iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Having An Only Child: Is It Selfish?

Only Child

  First Posted: 01/10/2012 10:44 pm Updated: 01/13/2012 1:27 pm

By Susan Newman, Ph.D.

Within a few months of my son's birth, I was put on the questioning block, "When are you having another?" I heard that almost as frequently as, "What a cute guy he is." My husband and I had some questions of our own: Would our son be lonely, spoiled, bossy as people tried to tell us. What would it be like for him to grow up without siblings?

The "have-another" campaign intensified as our son got older. Some comments were harsh: "How can you do THAT to your child!" "He needs a sibling." If you are considering or have a singleton, you undoubtedly will hear a variation on the theme, "You are being selfish." Were we?

Related: 10 things every woman should do before getting pregnant

Friends, neighbors, parents, and in-laws -- even perfect strangers -- have no qualms about inserting their opinions into your reproductive life. It's enough to make you wonder if you are being selfish or potentially damaging your child. For parents of one, the attacks may not stop until you are too old to have or adopt another child.

The admonishments are surprising given that the single-child family is the fastest growing family unit -- not just in the US, but worldwide in most developed countries. In England, for example, 46 percent of families have one child; in Spain and Portugal, 30 percent. According to the US Census, one-child families represent 22 percent (and climbing) of families -- and 30 percent in major metropolitan areas. The Traditional Family as we knew it -- "a boy for you, a girl for me," dad at work, mom home -- has changed dramatically. In fact, new Pew Research Center findings confirm that women are holding off on having babies; declines in birth rates were particularly sharp between 2007 (before the recession) and 2009 (the latest data available). Provisional numbers for 2010 reveal the decline continues.

Realism vs. Selfishness

Women are marrying and starting their families later than in previous generations and often face infertility when attempting to conceive a first or more children. For the first time in history, there are more women than men in the labor force. Over 70 percent of mothers with young children work -- some because they want to, most because they must to help support the family. Holding down a job and raising children at the same time is stressful and difficult, carrying risks in pay increases and in job security.

Related: 10 places I don't want to see your kids (or mine)

A job can be the thing that dissolves uncertainty about having more children. The impact of a second maternity leave, for example, can be extensive, particularly in the current economic climate; someone is always waiting to take your spot. I spoke with a woman who took what she says is the shortest maternity leave on record -- two weeks. When her boss was out on maternity leave a few years earlier, she stepped into her boss' job. As she explained, "I know this can happen, and I'm not about to let it happen to me."

Compounding job security uncertainty is "The Motherhood Penalty." Children help men advance, but mothers pay a price. The biggest gap is between mothers and childless women. Mothers' starting salaries are seven percent lower than women without children; and over the course of a career, the penalty is conservatively five percent per child!

When you combine employment concerns with the high cost of raising children, the trend toward one-child is likely to continue. Although no one likes to put a price tag on children, raising them is expensive. According to the Department of Agriculture, families with an average income between roughly $57,000 and $98,000 will spend a little over $286,000 to rear one child from birth through age seventeen -- college not included. About $46,000 is for food! Those of us who choose one child for whatever individual reasons -- age, infertility, finances, health, lifestyle preference — are being realistic, not selfish.

Only-Child Myths Masquerading as Fact

The naysayers will try to tell you that your singleton won't know how to share or stand up for herself; she will be spoiled without a sibling. The people who think that you are not a family unless you have two children are usually the same ones who cling to the antiquated stereotypes about only children. How many children you have is a personal choice that has nothing to do with the only-child myths that masquerade as fact.

Hundreds of studies conducted over the last three decades have disproven the stigmas attached to only children. For instance, research done at The Ohio State University and ironically titled, "Good for Nothing: Number of Siblings and Friendship Nominations among Adolescents," showed that only children were just as popular as their peers with siblings. Furthermore, the authors noted, “These results contribute to the view that there is little risk to growing up without siblings -- or alternatively, that siblings really may be 'good for nothing.'" Onlies are more connected to other children than ever before by technology, and that connection gives them a social life that extends beyond school hours and the after-school activities they share with friends.

The parents of onlies have not cornered the spoiling children market. In this culture of yes-parenting, with or without siblings, so many children are spoiled because parents can't say no. Look around at children you know with siblings. They are as likely to be spoiled as those without, but society has been programmed to believe only children are more spoiled.

Every child is exposed to an endless array of experiences that will shape his temperament and his functioning as a grownup. Having or lacking a sibling is just one piece of the thousands of pieces that contribute to and shape a child's development... and her joy or misery during her formative years. It is parenting more than having siblings that influences how an only child -- or any child for that matter -- fares in the world.

Related: 7 reasons why I hate kiddie parties

The New Traditional Family

Given the many pressures on parents today, more and more feel that they can be better parents to one. As the parent of one, you can give your child the full benefit of your time, attention, and resources. Most people do a reality check before adding another child to their family. The era of getting married and having the requisite two children is long gone. Family has new definitions that include single parents, gay and lesbian parents, and, of course, one child.

This mother of one sums up the feelings of many who believe a singleton is right for them. To have one child she feels is "seen as selfish, because children are the ultimate sacrifice. Those of us who attempt to make the best of all aspects of our worlds are often seen as greedy because we want it all. I WANT and love my child more than anything, but I also WANT a career and I really WANT a happy marriage. Adding another child to our lives would directly affect two of the three things that have the greatest impact on my happiness quotient."

Turns out she is onto something. There's no question that people with children are happier -- happier than those without children. But, how many? Increasing evidence shows that mothers of one are happier than parents with more than one child. Hans-Peter Kohler, a University of Pennsylvania researcher, discovered that second and third children don't increase happiness. His study of 35,000 adult identical twins in Denmark showed that "additional children beyond the first child have no effect for fathers [in relation to happiness]" and that more children make mothers less happy. Kohler and other researchers agree -- the more children you add to the family, the more stress you add to the adult relationship.

Having one child may not be what you intended when you started your family, but it is increasingly a popular, happy choice. "Here's how I approach it," explains Melanie, one of the hundreds of people I interviewed when doing research on only children. "I only look forward. You can't go back and think, 'Did I make a mistake?' I never felt that way. I wondered if I would question myself, but she's eighteen, and I haven't yet."

My son is in his 20s and we feel we made the correct choice for him and for us. As the New Traditional Family with one child takes hold, the good news is the judgmental have a new target -- the childless. The heat is turned down on parents of only children because of singles and couples with no interest in having children. They are childless by choice. The barbs and judgments directed at them will sound familiar to anyone with a singleton, especially the first: selfish, neurotic, childish, materialistic, uptight, even deviant.

Where do you draw the line between being selfish and having a life that allows you to be a content, happy person or parent?

More on Babble.com:
9 Awesome Things You Can Do Immediately After Giving Birth
7 Ways To Babyproof Your Relationship
Hilarious Maternity Shirts That (Almost) Make Me Want To Be Pregnant Again

FOLLOW HUFFPOST PARENTS

 
 
  • Comments
  • 442
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (15 total)
12:54 PM on 03/06/2013
Nice article. It brought me a little comfort. I am the mother of an only child. I have heard "You're not a real parent until you have a second child." I heard "Having an only child is selfish." And one friend who was having fertility problems and who knew I was too, and that I would probably never have a second, told me she never would have had her son if she wasn't going to have another. That's her prerogative but it incensed me. Is a kid like one shoe that there's no point in having if not part of a pair? A salt shake minus the pepper shaker? My daughter and her life are priceless, whether she has sibs or not.There are so many people and things in a person's life to make that life more than worthwhile - and to fill it up with happiness and pleasure. The parents who pass judgement, as you said, are swayed by myths - and perhaps ego.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lisa Shields
Poet & Advocate For Special Needs Children
08:57 PM on 01/19/2012
As the proud mom of an "only", now 20, I understand your feelings.
At first, we did consider having another...but along the way it was clear that we had ENOUGH for one...enough love, time, attention, and patience. We had decided to stick to that number when an accident made further children impossible...but since we had already decided on one, it wasn't an occasion of grief.

When my daughter was ten, there were severe issues---and for several months we fear for her life. People said things like "well you can always have another.", to my horror. A child, be it one or many is unique...and the presence of others does not change or reduce grief.

The next 18 months proved difficult. If we had other kids, they would have suffered neglect. I quit my job, and position on a community executive board to turn my full attention to helping my daughter through a truly awful time. Today she is healthy, brilliant, and in college pursuing a degree in education.

I am always amazed when people say they want three children---or more before they have had a single one. You are the best judge of what you can do, and handle---and that's not selfish.

I asked my daughter recently if she minded being an only...and she said she was grateful that when she needed us the most, we could be there. That says it all.
03:00 PM on 01/19/2012
My friend just lost her only child to suicide, I worry she will try the same thing. I lost one of my 6 children in a car accident when he was 28 and if I had not had other children to live for, no telling what I might have done. Selfish, maybe, but it might also be selfish to have more than one child.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lisa Shields
Poet & Advocate For Special Needs Children
08:59 PM on 01/19/2012
How is that selfish? I think it's more selfish to have too many kids...and then be less parent than all they need.
04:59 PM on 01/18/2012
Is this even a valid topic for 'debate'?

Mothers. Darned whatever they do. Darned whatever they don't.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
GraniteSkyline
I wish you happiness!
07:46 AM on 01/18/2012
I had an emergency C-section at 11AM and around 3PM a nurse asked me in all seriousness, "So, are you planning to have another one soon? Will we see you in here again in a year or two?"
11:02 PM on 01/17/2012
No have as many or as few as you want as long as you raise a good person I don't care. I'm having number 3 number one an two are kind helpful joyful loving engaging girls, but you can have the same outcome with 6 or 1. it's all on us the parents.
07:11 PM on 01/17/2012
This age old squabble it rooted in the desire of people to have certainty in their decision to have none, have one or have more. The certaintly that their decision was right or spot on. People with none will argue environmental demands, food shortage and global violence - okay valid reasons for you. People with one may consider the personal and economic costs of having more than one - valid reasons. People with more than one may think it would be great that their kids have each other as playmates and through life - valid reason. As an only child there were moments I wished for someone to play with but I never felt truly alone, I have known people with siblings that got along with one another and others not so much - even as adults. In the end our reasons are an attempt to optimize the best of life but we shouldn't be under the illusion that one is better than the other - life is never perfect, you can still be alone/lonely even in the company of friends and family, family is important but still takes money to feed them and raising a family of one or more is always more work than one imagines. Parenting is about helping our children, whether they be one or more to overcome the less than perfect in life and to feel loved.
09:23 PM on 06/14/2012
Well said:)
07:00 PM on 01/15/2012
I don't know why people are always giving mothers of only children such a hard time. There are so many only children now, why is there still that stigma about only children.

This is for all of the mothers of only children out there. This is very cute, made me the mother of an only smile!

She's my one and only child

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xiC1prhEyDQ
isisreptiles
Pro-choice, pro marriage equality
07:36 PM on 01/14/2012
Considering what it costs to raise and educate a child, the fact that mothers generally work outside the home, the fact that people wait until much older ages to have a child, and overpopulation, it makes a lot more sense to have only one.

There is also no guarantee that siblings will like or love each other or get along.

Children only become spoiled if their parents spoil them. There are only children who are not spoiled and children with siblings who are very spoiled.

In this day and age, it makes perfect sense to stop at one.
01:50 PM on 01/14/2012
"Look around at children you know with siblings. They are as likely to be spoiled as those without, but society has been programmed to believe only children are more spoiled." It's not "society," it just makes sense. If you only have one child, who are you going to spend your time, energy and money on? Duh. And yes, you can have 2 or 3 spoiled children, but at the end of the day, those 2 or 3 chidlren know full well that parents have to spend time with ALL of them and none of them feel that they're the only ones getting it all.

I was 10 when my brother was born, so I was basically an only child. I love, however, having my brother to help with my elderly parents now. My children had an uncle who loved them as unconditionally as I did. He's been there for me, I am so grateful that my parents gave me a sibling after all.

I don't care what anyone does with their family, a couple can make that determination on their own and it's none of anybody else's business, but yes, if you only have one, you will have a spoiled child. However, there are lots and lots of wonderful, caring, nurturing, respectful, kind "spoiled" children and grownups out there.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kenneth Alton
11:44 AM on 01/14/2012
I wonder how much of the trend (over the centuries, not just the past few decades) towards having smaller and smaller families till, ultimately, just having one child is a reflection of better medical care. Sure, modern economics (no longer living off the land, later marriages, both parents working) play an important factor. But there was a time when if half your children lived to adulthood a parent might consider themselves incredibly fortunate. (There are still parts of the world where that remains true.)

Do we choose to stop at one, placing the totality of our hearts into their tiny hands, in part because we no longer need doubt or fear that our wee bonnie will always be with us?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NoSandwiches
11:28 AM on 01/14/2012
I raised an only child to age 18 and then became pregnant at the age of 40. We raised or second son to the age of 5 as an only child, then took in our niece and her 3 year old who is now 5. I can tell you that from the perspective of a parent who has "done both" that it is much more rewarding to have two kids for both the children and the parents. My son used to come home after we picked him up from Gramma's and pretty much do nothing. He had lots of toys but never really played with them. With another child in the house, they play imaginative games together, play with the blocks and cars and crayons in a furiously happy manner. Both my niece and my husband agree with me that these boys are better for having each other. My son teaches his "cousin" every day, and in return he gets to learn how to deal with a younger brother--something that has really helped him handle conflict in school where before he would cry. When children are happier, adults are happier.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
GraniteSkyline
I wish you happiness!
07:51 AM on 01/18/2012
You're lucky they get along. My kids get along okay but my best friend's two kids are like water and oil--or fire and gasoline. They have two very different personalities and they just conflict over everything.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ragdolly
Consider the lilies of the field.
08:55 AM on 01/18/2012
You are right about personality clashes. Everyone used to tell me how lucky I was to have a 'big' brother, however, my big brother was very cruel to me and I was afraid of him, so I didn't tell anyone. He is a really nice man now, and I love him, but he made my young childhood very difficult. I think that family dynamics are often very difficult to understand. I've sometimes thought that it was because I was a"surprise" baby. My father was 46 and my mother 40 when I was born. Perhaps they just didn't have the energy to supervise adequately, as they did with earlier children. It certainly made me a vigilant parent! My own three got along quite well together most of the time.
10:59 AM on 01/14/2012
Well, considering the fact that all beings that enter into this world have to suffer and die, it is a selfish act to have any kids at all. People have kids because they think it's going to make them happy. They're not considering the kid. More kids, more selfish.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NoSandwiches
11:35 AM on 01/14/2012
My surprise child (at age 40) helped ease the suffering and prolong the lives of both my mother-in-law and my mother. My mother-in-law suffered from dementia, but the one memory that she could form and keep in her muddled mind was that her son was going to have a baby. His visits brought smiles on the faces of everyone at the facility. My mom lost my dad at 52, then suffered through cancer that nearly killed her and left her weak. She didn't give up and works 10 times harder to stay health because she gets to be his care provider after school. This child, who came into the world despite problems with infertility (we did not try to have a child) is one of the happiest kids I know. He is an old soul that loves to rock and talk with gramma, and is very cooperative, entertaining, and easy for her to watch. While I agree that plenty of people are selfish about children, you, my friend, could use a hug.
04:36 PM on 03/13/2012
How much more happier she could have been if you have more children. It is not your choice to have only one, is it? Every member of the family would have been happier if you had more kids, don't you think so?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
GraniteSkyline
I wish you happiness!
07:52 AM on 01/18/2012
So having kids is selfish and therefore no one should have kids? How long do you think that plan can go on?
06:13 PM on 01/13/2012
"There's no question that people with children are happier -- happier than those without children."

Baloney! Not true for me.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tjsmother
wife, mother, and open-minded. Too smart for most
12:13 AM on 01/14/2012
I agree. I might be a mom, but those I know who don't have kids (or want kids) are just as happy as my husband and I are as parents.
12:51 AM on 01/14/2012
Exactly. I think what does make a difference is where people find their passion - I loved adults, even as a kid, especially older people, and now I work with adults, many of them parents - and I like to think that I'm creating a better world for other people's children.
05:27 PM on 01/13/2012
Children, and how many, would be a personal choice. But let me tell you this -- I used to have money but no kids. Now I have kids but no money --- and I've never been richer in my life, nor would I change it for the world.