iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Mitt Romney, GOP Frontrunner, Benefits From Toothless Competition

First Posted: 01/07/2012 11:19 pm Updated: 01/08/2012 6:30 am

MANCHESTER, N.H. -- What was supposed to be a Bataan death march of a debate for Mitt Romney on Saturday turned into something of a cakewalk, as none of his nearest competitors -- and none, really, are that near -- chose to take a whack.

Indeed, at one point the moderators managed to do what seemed unthinkable: bring Romney and his most aggrieved detractor, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, to agreement, albeit on the issue of anti-Catholic bigotry. At another point, the former Massachusetts governor was able to recite large swaths of his stump speech as everyone else simply looked on.

"Mitt Romney by far and away is the best debater, best advocate for the Republican Party on that stage," proclaimed one of his top surrogates, former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty. "There is no question about it. It's like the varsity playing the junior varsity... Having debated him I know a little bit about that."

Hosted by ABC and Yahoo News, Saturday night's debate was exactly the type of non-eventful affair desired by someone comfortably in the lead in the New Hampshire primary polls and expanding his lead in South Carolina. And it raised the question, yet again, as to whether the rest of the field is wary of attacking Romney head-on for fear of alienating the next GOP nominee or, potentially, president.

All of which is not to say that Romney went unchallenged. Early on in the debate, the conversation surrounded his time at the private equity firm Bain Capital -- a portion of his resume that has been a huge hurdle in past elections. Former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum accused him of lacking the type of political gravitas to do anything more than manage an economic crisis. Gingrich dug deeper, stating bluntly that he was "not nearly as enamored of a Wall Street model where you can flip companies, go in, and have leverage buyouts."

Romney was ready. "I'm not surprised to have The New York Times try and put free enterprise on trial," he said. "I'm not surprised to have the Obama administration do that, either. It's a little surprising from my colleagues on this stage."

From there, it would be another 85 or so minutes until his economic record was challenged again. And in the spin room after the debate, surrogates for each campaign were left to explain why the gloves were left on.

"He didn't tell me any of his plans so I don't know," Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) said of his father's performance. "When he goes into the debates he plans on saying basically the same message he has been saying for a long time. I don't think he goes into it with a tactical strategy that I'm going to go after a certain candidate or anything."

For Romney, it wasn't all luck that he drew a toothless field. Having run for the office before, he is simply better at electoral politics than anyone else in the GOP field. Sometimes, his political acumen gives off the distinct wave of insincerity. Oftentimes, it's a huge asset. The quote one of his advisers pointed to, when asked about the former governor's good fortune, was from the famed golfer Ben Hogan: "The more I practice, the luckier I get."

That certainly seemed to be the case Saturday. Take, for instance, the bizarre exchange between Romney and moderator George Stephanopoulos on contraception and states' rights. At first, Romney pleaded ignorance.

"George," he said, "I don't know whether a state has a right to ban contraception. No state wants to. I mean, the idea of you putting forward things that states might want to do that no -- no state wants to do and asking me whether they could do it or not is kind of a silly thing, I think."

When that didn't work, he pulled out one of the debate's most memorable lines: "Contraception, it is working just fine. Leave it alone."

When a somewhat exasperated Stephanopoulos moved on, he had left unmentioned the fact that Romney once said he would "absolutely" support a "constitutional amendment that would have established the definition of life at conception" -- something directly pertinent to the right of women to use some forms of contraception.

If Romney's skill and good fortune were, in the end, the theme of the night, it's impossible not to note the role played by Rep. Ron Paul. The Texas Republican is, by many counts, the most organized candidate in the race. He polls as close to Romney as anyone else in the field, and has the type of campaign infrastructure to make the primary very interesting. His campaign chairman, Jesse Benton, insisted on Saturday night that they would remain in the race until the convention. They certainly have the money to do just that.

But at Saturday's debate, like all previous ones, the congressman simply aimed his guns elsewhere. As the conversation hovered around Bain Capital early in the debate, Paul was the one who took it off track, charging Santorum with having a "big government" record. And in one of the night's most memorable exchanges, he sparred with Gingrich over his deferments during the Vietnam War.

"When I was drafted, I was married and had two kids and I went," Paul declared after Gingrich explained that he was "married with a child" when the draft came calling.

Benton noted that the Paul campaign was running commercials in New Hampshire that went after Romney for supporting the bank bailout and the individual mandate. But he also conceded that, right now, the campaign is not all that interested in making Romney's life miserable.

"It is pretty clear right now that as far as primary voters go, we are not fishing out of the same pond," Benton said. "People who are comfortable with Mitt Romney want the safe moderate status quo choice. We are trying to consolidate ourselves as the only limited government choice, the only choice that symbolizes real change and shaking up the establishment. We are confident that Mitt Romney voters will get behind Dr. Paul as the nominee, but right now we are not sharing a real broad pool of people."

HuffPost's Amanda Terkel contributed reporting.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5,596
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (77 total)
photo
marymeade2
I prefer liberty over tyranny
04:39 PM on 01/10/2012
I don't care who gets the nomination, I wll vote for that person. I don't care what anyone says to that. I happen to think Obama wants this country to be like socialist Europe. He wants to fundamentally change this country and that statement, to me, doesn't mean he believes in free enterprise or freedom at all. It means to me he wants the government to have more control over all industry in this country, maybe not by pure state ownership, but by heavy handed regluations and other controls. Look at how many agencies are already given authority to regulate. Just how much are you willing to give up?
11:23 AM on 01/09/2012
Ron Paul just hasn't turned his guns on Romney yet. The "one-man wrecking crew" will take out the others until it's down to just the two of them...then LOOK OUT MITTENS.
photo
carbar4647
curmudgeon-in-chief
10:48 AM on 01/09/2012
When did obama get his teeth pulled??
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:30 AM on 01/09/2012
In my opinion debates are toothless for the following reason. The Republican Party is the Party of "NO" regarding the 99%, and the Party of "Yes" regarding the 1%. Since the 1% own the airwaves, they will not allow questions like " “You stated you’re going to stop tax loopholes, but how will huge campaign donations influence you, and as a long time politician what have you done to eliminate tax loopholes?

Other question might be: Why as a politician have you elected to eliminate government jobs rather than renegotiate with drug companies likely overcharging our federal government (taxpayers) billions of dollars? Why have you eliminated government jobs before stopping tax breaks to profitable big businesses outsourcing jobs? Why are we allowing our taxes to enrich the elite while reducing tax revenues needed to repair roads and bridges; hire teachers, policemen and firemen?

Lastly, those in power want toothless debates because if Republicans really attacked each other, guess who would use information from those attacks later this year during the debates between Republicans, Democrats, and Independent candidate for President?
08:21 AM on 01/09/2012
NEWT WHEN RON PAUL WAS DRAFTED, HE WAS MARRIED AND HAD 2 KIDS, HE COULD HAVE GOTTON A DEFREMENT LIKE YOU DID, BUT YOU SEE THATS THE BIG DIFFRENCE BETWEEN YOU AND PAUL. WHEN IT COMES TO THE SERVICE OF YOUR COUNTRY PAUL DOES NOT SPEAK OUT OF BOTH SIDES OF HIS MOUTH LIKE YOU DO. PAUL WENT AND DID THE HONORABLE THING, WHILE YOU HID BEHIND YOUR WIFE'S SKIRT.
11:21 AM on 01/09/2012
The wife he later dumped when she got cancer?
11:40 AM on 01/09/2012
NEWT'S FIRST WIFE WAS HIS HIGH SCHOOL GEOMETRY TEACHES AND WAS 8 YEARS OLDER THAN NEWT, SHE SUPPORTED NEWT UNTIL HE GOT HIS PHD, THATS WHEN NEWT SAID BY, BYE, AND NEVER PAID CHILD SUPPORT, THE LOCAL BAPTIST CHURCH TOOK UP A COLLECTION TO FEED NEWT;S KIDS AND WIFE. SO WHEN NEWT SPEAKS ABOUT HIS CHRISTIAN MORALS DONT BELIEVE HIM , HE HAS NONE.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NYCBruce
A little common sense goes a long way...
02:13 AM on 01/09/2012
No, we won't see the TOOTHLESS people until they pan the audience at a debate in South Carolina! THEN you'll see some good gumming!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
boogie albert 56
But I wa promised a Water Buffalo
12:45 AM on 01/09/2012
For a second there I thought they were going to say something about one of Bill Clintons old girlfriends.
10:04 PM on 01/08/2012
not only is their debates toothless but they are brainless as well
09:53 PM on 01/08/2012
Mitt is a Mexican, and from Mexico, and his Birth papers say Mitt was born in Mexico.
09:43 PM on 01/08/2012
The competition is amazing , they run broken field from one error to another................
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nautilus55
09:35 PM on 01/08/2012
Within the past week just heard a gay friend, a black friend and a Hispanic friend that now are leaning towards voting for Mitt Romney if he is the Republican candidate- WOW how many liberals heads just exploded
01:09 AM on 01/09/2012
your black gay and hispanic friends are all low information voters, if they would even think of voting for mittens. You probably are also.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nautilus55
07:26 AM on 01/09/2012
No the exact opposite- all college educated and see through the smoke and mirrors of the liberal Democrats. They are actually offended that people like you assume that if they are gay ,black or Hispanic they MUST vote Democratic. They are clear thinking and do not want to be stuck on the Democrat plantation waiting for the crumbs that Obama and your party hands them. Your party relies on people that are content to be manipulated
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
squareroot84
09:21 PM on 01/08/2012
Whatever
09:08 PM on 01/08/2012
Excuse me. My name is Nuforas. I am from what you earthlings think of as "outer space". For your information, I have correctly called all US presidential elections since I started watching them some 200 earth years ago. This one is easy to call but all I am willing to reveal at this time is this: None of these Republican contenders will occupy the White House in 2012.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ShanaJuly
09:12 PM on 01/08/2012
Lol
09:51 PM on 01/08/2012
Please go back to your planet and consult your Space Light again because a mistake has been
made . A Republican will occupy the White House in 2012 . LOL
10:20 PM on 01/08/2012
Please note that Nuforas did not state a Republican could not occupy the White House in 2012. Please reread the correct statement originally posted by nuforas.
10:45 PM on 01/08/2012
Only in your Rush drug induced dreams. Who is going to vote for a wishy washy, richy-rich spoiled brat, corporate raider Mormon for Preident?
photo
aphidavis
"So much that Liberals know, just isn't so"
09:07 PM on 01/08/2012
When I read "Toothless" I could only think of Barney.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ardale
08:12 PM on 01/08/2012
and from the toothless media