More

Lamar Smith, SOPA Author, Says Won't Back Down Despite Fierce Criticism

Lamar Smith Sopa

First Posted: 01/12/12 08:36 PM ET Updated: 01/13/12 11:36 PM ET


By Jim Forsyth

SAN ANTONIO (Reuters) - The lawmaker behind a bill to combat online piracy vowed on Thursday to press ahead in the face of fierce criticism from Internet giants such as Google and Facebook.

"It is amazing to me that the opponents apparently don't want to protect American consumers and businesses," Republican Representative Lamar Smith told Reuters in a telephone interview.

"Are they somehow benefitting by directing customers to these foreign websites? Do they profit from selling advertising to these foreign websites? And if they do, they need to be stopped. And I don't mind taking that on."

The Stop Online Piracy Act, which is before the House of Representatives Judiciary Committee chaired by Smith, aims to fight online piracy of pharmaceuticals, music and other consumer products by allowing the Department of Justice to seek federal court injunctions against foreign-based websites.

Smith said Internet counterfeiters cost American consumers, businesses, inventors and workers some $100 billion a year, though critics accuse him of exaggerating.

Under the bill, if a judge agrees that websites offer material that violates U.S. copyright laws, Internet service providers could be required to block access to foreign sites and U.S. online ad networks could be required to stop ads and search engines barred from directly linking to them.

Heavyweights such as Google, Twitter, Facebook, and Reddit oppose the bill, which came under fire at this week's Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas.

Reddit chief executive Alexis Ohanian has said it would "cripple the Internet" and pledged to take his social media site dark for one day next week to protest the bill.

"This (SOPA) could potentially obliterate the entire tech industry - a job-creating industry," Ohanian wrote on his blog.

Smith stressed the bill would only affect websites based outside the United States and criticized opponents for failing to cite specific sections, saying many have failed to read it and were disguising their economic interests with rhetoric about Internet freedom.

Google executive chairman Eric Schmidt told the Economic Club of Washington last month that the bill would "effectively break the Internet" and he compared Smith's efforts to the same type of censorship that Google has experienced in China.

"There are some companies like Google that make money by directing consumers to these illegal websites," Smith said. "So I don't think they have any real credibility to complain even though they are the primary opponent."

Smith has received numerous awards from conservative organizations for his opposition to efforts to expand the federal government's power.

But the Texas representative says giving Washington sweeping powers over the Internet is necessary to protect free enterprise.

Smith predicted the bill would pass the House. It was about halfway through the process of committee hearings and could go to the House floor in a matter a weeks, he said. The Senate was considering a similar measure.

(Editing by Daniel Trotta and Xavier Briand)

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

By Jim Forsyth SAN ANTONIO (Reuters) - The lawmaker behind a bill to combat online piracy vowed on Thursday to press ahead in the face of fierce criticism from Internet giants such as G...
By Jim Forsyth SAN ANTONIO (Reuters) - The lawmaker behind a bill to combat online piracy vowed on Thursday to press ahead in the face of fierce criticism from Internet giants such as G...
Filed by Catharine Smith  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 117
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tracee Collins
APATHY = COMPLICITY
10:32 AM on 01/18/2012
Now HOW DID WE KNOW it would be a doddering old white man? We just KNEW.
03:47 AM on 01/18/2012
Small government Republicans authoring bills that grant the government sweeping new power and limits the free flow of information. How hypocritical. These same Republicans vote to cut government spending, which in turn affects millions of Americans, but somehow they find it ok to spend money enforcing this law.
10:20 AM on 01/16/2012
He is also the one blocking H.R. 2306 which would end marijuana prohibition.

He is a total control freak, and it's you he want's to control.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:57 AM on 01/16/2012
No way this thing passes. Absolutely, none. The effect on innocent websites would be devastating and it would (basically) mean the end of the internet as we know it.
09:19 AM on 01/16/2012
Can we go back to not listening to anyone over 30?
Winedude
Always enjoying fun in the sun...
11:11 AM on 01/16/2012
That's about as stupid as me saying that we don't have to listen to inexperienced kids under 30. There are people in ALL age groups that are responsible folks. There are also people in ALL age groups that are irresponsible rectal pores...these are the ones to ignore.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tracee Collins
APATHY = COMPLICITY
10:34 AM on 01/18/2012
Dude, I'm 49, and not one of those nasty thuglican fools. Virtually everyone I know is much like me, and....(GASP!) many of us are inour 40s, 50s and some even beyond.....

Age is a number. It's MENTALITY you need to be looking at.....What about "young republicans" groups, etc....?
01:15 AM on 01/16/2012
Then he AND his briber pals will share a great cell block.....
07:58 PM on 01/15/2012
I still don't get it. I am all for SOPA and am NOT a Repub. I have actually read much of the bill and it doesn't look like such a bad thing to me. It DOES NOT give corporations the ability to shut down web sites on their own, only any avenue to petition the Attorney General for action. I mean Apple does this all the time by stopping another phone maker from selling their smartphone just by filing a lawsuit and asking for a halt in its sales. Before their competitor even gets their day in court or has been determined to have done anything wrong.

So if the opponents of SOPA get their way, does this mean that Child Pornography will now be a first amendment issue and be OK? Why not, no one can block the sites? Same illegal issue, same results.

Be careful what you ask for, you might just get it!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Daryl Pienta
Not a fan of the far righ...errr. wrong wing
09:28 AM on 01/16/2012
just more big government.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:55 AM on 01/16/2012
No, it gives the complainer a *direct* line to shut down a website without *any* pre-notification or remedy from that website. To get back up, the website must go to court. So (for instance), someone posts a video to a website which happens to have music playing in the background and the owner of that music can then IMMEDIATELY shut down the website. In fact, even posting a LINK to another site which offers that video will shut down the website at which the link was posted. For highly trafficked sites, it effectively means the END of visitor posting.
08:41 PM on 01/16/2012
That is not true. No death panels either.
05:40 PM on 01/15/2012
I guess Lamar is still trying to get AT&T to move their HQ back to San Antonio.
photo
planetjeffy
On the other hand, you have different fingers.
04:11 AM on 01/15/2012
old media refuses to fix their outdated business model
they prefer to "fix" the internet
and they have found schlubs like Lamar Smith to pay off
08:50 PM on 01/14/2012
Anybody working on a recall election for this traitor? What will it take and when can he be booted out?

And not only him but any and all from both parties who supported this assault on our freedom.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BillKen
01:38 AM on 01/15/2012
Do Texans use the 'internets'? Lamar is a Texan, cut from the same cloth as 'W', a recall maybe
difficult because birds of a feather, flock together. What do you think it will take to stop the
prostituting and get these characters to take care of business for the people, the ones that breath
and pay the bills.
Semper Fi
photo
webwzrd
Reality is liberal indoctrina­tion.
08:26 PM on 01/14/2012
These guys are in the pockets of the likes of RIAA, the big hollywood studios, and large software vendors like Microsoft and Oracle. This legislation would jeopardize more jobs than it supposedly protects, and businesses would use this legislationto go after legitimate competitors or their dissenters. We have enforceable copyright treaties with most countries, and any legislation should target only those we don't have treaties with. It should also enforce due process and have an appeals mechanism, so the website can defend itself as well.
photo
CJ40inWI
Save Pip Boy! Stop SOPA!
07:40 PM on 01/14/2012
This is why we should never let people who have no freaking clue as to how the internet works, make laws about the internet. (This applies to the FCC as well)
06:53 PM on 01/14/2012
The truth is, people are unwilling to or cannot afford to pay ridiculously high prices for intellectual property or copywrited materials. It is incorrect to count the cost to those with the rights using "illegal" sales as a basis. Those prodcuts would probably not have been purchased "legally" because they are overpriced and the consumer cannot afford them.

Government legislation aleady has the consumer over a barrel. We are are forced to consume artificially overvalued products. Our special interest government and corporate congressmen are selling us out on a regular basis. Mandated auto insurance is a prime example of this.

We need new legistaltion, but it need to address conflicts of interest in government!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
drunkarate
02:20 PM on 01/14/2012
There are ways to combat piracy without curbing free speech in the process. Why any politician would think that this "round up the usual suspects" mentality towards the internet is worthwhile is being paid off by those with the most to gain from its passage. And its not the American public, and certainly not the constituents Lamar Smith swore to represent.
photo
flashfyre
Honore de Balzac
12:37 PM on 01/14/2012
It's not just this Lamar that's selling favors to the content corporations, it's also Howard Berman D Hollywood and John Conyers D New Jersey.

Darrell Issa an R from California has been listening to tech people, not just pandering to K street. He's trying to push the alternative OPEN act.