iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Mitt Romney Blowout Could Help Senate Democrats, Memo Says

Mitt Romney

First Posted: 01/09/2012 3:18 pm Updated: 01/09/2012 4:38 pm

WASHINGTON -- Mitt Romney could help Democrats keep control of the Senate by sewing up the Republican presidential nomination quickly, some Democratic strategists hope.

Chief among those are advisers to Rep. Joe Donnelly (D-Ind.), who is running to challenge incumbent Republican Sen. Richard Lugar and who sees a better shot at winning that Senate seat if the well-known Lugar loses a May primary to state Treasurer Richard Mourdock, a Tea Party candidate.

A Donnelly campaign memo obtained by The Huffington Post notes that Lugar's job approval rating has hovered around 42 percent lately, making him vulnerable to a primary challenge. But being better organized and more established than Mourdock, Lugar likely retains the edge if the Indiana primary becomes a high-interest, high-turnout affair, pushed along by an ongoing presidential nomination contest.

That's where Romney comes in, should he trounce his opponents in Tuesday's New Hampshire primary and ride the momentum through the next several states. By the time the later primaries occur, the presidential nomination contest could be all but over, leaving behind only those voters who care the most about electoral politics. They tend to be activists, and on the GOP side, they include Mourdock's Tea Party base.

"If the Republican nomination is sealed by the time Indiana's May primary rolls around, low turnout may prove a significant factor -- and a real challenge -- for Lugar," argues the Donnelly memo, prepared by the Global Strategy Group. "Lugar's success is largely dependent on a higher primary turnout, where the ideological bent of the voters is more mixed. In a low turnout election, Tea Party voters, who favor Mourdock, would dominate the primary."

According to Global Strategy Group's surveys last month, Mourdock and Lugar are statistically tied (42 to 41 percent) among GOP voters who took part in the last two primaries.

But if Romney is seen as a lock at the top of the ballot, Tea Party voters in particular could be inspired to turn out. Call it a Romney effect. "They are so effing pissed about Romney, they aren't going to settle anywhere else -- certainly not for Lugar," a Democratic operative said.

The hope for Democrats in Indiana is that the more conservative Mourdock would then alienate moderates and independents in the general election, giving Donnelly, a conservative Democrat, a chance in a state where a similar Democrat, then-Rep. Brad Ellsworth, was handily beaten in 2010 by now-Sen. Dan Coats, a former Republican congressman.

Indeed, Global Strategy Group's data -- which should be taken with a grain of salt because it was gathered for Donnelly -- finds Donnelly leading Mourdock by about seven percentage points.

Beyond Indiana, there are other races where Democrats hope a Romney effect could boost Tea Party candidates, presenting Democrats with opponents they might defeat and decreasing the odds the GOP can pick up the four seats it needs to take over the Senate. Among them are Nebraska (where Democrats are in deep trouble with the retirement of Sen. Ben Nelson), Michigan, Wisconsin, Missouri and, lately, even Virginia, where GOP favorite son and former Sen. George Allen could face a challenge from state Del. Bob Marshall.

Strategies that depend on such complicated ripple effects often prove unsuccessful, and Republicans point to 2010 general-election victories by such Tea Party favorites as Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), who both won primaries over more moderate Republicans.

"Perhaps if national Democrats had spent more time focusing on their own races and on an agenda that is supported by a majority of voters, rather than spinning meaningless Republican primary narratives, they wouldn't have lost seven Senate seats and control of the U.S. House last cycle," said National Republican Senatorial Committee spokesman Brian Walsh. "It is amusing though to watch them do the same thing again in 2012."

Democrats respond by noting Republican losses in 2010 in Delaware (Christine O'Donnell), Nevada (Sharron Angle) and Colorado (Ken Buck) as evidence that Tea Party candidates can help them.

Michael McAuliff covers politics and Congress for The Huffington Post. Talk to him on Facebook.

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Mitt Romney could help Democrats keep control of the Senate by sewing up the Republican presidential nomination quickly, some Democratic strategists hope. Chief among those are advise...
WASHINGTON -- Mitt Romney could help Democrats keep control of the Senate by sewing up the Republican presidential nomination quickly, some Democratic strategists hope. Chief among those are advise...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 601
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
Clevelandinwi
Progressive is good; regressive, not so much.
09:23 AM on 01/10/2012
Republicans have this problem. They know romney is a 'joke' as far as their 'ideals' go. Then they think that the same thing happened in 2000 and the 'joke' got elected and almost destroyed the country. So what will the next 'joke' do?
photo
AlanDente
Noses: made to hold glasses
09:09 AM on 01/10/2012
Anyone ever seen the South Park episode about Mormonism?

"Mr. Romney runs for President, (dum dum dum dum dum)..."

Amazing how candidates can besmirch each other over views on sexuality, economic views, personal history, whether or not they sexually assaulted a bunch of women in their spare time, whether they can't remember their own policies on TV and whether they're Michelle Bachmann...

But when it comes to truly bizarre views on religion, suddenly 2 of the candidates get a pass. Bit odd, no?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
AxelDC
08:53 AM on 01/10/2012
Teabaggers will make sure the Republican Party is not a viable national party until they die off or the Party splits.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
bighat
Truth as I see it
08:37 AM on 01/10/2012
Romney is a RINO. In any other state other than Mass and perhaps the NE states Romney would be considered a liberal. Not even a centrist. Quite possibly more liberal than Obama.
08:07 AM on 01/10/2012
All the candidates helps the Democrats. If they truly believe in moving the country forward, this election should be a landslide for them!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
invmartyc
Am I not turtle enough for the turtle club?
07:29 AM on 01/10/2012
All the republicans running for president and presently in congress are a big boost for democrats! The presiential candidates for just being who they are and the people in congress for all their obstructing and work to improve the profits for rich people while driving the middle class into the poorhouse. Good old GOP- Greedy Obstructing Polititians!
nbb
332-206
07:16 AM on 01/10/2012
Mitt could be squarely on message and still be of help to President Obama's campaign. The problem for the GOP Baggers is in their message. They really do not have much to offer the American voting public.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marijam
Independent
06:50 AM on 01/10/2012
There's going to be a Tea Party backlash led by moderates and Independents.
PatrioticUSGlory
Lawyer, Market Analyst, Economist
07:09 AM on 01/10/2012
The tea party is going to react to something?
06:39 AM on 01/10/2012
My point... when I asked a Tea Party supporter to give up his social security and medicare, he refused, but said that since I'm young I should do without it... It's ok if he get's it, but not me... The mantra of the Tea Party.
06:37 AM on 01/10/2012
The GOP is split and vulnerable. Tea Party crazies want to enact severe change that scares a lot of people. There's no real true method to what they want to do other than line their pockets and take away from the American people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dan laurie
Us Not Them Finally
06:23 AM on 01/10/2012
Are the primaries for the SENATE on the same voting day as primaries for the Presidential candidate? I don't think so.
PatrioticUSGlory
Lawyer, Market Analyst, Economist
07:03 AM on 01/10/2012
Each state is different. The Senate primary dates for each state are available online. For example, Virginia's is 11-6-12. However, in Virginia, parties have the option of whether to hold a primary or to nominate their candidate through a party convention
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dan laurie
Us Not Them Finally
06:15 AM on 01/10/2012
What really sucks is that voting is so take-it-or-leave-it in the U.S. People who care so little about democracy stand a good chance of losing it. Yes, money rules politics more and more. But money isn't everything....
PatrioticUSGlory
Lawyer, Market Analyst, Economist
07:04 AM on 01/10/2012
The assumption behind taking money out of politics is that people are scum who will allow their votes to be bought. But people need information with which to vote, and money gets the information to them.
photo
AlanDente
Noses: made to hold glasses
09:01 AM on 01/10/2012
In the UK political parties and candidates spend far, far less on campaigns, and our voters are just as (un)informed as yours!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dan laurie
Us Not Them Finally
09:23 AM on 01/10/2012
its not that... please listen. People are not scum. The Corporations international and very wealthy.they are scum..Why because they only care about their profit and they have lost their souls...First there was the money Barons now there is the Corporatists who live only to serve the massive corporations. The Supreme Court claims Corporations are persons. People have Capital punishment why not criminal corporations????.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lawyer13
retired Lawyer, General and Psychiatric Nurse, wit
05:53 AM on 01/10/2012
A view from across the pond : If Mitt Romney and the other T/Republican clowns represent the opposition to President Obama, then he will be elected for another four years by a LANDSLIDE
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Giggie
06:41 AM on 01/10/2012
It looks like that to me as well, but don't be so sure. I have always thought that their platform was ignorant, and bigoted, but look how they did in 2010.
photo
LINDA MCC IN WISCONSIN
Comic-CONS - PANTS AFIRE!
07:33 AM on 01/10/2012
Since 2010, the country has seen how these cons act and what they believe. The voters have had a long time to realize what damage they could do.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marijam
Independent
06:52 AM on 01/10/2012
Obama will win, but not by a landslide. It's going to be close. Obama's lost support by those former supporters who don't like it that he sold out to Wall Street. On the other side, conservatives that listen to Rush Limbaugh aren't going to vote for Mitt. The two will cancel each other out. So it's going to be close, as usual. I give it to Obama, though, because he got OBL.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lawyer13
retired Lawyer, General and Psychiatric Nurse, wit
07:26 AM on 01/10/2012
"marijam" Just as long as the present occupier of the White House remains, that's good enough for me and dare I suggest America too.
05:48 AM on 01/10/2012
such adorable wishful thinking. If Obama runs, the democrats will be on the outside looking in just about everywhere. The socialist takeover of the once proud party of the working class doomed them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dan laurie
Us Not Them Finally
06:17 AM on 01/10/2012
You said WHAT in Oppositeland? "Socialist takeover"? We're all on the floor laughing.
PatrioticUSGlory
Lawyer, Market Analyst, Economist
07:06 AM on 01/10/2012
So the Government's hand in business is not socialism. Time to go back to class.
07:48 AM on 01/10/2012
We? How many of you are in their? I guess it takes a village to be so obtuse.
06:33 AM on 01/10/2012
I don't understand because birth control, marriage and abortion are all socialist programs being initiated by the GOP who claim that they want zero government intervention. I guess that corporations can run ramped while We The People become enslaved by their propaganda.
07:46 AM on 01/10/2012
wow. public school education?
05:41 AM on 01/10/2012
Are we realy thinking of giving up on President Obama? The money he gave Wall Street and the Auto Compants has almost all been repayed and with intrest. This stop the county from falling farther and saved houndreds of thousand of auto worker jobs, again stoping a great fall into a larger recession. His healt care program will give insurence to almost 40,000,000 of uninsure. ' and by 2014 people that are already sick will no long be denined coverage, no small feat. The rebublican have tried in every way to misinfomr the public on all these programs and I think you know that. They too have done evertyhing in their power to stop the work of Congress. All just to make the President look bad and unelectable. Rather mean spirted to say the least.

REELECT PRESENT OBAMA IN 2012! Let him finish his job, he has proved himself, no matter how the GOP tried their best to make him look like a failure by not work together in Congress. Their plan has backfired.

OBAMA IN 2012 It would be good for America!
It's time to open your eyes and think that concidering the difficulties of these past years Prtesident Obama has done a good job and you should give him a fair concieration to reelect him.