More

HUFFPOST FUNDRACE - Newt Backs Off

First Posted: 01/13/12 06:15 PM ET Updated: 01/13/12 06:18 PM ET

Newt Gingrich is now backing off attacks on Mitt Romney after his super PAC's ads were deemed to contain falsehoods. HuffPost's Jon Ward reports, "Newt Gingrich has called on a pro-Gingrich super PAC to edit a 28-minute film attacking Mitt Romney to "remove inaccuracies" and asked Romney to make the same public appeal to a super PAC supporting his presidential bid. 'This week, fact check organizations like The Washington Post and Politifact have ranked advertisements produced by Super-PACs supporting Governor Romney and myself as containing enormous inaccuracies,' said Gingrich in a statement sent out by his campaign on Friday." [HuffPost]

Fundrace: While Gingrich goes further in distancing himself from his super PAC's attacks than Mitt Romney ever did, by calling for the ads to be taken down, his comments still reveal the Janus-faced nature of the super PAC system. The candidate is able to maintain innocence and distance from the most vicious attacks while still benefiting from those attacks, even if they call for the attacks to cease.

Who's behind the anti-Romney documentary anyways? Barry Bennett, the man who claims he fronted $40,000 to make the documentary, has a long history of running secret money operations including one that was investigated by a Senate committee in the 1990s. [HuffPost]

Super PACs are outspending candidates 2 to 1 on the air in South Carolina. [ABC]

CMAG's Ken Goldstein and Elizabeth Wilner have an excellent piece explaining what to look for in ad buys to understand campaign strategy.

He's in it to win one state! Stephen Colbert announced last night that he is running for President of South Carolina. The stunt appears to be another in Colbert's long-line of expert parodies of our campaign finance system's many absurdities. Case-in-point, Colbert is handing off his super PAC to his show's executive producer Jon Stewart while he "runs for president." That super PAC is already buying air time in South Carolina. And Public Campaign, the campaign finance reform advocate, is teasing a campaign to challenge Colbert.

Tease: HuffPost's Dan Froomkin and Paul Blumenthal will be up with a multi-part series on Colbert's super PAC next week.

Speaking of those coordination rules that Colbert makes a mockery of, turns out that they are nearly impossible to enforce. [iWatch]

A super PAC supporting Ron Paul made a big advertising purchase on Thursday seemingly out of nowhere. The Santa Rita Super PAC filed with the FEC on January 4 and reported an expenditure of $317,541 on Thursday. Most of that expenditure went towards ad buys for seven different ads in South Carolina. The group hasn't disclosed it's donors yet.

A high spending campaign with a high spending super PAC that amounts to nothing. The sad, sad tale of Rick Perry and how money can't always buy you...uh...um...oops. [WaPo]

CAMPAIGN VIDEOS

Help us populate our list of campaign videos. Send any notable TV, radio or web ads that you see to Fundrace. Send your submissions to paulblumenthal@huffingtonpost.com.

Committee: Mitt Romney for President
Spot: "Bright Future" -- Romney responds to GOP attacks on his record at Bain Capital with this ad touting his work creating jobs and helping businesses. The ad highlights Bain's investment in Staples, Sports Authority, and Steel Dynamics, three of Bain's most successful investments. Romney is portrayed as a "conservative businessman" who "helped create and ran a company that invested in struggling businesses, grew new ones, and rebuilt old ones." The ad ends with an admonition to his GOP opponents that these attacks were expected from President Obama, but not from Republicans.
Link: [http://youtu.be/m9LZ3oQzTdg]
Market: South Carolina.
Buy: Undisclosed.

Committee: Restore Our Future
Candidate opposed: Rick Santorum
Spot: "Facts" -- The pro-Romney super PAC takes aim at Rick Santorum for the first time in this ad. Like all Restore Our Future ads, this ad explains its attacks by claiming that President Obama would love to run against Santorum, "Barack Obama knows four facts about Rick Santorum...that you don't." The ad then lists those facts: Santorum's support for earmarks, voted for the Bridge to Nowhere, voted to increase the debt limit five times, and voted to let convicted felons vote. Nevermind that two of those are the same and the other two wouldn't bother the Obama administration, it's still really Obama who is leveling these attacks, not Restore Our Future.
Link: [http://youtu.be/oi6JL8JlLKM]
Market: Unknown.
Buy: Undisclosed.

Committee: Red White And Blue Fund
Candidate supported: Rick Santorum
Spot: "Values" -- Rick Santorum's grandparents escaped totalitarianism to come to America and their values inform his beliefs, according to this super PAC ad. The ad touts Santorum having "never wavered in his support of the unborn and the only one with experience in the fight against radical Islam."
Link: [http://youtu.be/JhNdmD_I3Aw]
Market: South Carolina.
Buy: ~$600,000.

Committee: Newt Gingrich for President
Candidate opponent: Mitt Romney
Spot: "The French Connection" -- Romney is portrayed as a liberal in this ad, which includes a clip of him speaking French. Knowing and speaking French is, apparently, an unbelievable crime in a Republican primary.
Link: [http://youtu.be/tyFaWhygzjQ]
Market: YouTube.
Buy: None. Just a web video.

Committee: Winning Our Future
Candidate opponent: Mitt Romney
Spot: "King of Bain Trailer" -- The 30-second trailer for the anti-Romney documentary features clips of the film showing Romney as a corporate raider who stole from the poor to give to himself.
Link: [http://youtu.be/PyflCSLssuk]
Market: South Carolina.
Buy: Undisclosed.

Committee: Suzanne Bonamici for Congress
Spot: "Bonamici: The Right Priorities In Washington, More Jobs For Oregon" -- This ad comes as ballots go out to voters in the special election race to fill the empty seat in Oregon's First District. Bonamici argues that she will go to Washington to create more jobs for her district.
Link: [http://youtu.be/L8TFSKUROSc]
Market: Oregon First District.
Buy: Undisclosed.

TRACKING INDEPENDENT SPENDING IN THE PRESIDENTIAL RACE:

These numbers represent spending by independent groups, like super PACs and non-profits, to support or oppose a particular candidate for the presidency in 2012. Fundrace will update this spending daily to help show which candidates are gaining from the proliferation of independent groups in this coming election.

Newt Gingrich (R), $982,082 to support, $7,683,140 to oppose.
Rick Perry (R), $3,798,524 to support, $0 to oppose.
Jon Huntsman (R), $2,453,204 to support, $0 to oppose.
Ron Paul (R), $1,319,241 to support, $165,279 to oppose. (+$58,193)
Mitt Romney (R), $930,000 to support, $450,741 to oppose. (+$455,000)
Rick Santorum (R), $832,436 to support, $3,028 to oppose.
Herman Cain (R), $462,217 to support, $0 to oppose.
Barack Obama (D), $0 to support, $429,919 to oppose.
Gary Johnson (R), $518 to support, $0 to oppose.

RECENT INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURES

Citizens for a Working America, $455,000 to support Mitt Romney for President in South Carolina.
Endorse Liberty, $58,193 to support Ron Paul for President.

RECENT POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE REGISTRATIONS

PNC Financial Services Group Inc. PAC, Pittsburgh, Pa., Treasurer: Zandra Moss.
No Compromise PAC, Dallas, Texas, Treasurer: Claude E. Blankenship, Jr.
No Compromise SuperPAC, Dallas, Texas, Treasurer: Claude E. Blankenship, Jr. (Super PAC)

Send tips, hints, submissions, rumors to HuffPost Fundrace at paulblumenthal@huffingtonpost.com.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 133
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
06:55 PM on 01/14/2012
Colbert is the only honest one out there.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BobHiggins
Living on the brink of was.
02:03 PM on 01/14/2012
If Newt is instructing his super PAC to back off and remove inaccuracies from its ads, why does this constitute iunlawful "coordination" between them?
photo
FilthyHarry
Expletive Deleted
01:45 PM on 01/14/2012
He's not mocking Citizens United. He's mocking the SCOTUS, the Congress, Election Laws.

And more importantly he's educating the public about our electoral system in deeper and more meaningful way than any of the mainstream media does.
photo
99er2049er
Obama 2012 - Romney 2048
01:42 PM on 01/14/2012
Just another one of the republican Frankenstein monsters coming back to attack their own.
11:33 AM on 01/14/2012
links aren't working, what's up HP?
11:19 AM on 01/14/2012
What's not to mock...

Corporations are people. Yet corporations don't vote.

If corporations voted, then a small corp owned by one person would get 2 votes.

A small corporate owner gets to contribute as a private citizen as under his corporation. It's a way to circumvent the contribution limits of individuals.
photo
99er2049er
Obama 2012 - Romney 2048
01:44 PM on 01/14/2012
Something else to think about, if a corporation has thousands of workers and the CEO's vote represents all thousand of them and he is likely going to vote opposite of those workers best interests, such as voting for allowing increased pollution from his factory, because they puts profit in his pocket while adding pollution to the city where the workers live, then that CEO is not representing his thousands of workers but only himself.
nothingchanges
too soon old, too late smart
11:03 AM on 01/14/2012
Colbert makes mockery of "Citizens United".................

IMPO..................

Not near as much as "Citizens United" is going to make mockery of fair and open elections.

Remember the 2012 elections well America...............they may be the last ones America as a "Democratic Republic" ever has.

60 years ago America was involved in a "war to end all wars". Many of our fathers died in the fight against fascism, only to see our bought and paid for Congress embrace it today, for campaign cash.

How far this country and fallen, in just my lifetime.

It's disgusting.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
datenutloaf
.......not approved by the moderators...........
10:39 AM on 01/14/2012
Wonder if he'll hold a mockaucus in S C?
photo
Tenderlies1
Im Old Enough to know better, are you
03:23 PM on 01/14/2012
What is really sad is the fact that Colbert a well know comedian as well as Jon Stewart and Bill Mayer are all more knowledgeable than any they have running as President. Of course they intend to make fun of the whole thing but thats exactly what its been. When the middleclass doesn't make money no one makes any not even the rich. And like it or not Unions brought us up and Government is bringing us down. Anyone remember how labor use to be before Union's. If you don't then you better study because you may well be going back. You don't have to join a Union they still pave a way for you to make a living wage and have benefits, with out them no one is fighting for you and your family. Politicians are no longer fighting for this country or its people they are simply enriching them selves and the quality that use to be in the United States is everywhere and going everywhere but here.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lNSCOUT
10:39 AM on 01/14/2012
I wouldn't fret....Wen United Citizens will have the last laugh....and that is why we OCCUPY.
photo
Jaladeno
Jaladeno says he'll never go 3rd person on you
10:21 AM on 01/14/2012
Colbert is a genius at mockery through over-exageration.
11:20 AM on 01/14/2012
Actually, he wasn't exaggerating this issue.

That's how easy the scam is played.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wespenn56
Conservative does start with "CON"
01:23 PM on 01/14/2012
Common sense has failed to show how bad the corruption in politics is...perhaps humor will (and is seems to be succeeding).
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Stephen Stafford
Be the answer to somebody's prayer!
10:16 AM on 01/14/2012
You know the first version of something, the first round or two of a thing, is somewhat like an appetizer. These Super PACs seem to specialize in sugary fat fare for the electorate. Problem is we can't leave this restaurant, and all courses will be served.

I am joining them in a most American Way. Look for my line of barf and scoop bags, to be stationed on a free standing platform next to your television. They even feature a rinse and spit feature, with sanitary wipes. $20.12 of course. Keep it simple.

This will be mandatory come General Election time. I tell you, you won't be able to manage without it. Talk about throw a rock and hide your hand! Any nobody with a few spare millions can get in and wreak all the havoc they like. No one can stop them. They are responsible to no one.

Some of you are now able to understand the billion dollar goal of the President's re-election campaign. They do not know who or what they will be refuting. They just know they better be prepared to deal with all comers right away.

Avoid the rush and get that order in today. Might want to really stock up. The Super PACs are.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PallinAround
In search of truthiness
11:22 AM on 01/14/2012
Citizens United: The activisit Supreme Court's jobs program, proudly brought to us by the GOP on behalf of their corporate-welfare-loving benefactors.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Stephen Stafford
Be the answer to somebody's prayer!
11:34 AM on 01/14/2012
Look for a callback on the auditions for the announcer spot. Well done.
photo
farmilyman
everything is illusion
10:06 AM on 01/14/2012
Citizens United makes a mockery of the election process in the US.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
datenutloaf
.......not approved by the moderators...........
10:42 AM on 01/14/2012
Yep

We have to thank the supreme Corporation K-RATS (kennedy,roberts,alito,thomas,scalia) for their stunningly corporate ruling......

They only ask themselves one question..... WDTKBW WahtDoTheKochBrosWant?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Pearce banned
Never let them tell you it can't be done.
09:56 AM on 01/14/2012
Though it is possible to either parody or mock a parody, it is only possible to mock a mockery, so Colbert's extended skit on American campaign finance should be referred to as a mockery.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
yellowdoggie
Level 1 Baggerese Translator
10:56 AM on 01/14/2012
How about we call it performance art?
09:53 AM on 01/14/2012
...

Never will forget those DC hearings where Colbert made a complete joke of himself...

Didn't know whether to stay in character or not....Dem stooge...
.
photo
Jaladeno
Jaladeno says he'll never go 3rd person on you
10:22 AM on 01/14/2012
But you go on in your regressive little world, steadfastly refusing to get the point he was making at those hearings.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Iarossi
A proudly progressive veteran and educator
10:33 AM on 01/14/2012
You do realize that the fools were the politicians who had a comedian, in character, testify, right? His entire performance was a spoof, and it demonstrated the limited intelligence of those running the hearings and actually asking him questions.

Geez...
11:22 AM on 01/14/2012
Man, that went right over his head.
photo
ruthtruth
seeker of truth, willing to listen
09:29 AM on 01/14/2012
Thank you Stephen Colbert for showing how stupid and corrupt this Citizens United and all the other Super Pacs are. People pay attention. It's time we the people decide who wins or loses. Get big money out of politics and let the people decide. Enough already.