More

Obama's Smaller Government Plan Kindles Some Republican Warmth

Barack Obama Trim Government

First Posted: 01/13/12 06:46 PM ET Updated: 01/14/12 11:30 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- Congressional Republicans are cautiously embracing President Barack Obama's proposal for shrinking the size of the federal government, although many are watching to see if his actions will match up with his words.

Obama announced Friday that he will ask Congress to give him new authority to consolidate government agencies. His first project would involve merging six major trade and business agencies into one and eliminating the Commerce Department. The reorganization would save $3 billion over 10 years and streamline services for businesses.

"Today, I'm calling on Congress to reinstate the authority that past presidents have had to streamline and reform the executive branch," Obama said during remarks at the White House. "This is the same sort of authority that every business owner has to make sure that his or her company keeps pace with the times. And let me be clear: I will only use this authority for reforms that result in more efficiency, better service and a leaner government."

Ronald Reagan was the last president who had such streamlining power. If Congress gives Obama the green light, he would gain fast-track authority -- that is, the ability to bypass a Senate filibuster -- for any number of government consolidation proposals aimed at saving taxpayer dollars and boosting efficiency. The House and Senate would have to hold an up-or-down vote within 90 days of receiving such a proposal.

Key Republicans tentatively lined up to support the president's plan, which isn't surprising given that the GOP is traditionally the party of smaller government. In fact, Obama is effectively forcing House and Senate Republicans to prove their support for paring down the federal workforce.

"I stand ready to work with President Obama on proposals to reorganize federal agencies," said Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

"While I have been disappointed that the White House has not embraced earlier bipartisan congressional efforts seeking collaborative engagement on proposals to reorganize government, I hope this announcement represents the beginning of a sincere and dedicated effort to enact meaningful reforms," Issa added.

Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), the ranking Republican on the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, praised Obama for choosing the Commerce Department as his first target. That agency is "a catch-all department of programs, ranging from weather to the census to trade," she said, and in general, "there is no shortage of agencies and programs ripe for streamlining and eliminating duplication to save money and improve service."

Aides to House and Senate Republican leaders also warmed to Obama's plan, as long as he actually delivers on it.

"While we welcome the president's reported efforts to reduce duplication [and] waste and simplify the federal bureaucracy, we hope that these strong words are followed by stronger action," said Laena Fallon, spokeswoman for House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.).

"Given the president's record of growing government, we're interested to learn whether this proposal represents actual relief for American businesses or just the appearance of it," noted Brendan Buck, spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio). "Eliminating duplicative programs and making the federal government more simple, streamlined and business-friendly is always an idea worth exploring."

Don Stewart, a spokesman for Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), knocked Obama for "presiding over one of the largest expansions of government in history," but said Senate GOP leaders would take a look at what Obama wants to do. "It's interesting to see the president finally acknowledge that Washington is out of control," said Stewart.

Obama's proposal aligns with the administration's "We Can't Wait" message, which will be invoked through Election Day. The president has been saying for weeks that he plans to use his executive authority to do whatever he can, regardless of partisan logjams in Congress, to boost the economy and bring down spending. Friday's announcement was no different.

"With or without Congress, I'm going to keep at it," Obama said. "But it would be a lot easier if Congress helped."

Lawmakers won't be back in town for another week and a half, so Obama will have to wait to see if Congress will grant this new authority.

The six agencies the president plans to target first are the Small Business Administration, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, the Export-Import Bank, the Overseas Private Investment Corporation, the Trade and Development Agency, and the trade and business functions at the Commerce Department. Jeffrey Zients, deputy director of the Office of Management and Budget, told reporters Friday that the plan would result in 1,000 to 2,000 jobs being lost. But those cuts would be made through attrition, not layoffs.

Obama is already meeting some resistance over this first proposal. Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mont.), chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, and Rep. Dave Camp (R-Mich.), chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, issued a joint statement expressing concern about changes to the U.S. Trade Representative.

"Taking USTR, one of the most efficient agencies that is a model of how government can and should work, and making it just another corner of a new bureaucratic behemoth would hurt American exports and hinder American job creation," said Baucus and Camp. "We certainly need to look for ways to reduce government and cut taxes, but not at the expense of programs that are helping businesses, ranchers and farmers create jobs and expand our economy."

Some environmental groups are also dismayed that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which is currently under the Commerce Department, would be transferred to the Interior Department. "This is not merely some technical, bureaucratic shift," Frances Beinecke, president of the Natural Resources Defense Council, said in a statement. "The move could erode the capabilities and mute the voice of the government's primary agency for protecting our oceans and the ecosystems and economies that depend on them."

Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) questioned Obama's sincerity in wanting to reform government at all since he didn't consult with Congress before making his big announcement.

"What's disconcerting is that the president has again chosen not to work with Congress -- even after I specifically asked the Obama administration to fully brief Congress if it chose to reorganize our trade agencies," Hatch said. "As the lead Republican on the Finance Committee, I will discuss this matter with my colleagues and will expect a full accounting by the administration in short order."

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Congressional Republicans are cautiously embracing President Barack Obama's proposal for shrinking the size of the federal government, although many are watching to see if his actions wi...
WASHINGTON -- Congressional Republicans are cautiously embracing President Barack Obama's proposal for shrinking the size of the federal government, although many are watching to see if his actions wi...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8,605
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (93 total)
  1 of 2  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
jmpurser 01:40 PM on 01/15/2012
Apparently the government is too large to comfortably ignore the plight of the people. Let's see: Cutting taxes stimulates the economy! Gosh darn regulations are hurting bidness! It's the government's job to help businesses and businesses' job to help the people! Separate but equal is my preferred civil rights solution! Unless of course you're "indefinitely preventatively detained without recourse to the  Read More...
abhorson
Si Si Chiquita. There's a woman worth her ransom
05:43 AM on 01/18/2012
and today he announced he wants to lower the corporate tax rates .... and Republicans said they supported that TOO...

you know, with him freed from having to run for re-election AND a Republican House and Senate... it might be easier to pass business-friendly legislation than with Mitt Romney in the Oval Office....

and they said Reps and Dems couldn't work together...
06:45 PM on 01/16/2012
That Obama, the fun-loving Kommissar-in-chief, throwing all he BUSINESS agencies under the buss, and reducing his multi-trillion dollar budget by $1.50, what will that merry prankster come up with next??
abhorson
Si Si Chiquita. There's a woman worth her ransom
05:44 AM on 01/18/2012
he'll announce another piece of the health-care law he's canning... might turn out better than hoped
09:20 AM on 01/18/2012
He ain't cannin' nothin', just parking it, leaving his 15 member panel of Komissars inactive but unouched, activated in 2014 when their sleeper cell can open the doors for his political cronies, all on my high schooler's national credit card.

That's the action of the feckless, petty and weak, tin-pot bullies who have little use for we the great unwashed and our free choices, surround themselves with sycophants, always lecturing, never debating or dialoguing, like Hitler, Mussolini, Lenin, Fidel and all the rest of the abusers of power.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rixar13
U.S. Coast Guard Veteran and University
02:49 PM on 01/16/2012
"The reorganization would save $3 billion over 10 years and streamline services for businesses."

Should be a shoe-in via Congress...? sarcasm
abhorson
Si Si Chiquita. There's a woman worth her ransom
05:45 AM on 01/18/2012
you might be surprised... did you see? all Republican leaders announced they were in favor of it
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eagle Rider
Yeah, yeah...that's the ticket!
10:32 AM on 01/16/2012
Stick and move, bait and switch, shuck and jive...
abhorson
Si Si Chiquita. There's a woman worth her ransom
05:46 AM on 01/18/2012
of course, it's election season ... but, if he did win and the Reps controlled House and Senate, and with him NOT having to run again ... he'll really want to say he united the parties and got something done ... so, it might actually happen
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Hillbilly49
Don't tell me you are a Christian; let me guess.
10:16 AM on 01/16/2012
It doesn't matter too much if government is small or large; what really matters, "is it competent."  We had eight years of Bush League Government that demonstrated how destructive incompetent leadership could be. Bush managed to lie America into a senseless war he wouldn't pay for, he decimated FEMA and refused to regulate banking.  We will be cleaning up the incompetence of your Bush League President for many more years to come.
09:28 AM on 01/16/2012
Trick me wunst shame on you.!
Trick me twyst shame on me!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Hillbilly49
Don't tell me you are a Christian; let me guess.
10:24 AM on 01/16/2012
Republicans are always yammering on about small government but what they really want is incompetent government.  That was demonstrated clearly by eight years of our Bush League President giving us all an object lesson in how incompetent he could make government and the presidency.
10:41 AM on 01/16/2012
Not nearly as incompetent as our current president.
Hopefully real change is on the horizon.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:28 AM on 01/16/2012
The only HOPE for America is a Law for the Rebuilding of America that includes the following CHANGE:

Representation of the 50 states is abolished.
(a) The sovereign rights of the 50 states are transferred to the federal government.
(b) The governments of the 50 states are subject to the federal government.
The governors are subject to the authority of the President.
The federal government may modify the constitutional rights of the 50 states.
The President will issue the legal and administrative decrees necessary for the implementation of this law.
This law will become effective on the day of its official publication.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SportyJim
procrastination app coming soon
02:28 PM on 01/16/2012
I assume you'll be installing a new class of ruling elites headed up by Whoopi Goldberg and Joy Behar!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:03 PM on 01/16/2012
It has all been done before and in very similar circumstances of national bankruptcy and working class suffering. In fact, if you read this through, it is almost as if someone in Washington, D.C. read this.

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v12/v12p299_Degrelle.html
11:01 PM on 01/17/2012
we have all that now, plus fried chicken on sunday.
photo
Thumbody
just for the halibut!
09:26 AM on 01/16/2012
What a joke this has nothing to do with savings. It is all about eliminating any assistance for small business in America. The large corporations have been pushing for this to insure that they receive all of the federal contracts and funding going forward. Obama is the worst President in history for small business and entrepreneurs in America in favor of his buddies on wall street. See this and him for what it truly is.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:14 AM on 01/16/2012
A very famous figure in history once asserted: "The people were not put here on earth for the sake of the economy, and the economy doesn't exist for the sake of capital. On the contrary, capital is meant to serve the economy, and the economy in turn to serve the people."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:09 AM on 01/16/2012
“Hmm, a politician asserting his need for the power to do what needs to be done to save the nation from big government. What could ever possibly go wrong?

A famous figure in history once said, "We have the power. Now our gigantic work begins."

http://www­.ihr.org/j­hr/v12/v12­p299_Degre­lle.htmlâ€
08:56 AM on 01/16/2012
This is such a con. He is proposing this just for political campaign funds from big business. FYI Merging wasteful agencies doesn't mean smaller government. The agencies the SBA, OPEC, AND THE EXPORT IMPORT BANK. They are CORPORATE WELFARE agencies. They hand out taxpayer subsidies to prop up private businesses. They hand out taxpayer money to big business
that don't need hand outs but promise to fund political campaigns.
Merging these agencies in with the dept of commerce we might as well call
the new dept. "THE DEPARTMENT OF CORPORATE WELFARE" And giving the SBA a
cabinet position should be called for what it is "CABINET LEVEL
CORPORATE WELFARE".
08:54 AM on 01/16/2012
This Departments are Clowns, so what is going to change, NOTHING
photo
massjim
Dem? Repub? Is there a difference?
08:29 AM on 01/16/2012
Has Obama had a change of heart and become a small government advocate? Of course not, look at the calendar, it's an election year! But that's ok, conservatives will welcome it anyway, and take whatever he gives in reducing government size. His supporters don't actually want this, they will be disturbed at this action, and independents and conservatives will see right through it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SportyJim
procrastination app coming soon
02:32 PM on 01/16/2012
Well it's not much; it's all for show; but it is something.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PollyTics
undefined
07:25 AM on 01/16/2012
I simply wish Obama would answer a question which I have asked over and over again: why do you seem to intent on "kindling Republican warmth" when you leave most of your actual supporters out in the cold?

Now I wilt vote for Obama, but he continues to make it more and more difficult for me to do, so please wake up Obama! It's fine to want to bridge the political gulf in this nation, but to do so at your own supporters and party's cost?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SportyJim
procrastination app coming soon
02:44 PM on 01/16/2012
I'm just this much across the aisle from you politically (center-right), so of course this is appealing to me. I think trimming the fat should appeal to all. It might even affect my livelihood (I work for the Navy as a civialian tradesman). I hope it doesn't, of course. I'm astonished that both parties usually only pay lip service towards bipartisanship (unless it's election year). The current refusal of Republican's to compromise (and it sure seems like it's more for political gain, especially if they don't jump at this offering) is embarrassing and actually makes me pine for the days of Clinton and Gingrich.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PollyTics
undefined
08:50 PM on 01/16/2012
LOL, YIKES...pining for the day's of Clinton & Gingrich? GULP, although I understand what you mean, I might have picked another example. ;-)

It's not that I don't think rethinking of the government operations is out of line, it is that it always seems to come when the GOP is pushing that (or another idea) and not from the center to left of the charts. It's deeply disturbing to me that Obama seems insistent on his idea for bipartisanship when it is clear that the GOP will have none of it.

I will say some quiet prayers that whatever the outcome of this measure, that your career with the Navy is not affected.
oilfield
small manufacturing business owner
10:51 PM on 01/15/2012
maybe give limited authority for one department first....he's not a trustworthy guy.
05:47 AM on 01/16/2012
And I suppose this gaggle of R wannabes running around campaigning is your idea of trustworthy? Thanks, I needed a little humor before I have coffee.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dave dbo
the truth needs no varnish
05:59 AM on 01/16/2012
GW was trustworthy. See where that left the country and the world.
Boehner and McConnell are trustworthy as they fight for big corporations
oilfield
small manufacturing business owner
12:33 PM on 01/16/2012
so do you blame the tech bubble on clinton too?