofficially long-term unemployed increased by almost as much those who were officially out of a job by the government's count. (2.0 percentage points of the working-age population versus 2.5 percentage points).

"The government's count of the long-term unemployed is important, but it hides almost as much as it reveals," Schmitt said. Schmitt sees very little on the horizon to ease the suffering of long-term hardship.

For those workers, who have likely seen their skills and savings erode over the last few years, getting back into the labor market will prove ever-more difficult, particularly if job creation keeps chugging along around 150 or 200 thousand jobs a month. The new jobs, research shows, will probably go to the freshly unemployed.

This is a reality that Hazel Feldman is all too familiar with. Feldman is 58 and living in New York City. She has a masters degree in social work from Hunter College and a B.A. from Fordham University, and a long career as a social worker behind her. But besides a little bit of off-the-books childcare, she's been unable to find work since August 2008.

She's still looking, but she's given up hoping she'll ever find anything.

"It just goes on and on and on because there are no jobs," Feldman said. She is nearly out of her small pool of savings and lives very frugally, walking all over the city to save the subway fare.

"It's not getting better, so it's getting worse," she said.

Arthur Delaney contributed to this reporting.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
After months of reports suggesting that the U.S. labor market might never change, the latest jobs picture is giving Americans something they haven't had for some time: a reason to hope. In December...
After months of reports suggesting that the U.S. labor market might never change, the latest jobs picture is giving Americans something they haven't had for some time: a reason to hope. In December...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 13,008
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (182 total)
11:24 AM on 01/11/2012
It's still too early to jump to conclusions. Next month's jobs report will be the real test. Holiday temps & seasonal workers now being let go will tell the true story.
06:39 PM on 01/09/2012
"Let's say you were a long-term unemployed steel worker from Ohio and you buckled under and said, 'Okay, I'm going to work for Walmart for 9 dollars an hour' -- have your problems been solved?" Schmitt said. "Are you no longer experiencing hardship in the labor market?"

Says a lot. All jobs are not created equal. More jobs doesn't necessarily equate to more equity in terms of income. Will that income gap between the high and the low persist and/or widen?
11:28 AM on 01/11/2012
Right now, in my region, people will kill for a minimum wage job of any kind.
03:59 PM on 01/11/2012
You know, they will here in my area, too. Yet, the irony is is that if they take these minimum wage jobs (at least here in MN), they will often be just over the income guidelines for any and all help with food support, supplemental health insurance, etc. That is the situation my family is in. We are no longer eligible for ANYTHING and yet between us, hubby and me have 4 jobs. Every month it is so depressing that we make this endless choice of food versus utilities. We have health insurance that takes over half of his income and yet we never meet the deductible for each family member. We end up paying out of pocket for all our medical expenses anyway. Something is terribly wrong in America. Our family is WORKING and we still can't make it and we are not the only ones. And we DON'T live high off hog...No credit card debt, a small modest home, older used vehicles. It feels like we are being punished for doing the right things. Income disparity and the demonization of the working poor are serious social ills in the US.
09:56 AM on 01/16/2012
That's true .just check Italy out ,they would be more than happier to go US Walmart
By the way ,in my country China Walmart pay 1.2 dollar/hr
9 dollars/hr is the wage for some Chief positions
BTY, obviously widen,
photo
geneandeddie59
Internationally unknown
03:28 PM on 01/09/2012
Stopped looking for work, took job for lower pay, took temp job, etc having the effect of reducing the unemployment rate never bothered the GOP when they were in the White House. It also never bothered the big corporations who shipped the manufacturing jobs overseas and helped transition those workers from factories to retail stores.
10:00 AM on 01/16/2012
people just can't live for temp jobs ,some come and some go , thus the rate remains the same
when WH get rid of this problem , people suffer for the solution we compromise
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
02:09 PM on 01/08/2012
Glad that things are getting better...
06:08 PM on 01/08/2012
Seasonal hiring and the BLS likes to fudge the data. Expect a later correction revising downward in March. They have had the bad habit of doing so for the last few years.
photo
Bienville
Make levees, not war
08:28 PM on 01/08/2012
That's BS.

The numbers for September and October were adjusted upward.

I have been following these numbers for years. Durng the Bush administration, it was the same thing: some months adjusted upward, some downward. Anyone that says there's a general trend benefiting the current President - and current president - is full of it.
12:09 PM on 01/08/2012
Haaa haaa haaa not true ! better said 2 million jobs added (in China).
11:06 AM on 01/08/2012
OK let me explain. You hire 200,000 people just before Christmas and then you let them go right after the holidays are over.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
02:23 PM on 01/08/2012
I can't blame Mr. Obama for this failure.
11:04 AM on 01/08/2012
http://jessescrossroadscafe.blogspot.com/

06 January 2012
Gold Daily and Silver Weekly Charts - Rounding Errors In the Big Scheme of Things

The markets did a 'pop and flop' on the 'better than expected' payroll numbers. While the number did beat expectations, it was largely due to temporary hiring for Christmas delivery and sales that was not properly deseasonalized.

I did not write something about this, but I do wish to point out something new. The BLS has always rounded the headline number of course, but now they are starting to round the 'raw number' as shown in the first picture below. That I have never seen before.

Considering that the headline number these days is around a couple hundred thousand, rounding the raw number to the nearest hundred thousand is almost bizarre.

Gold and silver moved around after the big rally at the first of the week. I think this is the market level they would have been at before the very conscious smackdown at the year end to make the mark-to-market on their short positions look better.

What next? Earnings season starts on Monday with Alcoa, and there will be another European debt meeting on Monday.

Have a great weekend.
iam99
To know what you prefer...
01:41 AM on 01/08/2012
What is the moral imperative for the people to pay for the failed business model of certain financial corporations through bailouts, and particularly future generations?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
02:12 PM on 01/08/2012
Future generations will figure it out. They will have to.
11:51 PM on 01/07/2012
What BS. Having a ob no longer means anything. People working at Walmart and Home Depot can't support themselves let alone families. They are working f7or spending money and 25 million are still out of work or working at Walmart You have allowed the Fed and the government to push inflation to the point that no one can survive and the people who paid for your greed are the American worker. Now because the middle class is gone government revenue has shrunken and it will have to raise taxes eliminating more companies and more jobs. Wah tgo go with rthis shrinking unemployment BS.
09:13 PM on 01/07/2012
When there is talk about the need to create jobs in this country why is there never any mention of the jobs that have been lost over the last 30 or more years due to Free Trade and Offshoring? Repairing infrastructure and building bullet trains are jobs paid for out of the governments budget and as such amount to “work for welfare” jobs. We need to bring offshored jobs back into this country by using our trade agreements to tax certain imports to allow US companies to start back up. The promise that Free Trade was good for the consumer only worked as long as there were enough US companies left employing people to buy the imported goods. The reason we have deficit spending is that there aren’t enough companies and working people paying taxes any more.
11:08 AM on 01/08/2012
I think the bullet train idea is the biggest piece of BS I've ever heard of.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
02:16 PM on 01/08/2012
Private contractors are awarded federal projects. I wouldn't consider the interstate highway system, for example, an excuse for federally-funded welfare. Or NASA.
06:45 PM on 01/08/2012
And just who do you think pays the private contractors? What makes you think that the contracts might not go to a Chinese contractor like several large contracts in California on the new Bay Bridge project because a Chinese steel polisher makes about $12 a day? Anyway, that just adds another non-government agency layer between the government dollars and the worker. Moreover, infrastructure encompasses a whole lot more than interstate highways. The point is if the Feds dream up projects that they wouldn’t otherwise do just to put people to work then call it what you want it’s still contributing to the budget deficit. Have you not heard of the WPA (Work Projects Administration) created during the Great Depression? Am I the only one that sees the correlation here? What’s needed are jobs created by the private sector with private sector money. That isn’t going to happen until our government that is sworn to protect us from all enemies foreign and domestic starts protecting American jobs and companies and whole industries from countries like China by modifying our trade policies. Make no mistake, China is our enemy.
photo
KeyopsBack
Obama 332 Romney 206
08:50 PM on 01/07/2012
Bad news for all the family values cornball cheating on their wives vitter repubs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hoop Ojoop
11:44 AM on 01/09/2012
Do you really think the economy is improving? Do you know anybody in the 99%. people are hurting. It is not getting better.
photo
RepublicanDepression
Of the1% by the1% for the Gerrymandering One% =GOP
04:09 PM on 01/07/2012
Hey Republicans!

Obama added manufacturing jobs for the first time since Clinton.

Manufacturing jobs are UP two years in a row, after Obama's stimulus.

Guess those Bush tax cuts for the wealthy just needed about a decade to kick in and do their magic producing manufacturing jobs, right?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jdl51
06:30 PM on 01/07/2012
The republicans were tripping all over themselves during the Clinton administration claiming the Reagan tax cuts were responsible for all the jobs created, 10 years after the fact, even though every single one of them, to a man, swore that the Clinton tax increases would cause a severe recession. They love to have it both ways. It has always been thus.
04:50 AM on 01/08/2012
hey lets read the entire article. the white houses report doesn't correctly represent what our unemployment really is. the unemployment is higher than 20%. obama is trying to use the seasonal holiday jobs as so called evidence that he is doing a good job. in reality all those seasonal jobs will disappear.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
02:20 PM on 01/08/2012
We had this same discussion last year this time.
photo
RepublicanDepression
Of the1% by the1% for the Gerrymandering One% =GOP
02:24 PM on 01/08/2012
Globalwhat: ". the white houses report doesn't correctly represent what our unemployme­nt really is."

1) LOL! This is the way unemployment is ALWAYS measured. Show us your posts complaining about this form or measurement during the BUSH administration! LOL!

2) Of course there are an unknown number of temporary seasonal jobs. There ALWAYS are. What percent are you claiming are seasonal?

3) In fact, the gains outpaced what economists were calling for even though they factor in temporary seasonal jobs. How does your theory account for that?

4) Is Obama's SPECTACULAR job creation rate after the GOP Bush crash also "seasonal"?

http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-12-07/politics/30485008_1_unemployment-rate-obama-election-day

http://static6.businessinsider.com/image/4edfe187eab8eaab3600001b/chart-unemployment-rate-and-jobs-added-during-the-great-recession-dec-7-2011.jpg

LOL! Read it and weep!
03:27 PM on 01/07/2012
If this keeps up some Republicans are going to have h'll to pay. They promised the Koch Bros., Limbaugh, and Dick Armey that this would never happen on their watch. Their stated goal was a failed Obama presidency and by default a destroyed economy. Good news for ordinary Americans is bad news for the Republicans.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
02:22 PM on 01/08/2012
I just want to be on the winning side for a change. Just to see what it feels like.
03:05 PM on 01/07/2012
How many Democrats read the headline and thought, "Finally, jobs are coming back under our president."?

How many Republicans read the headline and thought, "It's just a fluke, we will lose jobs next month."

That's what's wrong with our country.
photo
RepublicanDepression
Of the1% by the1% for the Gerrymandering One% =GOP
04:10 PM on 01/07/2012
What's wrong with thinking about the jobs that are coming back under our President- your President and mine?
11:11 AM on 01/08/2012
Nothing, except these are just seasonal jobs. It's all a mirage.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
02:25 PM on 01/08/2012
Yes, I have a friend who has 3 of those jobs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jdl51
06:34 PM on 01/07/2012
Job growth has been in a steady uptrend now for quite awhile, if you've been paying attention and know how to read a chart. And if you look really hard, you'll see where the trend reversed itself from the over 700,000 a month job losses late 2008, early 2009, right around the time the stimulus kicked in. I swear I'm not making this up, repubs, but I'm sure you'll find some other republican based reason why that is so.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rogiec123
Look Beyond The Surface
08:11 PM on 01/07/2012
If you take into account all those who dropped out of the workforce the rate is closer to 16%. Check out that chart.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
02:27 PM on 01/08/2012
When you're the one out of work, all of the numbers and charts are meaningless.
02:31 PM on 01/07/2012
ATTENTION WELFARE FREELOADERS........Turn in your welfare checks. The recession is over.
photo
RepublicanDepression
Of the1% by the1% for the Gerrymandering One% =GOP
04:13 PM on 01/07/2012
Yeah, you tell those Greedy One Percenters like Exxon getting all that corporate welfare. No more for them!

LOL!

And the GOP Bush recession has been over for a long time under Obama.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jdl51
06:36 PM on 01/07/2012
My favorite welfare queens are the farmers who consistently vote republican and their small govt mantra, yet rake in tens of thousands of tax dollars every year, if not more, for not growing anything. Is this a great country or what?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
02:36 PM on 01/08/2012
What defines welfare? Food stamps recipients? People drawing social security disability? People I know getting these benefits really need them to keep fed and warm. Many of them are also working and by no means lazy, but they just don't earn enought to live on. The hardest job I ever worked was as a minimum-wage fast food employee while in college. I can't imagine trying to live off of work like this. It's tough, very tough.