iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Dark Matter Map Is Largest Ever (PHOTO)

  First Posted: 01/09/12 06:09 PM ET Updated: 01/09/12 06:09 PM ET

Dark Matter


This story was updated at 11:47 a.m. ET.

AUSTIN, Texas — The hidden side of the universe is now a bit more illuminated thanks to the largest map yet of dark matter, the strange substance thought to inhabit much of space.

Scientists have created the largest scale rendering of dark matter across the universe, revealing a picture of the invisible stuff thought to represent 98 percent of all matter in the universe.

Dark matter has never been directly detected, but its presence is felt through its gravitational pull on normal matter. Scientists suspect dark matter is made of some exotic particle that doesn't interact with regular atoms.

"We know very little about the dark universe," said co-leader of the study, Catherine Heymans of the University of Edinburgh's School of Physics and Astronomy, during a press conference announcing the findings here at the 219th meeting of the American Astronomical Society."We don't know what the dark matter particle is. It's very widely believed that the final understanding of the dark universe is going to have to invoke some new physics."

The new map reveals the distribution of dark matter over a larger swath of space than ever before. It covers more than 1 billion light-years. One light-year is the distance light travels in a year, about 6 trillion miles (10 trillion kilometers). [See the new giant dark matter map]

Warping light

To trace invisible dark matter, the researchers searched for signs of its gravitational tug on other matter. They measured an effect called gravitational lensing, which occurs when gravity from a massive body bends space-time, causing light to travel along a curved path through space and appear distorted when it reaches Earth.

The scientists measured warped light from 10 million distant galaxies in four different regions of the sky, caused when those galaxies' light passed by large bundles of dark matter that bent its path.

"It is fascinating to be able to 'see' the dark matter using space-time distortion," another co-author of the study, Ludovic Van Waerbeke of the University of British Columbia, said in a statement. "It gives us privileged access to this mysterious mass in the universe which cannot be observed otherwise. Knowing how dark matter is distributed is the very first step towards understanding its nature and how it fits within our current knowledge of physics."

Scientists hope that by plotting out the distribution of dark matter throughout space, they will come closer to understanding what it is.

"By analyzing light from the distant universe, we can learn about what it has travelled through on its journey to reach us," Heymans said. "We hope that by mapping more dark matter than has been studied before, we are a step closer to understanding this material and its relationship with the galaxies in our universe."

A close match

The new maps represent the first direct evidence of dark matter on such large scales.

"What we see here is very similar to the simulation," Van Waerbeke said. "Dark matter is concentrated in lumps and the rest stretches in filaments."

The web of dark matter throughout the universe revealed by the map agreed well with predictions made by computer simulations based on scientists' best theory of dark matter.

"So far we haven't seen any off things, or any deviation from what we expect," Van Waerbeke told SPACE.com.

To create the map, the astronomers used data collected by the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope in Hawaii during a five-year project called the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Lensing Survey.

"These lensing maps are very important tests of our cosmological paradigm," said astronomer Rachel Mandelbaum of Carnegie Mellon University and Princeton University, who was not involved in the new study. "These results could be used as a test of dark matter, dark energy and even the theory of gravity."

Smaller scales

In a separate study also presented today at the American Astronomical Society meeting in Austin, Sukanya Chakrabarti of Florida Atlantic University developed a new method of mapping the dark matter in individual galaxies.

Chakrabarti studied ripples on the outskirts of spiral galaxies to trace the shape of the dark matter within and surrounding the galaxies.

This research, targeting the invisible stuff on a much smaller scale than the first study, also helps astronomers hone in on an understanding of dark matter.

"These results with spiral galaxies allow the study of matter in a regime of individual galaxies, which has not been possible with weak lensing," Mandelbaum said. "Both of these results represent two important ways of studying the dark mater, but they're in two very different regimes."

You can follow SPACE.com assistant managing editor Clara Moskowitz on Twitter @ClaraMoskowitz. Follow SPACE.com for the latest in space science and exploration news on Twitter @Spacedotcomand on Facebook.



Copyright 2011 Space, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST SCIENCE

This story was updated at 11:47 a.m. ET.AUSTIN, Texas — The hidden side of the universe is now a bit more illuminated thanks to the largest map yet of dark matter, the strange substance thought ...
This story was updated at 11:47 a.m. ET.AUSTIN, Texas — The hidden side of the universe is now a bit more illuminated thanks to the largest map yet of dark matter, the strange substance thought ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 55
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:06 AM on 01/11/2012
When physicists attempted to recreate a spiral galaxy based on known matter/gravity in a computer simulation, it fell apart and they were unable to do so until they started added matter (and therefore gravity) into it. They had to add a lot--almost doubling the amount that was known, or that we can see). Then the simulation worked perfectly and "dark matter" was born.

It has since answered (or been used to answer) many other previously unexplained phenomena in the universe.

I'm still waiting for an explanation on "nothing" and whether there is such a thing. A mile of nothing is nothing, just like a truck-load of nothing is nothing. So saying that energy can weaken over a distance of nothing makes no sense. Energy cannot be lost (cannot be created or destroyed). Therefore a unit of heat traveling millions of light-years of "nothing" would not be able to transfer its energy and retain it. The same is true for magnetic forces or any other form of energy.

There's a whole lot out there that we haven't discovered.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SiriusMrE
"I wouldn't have seen it if I didn't believe it."
04:19 PM on 01/12/2012
Exactly.

Check this out:
"The line of reasoning seemed unassailable, and it followed directly from a theoretical assumption shared by almost all astronomers. This foundational assumption is that, at the macrocosmic scale, gravity reigns supreme. It is gravity that organizes galaxies and gives birth to their constituent stars. So if there is not enough visible mass to do the surprising things seen in space, then the only option is to add invisible mass to make the astronomers’ equations match observations."
Still Chasing the Ghosts of 'Dark Matter' and 'Dark Energy': http://www.thunderbolts.info/webnews/ghosts_of_dark_matter.htm
03:56 AM on 01/11/2012
Couldn't dark matter be what the multiverse is made of? If the theory of several intertwining universes is correct, these other universes must consist of matter. This matter and these universes are hidden, obviously, but may be felt through their gravitational pull. This is what much-followed blogger Rob Bryanton syas about it: http://imaginingthetenthdimension.blogspot.com/2007/05/multiverse-and-dark-matter_17.html
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cre8iveman
11:38 PM on 01/14/2012
Yes your description has come up as a possible source of not just Dark Matter, but why gravity itself has the value it has, because some of the gravity we observe extends into another dimension or universe, making it seem weaker in our universe.
11:47 PM on 01/10/2012
if only we can make it into a fuel to power our spaceships
photo
BluePhantom2
The Blacksmith & the Artist reflected in their art
06:58 PM on 01/10/2012
Very cool!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
obeliskpress
Muddy water, let stand, becomes clear.
05:48 PM on 01/10/2012
Most of the universe functions well outside of our organs and instruments of perception. It's like an ant trying to 'understand' the space shuttle.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cre8iveman
11:56 AM on 01/20/2012
That is why we invent instruments like telescopes and microscopes to extend our senses in order to detect phenomena beyond our natural senses.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
methodman
05:39 PM on 01/10/2012
I would like to see the conversation about gravity and the nature of radio on dark matter and the nature of direction. The procedures kind of share an insight into the basic phenomena impulses that let us as lay people mis-catalog them until reasoning and the proper acronyms for interpreting, layering and orders for a property to emerge are understood. Invent a false acronym and a true one. Let us blog on the merits of both without knowing which is valid. It might make a good conversation. of what I need to know to get to a point where the most concepts can block out measures of variability.
photo
oneeasyrider
E=mc2: From light you exist
02:24 AM on 01/11/2012
Radio waves are part of the light spectrum with the lowest energy waves, but still are bent (gravitational lensing), like all other light waves.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SiriusMrE
"I wouldn't have seen it if I didn't believe it."
05:06 PM on 01/10/2012
This is interesting...because I am a fan of sci-fi. It is amazing to me that the WEAKEST force in the Universe is called upon to organize the cosmos. That is the only reason that we get strange ideas like "dark matter." To a man whose only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.

There is another viable alternate theory that DOES NOT require "exotic particles" or "new physics."

"The ‘Alice in Wonderland’ aspect of big bang cosmology is highlighted by the fact there is a competing ‘plasma cosmology,’ which is recognized by practical electrical engineers but unknown or dismissed by the mythmakers. Plasma cosmology deals with the dominant (>99%) form of matter in the visible universe. Plasma cosmology can demonstrate the formation and detailed rotation pattern of spiral galaxies, both by experiment and particle-in-cell computer simulation, using Maxwell’s laws of electromagnetism alone. The puny force of gravity can be ignored! Plasma cosmology can also explain the activity in the centres of galaxies without resort to the mythical dark gravitational beast — the ‘black hole.’ The Electric Universe goes further and also explains the gravitational effects observed at the center of the Milky Way in electrical terms. So much for the gravitational cosmology of the big bang! No invisible ‘dark matter’ need be conjured up and placed where needed to save the plasma model."
-- A Nobel Prize for the Dark Side: http://www.holoscience.com/news.php?article=8qx7sc1r
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cre8iveman
11:43 PM on 01/14/2012
But plasma is simply shattered atoms, which manifest electromagnetism. Basic physics says that opposite charges attract and like charges repel. So the Plasma Theory can't explain how celestial bodies would form. The particles would repel one another, or merely form clumps of molecules. Gravity is still need to create stars and planets.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SiriusMrE
"I wouldn't have seen it if I didn't believe it."
11:12 AM on 01/17/2012
Oh, no! Plasma is the fundamental state of the Universe! Instead of the fourth state of matter, it should be considered the first. And it behaves electrically. Sure, gravity's involved; but, only after electrical forces--which are 39 orders of magnitude stronger than gravity--are equalized.

Clouds of plasma moving relative to each other in space form what are called double layers between themselves. These DLs induce electric fields between the layers. These e-fields induce filamentary currents, a kind of electric discharge, which often contain "pinched" areas along them that become galaxies on the larger scale, but also stars on a smaller scale.

Here. Check this out:
http://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/2011/09/02/essential-guide-to-eu-chapter-1/

Do some investigating and make up your own mind.
03:33 PM on 01/10/2012
neat!
03:02 PM on 01/10/2012
I'm sure that generations from now parents will be saying to their kids, "What in hell is the dark matter with you?!"
03:00 PM on 01/10/2012
Looking forward to having some dark matter ice cream some day! Cool!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CadOps
A small blue dot, in a big red state
02:52 PM on 01/10/2012
COOL...I love this stuff
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rafael Perez
02:40 PM on 01/10/2012
I'm no physics major, but isn't there a contradiction in this article?

It says it has captured 98% of all dark matter in the universe. So does that mean we have a picture of what consists of almost all of the universe? I thought the universe was infinite. If I am wrong, and the universe is not infinite then where does it end? And what is behind the end? a solid wall that expands infinitely? wait, that contradicts my statement of the universe not being infinite, so... 98% of dark matter that was pictured is the only dark matter in the universe? clearly there is more than dark matter, we have other stuff... but doesn't that make it infinite?

I don't get it. I wasn't that good in Physics anyway =___="
02:45 PM on 01/10/2012
The observable universe is finite--we can only see 13.4 billion light years (the age of the universe) in any given direction, but it could extend out quite a ways from that. Beyond that, it's probably stars, but we would only see it as a blast of microwave radiation (the cosmic microwave background radiation). All the dark matter in the observable universe was 'pictured' in that picture, and dark matter makes up about 98% of all the matter in the universe (the other two being regular matter).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rafael Perez
10:46 PM on 01/10/2012
so... what is the black stuff we see in the sky? the edge of the universe?

I would understand the scientific explanation of seeing something from where you are standing up to its edge where it ends, but its flaw is that we would only make that observation bc from where we would see this end it would be bc the Earth is curved and not flat.

A more reasonable explanation would be in photography, the "depth of field", so to say would explain a lot. We look at an object concentrated in the middle of a photo and it is far away. With your explanation that we could see the observable universe in any direction would make sense then? meaning that it does not matter in what angle we view the universe, it is still an end, something big, black and far away?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cre8iveman
11:44 PM on 01/14/2012
Looking back in time we would see the early stages of galaxy and star formation. At 13.7 billion years, there would be no galaxies or stars, just high energy combining into a smaller space.
02:52 PM on 01/10/2012
So far, the thought is: universe expanding infinitely, matter (stuff) in the universe, finite. So as the universe expands, it'll get 'colder', but that's neither here nor there. 'We' were pretty sure we know how much stuff is in the universe by how everything reacts to everything else, but there were reactions by stuff we could see to stuff we couldn't see. It was dubbed dark matter, and people went looking for it. In this case, it looks like they're finding it, but it was known to be there. It was always part of the picture of the stuff in the whole universe.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rafael Perez
10:47 PM on 01/10/2012
and what is beyond dark matter?... more dark matter that expands infinitely?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
plansmaker
There Is No Such Thing As Infinity In Science
02:33 PM on 01/10/2012
."We don't know what the dark matter particle is"....
THAT"S AN UNDERSTATEMENT OF CENTURY!!!
Shouldn't they (scientists) tell people what they know not what they don't know?
03:24 PM on 01/10/2012
what they need to do is study the dark matter we are about to enter within this galaxy..you know that dark rift the sun is headed toward
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LloydDrako
04:30 PM on 01/10/2012
Here is what they know, and what they are telling you that they know: about a quarter of the known mass-energy in the universe consists of something that has mass and therefore exerts and "feels" the force of gravity, but does not for some reason "play well" with the electromagnetic force, hence does not give off light, radio waves or any of our other usual means of investigating things in nature.
02:11 PM on 01/10/2012
DARK SIDE OF THE MOON...SIDE 2
01:54 PM on 01/10/2012
"invisible stuff thought to represent 98 percent of all matter in the universe.
[...] made of some exotic particle that doesn't interact with regular atoms."

So...since we're made up of regular atoms....that means...to the rest of the universe....

WE ARE THE 2% !!!
02:23 PM on 01/10/2012
Yep, the cause of every problem, lol.