More

Illinois Gay Marriage Push In The Works? Proponents Meet, Discuss Strategy

Illinois Marriage Equality

First Posted: 01/10/2012 4:41 pm Updated: 01/10/2012 4:41 pm

A group of Illinois lawmakers have begun laying the groundwork for their latest push to bring marriage equality to the Land of Lincoln.

The Windy City Times reports that state representatives Greg Harris, Deb Mell, Kelly Cassidy, Ann Williams, Sara Feigenholtz and state senator Heather Steans have begun meeting with area LGBT and progressive groups to talk strategy for a bill that could be introduced as early as 2013.

Harris, who was the lead architect of the state's civil union law granting many of the same rights and responsibilities to same-sex spouses as heterosexual couples within state boundaries, admitted to the Windy City Times, however, that taking the next step toward marriage equality will not be an "easy process."

For many LGBT advocates in Illinois, while the civil union bill becoming law in January 2011 was acknowledged as an important political victory, a discrepancy remains when it comes to full marriage equality. Because the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) remains on the books, many rights still elude even those same-sex couples living in states that legally recognize their relationships. And a civil union, they say, is not equivalent to marriage.

Join The Impact Chicago (JTIC) was among a number of groups that took to the streets in a rally for marriage equality in Chicago's East Lakeview neighborhood in June, shortly after the state's civil union law went into effect.

Lauren Fleer, a member of that group, had recently married her partner of nine years in Iowa, where marriage equality was approved in early 2009. She told HuffPost Chicago that the Iowa official who approved their union asked why they, as an Illinois couple newly permitted to enter into a civil union, had crossed the border into the Hawkeye State for a marriage license.

"I think it's generally presumed that civil unions are the same thing as marriage and that's a mistake," Fleer said in June. "They gave us civil unions because they didn't want us to have marriage. We have one set of laws for all the straight people and now we're going to give you a separate and lesser set of laws for all you same-sex loving people and that's unacceptable."

State lawmakers pushing for marriage equality in Illinois said they are looking to the November elections as a crucial political moment as the entire state legislature is up for re-election.

Opponents of marriage equality have also begun their work to block same-sex spouses from being married in Illinois. In September, the Catholic Conference of Illinois announced the formation of a Defense of Marriage department, which it said will fight any attempts to legalize same-sex marriage in the state and work to protect the "stature of the nuclear family -- which provides love, stability and confidence to children, as well as organization to society."

Illinois marriage equality bills have been introduced several times before, but have thus far failed to pick up much momentum. In 2007 and 2009, Harris introduced the Religious Freedom and Marriage Fairness Act, which died in committee both years. In 2009, Steans introduced a Senate version of Harris's bill, the Equal Marriage Act, which also died in committee.

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CHICAGO

A group of Illinois lawmakers have begun laying the groundwork for their latest push to bring marriage equality to the Land of Lincoln. The Windy City Times reports that state representatives Greg ...
A group of Illinois lawmakers have begun laying the groundwork for their latest push to bring marriage equality to the Land of Lincoln. The Windy City Times reports that state representatives Greg ...
Filed by Joseph Erbentraut  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 87
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
07:26 PM on 01/11/2012
So now you are going to try and block heterosexual marriages in Illinois. LOL You have become the very people you dislike. In trying this endeavour you might just get the opposite results. Good luck.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ioan Lightoller
Proud Married Gay Pagan Man
08:46 PM on 01/11/2012
And how will straight marriages be blocked?
09:13 PM on 01/11/2012
Hey loan it mentions it early in the article , i had to go back and to read it , it just caought my eye, so i had to comment. That this a bad idea for the gays in Illinois. Reread it and let hear what you think. goodday
09:14 PM on 01/11/2012
Sorry about the spelling i have fat fingers :)
anon004
With this moniker, you were expecting a picture?
09:40 PM on 01/11/2012
"So now you are going to try and block heterosexu­al marriages in Illinois."

Huh? Is there any supporter of marriage equality, anywhere, who is trying to stop straight marriage? Please, life is so much easier when you accept reality.
11:07 PM on 01/11/2012
sorry anon i read that article to fast i was wrong
07:06 PM on 01/11/2012
Each state has its own laws around marriage, if someone is married in one state and moves to another, their marriage is legally recognized. This is not the case with civil unions If someone has a civil union, it is recognized by some states and not others. Some states have ruled that they do not have to recognize civil unions performed in other states, because their state does not allow for civil unions. A United States citizen who is married can sponsor his or her non-American spouse for immigration into this country. Those with civil unions have no such privilege. Civil unions are not recognized by the federal government, so couples would not be able to file joint-tax returns or be eligible for tax breaks or protections the government affords to married couples. In 1997, the General Accounting Office released a list of 1,049 benefits and protections available to only married couples. These benefits include such things as survivor benefits through Social Security, sick leave to care for ailing partner, not having to testify against your spouse in civil court cases, tax breaks, veterans benefits and insurance breaks. Things like family discounts, visiting a spouse in the hospital and making medical decisions if your partner is unable to. Restricting a select group of American citizens to "civil union", and not full "marriage" establishes a "less than deserving" second-class distinction which provides fodder for continuing discrimination in all aspects of fair and equal treatment and basic civil rights.
06:01 PM on 01/11/2012
Yes Illinois, worry about this, forget the lack of jobs and the lower value of your houses, good going. lol.
photo
Aldyth
Advocating for those who cannot defend themselves.
09:44 AM on 01/11/2012
Just do it.

I am so tired of the extreme right wing that runs the Republicans going on and on about marriage being defined in only one way. For Illinois to pass a bill authorizing any two consenting adults to marry and have all of the rights and responsibilities therof would rub their nasty noses in it.

It's time for politicians to get their noses out of our bedrooms.
08:20 AM on 01/11/2012
Great news. I'll be doing what I can for marriage equality in Illinois. As for the Catholic church and anyone else who opposes same-sex marriage on religious grounds, their position makes absolutely no sense because 1.The state of Illinois, like all other states, demands no religious blessing whatsoever for legal recognition of opposite-sex marriage. 2. Many churches gladly perform weddings for same-sex couples.
Nor does the Catholic church's attempt to depict this as an issue of child welfare make one lick of sense. No child being raised by opposite-sex parents is helped by marriage inequality, while, on the other hand, children being raised by same-sex parents ARE harmed by this form of legal discrimination. And, needless to say, gay couples aren't robbing heterosexuals of their children and depriving them of a mother and father. Totally irrational, but then using children to battle gay rights always is and has been nothing but a cynical attempt by the religious right to disguise their simple anti-gay bigotry.
photo
Aldyth
Advocating for those who cannot defend themselves.
09:45 AM on 01/11/2012
You make an excellent point about adoption!
07:37 AM on 01/11/2012
Yes we are ready to get married in Illinois! 2012
photo
Aldyth
Advocating for those who cannot defend themselves.
09:46 AM on 01/11/2012
It's time for our government to quit trying to define what relationships between consenting adults ought to be.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Karla Pepmeyer
06:22 AM on 01/11/2012
In many southern states it was illegal for someone born 'white' to marry someone born 'colored' until the late 1940's. Did this make it right? No, of course it didn't and now it's the 21st centry. We need to recognize the rights of everyone to make a civil and romantic union in the form of marriage. There is no reason not to do so in this day and age.
anon004
With this moniker, you were expecting a picture?
09:57 PM on 01/11/2012
Until 1968, actually, but you are right with your main point.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Karla Pepmeyer
10:35 PM on 01/11/2012
I stand corrected, thanks very much!
04:51 AM on 01/11/2012
This was the last problem Illinois had. After this, it will be perfect.
photo
Aldyth
Advocating for those who cannot defend themselves.
09:41 AM on 01/11/2012
This may be the only thing that Illinois does right this year.
photo
BVictor1
Chicago, My kind of town...
01:21 AM on 01/11/2012
Yeah, we're ready.

Southern Illinoisans aren't going to like it but oh' well...
photo
Aldyth
Advocating for those who cannot defend themselves.
09:47 AM on 01/11/2012
As a citizen of Forgottonia (google it), I can tell you that I will like it just fine. Consenting adults should have the right to marry whoever they choose.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NWBrunette
Blessed Girl
12:51 AM on 01/11/2012
Go Illinois Go! Make America proud.
photo
BVictor1
Chicago, My kind of town...
01:25 AM on 01/11/2012
We'll try.
photo
lovingthismoment50
I cringe at the past and dream for the future.
12:10 AM on 01/11/2012
Do the right thing, Illinois! Show those pesky Catholics that there's nothing wrong with being on the right side of history.
08:29 AM on 01/11/2012
The Catholic clergy is what you mean. Lay Catholics on average are actually somewhat more supportive of gay legal equality than Americans as a whole.
11:29 PM on 01/10/2012
Is ILL-ANNOY ready?

At first I thought YES; it is about time that the state be the last state to approve conceal and carry.

Then after reading the article, the answer is no.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:31 PM on 01/10/2012
Every once in a while IL does something to make me proud. Go for it.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all (wo)men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
Someone will say but it doesn't specifically say "gay marriage"! Well I say tough, it doesn't say only these 3 things, it says "among". If a same sex marriage makes someone happy, I certainly don't object. Doesn't infringe on my rights.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eliasasm
08:39 PM on 01/10/2012
I don't get it! "Marriage" isn't legal for anyone without a civil document. Going to a church and getting "married" is not recognized as anything legal without a civil document. All legal "marriages" are civil unions. If you want to call your legal civil union something else, go for it, but what the he!! is the issue here?!?! There is absolutely nothing in the Constitution defining a civil union. End of story. Let's move on!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bob Kellerman
Let's have more sanity toward each other
10:00 PM on 01/10/2012
YOU DON'T GET IT

Does this help--
"I am giving my daughter away at her civil union"
"George, darling, I could not spend my life with another. Will you civil union me?"

JUST A CHEESEY, UNROMANTIC SUBSTITUTE, LIKE DIFFERENT SCHOOLS FOR BLACKS
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eliasasm
10:21 AM on 01/11/2012
The FACT is that all marriages are legal civil unions. You are free to call it whatever you like. So what's your point?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
talkstocoyotes
11:05 PM on 01/10/2012
No; the legal status is civil marriage. Civil unions have their place as a transition; but essentially Ms. Fleer summed it up quite accurately:

""They gave us civil unions because they didn't want us to have marriage. We have one set of laws for all the straight people and now we're going to give you a separate and lesser set of laws for all you same-sex loving people and that's unacceptable."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tvLestat
07:21 PM on 01/10/2012
thank god they are finally tackling the important issues. i am so sick of them wasting their time on the economy and joblessness.
photo
zeroesandones
just a regular guy
08:10 PM on 01/10/2012
I whole heartedly agree.. And if they did the same federally it would be icing on the cake..
Thanks for caring..
03:11 AM on 01/12/2012
1) why not the other way around guys? – why don't you guys stop fighting against gay marriage..... then we can all get on with focussing on the 'important issues' you so care about?
2) PS it is VERY important to me because I am facing the possibility of being deported from my partner of 14 years - ONLY because the federal government in USA doesn't recognize gay marriage. If we were a straight couple I'd be able to stay here with him as a spouse no questions asked...........see, what is unimportant to you is quite important to us.........
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:30 PM on 01/10/2012
said the guy with nothing at stake.