Domain Names: The End Of The Dot-Com Era?

Domain Name

First Posted: 01/11/12 07:15 PM ET Updated: 01/11/12 10:49 PM ET

It could be the end of the World Wide Web as we know it: After rolling out just 22 top-level domains in the past 10 years, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), the nonprofit formed in 1998 to coordinate the Internet's naming system, is flinging the doors open on Thursday, allowing companies, organizations and cities to register for any generic top-level domain (gTLD) they want.

While most of the websites people visit now typically have extensions like .com, .org or .edu, companies and organizations will essentially be able to make up their own starting this week. For example, if Pepsi buys .pepsi, it can launch its own drink.pepsi website.

By the time the process is finished in 2013, Web addresses could start to look less like the streamlined World Wide Web we know today and more like the Wild Wild West. "We're talking about a large number of words," ICANN spokesman Brad White said. It means a large number of characters as well, in Chinese, Greek, Hebrew, Arabic and Cyrillic -- which White says "can dramatically increase the Internet penetration rates" globally.

Why so expansive of a move? "The whole reason we're doing this is to increase competition and innovation on the Internet," White explained. "We were devised by the U.S. government to increase innovation and competition in the domain space. What we're trying to do is give innovators a blank palette here. We don't know how innovators will use this new gTLD space to come up with new ways to use the Internet. The most exciting thing is not what we can visualize, but what we can't."

Some entrepreneurs are visualizing this as a big moneymaker, and planning to place their stakes as domain-name speculators, according to a recent report in The Wall Street Journal. Some of the in-demand properties include .eco, .bank and .wine.

The opportunities may be endless, but the costs and requirements are exclusionary. It costs $185,000 just to apply for a gTLD, which is "a drop in the bucket compared to the costs of running an Internet registry," White said. "Applicants have to show they have they appropriate capital and technical understanding. The guidebook of how to apply for this thing is 300 pages long. It's not one-size-fits-all, and we don't want people to be caught unaware of what it takes."

That means while corporations like Pepsi shouldn't have a problem registering for.pepsi, smaller businesses may be shut out. ICANN does offer an Applicant Support program that provides financial and nonfinancial assistance to what it calls "deserving applicants," based on three criteria sets: public interest benefit, financial need and financial capabilities.

Although skeptics wonder about possible issues with security or fraud, White said the new space is safer than the existing one. "Rights holders can register to protect their trademark even if they're not applying for a domain," he says. "We do background criminal checks of prospective registry operators, have a trademark clearinghouse and a different dispute resolution program. Current threats were analyzed and the defenses against them were improved upon."

The deadline for applications is Apr. 12.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST SMALL BUSINESS

It could be the end of the World Wide Web as we know it: After rolling out just 22 top-level domains in the past 10 years, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), the nonprofit fo...
It could be the end of the World Wide Web as we know it: After rolling out just 22 top-level domains in the past 10 years, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), the nonprofit fo...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 111
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
11:24 AM on 04/23/2012
Thank you for this great article. I was eating some shreddies cereal as I am reading this and am really excited about what I am reading. I actually really like the idea of being able to be more flexible on the internet. I am excited to see what different companies and retailers will do with this.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gerald Sheffield
My friends in Paris went "gorillas..."
11:36 PM on 01/13/2012
Oh ad BTW, the deadline is months away.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:42 PM on 01/13/2012
I claim .1 Can someone loan me 185K?
04:23 PM on 01/13/2012
How are we going to know the difference between a "government" website from a "commercial" website without the dot com after it ie. www.USA.com or www.USA.gov?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:44 PM on 01/13/2012
You can always tell the difference by the nudity.
09:49 PM on 01/13/2012
Fabini, very funny. The dot com era will never end, they have tried this before with so success. With too many con artists and scam websites out there, the gLTD will not happen.
09:50 PM on 01/13/2012
The gLTD will not succeed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProgressiveCDN
A Progressive Moderate
01:05 PM on 01/13/2012
I'd say this is really cool and even revolutionary.... but the exclusive pricing spits in the face of any prospective small online business. It's a shame really. This kind of pricing goes against everything the internet is supposed to stand for... current domain names rarely reach over $200 to register.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:48 PM on 01/13/2012
There was a day when we the people had control, but that's past, we the monied interests control now. The saving grace is that is unlimited open grazing land. Names are becoming ubiquitous, common, and of no value. ".ksdv§8qfbq1wfoiugva" is as goood as any other.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SmileAndActNice
Utilitarianism, the -ism that works.
12:15 AM on 01/17/2012
I actually have no problem with this .. provided the money is going to good use. ICANN is non-profit so they have to be using it to do something ... what exactly?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank1946
Tell the Truth
09:03 AM on 01/13/2012
$ 185,000 per gTLD..................sounds like IBM again !

A Federal Program to help with the cost maybe ?

SBA ? Grant ? Bailout ?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jabailo
(Participant) Texeme.Construct()
01:38 AM on 01/13/2012
Man, if you thought there was domain squatting before...just wait until this gold rush begins!!
12:46 PM on 01/12/2012
I suspect that those people who have objected below to this TLD policy reform on the basis of vague arguments about the scourge of corporate ownership have no clue what is involved in running a top-level DNS service. Trust me, you don't want to own your own TLD. You don't have the technical competency, the hardware provisions, or the network throughput. It's a big responsibility.
photo
PenguinLinux
got root ?
12:38 PM on 01/12/2012
This is going to be domain camping all over again too.
photo
PenguinLinux
got root ?
12:33 PM on 01/12/2012
I should register .root .corp .local .domain -- and can I register .. too?

Seriously. I can see thin more of a PITA than anything else. Instead of just blocking facebook.com, now I'll need to block .facebook .fb .facebook-network etc. I guess what I should just do is block facebook's IP range anyway.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
arizonahd
I are educated.
12:13 PM on 01/12/2012
I don't get it, why is this a bad thing?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SmileAndActNice
Utilitarianism, the -ism that works.
12:18 AM on 01/17/2012
Its not "bad" exactly ... its different.

Some algorithms optimized for the smaller dictionary may degrade in performance or perhaps fail when previously illegal tails hit them ... And a whole bunch of "match anything that looks like a URL" code will need work ...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Xtazia
come to the dark side...we have cookies
12:01 PM on 01/12/2012
buh? buh? but I like .com and .org. This is gonna get messy
11:58 AM on 01/12/2012
turtleboner.com and boobiesparkles.com are still readily available.
democles
swords-r-us
11:35 AM on 01/12/2012
It was only a matter of time before the multinationals abetted by google,etc., made a play to get people out of the net and make all content pay.
11:16 AM on 01/12/2012
$185,000 should not be considered by corporations as "a drop in the bucket" because it ultimately leads to depletion of nonrenewable resources that will be needed by future generations. This is particularly the case if it is used primarily for "status" purposes or to encourage the further, unnecessary depletion of nonrenewable resources.
12:35 PM on 01/12/2012
I don't understand. Are you suggesting that purchasing power is a non-renewable resource, or that top-level domain names are a non-renewable resources? Both assertions are false.
07:33 PM on 01/12/2012
I am suggesting neither. I am saying that any money that circulates ultimately gets used in part to purchase non-renewable resources, such as gasoline that comes from oil. Until there is better information available that we will not have a nonrenewable resource issue in the future, I believe caution is warranted.