iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Republican Debate Best Moments: Romney Gets Off Easy, Huntsman Talks Mandarin, Paul Provokes

First Posted: 01/08/2012 12:07 am Updated: 01/08/2012 12:17 am

MANCHESTER, N.H. - Nothing much changed during the New Hampshire debate Saturday night, especially since former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney went completely untouched by his opponents. But there were a few noteworthy moments in the 14th debate of the Republican presidential primary. Here they are in the order they happened.

1. The One Attack On Romney Of The Night

Everyone -- even the Romney campaign -- thought the former Massachusetts governor would be attacked from multiple sides.

"He went into it believing he was going to get beat up on all sides," said Romney adviser Ron Kaufman.

And early on, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich delivered a line that signaled the possibility of a long night for Romney.

"I'm very much for free enterprise," Gingrich said, and then targeted Romney's career at Bain Capital.

"I'm not nearly as enamored of a Wall Street model where you can flip companies, you can go in and have leveraged buyouts, you can basically take out all the money, leaving behind the workers," he said.

Yet that was it. It came in the first few minutes of the debate, and it was the most ferocious broadside leveled at Romney the entire night.

2. Paul And Santorum Trade Barbs As Romney Looks On

Moments later, Texas Rep. Ron Paul and former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum were shooting at one another in an extended back and forth, with Romney standing in the middle looking happy as a clam to have the candidates knocking each other.

Paul repeated his attack -- already up in a TV ad -- that Santorum is "one of the top corrupt individuals because he took so much money from the lobbyists."

But as he continued to talk, the microphone emitted some feedback, causing Paul to stop and say, "There it goes again."

Santorum leaned into his mic and wisecracked: "They caught you not telling the truth, Ron."

After Paul finished his takedown of Santorum, the former Pennsylvania senator responded: "The group that called me corrupt was a group called CREW. If you haven't been sued by CREW, you're not a conservative. CREW is this left-wing organization that puts out a list every election of the top Republicans who have tough races and calls them all corrupt because they take contributions from PACs."

"It's a ridiculous charge," Santorum told Paul. "And you should know better than to cite George Soros-like organizations to say that they're corrupt. So that's number one."

Romney stood quietly between the two, hands in pockets, a bemused smile on his face.

3. Paul Attacks Gingrich On Deferments

Paul went after Gingrich hard for receiving deferments from military service during the Vietnam War, drawing one of the angriest responses from Gingrich at any debate or moment in the campaign so far.

"People who don't serve when they could and they get three or four or even five deferments aren't -- they -- they have no right to send our kids off to war," Paul said. "I'm trying to stop the wars, but at least, you know, I went when they called me up."

"I have a pet peeve that annoys me to a great deal, because when I see these young men coming back, my heart weeps for them," he said.

Gingrich responded: "Dr. Paul has a long history of saying things that are inaccurate and false. The fact is, I never asked for deferment. I was married with a child. It was never a question. My father was, in fact, serving in Vietnam in the Mekong Delta at the time he's referring to."

"I think I have a pretty good idea of what it's like as a family to worry about your father getting killed," Gingrich added. "And I personally resent the kind of comments and aspersions he routinely makes without accurate information and then just slurs people with."

But Paul persisted: "I need one quick follow-up. When I was drafted, I was married and had two kids, and I went."

That prompted Gingrich to say, "I wasn't eligible for the draft. I wasn't eligible for the draft."

4. Paul On 'True Racism'

Paul's comments on the U.S. criminal justice system rank as unusual for a Republican debate, and likely turned a few heads among any Democrats who were watching. Here are his comments in full:

And one of my heroes is Martin Luther King because he practiced the libertarian principle of peaceful resistance and peaceful civil disobedience, as did Rosa Parks. But, also, I'm the only one up here and the only one in the Democratic Party that understands true racism in this country is in the judicial system. And it has to do with enforcing the drug laws. Look at the percentages. The percentage of people who use drugs are about the same with blacks and whites. And yet the blacks are arrested way disproportionately. They're -- they're prosecuted and imprisoned way disproportionately. They get -- they get the death penalty way disproportionately. How many times have you seen a white rich person get the electric chair or get, you know, execution? But poor minorities have an injustice. And they have an injustice in war, as well, because minorities suffer more. Even with a draft -- with a draft, they suffered definitely more. And without a draft, they're suffering disproportionately. If we truly want to be concerned about racism, you ought to look at a few of those issues and look at the drug laws, which are being so unfairly enforced.

5. Contraception Confusion

"Governor Romney, do you believe that states have the right to ban contraception? Or is that trumped by a constitutional right to privacy?" asked ABC's George Stephanopoulos.

Romney was clearly irritated by the question: "George, this is an unusual topic that you're raising. States have a right to ban contraception? I can't imagine a state banning contraception. I can't imagine the circumstances where a state would want to do so."

"The idea of you putting forward things that states might want to do that no -- no state wants to do and asking me whether they could do it or not is kind of a silly thing, I think," Romney said.

The back and forth went on for several minutes, as Stephanopoulos pressed the question, leading former New Hampshire Gov. John Sununu to remark afterward that "the moderators asked the dumbest questions I've ever heard."

"Have you ever heard a dumber question than the contraception question?" Sununu said of George Stephanopoulos' queries. "He should be ashamed of himself."

6. Perry Says He Would Send Troops Back To Iraq

"I would send troops back into Iraq," Texas Gov. Rick Perry said. "I think we start talking with the Iraqi individuals there. The idea that we allow the Iranians to come back into Iraq and take over that country, with all of the treasure, both in blood and money, that we have spent in Iraq -- because this president wants to kowtow to his liberal leftist base, and move out those men and women. He could have renegotiated that time frame. I think it is a huge error for us."

Perry added, "We're going to see Iran, in my opinion, move back in at literally the speed of light. They're going to move back in, and all of the work we've done -- every young man that has lost his life in that country will have been for nothing. Because we've got a president that does not understand what's going on in that region."

7. Huntsman's Mandarin Gambit Falls Flat

An exchange between Romney and Santorum on China led to one of the most awkward moments of the night: former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman speaking in Mandarin.

Huntsman, as he has before, hit Romney for saying he will label China a currency manipulator during his first day in office.

"It's not sense to think you can slap a tariff on China the first day that you're in office as Gov. Romney would like to do," said Huntsman, who was the U.S. ambassador to China from 2009 to 2010.

Romney hit back.

"I'm sorry. Governor, you were, the last two years, implementing the policies of this administration in China. The rest of us on the stage were doing our best to get Republicans elected across the country and stop the policies of this president from being put forward," Romney said, then launched into why he would want to push back against China if he gets elected president.

Huntsman, somewhat exasperated, shot back: "I think it's important to note, as they say in China, 'ta butai liaojie zhege qingxing.' He doesn't seem to understand the situation."

The audience laughed as Huntsman said his lines in Mandarin. Huntsman has done that before in debates, but never in a way that appeared as if he were trying to flaunt his knowledge of the language. Huntsman has had a tough time going off script or making jokes this entire debate season, usually coming off awkwardly, and this moment seemed to capture that perfectly.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 219
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
10:06 AM on 01/08/2012
Whoop-de-doo he's speaks mandarin. So do I , however my language skills came from a 48 wk course at the defense language institute and 4 years of military service. I guess if my daddy had been a billionaire I might have gained my language skills as an ambassador and impressed the audience in New Hamshire. So I formerly announce that my mandarin language skills and I are running for the republican nomination for President I expect to be first in the polls for 2-3 weeks then my polling numbers will fall quickly to dead last .
10:01 AM on 01/08/2012
Ron Paul's comment about being the only one to understand racism is absurd. However, his facts about the way minorities are targeted in the Drug War, arrests, death row, etc are spot on! So, given the candidates he's against, perhaps he's correct.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jordan2
Constitution...See:The Originalist Perspective
12:14 AM on 01/09/2012
What's absurd if he was referring to the other candidates. Methinks you really have never studied the man. Have you seen any minorities leaving him?
09:58 AM on 01/08/2012
EVERY single one of these 'bags would be your nightmare-college roommate--with the possible exception of Huntsman. I totally blame so-called evangelical "christians' for the most despicable, pathetic, cast of presidential hopefuls, who have focused 98% of their attention on abortion and gay marriage instead of the REAL issues. When the movie comes out about the collapse of America, I'd bet 10,000$ that it will begin with a mega-church in Dallas. Infuriating and tragic!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bigdaddy Milkman
10:39 AM on 01/08/2012
"Citizens United" will still be the tipping point.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
duhtruth
09:53 AM on 01/08/2012
If Perry wants to send troops back to Iraq, I hope he is in the front of them leading the charge. Old men have to lead by showing the way, not by cowering in the corner. Disgraceful and cowardly!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sejs105
11:38 AM on 01/08/2012
I am no political pundit or a professional commentator. What would be accomplished by sending troops back into Iraq? More deaths and woundings, to what avail? Iraq is a country with civic pride like that of America and any other country. Don't think for a moment the Teutons that Ancient Rome did battle with or the Celts in Ancient Gaul simply because they were conquered by a stronger better equipped force of soldiers did not and do not to do this day contribute their own type of civic pride to their countries in who they were and are. My point is this:If any country is having a political problem is that problem not theirs and no one elses?
09:48 AM on 01/08/2012
Jon Huntsman is the one Republican candidate with the credentials, values, and character to actually pose a challenge to Obama in the GE. Is that why our our still pro-Obama media (both the new and the old) continues to slight Huntsman in its coverage?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
duhtruth
09:54 AM on 01/08/2012
No! Only because they cannot understand Mandarin!
10:15 AM on 01/08/2012
Evidently, the media also has difficulty with English. I would think that in an era of China's increasing competitiveness with the U.S., Huntsman's language skills, in addition to his impressive background, would be considered an invaluable asset. Instead, our media ridicules him for being able to speak mandarin.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kbeth
Dear Jesus, Save us from the Christians. Amen
09:59 AM on 01/08/2012
No, our media is mainly interested in sensationalism, it has nothing to do with President Obama. If Huntsman starts saying some of the stupid things the other candidates say he will get coverage too. Most of his lack of coverage is because the Republican Party doesn't want him and the Evangelicals don't want him.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:52 AM on 01/08/2012
very well stated, kbeth.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nelore
09:36 AM on 01/08/2012
Huntsman is the more moderate candidate and he would have been the most difficult candidate to defeat had he been able to connect with the GOP. As it is the best option for him is to switch later on and get out of the far right GOP political suicide band wagon.
09:52 AM on 01/08/2012
why water down the conservatism...........
09:57 AM on 01/08/2012
Indeed. All the way to the guillotine!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lriSdismayed
09:18 AM on 01/08/2012
Interesting how Perry would like us all to go back to Iraq. I wonder how the President and the people of Iraq think about that. It would seem that they just don't have a choice because Perry wants their treasure. A little note to Perry, THEY WANTED THE US OUT.
Hmmmmmm another aspect to Perry's statement of: "every young man who has lost his life for THAT country!" All the time these young men and women were serving under the Bush administration they were told they were fighting for their country not THAT country. No wonder there is such a high percentage of US servicemen who went to Iraq battling severe depression and suicide, because we were in it for the wrong reason.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nola70119
09:08 AM on 01/08/2012
It is a shame. I think Huntsman would be the best candidate up there, given the options.
09:54 AM on 01/08/2012
and yet i bet you won't be voting in the primary for him
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nola70119
02:10 PM on 01/08/2012
I did not register with a part affiliation. As you know, the GOP ramped up their party purity, so in Louisiana what used to be an open primary is now closed, The GOP here changed the laws so only registered Republicans can vote in their primary. So... no. And the GOP is to blame.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
duhtruth
09:55 AM on 01/08/2012
There is no best candidate from this group.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:02 AM on 01/08/2012
One thing that has been clear about Mitt and was on full display last night is that he is a total control freak. He's a 'my way of the highway' sort of guy and gets mad and reactive when someone questions him. He went so far as to refuse to answer questions last night just to make his point. He's got to have that last comment to prove his point. He's obviously extremely insecure--maybe all of this campaigning is to best his dad.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bigdaddy Milkman
10:48 AM on 01/08/2012
I think that has more to do with his Mormonism. They are not used to being questioned or "disrespected" by people who dare to challenge or disagree.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:01 AM on 01/08/2012
As reported by The Huffington Post:

Gingrich responded: "Dr. Paul has a long history of saying things that are inaccurate and false.
===========================
As a Texan who has had to live under the influence of Dr. Ron Paul's political decisions here in Galveston County, I can truely say, "the America he invisions is not the America I want to revisit."

Congressman Ron Paul of Lake Jackson is financially supported by some of racist groups in America. Senator Ran Paul of Kentucky, is just a chip off the old block. The repeal of a century of
advances America has made would be under constant attack with the election of a Ron Paul to the highest office in the land. This dog ain't gonna hunt.
08:26 AM on 01/08/2012
Did anyone see Romney answer any questions beside dodging them with lengthy speech about how he has lived the economy as if the rest of us just got here.
Q: Gov Romney what is YOUR PLAN to make the economy better?
Romney: We have a president who does not understand how the economy works, i have been a CEO and have lived the economy. CEO are no managers, they are people too and with Obama's policies the country is going to fail.

Either he is stupid or has no plan.
Norm
Read think read analyze read comment
08:30 AM on 01/08/2012
Yeah, being more direct would be helpful. Since I get to see his ads in addition to the debates, the man could also refrain from launching into his "America is Beautiful" pander.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
everything news
I have no bio.
09:06 AM on 01/08/2012
That is because he has nothing else to say about his childhood to show that he understands the plight of the less fortunate. He comes from an upper class family with no hardships. So he can only recite America the Beautiful, which prooves nothing about him. We can all recite America the Beautiful even the poor.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:04 AM on 01/08/2012
It made me so mad that the moderators didn't just keep bringing him back to the question asked. I also don't understand why people think that the government should be run like a profit-driven private corporation. He has no plan except to continue to move money out of the economy and into his buddy's pockets.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
duhtruth
09:59 AM on 01/08/2012
He has identified the basic problem: that we need more manufacturing jobs in the US. The solution: sorry, that is beyond the scope of this discussion. Next question, please.
08:20 AM on 01/08/2012
Newt and Santorum are political gay couple. In are in bed with each other.
photo
proshot22
RLTW! 3/75th '05
08:08 AM on 01/08/2012
It would be a lot more interesting if the winner gets nominated and the losers get deported.
09:15 AM on 01/08/2012
Yes, interesting for us, but who in the world do you think would want to take in the losers? I mean losers of this magnitude...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sock Monkey
Deceive. Inveigle. Obfuscate. The DC mantra.
09:44 AM on 01/08/2012
Depends on their net worth.

I bet it's higher than a few small countries.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
duhtruth
10:00 AM on 01/08/2012
Deport all of them!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bwither
08:08 AM on 01/08/2012
The contraception question to Romney wasn't dumb. His primary rival right now, Rick Santorum, made a comment just before the Iowa caucuses that YES he would let states ban birth control. This would've been an opportunity to differentiate the two candidates.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MountainPenelope
Hands off my micro-bio (& my Medicare)!
08:37 AM on 01/08/2012
I agree. That was a fail on Romney's side. They could have hit Santorum hard on that one. George handed Romney a piece of cake and he didn't have a fork.
10:13 AM on 01/08/2012
Well said.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:06 AM on 01/08/2012
But Romney does support the ban on any birth control that would prevent implantation. He said so on Huckabee's interview He openly spouted his support for personhood amendments. His run around this--putting the blame on G. S. for a stupid question proves that he doesn't even remember what he's said in the past and will lie about anything.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tizzie Cregan
08:08 AM on 01/08/2012
OK, so there are folks who would rather be spending time pushing a political party to get elected than doing their jobs, ones who think that questions on women's rights are stupid, other who find a way to take pride in being sued because it plays on party politics, another who would chose to stay on foreign ground as a police entity indefinately. Is anyone else seriously worried about the future of this nation, or even remotely worried that the candidates have absolutely NO CLUE as to the job they are applying for? I mean really. I am not a lover or hater of Obama (just kinda seeing dud with a few minor ups and downs, but mostly someone who will be shot down by law in the end) and soIam quite open to the idea of choices, but there just aren't any. One would THINK (not being a republican myself, I am only guessing through logic here) that the opposing party would want a viable candidate to challenge Obama right? So where is this candidate? So far all I see are clowns, fools and napoleon wnaa bes
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bigdaddy Milkman
11:01 AM on 01/08/2012
Your guessing went wrong the moment you applied logic to anything the Evangelical Right does. Since it's them controlling the Teapublican shift even further right, you need to think, "If I was a loon who believed in bronze age mythology about Gods and Monsters, what would I do?" Only then will you understand why they've got this crowd of crazies. The only one who isn't is Huntsman, who doesn't stand a snowballs chance.