More

New Hampshire Exit Poll Shows Mitt Romney's Strength There, Potential In South Carolina

New Hampshire Exit Poll

First Posted: 01/11/12 04:35 PM ET Updated: 01/11/12 06:37 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- Mitt Romney's solid victory in New Hampshire, judging from the network exit poll, can be credited to two factors that made the state especially hospitable to his candidacy: New Hampshire's Republican primary attracted fewer of the conservative and evangelical Christian voters that flocked to Rick Santorum in Iowa, and Romney benefited from greater general popularity owing in part to his service as governor of neighboring Massachusetts.

The upcoming South Carolina primary looks far less welcoming to Romney. Yet with that state's more conservative vote likely to split among several more conservative opponents, he may still win an unprecedented sweep of the first three contests of 2012.

The New Hampshire exit poll was conducted by Edison Research for the consortium of news organizations known as the National Election Pool. Detailed cross-tabulations were published by NEP members and subscribers, including CNN, NBC News, CBS News, Fox News and the Washington Post.

The exit poll confirmed two major factors that distinguish New Hampshire from Iowa and the other early primary states: Its Republican primary voters, whether they voted for him or not, were more favorably disposed to Romney, and its rules and traditions led to participation by many more independent and moderate voters.

Start with the independents. New Hampshire allows undeclared voters -- those not registered as members of either party -- to vote in the primary, so independent participation has always been high. This year, however, independent identifiers constituted nearly half (47 percent) of the Republican primary electorate, up from 37 percent four years ago.

That surge of independents helps explain the strong showings for Ron Paul and Jon Huntsman, who together received the votes of more than half of the independents (31 and 22 percent, respectively). The pattern was similar in Iowa, where Ron Paul alone received 43 percent of the independent vote, although independents were just a quarter (23 percent) of the Iowa caucus electorate.

2012-01-11-Blumenthal-NHexitbyparty.png

But the results among New Hampshire's Republicans may be a more important indicator of potential going forward. Romney won nearly half of their vote (49 percent), with Paul and Huntsman running far behind (15 and 10 percent, respectively). In Iowa, over half the vote among Republican identifiers went to either Romney (27 percent) or Rick Santorum (29 percent), with none of the other candidates winning more than 14 percent.

The independent vote will likely be less of a factor in the next two contests. In 2008, self-identified Republicans were 80 percent of the Republican primary electorates in both South Carolina and Florida. So at very least, those states appear less hospitable to the Paul and Huntsman candidacies.

Next, consider the favorite-son factor. New Hampshire voters were familiar with Romney from his four years as governor of Massachusetts and his earlier U.S. Senate run in that state, given that roughly four out of five of them live in the Boston media market and watch television on Boston stations. That exposure helped make Romney more popular. Pre-election polling by NBC and Marist College, for example, found that more of the likely primary voters in New Hampshire found Romney to be an "acceptable" candidate (60 percent) than did the likely caucus-goers in Iowa (50 percent).

The network exit poll found more evidence of Romney's popularity in New Hampshire. While he won 39 percent of the actual vote, an even larger number of primary voters (61 percent) said they would be satisfied if Romney won the nomination, far more than said the same about Paul (42 percent), Santorum (38 percent) or Gingrich (35 percent).

That popularity helped Romney carry nearly every demographic subgroup in New Hampshire. Paul ran first among voters under age 40 and those with annual incomes under $30,000, but Romney ran ahead with all other groups.

As CBS News exit poll analyst Samuel Best noted,"Romney expanded his support [in New Hampshire] well beyond the groups he won in Iowa." In New Hampshire, he was the first choice of Tea Party supporters (winning 41 percent of their vote), strong conservatives (29 percent) and self-described evangelical or born-again Christians (31 percent). Santorum carried all of those groups in Iowa, where their support for Romney did not rise above the mid-teens.

"The big question heading into South Carolina and Florida," Washington Post pollster Jon Cohen wrote, "is whether Romney will perform as well among these key Republican groups as he did in New Hampshire." Strong conservatives and evangelicals were 34 and 60 percent, respectively, of the South Carolina Republican primary electorate in 2008, compared to 24 and 21 percent, respectively, of the New Hampshire primary electorate on Tuesday.

2012-01-11-Blumenthal-Exitcompositionianhscfl.png

Without the boost of favorite-son status for Romney, exit polls past and present suggest that South Carolina has the potential to be far more favorable to candidates like Santorum, Newt Gingrich or even Rick Perry. But there's the rub. Any one of those candidates might have the potential to consolidate support among the most conservative and evangelical voters, but with all three running, those votes are likely to split.

Such a split occurred in South Carolina in 2008, when self-described conservatives divided their votes among Mike Huckabee (35 percent), John McCain (26 percent), Fred Thompson (19 percent) and Romney (16 percent). But since McCain won 50 percent of the votes cast by non-conservatives, he was able to carry South Carolina by three points (33 to 30 percent) over Huckabee.

If the conservative base divides again on Jan. 21, Romney may prevail even if he cannot replicate the support he won from the most conservative subgroups in New Hampshire. So the continuing campaigns of Gingrich, Santorum and Perry are one big reason why Romney may be able to hold his lead and win the South Carolina primary.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Mitt Romney's solid victory in New Hampshire, judging from the network exit poll, can be credited to two factors that made the state especially hospitable to his candidacy: New Hampshire...
WASHINGTON -- Mitt Romney's solid victory in New Hampshire, judging from the network exit poll, can be credited to two factors that made the state especially hospitable to his candidacy: New Hampshire...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 107
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
08:07 AM on 01/12/2012
hey south carolina are you really going to vote for somebody who looks down his nose at you and thinks you envy him?
01:11 PM on 01/12/2012
Maybe they will because people who aren't aware of FACT, just see what they want to see.
02:21 PM on 01/12/2012
thank you
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rightbrainedleftwinged
08:37 PM on 01/16/2012
Of course. South carolina was voted one of the stupidest and least educated states in the US. I wish the south would secede. Not even a nuclear war is going to change how these people think.
04:41 AM on 01/17/2012
your so right, sad but true
06:25 AM on 01/12/2012
Can He Hold ? Teflon is the antithesis of Adhesion ? Team Romney is Americas Answer for A Pragmatic Visionary. Don't you get "goosebumps" when see him ?
01:12 PM on 01/12/2012
No I get itchy...it must be a rash.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lawyer13
retired Lawyer, General and Psychiatric Nurse, wit
06:18 AM on 01/12/2012
A view from across the pond : I have to ask a very pressing question, with South Carolina being a very Evangelical Christian State, how on earth would a Mormon Candidate like Mitt Romney get any votes, I know that I always advocate that religion and politics do not mix, buy I still in this instant feel that an Evangelical Christian would not feel inclined to vote for someone who is so opposed to ones fundamentally held tenants of your belief, it must be a steep too far.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OldKatt
Yet, forever 21
12:18 AM on 01/12/2012
It looks like Romney dyes his hair and uses botox. A true conservative wouldn't do that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Talossa
Not all liberals are silly.
01:31 AM on 01/12/2012
He even used a teleprompter the other night. Shame on him.
daverfuller39
Unbiased and independent. How everyone should be.
11:31 PM on 01/11/2012
There aren't quite homers like New England homers.
11:30 PM on 01/11/2012
So, let me get this straight. New Hampshire voters chose Mitt Romney as the best of a bad bunch. That's the main factor. That's the reason. I voted for the one who disgusted me the least. That's the hope of the nation. Mitt stands for nothing, has no platform or plan of action, condemns his own healthcare program................Yep, he's the one. Wow, bring on 2012. If it was possible could we request the election date moved forward. We could surely use the time for better use and let Mitt get back to being Many Mitt.
Mochilero
Have backpack, will travel
11:02 PM on 01/11/2012
How about because most of the competition is clinically insane?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paperless Tiger
12:05 AM on 01/12/2012
Fanned. He almost seems normal.
01:17 PM on 01/12/2012
I like your qualifier "almost."
He's like the others... only in his own way (his political false face is more acceptable in our society).
10:29 PM on 01/11/2012
Romney will win South Carolina. South Carolina republicans are sheep of Bob Jones III and pretty much follow what he says without thought - like lemmings running off a cliff. BJIII - the gay hater and hate-speachmonger has endorsed Romney. So SC republicants will vote for Romney
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
happiness333
10:24 PM on 01/11/2012
The video, "When Mitt Romney Came to Town," is definitely a MUST SEE! Very informational and telling. It can be found on YouTube.
11:30 PM on 01/11/2012
everyone should see this. being talked about by lots of people.
10:13 PM on 01/11/2012
There's not a single one of these bozo's that stand a chance of becoming President. Mr. Romney might have stood a chance if he would have stuck to his principles as a moderate, providing he could have won the nomination with the current crop of wacko's who are making the decisions in the party; that aside, it'll be the same result as when Ellen Craswell (who!?!) ran for governor in Washington State. It was a landslide win for the democrates. Too far to the, or too far to the right only guarantees the other side wins.
10:10 PM on 01/11/2012
Er.. I didn't watch the victory speech, but in the film clips..was that a teleprompter I spied?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:41 PM on 01/11/2012
Remember those hay bales that he used to put on the stage and how one of them was always standing up on end? That one hid the teleprompter from the audience and the press. The New York Times sent a photographer behind the stage and he got a very clear picture of the thing.
10:56 PM on 01/11/2012
staged everything to fool the weak minded
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OldKatt
Yet, forever 21
12:20 AM on 01/12/2012
He must be taking lessons from W.
10:00 PM on 01/11/2012
Is anyone else paying attention to the fact that, even though Mitt Romney - as the GOP nominee - cannot defeat President Obama, his "victory" in the Iowa and New Hampshire caucuses indicate a clear defeat for the tea party Republicans!!!! The same tea party Republicans who're now holding a single-digit approval in the House.

Romney's "victory" also suggests a defeat for the establishment Republicans whose sole objective in this primary process has been to put literally anyone in the frontrunner position except Mitt Romney!

The losers of these primaries, the Republican heirarchy (tea partiers and establishment), are now being forced to settle for the one candidate (besides Paul and Huntsman of course who never stood a chance) that they did not want.

Now let's see how they're going to rationalize how the true Christians that they are now support a Mormon for the presidency, or how the true conservatives that they are now support someone who wouldn't know true conservatism if it slapped him in the face. Now let's see just how hypocritical they really are!
10:45 PM on 01/11/2012
Did you even read the article? Romney IS the establishment candidate, the bulk of the Tea Party voted for him, as did Christians and "strong" conservatives. But even more telling were the independents, making up nearly half the voters. That suggests the previous polling is correct that Obama has lost 2/3rds of independents who voted for him in 2008. Your "analysis" is opposite of what took place.
11:02 PM on 01/11/2012
I didn't say that they didn't vote him; what I said is that they have to "settle" for him, which is exactly what they're doing!

The tea partiers settled for Mitt, even though he doesn't represent
photo
Derpwood
The voices tell me that it's all your fault . .
11:17 PM on 01/11/2012
LOL

Nice try
glesslib
Fox proves you can fool people all the time.
10:48 PM on 01/11/2012
Tea Party movement did its dirty work and then what so many others have done before....fell apart. You can't just build on hate and fear forever. You have to offer people something of substance. There never was any substance to this movement...just a lot of old white folks who have had it better than just about any people who have ever lived on this earth.....all of them complaining because things are changing and they can't or won't.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hjo4
you can go with this or you can go with that
09:57 PM on 01/11/2012
The Newt PAC film on Romney has been released and it's damning,

http://www.webcasts.com/kingofbain/
08:48 PM on 01/11/2012
Mitt Romney = Gordon Gecko.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lawyer13
retired Lawyer, General and Psychiatric Nurse, wit
06:23 AM on 01/12/2012
And a Mormon Gordon Gecko as well. F & F from London England
11:24 AM on 01/12/2012
Here's fan 992. A Mormon Gordon Gecko? Does Oliver Stone know about this?
08:38 PM on 01/11/2012
So is this why we hear so much about rich Mormons. Do they have no human dignity. Are they just greedy. I have heard how out in Utah they teach their polygamist families to get on every government welfare and food program. Now here Mitt breaks these companies then has the American tax payor has to bail out the retirement programs. This is a outrage.
photo
Derpwood
The voices tell me that it's all your fault . .
11:18 PM on 01/11/2012
My parents, retired Physicians, lived in Utah and Idaho for about 12 years, and their wealthy LDS neighbors were some real pieces of work . .