More

N.H. Election Results: Mitt Romney Benefits From Second-Tier Field That Just Won't Quit

Nh Election Results

First Posted: 01/10/12 11:19 PM ET Updated: 01/11/12 01:59 PM ET

MANCHESTER, N.H. -- Mitt Romney may have formally won the New Hampshire primary Tuesday night, and by a fairly substantial margin at that. But his real victory came in the form of the concession speeches of his competitors, none of whom hinted that they would drop out of the race.

Despite more than four years spent campaigning for the presidency, Romney remains an untrusted commodity in conservative circles. What's propelling the former Massachusetts governor's candidacy this time around are competitors who are, at once, ineffectual as politicians and unwilling to quit.

The anyone-but-Mitt vote remains fairly divided, with Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) firmly winning over a solid chunk of New Hampshire voters Tuesday. Former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman spent time in the spotlight in the lead-up to Tuesday's vote as well, while former Sen. Rick Santorum, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, and Texas Gov. Rick Perry have all, at times, been the non-Romney flavor of the moment.

Were one of the candidates to quit, it could potentially boost one or more that remained. But in the wake of the New Hampshire primary -- in which Jon Huntsman finished third, Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich were battling for fourth as results were still rolling in and Rick Perry came in sixth -- not one hinted that he would even consider blinking.

"Third place is a ticket to ride, ladies and gentlemen," Huntsman told a crowd that was a touch dejected by his third-place finish. "Hello, South Carolina."

"We are going to go on to South Carolina," Santorum said during his speech at the Derryfield Restaurant in Manchester.

Mike Biundo, Santorum's campaign manager, said they will be investing about $1 million in media in South Carolina.

"We're obviously going to put a lot more money into media [in South Carolina] than he did up here, and certainly more than we did in Iowa as well," Biundo said. "We spent $30,000 on the air in Iowa, and we came within eight votes. We spent no money really on the air here, and this is where we came out. We feel very good. I think we have $1 million committed between what we're putting in and what we're going to put in."

And why would they quit? Two contests in, each candidate has a claim -- some more specious than others -- to being the ideal Romney alternative.

Huntsman, for one, closed strongly in New Hampshire, with a populist, post-partisan message that brought him from a likely 5th place finish to a runaway bronze medalist. Santorum lost Iowa by a scant eight votes, and has basically campaigned in the Granite State with an eye on South Carolina, his candidacy sticking, as it has, to social conservative themes.

Gingrich is still looking to even the score against Romney, with an eye toward at least bloodying him up a bit before dropping his long-shot White House aspirations. A potential influx in money to an allied super PAC allows him to do just that while continuing to operate a bare bones campaign. Before the results were in on Tuesday, his campaign had unveiled a television ad, which spokesman R.C. Hammond said would air on South Carolina television, that claims Romney "governed pro-abortion."

Perry, finally, gave up on New Hampshire last week, choosing instead to focus his resources and money in the South, where he has a geographical advantage.

"I believe being the only non-establishment outsider in the race, the proven fiscal and social conservative and proven job creator will win the day in South Carolina," he said in a statement. "South Carolina is the next stop. I have a head start here, and it's friendly territory for a Texas governor and veteran with solid outsider credentials, the nation's best record of job creation, and solid fiscal, social and Tea Party conservatism."

And yet, if each candidate had a plausible explanation for remaining in the race, they also had obvious reasons to drop out.

Huntsman held 170 public events in New Hampshire -- the equivalent of 20 events per percentage point of the vote he received --and still only came in third. Few states will, like New Hampshire, provide him with the type of independent electorate that is drawn to his candidacy. Gingrich scored fourth-place finishes in both of the first two states to vote, and his attacks on Romney's private equity days have elicited disgust in conservative circles. Perry nearly ended his campaign after the Iowa caucuses and, if the polls are to believed, has limited hopes for success in South Carolina. Santorum may seem like a logical choice to become the anti-Mitt. But his campaign has little to no money or infrastructure. And like the rest of the field -- save Ron Paul -- he has failed to actually qualify for several state ballots.

Romney, indeed, had every reason to strut on Tuesday night. He became the first non-incumbent Republican candidate to win both Iowa and New Hampshire and met expectations in the latter race. Were he to have called for Republicans to consolidate their support behind him, it wouldn't have come off as an entirely condescending request. But instead, it was Paul who urged the other candidates to drop out, recognizing that he may need some of the more conservative supporters currently backing other candidates in order to beat Romney.

"The results are in, and my campaign's incredibly strong second-place finish in New Hampshire has the national media stunned," Paul declared in an email to supporters late Tuesday night. "Add that to my top-tier showing in Iowa, and it's clear I'm the one Republican candidate who can take on and DEFEAT both Mitt Romney and Barack Obama."

"The race is becoming more clearly a two-man race between Mitt Romney and me," he continued. "That means there is only one true conservative choice. I urge my opponents who have been unsuccessfully trying to be the conservative alternative to Mitt Romney to unite behind my candidacy."

Also on HuffPost:


Watch the candidates' post-primary speeches:
Mitt Romney
1  of  7
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
"Thank you, New Hampshire! Tonight, we made history!" Mitt Romney told a cheering crowd in New Hampshire Tuesday. Romney's win made him the first Republican non-incumbent candidate to win both the Iowa caucus and New Hampshire primary.
FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
MANCHESTER, N.H. -- Mitt Romney may have formally won the New Hampshire primary Tuesday night, and by a fairly substantial margin at that. But his real victory came in the form of the concession speec...
MANCHESTER, N.H. -- Mitt Romney may have formally won the New Hampshire primary Tuesday night, and by a fairly substantial margin at that. But his real victory came in the form of the concession speec...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,248
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (54 total)
  1 of 3  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
ThunderclapNewman 11:14 AM on 01/11/2012
Rmoney has won a caucus and a primary---because he was competing against the weakest field of GOP candidates in memory.

His candidacy is deeply flawed, as are all the Republicans' efforts, and he will not have nearly this easy a time campaigning against the president should Rmoney actually get the nomination.

RNC rules prevent anyone from securing the nomination before April, so Rmoney has  Read More...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gottlieb
hated by left since 1973 and right since 1982
10:07 PM on 01/11/2012
Perry came in 6th is a nice way to put his 0.7% of the New Hampshire vote and his last place finish. Most voters have recognized Romney is mostly ambition with little ability or desire to govern and desperately seek any alternative. Romney being the establishment and corporate candidate status quo candidate is not going to play with the Tea Party. Santorum and Huntsman don't have the money or organization to go much beyond Florida. Paul has money and organization but is more Libertarian than Republican. I think Newt has the best chance of being the any other than Romney Republican candidate since he has money, ego, ambition, and a certain Machiavellian ability. Who ever is nominated will lose to Obama/Biden in 2012 though since the most credible Republican Governors are sitting out and looking to 2016.
08:02 PM on 01/11/2012
Southern red-necks are the base of the GOP so it will be interesting to see if they will support a good ol' boy like Newt or Paul when they get a chance or go for the Yankee Mitt. Of course they will support anyone rather than Obama but will they be able to hold their nose and actually vote for Mittens? Should be interesting.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
cavegal
The Revolution Will Not Be Privatized
07:12 PM on 01/11/2012
Good lord could Perry stuff any more political buzz words into one sentence:
"South Carolina is the next stop. I have a head start here, and it's friendly territory for a Texas governor and veteran with solid outsider credentials, the nation's best record of job creation, and solid fiscal, social and Tea Party conservatism."
What a panderer!  His handlers should see how many more words he can memorize!
photo
gwinegarden
She's an Arctic Wolf
07:11 PM on 01/11/2012
The longer the vicious infighting lasts, the better for the Democrats.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
cavegal
The Revolution Will Not Be Privatized
07:18 PM on 01/11/2012
And luckily for all of us it is all of the Republicans with ginormous egos that are running.  Newt should be a real hoot in the South. You know that's gonna be fun.  Santorum is just so delusional that it is almost, but not quite, sad to watch.  I'm having a howling good time knowing that the American public is seeing the absolute worse in the Republican Presidential field.
photo
justalurker
edited my micro-bio
07:11 PM on 01/11/2012
I don't need a stuffed shirt millionaire that wishes he had the charisma of an Obama lecturing me about "envy".
Blitzschnell
Left-leaning limericks, ballads and prose
07:06 PM on 01/11/2012
Should we stay or should we go?
Since Mitt’s won two in a row
If you’re happy with him, fine
If you’re not give us a sign
So tea bags let us know
Should we stay or should we go?

Mitt’s a tease, tease, tease
He wants everyone to please
He’ll say one thing then back track
“Flexibility’s†his knack
So tea bags let us know
Should we stay or should we go?

Should we stay or should we go now?
Should we stay or should we go now?
You want to burst Mitt’s bubble?
Send us money on the double
So tea bags let us know
Should we stay or should we go?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Mr Universe
Can't stop the signal
01:40 PM on 01/12/2012
Fanned for getting the Clash stuck in my head.
06:43 PM on 01/11/2012
I've always said the only way the "anyone but Romney" thing will work is if some of the others, such as Perry, start dropping out. The current field benefits people like Romney or even Paul, who would otherwise never win the nomination.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rodger leMonde
I call them as I see them.
06:42 PM on 01/11/2012
The more stay the greater the clown performance. Funny watching them spew vitriol on each other.
The longer they hold the stage the funnier they make themselves.
photo
Skunkman
old & decrepit
06:34 PM on 01/11/2012
I'm 81yrs old. Disabled one day long ago in Korea. No doubt
my own prejudices creep up in my posts time & time again &
although I try to be objective & let the facts speak for themselves
I still commit an assault upon the human spirit. My personal
observations are just that. I'm stuck with my liberal ideology &
happy to be so but I wish Romney & the rest good luck. Of course
I want you to lose but if by some miracle you win please do a decent job.

It's what we Americans deserve.

Mike;

Mike:
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
cavegal
The Revolution Will Not Be Privatized
07:15 PM on 01/11/2012
Wow skunkman!  I'm impressed with your keyboard skills and good judgment!  Thanks for your service.  F&F.
photo
Skunkman
old & decrepit
08:05 PM on 01/11/2012
Hi cavegal: (already f & f) Thank you but my posts have been
mediocre at best. It's always a pleasure to read your posts.
As for my service I enlisted so I asked for it & the Chinese
obliged, lol. No thanks necessary.:) Have a happy & healthy
2012. Take care.

Mike:
Blitzschnell
Left-leaning limericks, ballads and prose
07:17 PM on 01/11/2012
Faved from a fan.
photo
Skunkman
old & decrepit
08:08 PM on 01/11/2012
Hi Blitzschnell: Thank you. I write one good post out of 10. lol

Already f & f.

Cheers,
Mike:
06:34 PM on 01/11/2012
Should I stay or should I go?
Never should of been there in the first place, like most of the dishonest candidates.
photo
RUKidding0
Freedom is Fundamental
06:37 PM on 01/11/2012
... like Obama?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sandals
06:43 PM on 01/11/2012
Name one thing that is fact based!
06:31 PM on 01/11/2012
""""""SHOULD I STAY OR SHOULD I GO? """""""------ I would say still and better RUN and save the Campaign War Chest so far collected, money looses its value fast, invest in some new ""Newt Inventism- ent"""""----- that may bring in hefty returns. There is a saying in an oriental language there are others who can do better or show off better in poetry, but in talk and talk nobody can beat him arguing but campaign results prove one thing talk, and talk does not always work. It is the delivery and persuasion and convince people. Good thinking save the boat.
06:16 PM on 01/11/2012
The concern of the NATION should be putting the Lives of the people in the hands of a man who cannot make decision. When will his moment for implosive/explosive behavior come? What happens when we are ENDORSE or VALIDATED by people who cannot VALIDATE themselves? What does it tell us about ourselves and our judgement when we crave to be RECOGNIZE by those who has such little respect for themselves? Take a look at the politics and the BEHAVIOR from the FLIP SIDE of the CHART. Visit http://nldrecognition.wordpress.com. Read and Learn More. NLD Mom/cancer survivor
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sabela
like animals better than people.
06:14 PM on 01/11/2012
The teaser headline on the front page "shall I stay or shall I go" has caused me to have that darned Clash song in my head all day.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jackbutler5555
06:13 PM on 01/11/2012
If the anybody-but-Romney candidates were to coalesce around one candidate, it would not be Ron Paul -- who would remain apart. So, the best they could hope for is a three-way race. Romney probably believes that's quite doable.
photo
RUKidding0
Freedom is Fundamental
06:09 PM on 01/11/2012
I have to wonder at the impetus for this article.

Has the left become so freed from having to work for a living by our redistributionist government that they have nothing better to do than indulge themselves with idle and futile absorption in the conduct of the opposition party's primary process?

Since these same leeches have expressed years of dejection at the dearth of new entitlements emerging from the Obama administration, you'd think that they would be much more concerned with finding someone to challenge Obama in the primary to really push their social democratic agenda.
06:13 PM on 01/11/2012
I have to wonder at the impetus for YOUR comment.

How dare you call people you don't know anything about 'leeches'! You are beneath contempt and deserve Mitt Romney - he appreciates people like you (the kind of people who are really just corporations).
photo
RUKidding0
Freedom is Fundamental
06:16 PM on 01/11/2012
If you are the beneficiary of rent seeking government programs, you are a leech, period.

Produce or leech are the only two choices.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:25 PM on 01/11/2012
I agree with you,are you a leech if you are disabled from a stroke and get Disabilty ?
are you a leech if you have lost your job and get food stamps to feed your childern ?
And the list gos on and on.For a party who call them selfs Christians,
they sure are mean.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sabela
like animals better than people.
06:17 PM on 01/11/2012
Been working my entire life since I was 17 and I am certainly ENTITLED to Medicare and Social Security since I have PAID into them for 36 years.
photo
RUKidding0
Freedom is Fundamental
06:27 PM on 01/11/2012
Examine the consequence of your statement.

Government has taken up to 15.3% of your income for 36 years, so now you are ENTITLED to have this same government put a gun to other people's heads to continue the Ponzi scheme that is steadily reducing the ratio of contributors to recipients just so that you can get your entitlement.

By the time you have finished receiving these entitlements, the cost will have broken the financial back of this country.

Think more deeply.
photo
Lobo912
The GOP is in breach of America's social contract.
06:39 PM on 01/11/2012
I've been paying for 50 years and worked every day of my life since I was 14. Damn right I'm entitled to it.