iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Mitt Romney's Gain In National GOP Polls: Why It Matters

First Posted: 01/12/2012 2:33 pm Updated: 01/12/2012 2:33 pm

WASHINGTON -- Over the past week, Mitt Romney's support in the Gallup Daily national tracking poll on the Republican nomination rose above 30 percent for the first time. Gallup's most recent update on Thursday gives Romney 34 percent of the vote and a better than 2-to-1 lead over Rick Santorum (15 percent), Newt Gingrich (14 percent), Ron Paul (13 percent) and the rest of the Republican field.

For the better part of the last year, however, the best advice has been to either ignore national polls or at least read them with great skepticism. The history of the nomination battles of the last 30 or so years has been that the early primary and caucus states reshape the race, by winnowing the field and significantly increasing news coverage. Up until now, many primary voters have not been paying attention and have not made up their minds.

Now, however, with the Iowa caucuses and New Hampshire primary over, the national polls are worth watching closely. An examination of the national primary polls in recent elections shows that the month following the Iowa and New Hampshire contests is critical. That month is when voters make up their minds, often decisively shifting their support to previously lesser-known candidates who have emerged as winners in Iowa or New Hampshire. As a recent Gallup analysis shows, the leader after the New Hampshire primary usually wins the nomination.

In short, January is the month when the party decides.

Consider the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination contest. As seen in the chart below, national polls showed a mostly stable pattern before the Iowa caucuses. Hilary Clinton held a large, double-digit lead over Barack Obama and the other candidates that expanded slightly during the summer of 2007. In the month after the Iowa and New Hampshire voting in early 2008, however, Obama surged. He continued to gain throughout January, following a victory in South Carolina and moved ahead of Clinton in national polls just after Super Tuesday on Feb. 5.

2012-01-12-Blumenthal-2008Dems.png

After February, voter preferences again stabilized for most of the rest of the primaries, with Obama maintaining a modest lead nationally that ultimately translated into his accumulating the delegates needed to secure the Democratic nomination.

The charts that follow, created for The Huffington Post by Pollster.com co-founder Charles Franklin (who now runs PollsAndVotes.com), also track the national polls but focus only on the ultimate nominee. The example below again shows Obama's share in 2008, with each dot representing his percentage of the vote in an individual national poll. This view of the data better illustrates the two distinct bumps for Obama that occurred just after his Iowa victory and again following his big win in the South Carolina primary later in January.

2012-01-12-Blumenthal-Obama2008Franklin1.png

The even more dramatic surge to John McCain in the 2008 Republican contest occurred over the same time period. His support rose roughly 15 percentage points following his victory in the New Hampshire primary, then surged 20 or more points following his domination of the Super Tuesday primaries.

2012-01-12-Blumenthal-McCain2008Franklin1.png

The surge toward John Kerry in the 2004 Democratic nomination race was bigger, faster and even more decisive. By late 2003 Kerry's support had fallen to single digits in the national primary polls but exploded to the mid-40s immediately after he won both the Iowa caucuses and New Hampshire primary in 2004. Two weeks after winning in New Hampshire, Kerry was the choice of a majority of Democrats in every national poll.

2012-01-12-Blumenthal-Kerry2004Franklin.png

There have been exceptions to this pattern, of course. Dominant early front-runners like Bob Dole in 1996 or George W. Bush in 2000 saw little change in the level of their national support following the Iowa and New Hampshire contests. And when early primaries produced a more split verdict, such during the Democratic battles of 1988 and 1992, voters were slower to shift their support to the ultimate nominees.

Consider 1988, when Missouri Rep. Richard Gephardt and Illinois Sen. Paul Simon finished first and second in Iowa's Democratic caucuses, then Massachusetts Gov. Michael Dukakis won the New Hampshire Democratic primary, as expected. Partly as a result of the greater media attention paid to the Gephardt-Simon battle for second place and partly because of the even greater attention given the dramatic New Hampshire comeback by George H. W. Bush, Dukakis saw only a modest polling bump following New Hampshire. Polling was far less frequent than it is now, but his support did not reach or exceed 40 percent nationally until after primaries in March and April finally winnowed the field.

2012-01-12-Blumenthal-Dukaks1988Franklin.png

Romney and Dukakis were Massachusetts governors who easily won their respective New Hampshire primaries, but the parallels largely end there. Although this year's Iowa caucuses yielded a near tie, Romney can claim a victory in Iowa that eluded Dukakis. The remaining question is the outcome of the South Carolina primary, whose role in winnowing and deciding Republican contests has rivaled that of the Iowa and New Hampshire events for at least three decades. The historical pattern suggests that if Romney wins there, as McCain did, his support in national polling is likely to soar.

The signs for Romney are already promising. Again, the Gallup tracking has shown his support rising 10 percentage points, from 24 percent to 34 percent, in the 10 days since just before the Iowa caucuses. Other recent Gallup surveys identify Romney as the only candidate considered "acceptable" by both conservative, and moderate or liberal Republicans and the one widely seen as most likely to win the nomination.

Either way, as the past data indicate, January will be the crucial month. Rank-and-file Republicans have shown unprecedented uncertainty about the presidential race over the last year, as one candidate after another has taken a turn surging and declining in national polls. The next 30 days are likely to be the period when most of these Republican primary voters make up their minds, once and for all, about their preferred nominee.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,900
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (38 total)
12:19 PM on 02/13/2012
http://kookyronpaul.com
09:00 PM on 01/15/2012
Obama was highest Goldman Sachs recipient in 2008. You don't mention that.
08:21 AM on 01/15/2012
If you like Goldman-Sachs you’ll love Mitt Romney

The Big Five banks, Wells Fargo, Goldman-Sachs, JP Morgan Chase, Citi, Bank of America have contributed three times more to Mitt Romney’s campaign than the other Republican candidates combined.

These same Banks have only contributed one half the Romney amount to Obama.

These same Banks received stimulus funds, not the homeowners, but the banks, to build up their reserves while smaller banks like Wachovia and Washington Mutual were allowed to fail and were eaten by these Big Banks. That’s why you are now charged a fee for your no fee checking accounts and other fees have dramatically increased.

Because they can. You must be milked.

And, BTW, these banks along with four European banks, are owners of the Federal Reserve. How coincidental is that?

Mitt Romney has been bought and is the anointed one for next President of the United States. The Big Banks have decided. NOTHING will change.

Your vote has been bought.

This Tribal Elder is very much for Ron Paul. He has received NO banking or large corporate money.

Mitt Romney Contributors :
Goldman Sachs $367,200
Credit Suisse Group $203,750
Morgan? Stanley $199,800
HIG Capital $186,500
Barclays $157,750
Kirkland & Ellis $132,100
Bank of America $126,500
PriceWaterhouseCoopers $118,250
EMC Corp $117,300
JPMorgan Chase & Co $112,250
The Villages $97,500
Vivint Inc $80,750
Marriott International $79,837
Sullivan & Cromwell $79,250
Bain Capital $74,500
UBS AG $73,750
Wells Fargo $61,500
Blackstone Group $59,800
Citigroup Inc $57,050

Ken
06:41 PM on 01/14/2012
Romney says, "corporations are people, my friend". The "my friend" tag refers to some hapless voter who stated the obvious: Corporations are not people. Commercial law does construe corporate entities as "people" for certain narrow, specific and useful purposes. However, it's not clear how corporations recently became living, breathing people. The next question is: Are corporations also eligible to vote and run for public office?

The problem is Romney (and others of right wing persuasion) reject such language as "narrow and specific". They now tell us, corporations are people "for any and all purposes". A recent Court decision indicates a Constitutional amendment is needed to conclusively establish that, "We the People" does not include corporate entities. The question for Romney (and the Court) is: What part of "We the Pepole" do you not understand?
12:18 PM on 02/13/2012
Romney meant to say, "Corporations are my friends, people."
02:16 PM on 02/13/2012
It's a little know fact, but misstatements are a common feature of American history. The Preamble to the Constitution was supposed to say, "We the Corporations of the United States . . . " What Romney meant to say was, "People are corporations too, my friend . . . if they incorporate themselves". Who can argue with that?
01:41 PM on 01/14/2012
momma always use to tell us .son don't laugh at strange people, hee,hee but this barrel of monkeys the republicans have given us; heee heee,mommma is just to,sorry momma,just too ,heeeeeeeeeheeeeeee,heeeee
01:01 PM on 01/14/2012
Will be Romney nominated? MNBC today show one of the Evangelist leader explained that there are around 30 million Evangelist and the reason Mc Cain lost to Obama was they stayed seated at home. He said Romney has a lot to explain about religion and social issues and he almost said that most Evangelist are never going to vote for him. Romney is running ahead because he has the money and organization he had been running since President Obama won the election at the same time he is will not win a single Black vote and most Latinos are not going to vote for him. Romney could go to Florida and tried to speak Spanish and win some vote there at the same time in Florida there are several Latinos groups that do not listen to only one voice, different Latinos countries and different Caribean Islands and different issues. I have the feeling Romney is going to have a lot of hard time to be elected his own Party is not to happy with him!
Ideassoul
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mjc
Avoid printing any..
07:13 PM on 01/16/2012
Don't, please, believe anything that MSNBC states like that. I'd be surprised if there 30 million evangelical Christians in the US for starters. All the support for Romney is based on one thing: many Republicans believe he is the only one who is electable. Period. Why? Because most of the ones who survived a caucus and a primary are so far to the right that they'd never win a general election. I doubt that Willard Romney will be able to either...but maybe it is worth a try...!!!???
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
olerealist
retired trial attorney; former member of VA abd Wa
11:36 AM on 01/14/2012
The satirist, Stephen Colbert turned his SUPER PAC over to fellow comedian Jon Stewart, and announced he’s exploring a presidential run. He made the announcement on his show.

However, entertaining this may be, it is really NO JOKE. Under the absurd rule of Citizens United, COLBERT will be the “wizard” pulling the strings behind an almost transparent curtain which, in fact, enables him to “coordinate” his presidential election campaign WITH HIS PAC.

This “joke” is a masterful illustration of how Citizens United and the consequent “super pacs” corrupt campaign financing process.

Have been a licensed attorney for around 45 years, I believe I have learned a few things about SCOTUS decisions and their impact. I have never seen a court decision which is more destructive of the democratic process, nor one which more denigrates traditional American constitutional values, let alone established law.

There is no limit to the money which whatever, (corporate “persons”) and whomever are permitted to contribute to the super pacs. The “joke” is on anyone who believes for a moment that there no “coordination” between ROMNEY'S campaign and his pacs.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mug555
11:05 AM on 01/14/2012
Mitt Romney is a liar, liar, liar. He will say anything to get elected. There are some people who will vote for anyone who isn't Black. When they say they want their country back - we know why they want it back. An intelligent, caring, diplomatic un-white person in the White House - never.
09:04 PM on 01/15/2012
And there are some people ho will vote for anyone who isblack. Even if they are not qualified. It is a two way stret.
11:14 PM on 01/15/2012
Mr. Potato Head suits you just fine.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Daly
10:15 AM on 01/16/2012
what country are you speaking of?  or did you mean to say anyone that was not black.  The GOTP did everything within their power to point out the obvious , Obama black ego not a true American; never has a group of people been so out of their tree, I mean, they went all the way to Indonesia to prove that not only was they guy black but his preschool was teaching him more that the ABCs.  Just how much more crazy can it get.  This year not a peep from the only example of compassion that WeatherBain could offer up is his hiding out in France whilst his peers were shooting it out in Nam.
cosmicdart
paragon of paradigms
09:39 AM on 01/14/2012
It seems that if Mitt Romney gets into office he'll cut out all the fat and produce a lean and mean machine. President Obama has just caught on to this same idea. But how will this save us $13 trillion. It's like trying to put out a forest fire with a teaspoon of water. Perhaps we may live with this debt until we our robot probes find $200 trillion worth of gold, rare elements, and He3 on the Moon. Lets just say it's on the Moon and back our money with it!
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Daly
10:19 AM on 01/16/2012
Deficits don't matter; so much so that Bush ran up a tremendous one, he never saw a need to be truthful about the cost of his 6 week romp to liberty in eye-rack.  Mission Accomplished; he left office and suddenly your shorts are in a bunch when you learn of having to pay for cleaning up the DuctTape.  Double down on a 2008 reject who can only tell you that corporation are people .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jamico Bob
One can put a price on gold, friends are priceless
08:57 AM on 01/14/2012
I agree that January will be the crucial month for the republicans. I am looking forward to see what "soap opera stars" drop out and who will be man enough to "give it up" to Obama come election day. Wow, this primary must be nominated for any type of award!
11:11 PM on 01/13/2012
Mitt Romney Keeps Defending the Individual Mandate:
http://spectator.org/blog/2011/12/28/mitt-romney-...

The Romney Con Exposed:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=4vS9SF3vc-A
http://inflation.us/videos.html

Rush Limbaugh: Romney Is Not Mr. Conservative:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=bqNvB9p9cdc

Why Former Romney Campaigner Defects to Another Candidate:
http://www.revolutionpac.com/2012/01/former-romney-campaigner-defects-to-ron-paul/

Study: On Spending Cuts, Most GOP Candidates Light On Details; Who Isn't?: http://dailycaller.com/2011/12/30/study-on-spendi...

Another great place for information on the candidates is The Conservative Scorecard, which is an easy-to-read description on the strength of the candidates on key conservative positions. The ratings are based on their prior statements and positions over their political careers. It can be found here:
http://www.conservativescorecard.com/

Jon Huntsman Was for Cap and Trade Before He Was Against It:
http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/jon-huntsman-thought-cap-and-trade-was-awesome-bef

Gingrich would be worse than Obama on Foreign Policy: http://dailycaller.com/2011/12/28/gingrich-would-...
09:35 PM on 01/13/2012
Cain drops in polls, numbers go to other man, both (shall I say three) of them experienced the same
thing in the nineties . No more please, we can do it.An ex adulterer in the oval office and a first lady who had an affair with a married man. These type of persons will be making history that will be read by our children and granchildren a century later .Is this the kind of role model that we want our children see? Hypocracy is the buzz word here.
Protect our children. They are not political ( pandering, expediency, etc), and they need a God fearing leader in the white house as their role model.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Trublulu
06:54 PM on 01/13/2012
What I find astonishing is that Mittie, a person who is part of the establishment that has caused so much grief to middle Americans, is portrayed as some kind of savior to restore the country back to, what?, the "good old days" of the Bush wars, the downsizing of jobs, and the growth of outsourcing jobs overseas?
Republicans have never been happy with the election of President Obama and they would elect the devil himself just to defeat Obama.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mjc
Avoid printing any..
11:48 AM on 01/14/2012
And they are still trying to make contact with the guy with the horns. But think this band of GOPPERS will make it easier than ever for Obama to win, even Romney.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
olerealist
retired trial attorney; former member of VA abd Wa
11:52 AM on 01/14/2012
YUP TRUEBLULU You got it right: "Republican­s have never been happy with the election of President Obama and they would elect the devil himself just to defeat Obama."

And Repub's would squelch any hint of econmic recovery or new jobs until after the election.
The Country be danmed. And be damned if you serve in the US navy under this President or as ambassador to anywhere if you are a Republican.
photo
othel
I believe I don't believe
06:27 PM on 01/13/2012
Remember the "swift boat" PAC and what it did to undermine Kerry in '04? Kerry began his campaign highliting his military background - which the swifty boys quickly undermined. Romney will do same with his "business experience" for creating jobs. I can see his "swift boat" undermining coming from Bain closure ads similar to what Newt's using now.
07:27 PM on 01/13/2012
yeah they gave us bush jr. the swift boaters did. We can blame them for iraq.
06:13 PM on 01/13/2012
How nice! Middle class Americans supporting a guy who made millions decimating working people,
probably paying NO taxes, and most likely has money OFFSHORE. If it weren't for the fact that Romney is going to screw us SOOOOO bad, I would almost say that the country deserves it for being so stupid! GOBAMA 2012!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
olerealist
retired trial attorney; former member of VA abd Wa
11:57 AM on 01/14/2012
Hello silent - --: UNTIL VERY RECENTLY, the average middleclassman believed he might become rich some day and get the loopholes and breaks. That dream is now fading away thanks to Bush and company.