iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Kansas Voter ID Laws: Kris Kobach, Kansas Secretary Of State, Seeks Citizenship Proof

By JOHN HANNA   01/10/12 09:07 PM ET  AP

An unidentified voter casts his ballot for the US midterm elections at Colin Powell Elementary School, on November 2, 2010, in Centreville, Virginia. (Photo credit should read PAUL J. RICHARDS/AFP/Getty Images)

TOPEKA, Kan. -- The top elections official in Kansas said Tuesday that he'll push for a change in state law to start requiring some potential voters to provide proof of their U.S. citizenship beginning June 15, six months earlier than expected.

Secretary of State Kris Kobach told The Associated Press that the proposal he'll submit to legislators Wednesday would ensure the rule applies to this year's presidential elections. The House Elections Committee was scheduled to meet Wednesday morning to consider sponsoring the plan.

Kansas has a proof-of-citizenship requirement for people who register to vote in the state for the first time and for people who re-register in Kansas after living outside the state, but the rule isn't scheduled to take effect until Jan. 1, 2013. Kobach said he wants to move up the effective date so that it will be in place when voter registration begins to surge ahead of the vote for president in November.

Kobach, a Republican, pushed legislators last year to impose requirement, but some legislators were wary of the idea. Kobach is a former University of Missouri-Kansas City law professor who's become nationally known for helping state and local officials draft measures designed to crack down on illegal immigration, and he helped draft tough laws in Alabama and Arizona. He contends a proof-of-citizenship requirement will prevent illegal immigrants from registering to vote, but he sees the rule as part of a broader attempt to combat election fraud.

"We want the protection in place before the spike in registrations," he said.

Kobach said as soon as legislators enacted the proof-of-citizenship requirement that he'd push to have the effective date changed, but he hadn't publicly disclosed his preferred date until Tuesday.

The Kansas law accepts 13 types of documents as proof of citizenship, including a birth certificate or a passport. A driver's license is sufficient if the state issuing it requires proof of citizenship before issuing the license. Kobach noted that if people can't provide any of the specified documents, they still can submit other evidence of their citizenship and appeal to the State Election Board.

Critics of the proof-of-citizenship rule contend it will suppress voter registration, particularly among poor and minority voters. Kobach strong disagrees, saying it hasn't proven true in other states, such as Georgia.

According to the nonpartisan Brennan Center for Justice at New York University, Alabama, Kansas and Tennessee enacted proof-of-citizenship laws last year, joining Arizona and Georgia.

Kansas also has a law that took effect this year requiring voters to show photo identification at the polls. Last month, the U.S. Justice Department blocked South Carolina from implementing a photo ID law, and U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, during a speech in Texas in December, called on political parties to "resist the temptation to suppress certain votes in the hope of attaining electoral success."

Kansas state Rep. Ann Mah, of Topeka, the ranking Democrat on the House Elections Committee, said Kobach's push to move up the starting date of the state's proof-of-citizenship rule will give federal officials "a good reason to look at Kansas."

"Things are going to be confusing enough for folks," Mah said, noting the photo ID requirement already has taken effect. "Let's get one thing in place at a time."

Mah also said she doubts the state can do an effective job of educating residents about the proof-of-citizenship requirement if it takes effect June 15.

"There's no reason to bring it forward," she said.

But Kobach said his office already has prepared television ads for such a campaign.

Kobach served in the Justice Department under former President George W. Bush, a Republican, and he's criticized the Holder-led Justice Department, under Democratic President Barack Obama, as too political, particularly in handling election fraud and immigration issues.

A year ago, he said the secretary of state's office had received 59 reports of potential election irregularities affecting at least 221 ballots since 1997.

He said Tuesday that his office has an additional 41 cases of fraud from the 2010 election, nearly three-quarters of them involving either felons voting illegally or people casting ballots in two locations. Such cases are being forwarded to local prosecutors, he said.

Kobach argued that such statistics show the state should have its anti-fraud measures in place as quickly as possible. But Mah said problems remain rare and Kobach still can't demonstrate that illegal immigrants voted in 2010 elections.

___

Online:

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Filed by Chris Gentilviso  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 210
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
photo
Theo16610
mea navis aëricumbens anguillis abundat
11:14 PM on 09/25/2012
The Extent of the Problem

During the primary on Aug. 6, 405 people didn’t have the proper photo identification and all were allowed to cast provisional ballots. For perspective, 405 was one-tenth of 1 percent of the 398,367 ballots cast in the primary.

These provisional ballot voters had until the vote was final, when they were canvassed, to present their identification to election officials. This process resulted in 154 of the votes being counted, while 251 weren’t counted because the voters didn’t return with their identification.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Shatz
09:18 PM on 01/12/2012
Kansas activists were unable to obtain free voter ids in media sting (I was there) http://progressivetoo.com/2012/01/12/kanvote-and-occupy-wichita-unable-to-obtain-free-voter-ids-despite-new-law/
photo
Theo16610
mea navis aëricumbens anguillis abundat
02:23 AM on 09/26/2012
They are never going to see 40 people clammoring for free ID,
all at the same time and with the most akward questions.
This makes your episode good film but a faux sting.

Instead of overwhelming them with numbers and noise,
Send in 1-2 people undercover, to really see how the process works
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LangstonA
Attempting to stand in the gap.
07:35 PM on 01/12/2012
So again here is my question. The articles I'm reading about voter ID all say something to the affect that voters will be asked to show ID AT THE POLLS. I haven't voted at a poll in years. I've voted absentee ballot/mail-in ballot for decades.

The voter guide comes to my home address. On the back of the voter guide is an application to vote by mail. I mail in the application. My ballot arrives with its own return envelope. I mark the ballot and I mail back the ballot. I never see a polling place.

Will these laws require people to show ID in order to REGISTER or just show ID at the polls? If they don't need ID to register, why wouldn't people opposing these laws just encourage voters to fill out the absentee ballot/vote-by-mail form that comes with their voter guide right to their house?

This would also solve the problem of people who are elderly and don't drive, people who don't have cars, people whose pay gets docked if they take time off to vote, people who have to pick up their kids after work. Absentee ballot voting seems like a really simple, straightforward work around for people who do not have the required ID to show at the polls.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:51 PM on 01/11/2012
Kansas Voter ID Laws:
Kris Kobach, a Republic'CONS, Kansas Secretary Of State, Seeks Citizenship Proof for voting

The republic'cons' want "US citizen proof" if you want to vote but they are in no hurry to request "US citizen proof" if one want to own a gun? Why the right to vote is being treated differently than the right to own guns again? They both are protected by the US constitution, are they?

The truth is that Republic'CONS' want to suppress the voters turnout and their claim of voter fraud is mostly rubbish!
photo
surfinnonreality
EIT Excellence in Trolling Thanks for the talking
11:51 AM on 01/11/2012
Looks like an attack on the dems vote early vote often philosophy. If there are dirty tricks involved or voter fraud in anyway, then the voters should have to have ID. The fact that it happened and some got caught means there were more who got away with it. Voter ID requirement will effect everyone, dems and Republicans alike. Seems fair to me. Since there is no right to vote in the Constitution, I would like to see everyone who wants to vote provide a paystub from with in the last 2 years to be eligible.
12:32 PM on 01/11/2012
Maybe you ought to take the time to actually read the Constitution.
photo
surfinnonreality
EIT Excellence in Trolling Thanks for the talking
02:04 PM on 01/11/2012
I have. There are amendments that prohibit discrimination of voters by age, gender, race and not paying a polling tax, but the Constitution itself does not give anyone the right to vote explicitly as is does with the rights of speech and religion.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kennethmw
They've got the Blueberries on their faces!
02:26 PM on 01/11/2012
that would probably require an ability to read and comprehend.
photo
They Call Me Mr Snark
GOP = Guardians Of Privilege
11:44 AM on 01/11/2012
The RepubliCorp Party knows the only way they can win is to suppress the vote.
11:31 AM on 01/11/2012
Shouldn't the job of a Secretary of State to make it as easy as possible for people to vote especially in a country like the US where voter turnout is so low? That doesn't seem to be the case for Republicans, though. They've taken a non-existent problem and turned it into an excuse to make it difficult if not impossible for their fellow citizens to vote. What a sad and sorry bunch what used to be the party of Lincoln has become.
photo
millertime
Sometimes facts hurt...
11:08 AM on 01/11/2012
Land of the free, huh??
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dfranz
With Liberty and Justice for all
11:06 AM on 01/11/2012
What a bunch of cR@p. Voter fraud charges are frauds in themselves. The real story is making sure people who don't vote Republican, can't vote.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dorzic
10:45 AM on 01/11/2012
Was recently in Mexico. When asked, four out of four persons said they were not heading to Kansas.
SirCoolBreeze
GOP'ers = Alleged Unindicted Co-conspirators
10:36 AM on 01/11/2012
1996-2008, 4 million votes cast for President in Kansas, a total of 100 cases of irregularities 1997-2010. .000025% of votes.
The math doesn't add up that anything is happening in large amounts.
More Republican Lies.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AnswerToJob
Doesn't play well with Republicants
10:32 AM on 01/11/2012
Charming. Not much to boycott there anyway, best not to LIVE there, but here's a start.

DST Systems Inc. >5,000
Ford Motor Company >5,000
Hallmark Cards, Inc. >5,000
Health Midwest >5,000
St. Luke’s-Shawnee Mission Health Systems >5,000
Sprint Corporation >5,000
Employing 3,000-4,999 >5,000
Honeywell International Inc. >5,000
Black & Veatch >5,000
City of Kansas City >5,000
AT&T >5,000
Southwestern Bell Telephone >5,000
Trans World Airlines, Inc. >5,000
10:57 AM on 01/11/2012
You are confusing Kansas City, Missouri with Kansas City, Kansas! Some of the employers you have listed are in Kansas but most are in Missouri.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AnswerToJob
Doesn't play well with Republicants
11:44 AM on 01/11/2012
Thanks Russ, I DID see that I had picked up a list that started with Kansas City, and NOT necessarily Kansas...oh well, just add Koch Industries.
photo
squat6971
59 *was* divine -- 60? 61? not so much
10:28 AM on 01/11/2012
The Court should demand proof of a voter-fraud problem before allowing these voter-fraud-prevention laws.
10:48 AM on 01/11/2012
just look at the fraud in Bammer's election in Illinois
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
libwithaclue
GOPers taste like chicken and smell like......
11:35 AM on 01/11/2012
I heard that your m@ther was a wh@re and couldn't give it away. Is there any truth to this rumor? Prove that it isn't true.
12:33 PM on 01/11/2012
Go and spend some time getting acquainted with reality.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tangelan
You will not cast aspersions on my asparagus.
10:21 AM on 01/11/2012
The GOP knows that when they DO win its a fluke. Instead of this how about a jobs bill, Kansas?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kennethmw
They've got the Blueberries on their faces!
10:15 AM on 01/11/2012
If you don't want minorities and poor people to vote, Why not just create a poll tax? that's what they did in the '50's. That's where you trying to take the country back to, a time when women and coloreds knew their place. Sheesh!
10:49 AM on 01/11/2012
so valid ID is a poll tax? what are you smoking?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Daniel Zook
Just an observant Millenial.
11:52 AM on 01/11/2012
I think you read the comment out of context. He might have been being sarcastic.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kennethmw
They've got the Blueberries on their faces!
02:25 PM on 01/11/2012
The same thing you are if you think this is anything but a way to try to suppress the votes of people more likely to vote D. That's why school ID's don't work, but Gun Licenses do.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Daniel Zook
Just an observant Millenial.
11:50 AM on 01/11/2012
Poll taxes are illegal. So are reading and writing tests (for the voting process not school haha..) Thanks to confusing language provided from our govn't, they find ways to tiptoe around the law. There is no real problem showing your ID but for those who don't have them, they are told to pay for one in order to vote (that's the poll tax). They don't pay for the vote directly but they pay for the ID TO voteif that makes sense. Also, I.D.'s are free to obtain but you won't hear that from your DMV because they want to make some profit. Gerrymandering is also illegal but it still happens in the form of drawing "redistricting lines" for elections.