iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Jon Huntsman, Mitt Romney Spar In New Hampshire

First Posted: 01/08/2012 9:35 pm Updated: 01/09/2012 7:52 am

KEENE, N.H. -- Jon Huntsman said Sunday night that Republican presidential frontrunner Mitt Romney puts "politics first," as his campaign moved to highlight Romney's denigration of Huntsman's service as U.S. Ambassador to China two days before the New Hampshire primary.

"I'm somebody who believes in putting my country first. Mr. Romney apparently believes in politics first," Huntsman, the former Utah governor, said at a town hall event here on the campus of Keene State College.

"I say that's the problem with this country right now. You hear what I'm saying?" Huntsman said. "That's the reason we're not pulling together as people, because everything's politicized, as opposed to remembering that we are Americans, first and foremost. And that's the only way we're going to be able to solve our problems longer-term."

Huntsman said his exchanges with Romney, the former Massachusetts governor, at debates on Saturday night and Sunday morning revealed "the biggest difference between me and Mr. Romney."

Romney hit Huntsman on Saturday night in Manchester for "implementing the policies of this administration in China" while "the rest of us on the stage were doing our best to get Republicans elected across the country and stop the policies of this president from being put forward."

Huntsman raised the issue Sunday morning in Concord, saying Romney had knocked him for "putting my country first." In response, Romney doubled down.

"The person who should represent our party running against President Obama is not someone who called him a remarkable leader and went to be his ambassador in China," Romney said.

"This nation is divided because of attitudes like that," Huntsman responded.

The bickering between the Huntsman and Romney campaigns continued to escalate late Sunday afternoon, after New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, in New Hampshire stumping for Romney, questioned Huntsman's integrity for plotting a White House run against Obama while serving in his administration.

"I tell you, I wonder about Jon Huntsman's integrity," Christie said, according to a transcript of the event. "What was he doing in China preparing to run for president? Because this doesn’t happen overnight. You don’t come back to the US and all of the sudden wake up one morning and go, 'Look at all these people who are now putting together my presidential campaign' without the permission of the person that’s doing that. So I think there are a lot of questions to ask about Jon Huntsman out of this whole thing."

"My issue is not that he worked for the president," Christie continued. "I understand why Mitt thinks it is an issue. My bigger issue is that he was obviously being disloyal to the president while he was working for him. That’s a bigger question. Voters who want to vote for him should ask him that."

After Christie had delivered his remarks, the Huntsman campaign deployed a surrogate of its own for a withering response.

"Shame on Governor Christie for repeating Mitt Romney's divisive line of attack on Governor Huntsman's decision to put country before politics," said former Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Ridge. "The responsibility to represent our country in the most important diplomatic position of the 21st century should be applauded -- not politicized.

"This type of divisive attack is exactly what the country is sick and tired of. We deserve better."

At the town hall event here, Huntsman's wife, Mary Kay, defended her husband.

"He also worked for Reagan, he worked for Bush, he worked for Bush, and he's always felt that serving his country was most important, more important than politics," she said.

"If he had turned down the opportunity to serve, all I can say is, what kind of example would that have been for those boys?" she said, referencing the Huntsmans' two sons who are currently serving in the U.S. Navy.

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) also defended Huntsman at an event in Manchester on Sunday afternoon, calling Romney's remarks "narrow-minded."

"There are plenty of things we can argue about without impugning the motives of someone who has served this country at considerable personal inconvenience," Gingrich said.

Huntsman has shown some positive movement in the polls over the past day or two, moving into third place in Suffolk University's daily tracking poll with 11 percent. That's still well behind Romney's 35 percent, but Romney has dropped 8 points in less than a week. Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) has also picked up ground, moving up to 20 percent.

It's not clear whether Huntsman will have a path forward without an explosive showing in New Hampshire, where his more moderate tone suits the state's electorate much better than the deep red conservative state of South Carolina where voters will head to the polls on Jan. 21.

CORRECTION: In an earlier version of this article, Keene State College was mislabeled as Keene State University. We regret the error.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,441
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (39 total)
  1 of 3  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
Bronxdude 09:54 AM on 01/09/2012
Of the 290 house and senate Republicans, 141 became millionaires after taking office, and the rest report a net average annual income of $725,000 (shockingly, 63% of Republican house and senate members were not millionaires before entering office, no doubt helped along by corporate kowtowing and selling their votes to lobbyist). From 1981-2011, income for the bottom 98% increased 6%, while income for the  Read More...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ritamary
11:50 PM on 01/09/2012
Chris Christie questions Huntsman's integrity while he supports flipflopper/panderer Romney. Go figure.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ZeraLee
A Citizen's View from Main Street
03:53 PM on 01/09/2012
Romney proudly and publicly proclaimed that he puts party first. Huntsman properly called him on it. What follows provides an insight into who is willing to fall on that same America-last sword.
photo
Tom Airhart
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
04:10 PM on 01/09/2012
The Romney sword will not be manufactured in the USA, however.
Jamgrae
Aliyah
03:18 PM on 01/09/2012
When Mitt Romney says, "I like to fire people who provide services for me," it's almost as if he's setting the american people up in advance (encase he's elected POTUS) for some poison pills he's got ripe and ready for us to take...liberal and conservative working folk alike. After all, as a businessman, he's had to make the "hard" decisions......ON PUTTING PEOPLE OUT OF WORK.
cireneed
looking for some light...even a little
02:20 PM on 01/09/2012
So, Christie IS running for VP....this confirms it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nnealj1
Go figure, lost avatar, filled micro-bio....
02:28 PM on 01/09/2012
When he shows up for a televised event, he does kind of fill up the TV screen for viewers...he does make a commanding presence, if for no other reason that he's impossible not to see up there, on any stage....
02:19 PM on 01/09/2012
Two seemingly trustworthy candidates low on the totem pole share this, too, in common: neither will win. So why doesn't Jon Huntsman follow the lead of rival Buddy Roemer (even Ron Paul) and stay honest and on message?

Huntsman, a former ambassador, a former governor and businessman, with diverse experience and expertise, is informed on climate change and evolution and other issues that most of his competitors deny through ignorance or political expediency, yet he's flipflopped at least three times during his campaign, recently on December 6: Scientists "owe us more" on climate change; "There's not enough information to formulate policies." He had even said he'd "absolutely" run on a Michele Bachmann ticket if asked; the history-challenged Bachmann, whom he had roundly criticized; his evasive justification being, "If you love this country, you serve this country."

You can't win. Why not honor your statement, "I must be true to who I am"?

Others you may castigate
On the presidential slate,
Yet you sometimes take your cues
From their simpleminded views,

Though this contest that you're in
You must know that you can't win,
So those flipflops are in vain
That have sullied your campaign.

Here's a notion for you, Jon---
Be like Bud or even Ron---
Waffling is not their game---
Can't you try to be the same?

Spending only what Bud raises
Also merits boundless praises.
In this interparty war
From you we expected more.

Elizabeth Gerteiny
Author of The President of War
www.bushandcompany.org
photo
Tom Airhart
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
02:05 PM on 01/09/2012
I agree with Huntsman. Our country is indeed divided because of individuals like Romney and Gingrich as well.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nnealj1
Go figure, lost avatar, filled micro-bio....
02:30 PM on 01/09/2012
And, sadly, Congress is full of Repubs, exactly like these two....
03:18 PM on 01/09/2012
so very true that our beautiful country is now divided.
there was never any problem with friends or family being of a different Party.......Since the right wings took over the republican party, the climite has changed to where politics are NOT mentioned at a family gathering..
Their prechers/preist/minsters are telling people in church, they must vote repubican.
So sad, because many people have stopped going to church because of God being in Politics. especially the younger generation, who laughs at Pat Robinson and Rush.
then you have the older generation who believes what the church and Pat Robinson tells them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:56 PM on 01/09/2012
Just my opinion but I think Huntsman has the luxury of being "real" in this election because the GOP doesn't see him as a viable candidate this time around. The GOP machine hasn't gotten to him yet. So today's Huntsman is real. Once he becomes a viable candidate, possibly in 2016, the GOP will require him to spout the party rhetoric to be accepted.

What would be really cool is if voters, not just in NH but across the country, saw this as an opportunity to school the GOP good ole boys and make him their candidate BEFORE they poison him.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ritamary
11:55 PM on 01/09/2012
Sorry but any politician who supports the Ryan budget is unacceptable.
01:46 PM on 01/09/2012
Hutsman should definitely make

COUNTRY FIRST!

his mantra.
cireneed
looking for some light...even a little
02:22 PM on 01/09/2012
F&F
01:42 PM on 01/09/2012
As long as people have their precious cell phones and credit cards they will believe empty suits like Mitt Romney and his ilk. People, he is just more of the same crap that is in the White House now. Open your eyes, Ron Paul is our only way out of this mess. read the Constitution of the United States! You all can still read can't you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Llib Noswad
aka: Bill, Conservative
01:30 PM on 01/09/2012
Mitt, just ignore huntsman,obama is the democrat that you should be sparing with, not the democrat huntsman.
02:17 PM on 01/09/2012
I agree....Huntsman is the Obama plant to diverse the Conservative/Republican party
jaslyn
don't go away mad, just go away
02:49 PM on 01/09/2012
oh brother.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ritamary
11:58 PM on 01/09/2012
Huntsman is an Obama plant? Ha! You are truly delusional!
03:19 PM on 01/09/2012
Matty can't stand on his own two feet. if he wasn't bashing Pres. Obama he would have nothing to say. He cannot anwer a question for the media.
photo
Tom Airhart
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
04:12 PM on 01/09/2012
"Matty" as you call him, reminds me of Reagan.
Jamgrae
Aliyah
01:28 PM on 01/09/2012
Gingrich wants to dismantle the Romney campaign for revenge. The other candidates want to replace Romney as front runner. But the reason Romney shouldn't be elected is because the American people don't need a Wall Street businessman as POTUS. Romney continues to make the point that he's been in the private sector and knows how to create jobs....really? Isn't Romney the same guy who laid off all those workers and earned huge profits from Bain...profits he's still collecting on? And didn't he make that statement about, "I LIKE TO FIRE PEOPLE WHO PROVIDE SERVICES TO ME?" This, after saying he knows how it feels to get a pink slip (what he really means is he knows how it feels to give pink slips out). Just look at him, does he look like the guy you can have a beer with as a co-worker, or a guy who you work for? He laid off workers and re-hired others for the same job...at half pay. This is his (business) plan for the American people. What did he say when Obama loaned the Auto Industry funds to pick themselves up....he said let them fail. What did he say about the housing market and all those people who would lose their homes....he said let them be foreclosed on. That's all he knows, that's his business expertise....their lose is his gain. People...just figures on a chart board that Romney uses for his stock brokers benefit.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nnealj1
Go figure, lost avatar, filled micro-bio....
02:36 PM on 01/09/2012
Yup, sounds like you have Romney summed up in a nutshell...it's why Romney is going to be so easy to pick apart if he receives the Republican nomination. If Newt had baggage, well, Romney's baggage is heavier, because he's responsible for more good jobs created in China than for any he ever created stateside. Romney's company picked apart longstanding American companies, laid off their workers, and sent their jobs overseas. What jobs he was ever responsible for creating hardly compared in value to the jobs he destroyed. The Dems will love tearing into Romney's record of job-creation because it's much more fantasy than fact. There are too many Americans, out here, willing to tell their stories, on how their lives were destroyed in order that Mitt Romney, and his Bain company could become wealthy. There are more Chinese people who owe their good fortunes to Mitt Romney than Americans....
01:27 PM on 01/09/2012
"Deep red" South Carolina leads me to ask (for the zillionth time) why do people vote against their own interests. Is South Carolina filled with millionaires and billionaires? Are there no unemployed, no sick people without medical coverage? No hungry children? No family in poverty? The Republicans have succeeded in brain washing significant swaths of our people, to their (and our) mutual detriment.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:47 PM on 01/09/2012
Experienced, Pragmatic and Genuine are the words I would ascribe to JH. For MItt I would say Opportunistic, Entitled and Clever. Who would be better as President?
01:00 PM on 01/09/2012
OBAMA ! Period !!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:57 PM on 01/09/2012
well I would like to see some viable opposition here!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ritamary
12:03 AM on 01/10/2012
Yes, Obama is better. We should not return control of the federal government to Republicons when are just beginning to recover from the eight Bush years.
photo
Tom Airhart
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
04:05 PM on 01/09/2012
Huntsman would make the better President but that isn't what the Republican faithful are looking for. They're looking for the cutthroat and that would be Romney.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:43 PM on 01/09/2012
No pledges! No Dogma! = No Publicity! No Chance!
12:29 PM on 01/09/2012
Such a contrast in this presidential election. Pres. Obama ran a campaign of inclusion. This lot seems to think the only people that vote belong to the tea party or the far christian right.
photo
EdCorner
Now what - more of the same...
12:32 PM on 01/09/2012
Campaign of inclusion? You mean like a circus barker? I agree
photo
jlglaze
A simple man
12:56 PM on 01/09/2012
A bad day with BUSH was BETTER than ANY day WITH bHo
photo
Tom Airhart
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
04:08 PM on 01/09/2012
Remember, EdCorner, we Democrats voted in the last election while you guys voted from your armchair. We'll vote at the voting both once again. You see, we walk the walk. Give us some competition and stop taking about it and get out there and vote.