iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Linda McMahon, GOP Senate Hopeful, Wrote Keystone Op-Ed Parroting TransCanada

Linda Mcmahon Keystone

First Posted: 01/10/2012 10:53 am Updated: 01/10/2012 11:14 am

WASHINGTON -- After calling out an opponent for plagiarism, Republican Senate candidate Linda McMahon pulled key parts of her own Keystone XL op-ed, which ran last week on a Connecticut news site, from the website of the corporation that stands to profit from construction of the $7 billion pipeline: TransCanada.

In her op-ed, McMahon, who is running for the seat held by retiring Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.), wrote of TransCanada's pipeline: "Keystone XL stands ready to put some 13,000 Americans to work to construct the actual pipeline. These would be pipefitters, welders, mechanics, electricians, and heavy equipment operators, among others."

That sounds strikingly similar to what TransCanada itself wrote of the Keystone project on its website: "TransCanada is poised to put 13,000 Americans to work to construct the pipeline -- pipefitters, welders, mechanics, electricians, heavy equipment operators, among other jobs."

McMahon also wrote: "Another 7,000 manufacturing jobs would be created across the U.S. What's more, thousands of additional spin-off jobs likely would be created by the increased demand for local goods and services along the pipeline route."

Compare that with what's on the TransCanada site: "... in addition to 7,000 manufacturing jobs that would be created across the U.S. Additionally, local businesses along the pipeline route will benefit from the 118,000 spin-off jobs Keystone XL will create through increased business for local goods and service providers."

McMahon's office on Tuesday defended the language, arguing she is hardly alone in parroting TransCanada's numbers.

"These are factual statements widely used by advocates for the Pipeline," said McMahon spokeswoman Erin Isaac via email. "In researching the project and arguments both for and against it, the most compelling language revolves around job creation. These stats are repeated by respected industry experts and across multiple sources including TransCanada's website, which we should have cited in our piece. Ultimately, this project represents thousands of jobs and it remains unacceptable that this administration would continue to put up roadblocks when millions of Americans are still looking for work."

While that response does not address questions of literary authenticity, point taken. McMahon's office is certainly not alone in copying TransCanada's numbers without a fact check or attribution.

But those numbers are pure "monkey math," according to Trevor Houser of the Peterson Institute for International Economics. "They assume that if the money isn't spent on that project, it will get burned in the street," he told CNNMoney.

HuffPost's Tom Zeller has documented that TransCanada's assertion about the pipeline creating 20,000 jobs -- 13,000 in construction and 7,000 in manufacturing -- is a considerable exaggeration. He wrote:

The 13,000 construction jobs, for example, are really "person years of employment" -- a bit of economic modeling jargon that simply means one person employed for one year. Under that scenario, which is laid out rather plainly in the study commissioned by TransCanada but is frequently mischaracterized, a single laborer working for two years to build the Keystone XL pipeline would be counted twice.

So it was that the State Department, in its analysis of the project, estimated that its construction would create only between 5,000 and 6,000 jobs -- over three years.

Construction work being what it is, those jobs would also evaporate as soon as the thing was built.

The Keystone XL pipeline, which would move oil an estimated 1,700 miles from tar sands in Canada to oil refineries along the Gulf Coast, isn't the only issue to kick up copycat allegations in the race for Connecticut's open Senate seat.

After rival Republican Senate candidate Rob Simmons borrowed talking points from the National Federation of Independent Business to describe his own plans for jump-starting the state's economy, McMahon, the former CEO of World Wrestling Entertainment, was quick to condemn him.

"He's running against a businesswoman with real world business experience," McMahon spokesman Ed Patru told the Associated Press. "He's already at a decided disadvantage on the issue of job creation. Getting caught plagiarizing his job plan doesn't help to build credibility on the issue or build confidence."

Fairfield County money manager Peter Schiff, McMahon's other opponent for the Republican nomination, stayed mum on the issue. Simmons' office promptly removed the offending statement from its website, attributing the transgression to one of its young staffers, who Patru said had been thoroughly admonished.

Read McMahon's full op-ed piece here.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- After calling out an opponent for plagiarism, Republican Senate candidate Linda McMahon pulled key parts of her own Keystone XL op-ed, which ran last week on a Connecticut news site, fro...
WASHINGTON -- After calling out an opponent for plagiarism, Republican Senate candidate Linda McMahon pulled key parts of her own Keystone XL op-ed, which ran last week on a Connecticut news site, fro...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 465
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (13 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
George Frank
05:05 PM on 01/11/2012
LInda not only plagiarized what she wrote about the pipeline; if elected she wouldn't even pay attention to whatever environmental hazards are caused by that massive destruction to our country for the sake of "O Canada."
After damaging Americas environment, Canada will be selling that shale oil to Europe from our Gulf Coast.
Linda is in the "pockets" of corrupt greedy Canadian business interests. Of course she fills her pockets by denying health care to the pathetic, misused wrestlers who earned her fortune.
05:21 PM on 02/07/2013
You are absolutely right! Well, as far as I have read about this case I have made some conclusions. First, I would really like her to present us real and definite proofs and confirmations, regarding all these she just claims. In addition, I would like to highlight the fact that the site, where the quotes were picked up, belongs to the Canadian company, which was about to undertake the construction of the pipelines. Seriously?????
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Tuller
Retired News Librarian/Researcher
12:41 PM on 01/11/2012
Aren't Connecticut voters embarrassed enough about Joe Lieberman? Would they really compound their bad judgement for the rest of the nation to see by electing this shameless crook?
10:48 AM on 01/11/2012
The 5K to 6K jobs over 3 years number does not include the ongoing employment to patch and clean up spills, though.
So there's that.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alykatma
08:03 PM on 04/05/2012
Who pays for that.
Activation
The Truth
07:13 PM on 01/10/2012
What, the GOP is the mouthpiece of corporate America? Who knew?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Patriot86
Compassion is the basis of all morality.
07:07 PM on 01/10/2012
well you don't think she could write it all buy herself do you? Linda stop poisoning your employees.
07:04 PM on 01/10/2012
Another comment on XL? Hasn't it all been said already? Enough is enough! As Shatner said to all of the Trekkies on SNL some decades ago ... GET A LIFE! There has to be life beyond dirty oil!!!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bgofca
07:03 PM on 01/10/2012
repugs only win whenever they cheat and lie.
photo
chtrek
MichiganLiberal
06:58 PM on 01/10/2012
I wonder what she would be saying if that pipeline was going through the middle of Connecticut?
09:03 PM on 01/10/2012
She would say "bring it on, we need the work" That's what she'd say
photo
chtrek
MichiganLiberal
08:58 AM on 01/11/2012
I believe he would be singing a very different tune. I seriously doubt that taking a chance on polluting her state for jobs that aren't going to be permanent wouldn't go over too well with the people there and she'd be out of a job very soon.
photo
chtrek
MichiganLiberal
02:19 PM on 01/11/2012
I couldn't respond to your last reply so I'm doing it this way. I'm sure there are many folks in the path of pipelines who use well water and wouldn't be so quick to accept one running through their property. No I haven't heard of a pipeline exploding but there are other ways for disaster to happen and that doesn't mean I want one on my block. These things aren't just a few feet long and nobody monitors every inch of them 24/7 which leads to all sorts of possibilities especially when its in a populated area. I live 10 miles from a nuclear power plant and I'm just waiting for something to go wrong there. I'm not a big fan of messing around with Mother Nature.
photo
Littlewords
I think I am, therefore I am, I think?!?
06:56 PM on 01/10/2012
She's merely speaking, excuse me, echoing like the tool that she is. Beyond that there is the standard truism: Republican, hypocrite be thy name.
06:52 PM on 01/10/2012
If one person creates imagery, text, music, analysis, writings, dance, etc., and another person simply swipes it, it is infringement on the rights of the person who authored or created the work. It is also literary or artistic or creative theft. Honest folks don't swipe other folks creative or work product. They especially don't pretend they have created original work which actually has been swiped from another source. Honest folks don't do it. The thing is also that once a person of public stance has been caught swiping material from another source, there are usually serious, severe, and permanent negative repercussions. This info was apparently widely disseminated for pr purposes by TransCanada and therefore would perhaps not represent a serious breach of copywrite laws. It is also extremely unlikely that Transcanada would bring suit against Linda McMahon for copywrite infringement. This infringement will still though have serious repercussions for Linda McMahon and will bring questions to bear regarding her professional integrity.
10:53 AM on 01/11/2012
It is quite possible that the same person wrote both Linda McMahon's Op Ed and the text on the TransCanada web site.
Copyright law is not the real issue here.
The issue is that this politician is a shill for big oil.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Tuller
Retired News Librarian/Researcher
12:55 PM on 01/11/2012
Let's not forget that most Repuglickin legislation is written by the lobbyists for the industries and businesses it is designed to serve. I'm not sure any of the new Teabagger Repug legislators can write a grocery list by themselves.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sisa
06:48 PM on 01/10/2012
Sheeeessss baaaacccckkkk!
06:34 PM on 01/10/2012
If it cost 7 billion dollars to build a pipeline 1700 miles long, why don't they build a pipeline 500 miles long to Vancouver? They would have 5 billion left to build a new refinery, and assuming most of this fuel is going to China, they would only have to haul it about 5,000 miles in a tanker, as opposed to 12,000 miles in a tanker from Houston. The supertankers polution is not regulated, and the co2 they put into the atmosphere is staggering. There is way more going on here than meets the eye.
06:58 PM on 01/10/2012
That would be too easy and logical. Big oil doesn't abide by simplicity and logic
01:40 PM on 01/11/2012
Actually they want to build a pipeline across the middle part of British Columbia the hearing are just starting, and Harper and his gover't are using half-trues ,lies and innuendo to trip up and stop the opponents of the line.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Lee Harrington
I'd Love To Change The World..
06:27 PM on 01/10/2012
"Shovel-ready" ......more Tea Bagger "Talking Points"

GOP Senator Mitch ""the single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president" McConnell used the same phase.

Now whenever I hear it I think, Mitch McConnell is "shovel ready"....

Lets bury him under a landslide of votes for his opponent next election (2014)

AFTER seeing that Ms McMahon NEVER GETS ELECTED!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Edy Kel
06:24 PM on 01/10/2012
She's nothing more than a paid mouth piece for a foreign country.
01:44 PM on 01/11/2012
I hope not Edy Kel because if she is i want our money back and apology too!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ElleKaye
Beware the Zealots.
06:19 PM on 01/10/2012
You expect Linda to come up with an Op Ed that includes her own Op? Good grief! This woman knows Rasslin! The most profitable fictional "sport" around. Nothing is meant to be factual, not in the ring, and especially not in politics.
07:00 PM on 01/10/2012
Rasslin? Who? Mussolini? Perhaps
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tarby
07:08 PM on 01/10/2012
Wrestling Jeff.
Google her.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Tuller
Retired News Librarian/Researcher
01:02 PM on 01/11/2012
I'll bet she knows rustlin', too.