iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

California School Plan To Scrap Kindergarten Program Spurs Protest

Jerry Brown

TERENCE CHEA   01/13/12 08:30 PM ET   AP

SAN FRANCISCO — California educators and childcare advocates are protesting Gov. Jerry Brown's plan to scrap a new program for children who are no longer old enough for kindergarten.

In his plan to close the state budget deficit, Brown proposes to cut funding for "transitional kindergarten," a new grade level created when Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed legislation that raised the starting age for kindergarten.

Kellie Little, a salon owner who lives in Marin County, said she was planning to send her son, who turns 5 in November, to the new kindergarten program at her local public school.

"Now I'm going to have to scramble to find another pre-K program," Little said. "It's going to be even more expensive. It's definitely something I wasn't budgeting for. I was planning to get my son into transitional kindergarten."

The 2010 Kindergarten Readiness Act pushes back the date by which children must turn 5 to enter kindergarten from Dec. 2 to Sept. 1. The change will be phased in one month at a time over three years starting this fall.

The legislation established transitional kindergarten for kids who don't make the new cutoff date. The program is to be taught by credentialed teachers and tailored to children who would turn 5 in September, October and November.

The governor's plan would impact an estimated 40,000 children eligible for transitional kindergarten this fall – and about 120,000 kids when the law takes full effect in fall 2014.

Brown is seeking to close an estimated $9.2 billion budget deficit for 2012-2013 with a mix of temporary tax increases and spending cuts to social services and education.

The Democratic governor wants to save an estimated $224 million in the coming fiscal year by not requiring districts to offer transitional kindergarten. That savings would increase to $672 million in 2014-2015 when the kindergarten cutoff date is pushed back to Sept. 1.

"Given the fiscal situation the state is in, we should not embark on this type of a program expansion at this time," said H.D. Palmer, Brown's finance spokesman. "This is one of the difficult decisions that was necessary to close a budget gap of $9 billion."

Advocates of transitional kindergarten say the plan would shut thousands of children out of public education, cost several thousand teacher jobs and hurt families that can't afford an extra year of childcare or preschool.

"It's an immense hardship on the families, and it's not good for the kids," state Sen. Joe Simitian, who authored the 2010 law, said Friday. He and preschool advocates spoke out against the governor's proposal at the annual gathering of the California Kindergarten Association in Santa Clara.

California currently has one of the country's latest cutoff dates – about one-fourth of students are 4 when they start kindergarten. Most states require students to be 5 to enroll.

Raising the kindergarten age could lead to stronger academic performance, higher graduation rates and fewer students needing to repeat grades or take special-education classes, supporters say.

Many families hold their children back a year to give them more time to get ready for kindergarten, which has become more academically intensive in recent years, but that isn't an option for low-income families.

Parents who believe their children are ready for kindergarten or can't afford another year of childcare can petition their districts to allow their children to start school early, said Susan Burr, executive director of the state Board of Education.

The proposal to eliminate the mandate for transitional kindergarten is part of the governor's plan to give school districts more discretion over how they spend state education funds, Burr said.

"These decisions are best made at the local level," said Burr, who serves as Brown's education policy advisor.

A coalition of educators, preschool advocates and lawmakers vowed to fight Brown's kindergarten proposal.

"This is a nonstarter," said Catherine Atkin, executive director of the advocacy group Preschool California. "This is not the time to move backward in providing access to public education."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

SAN FRANCISCO — California educators and childcare advocates are protesting Gov. Jerry Brown's plan to scrap a new program for children who are no longer old enough for kindergarten. In his pla...
SAN FRANCISCO — California educators and childcare advocates are protesting Gov. Jerry Brown's plan to scrap a new program for children who are no longer old enough for kindergarten. In his pla...
Filed by Emmeline Zhao  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 151
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GoGrammie
Gay Advocate, Grandma, Space Geek
10:45 AM on 01/20/2012
I was one of those cut off kids way back in 1962. Because my birthday was on December 22 so I was almost 6 when entering school. Because of this I was always ahead in my class and lessons came easy to me. The problem has become what do working mothers do with their children who aren't yet in school? When we offer them viable alternatives to kindergarten which is really more about socialization than learning, we offer them better choices for their children. I think that many kids don't need kindergarten at all. First grade is a fine place to start if reading, writing, and math is what you want for your kids. Naps and games and fingerpainting are fine for baby sitters but not so good for our school system.I believe in the mastery system of learning and not grades or grade levels. If you don't have mastery of every subject that is taught our kids lose and kindergarten is irrelevant.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:49 PM on 01/18/2012
People need to know that public education is just part the grand scheme of the 1%:
1) Hire workers in other countries at less than $1.00 per hour;
2) Pay little or no taxes, which is used to fund state services;
3) Use their tax breaks (which should be going to states) to further destroy state budgets and public education;
4) The middle class & poor will never be able to demand jobs with decent benefits, because the unions have to be destroyed;
5) The Corporate controlled & owned media is being used to scapegoat teacher who are being abused (overworked and under paid), while never pointing to Corporate/ Wall Street greed which has caused so much "Poverty". Poverty is the real reason children in low-performing schools are failing: if your parents are worried about putting food on the table, education is not the priority, eating is.

Essentially making the entire US workforce afraid, intimidated, and weak because an uneducated people cannot or will not fight the powerful, they will simple fight each other weak people like themselves.

Stop buying their "Trinketts and Junk"! If Corpoations do not want to hire US citizens and do not want to pay taxes...............stop buying their stuff.
12:34 PM on 01/18/2012
Damn those schools palming the kids off on their parents.
foresure
Brash and Harsh
11:09 PM on 01/16/2012
Cutting early childhood education is like cutting the budget for vaccines. There couldn't be a better example of "Penny Wise and Pound Foolish'

Let California empty their prisons of low level drug dealers to save the money.

Raise the gasoline tax a cent a gallon, put a tax on arguella, anything, but don't cut early childhood education.

If need be, horror of horror cut the high school football programs.

Stop buying electronic stuff, but don't discard early childhood education.
Mildmannered
"Be excellent to each other"
09:12 PM on 01/18/2012
fanned
foresure
Brash and Harsh
10:30 PM on 01/18/2012
mildmannered

Thank you :)
photo
pphhrogg
domestic clown goddess
05:35 PM on 01/16/2012
I had no FREE pre-K class for my daughter, so I taught her all of her ABCs and how to count, etc. myself. I think MANY (not all, but many) parents just use schools for babysitters. Why not spend some more QUALITY time with your child and teach them yourself before kindergarten?
OldSchool4942
just passin through
11:26 AM on 01/17/2012
I agree but we pay the price in trying to catch the kids up to your kid’s level when they enter the classroom. Your child will sit while they catch the others up. Some kids learn bad lessons by this.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LisaCACO
someone ate my micro-bio!
04:35 PM on 01/17/2012
because not every family can afford to do that. many families have to send both parents to work full time (or more than full time), so school is vitally important. prek means the child will receive what your chld did-otherwise that child will start already behind other kids.
12:35 PM on 01/18/2012
Lots of parents work and still manage to teach the kids ABS and numbers.
04:49 PM on 01/16/2012
Hey California, is your state government still paying its vendors with IOUs?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AlonzoQuijana
04:43 PM on 01/16/2012
Someone has to pay for the pensions and public employee benefits. Looks like it will be the five-year-olds. Welcome to the liberal utopia. Scandanavian-level taxes. Latin American-style services.
OldSchool4942
just passin through
11:31 AM on 01/17/2012
If they would have raised the taxes slightly back then the pension problem wouldn't be a problem now. Blame your state legislature.
I agree they could do other things rather than take programs away form people that don't vote and are not really represented. Let the low level drug users out of prison on sole type of home sentance. Raise tax on porn industry. Make English the language of the state (that cuts printing and sign costs). Make sure the business taxes that are owed are collected.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AlonzoQuijana
01:30 PM on 01/17/2012
Well, the corrections officers union will object to any cutback in sentencing and prisons, as will the unions that represent the court officers and police. As for taxes, if you had raised thm way back, guess what? Pensions would have been even higher -- "Hey look," said a union negotiator circa 1980. "Look at those surpluses. We demand our fair share!"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GoGrammie
Gay Advocate, Grandma, Space Geek
11:08 AM on 01/20/2012
I find myself agreeing with you more often than I expected but I will point out that what happened to the pension system is that the states threw them into that great casino that is wall street. When wall street lost half it's value in 2008, 2009 it was the pensions that took the hit. The money would have been there had it been fostered instead of stolen. The banks got bailed out so they didn't take down the entire world but the pensioners were just SOL. And now they are our enemies too. For wanting what their contract's offered when they decided to give their entire lives to making America better. Huh. How many things can you see wrong with this picture? Too damn many.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:19 PM on 01/18/2012
If the Corporations paid their fair share in taxes, stop using said taxes to destroy public education by supporting Charters & Vouchers (Bill Gates), and stop having the Corporate owned media confuse/lie to people like you so no one really knows what is going on in classrooms. Teachers and their unions are being made scapegoats to de-fund (not reform) public education. The agenda and theory of the rich is: "A Less Educated People are Easy to Manipulate". There are no jobs, because the Corporations are also sending the jobs out of the country (Bill Gates), all while telling everyone he wants to improve education by not paying any taxes. These Corporations want to continue to use cheap labor at $1.00 per hour or even less. So............destroy the public educational system, by trying to educate children as cheaply as possible with unqualified, temporary teachers (TFA), then we can continue to ship the jobs elsewhere and turn the public against qualified, experienced teachers, then they will fight each other, while the Corporations make billions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GoGrammie
Gay Advocate, Grandma, Space Geek
11:21 AM on 01/20/2012
I am afraid that you are right and we can no longer think that it's just to ridiculous to contemplate, Low information voters that decide issues on 30 second ads are the biggest danger to our democracy. The GOP LOVE low information or single issue voters. God help us if they get away with this. What will America look like in 20 years? How did our pride in our education system turn into a wedge issue between the D's and the R's? This was something we all agreed on and had great pride in.Remember the race to the top? Somewhere along the line it became a race to the bottom. And it's the easiest thing we could reform and greatly improve. Mastery. No matter how old you are or what "grade' you are in mastery is the easy answer.
04:27 PM on 01/16/2012
Send the illegals home. California is a sactuary state, they get what they deserve.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GoGrammie
Gay Advocate, Grandma, Space Geek
11:33 AM on 01/20/2012
That has nothing to do with the sorry state of education today. It is years of belief that if you are seven you should know "this" and if you are 13 you should know "that". Everyone learns at a different pace and passing a child ahead who didn't really understand what you tried to teach him this year is DOOMED to make sure that he fails next year. Doesn't matter what the teacher tried to do. No 30 children are in the exact same place in any grade. Our computer systems make this concept so cheap and easy and would help teachers target children who need it most. Get rid of Kindergarten and ALL grades and work on mastery of every subject and no teacher OR child will ever fail again. Education problem solved. No one blamed. Just good old fashioned progress.
11:39 AM on 01/20/2012
I agree with what you have stated here. My children attends an accredited private school with small classes that takes this very approach. Althought iI can see the diffculties implementing this in a public education system with large class counts and a high number on illegal non-english speaking students. Regardless of beliefs on other issues our end goals are the same.
12:36 PM on 01/16/2012
Hopefully this action is part of an overall move to restore the original age. Arnold SCREWED California.
12:39 PM on 01/18/2012
The original age doesn't work. Ask any teacher and they can easily tell you which kids were too immature to start school so early without looking at their paperwork.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
katgal1232
in and out of the garden he goes
11:18 AM on 01/16/2012
The comments about CA are true in terms of our school systems and the Hispanic population has put a burden on it. I was raised in SF in the 70's by a Public School Teacher and she would not send us to the public school because of what she saw. That is pretty bad when a teacher will not send her children to the district she works in and the schools had not yet gone to pot.. Politics. prop 13, illegal immigration have destroyed the CA school system. If only we could address the real problems and the problems start at the top. CA should be allowed to not educate those that do not participate in our financial system. We also have problems such as getting students to school, there was a child that was picked up on a route that picked special needs kids, the parents complained and now their child is picked up by himself because his parent is disabled and the boy did not want to ride with special needs kids....Insanity. We had some school admin that was using school money to hire a body guard because someone had wrote him a nasty note. The only good thing about CA's school system are the students, teachers, aids and volunteers. The admin should feel very guilty for accepting their salaries.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
katgal1232
in and out of the garden he goes
10:47 AM on 01/16/2012
I am educator, we need to make K all day, no more of this noon bs. I went to K from 8-3, I knew how to read and add by Christmas. When they are 5-6, they are ready for the whole day. There are some kids that need to be closer to 6 to do the whole day. The kids that can not do a whole day need to stay in preschool. My child did not go to public school just because of crap like this. If we do not take advantage of their fabulous little minds when they are sponges, we are being stupid. My daughter went to Catholic school and she went all day, the entire class was reading by Christmas and that is the way it should be. If we get rid of K, that means kids won't start school till 6 yrs old and a lot of them will be 7. I am so grateful that i did not deal with our local school district, because of this type of thing and also the 0 tolerance issue in the districts. It just is layer upon layer of stupid, and it begins at the top, while the students and the teachers suffer.
12:37 PM on 01/18/2012
My kids' teachers got it done in half a day. Kids have the rest of their lives to go to school and work all day. Let them be kids and play that other half of the day.

This has nothing to do with getting rid of kindergarten. The state rightly moved up the age so that they don't have to deal with babies in kindergarten.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
katgal1232
in and out of the garden he goes
02:10 PM on 01/18/2012
you are entitled to your opinion, but you did not say anything that validates what you think.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
katgal1232
in and out of the garden he goes
12:39 PM on 01/19/2012
you are a low life
11:45 AM on 01/15/2012
I had three kids born in December and never felt it was a burden that they could not start school till the following school year. In my state the cut off date is Oct 1.
07:01 PM on 01/15/2012
I think the problem is that the kids needing special help are not identified until schools starts
So if public school start later, some kids may never catch up. Those at or above grade level can get bored, those struggling get frustrated. The teachers get caught in the middle with constant budget restrictions as the needs of kids at both ends of the spectrum get left out.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
katgal1232
in and out of the garden he goes
10:59 AM on 01/16/2012
They really don't address it until 2nd grade, because a lot goes on in that time, there is an evening out and the slower ones do a lot of catching up because of maturity levels. If a child is going to be held back it usually happens in K or 1. Testing starts in 2nd grade because you can't test a kid until they can at least read a little. One has to be able to see for example is transposition is just little problem or is the child really not seeing the letters and numbers in order. K is so important for everything, social, following instructions and then more than one at a time. Decoding begins immediately. Just so important.
photo
pphhrogg
domestic clown goddess
05:37 PM on 01/16/2012
MOST private schools don't have Pre-K either.
10:12 AM on 01/15/2012
The state would get much more 'Bang-for-its-buck" in the long-term by funding all-day programs for 4 & 5 year old children and eliminating the senior year of high school. All of the research shows how extermely important early childhood education is for future success in school, while trying to 'remediate' kids in high school is mostly a lost cause. By the time students complete 3 years of high school (or successfully completed enough course work to be classified as a 'senior'), if they have not dropped out, they are ready to graduate and go on to a junior college or technical school.

Once classified as 'seniors', the vast majrity of students have also passed their high school competency tests. So why should our tax dollers be wasted on a senior year in high school....especially when most of these students are either in school only half a day (for many, their only required course is senior English) or taking 'advanced' classes that they could just as well take in junior college? If we want to get the kids in the 99% 'proficient', then we should do what the parents in the 1% do: start their children's education at 3 and 4 years of age!
11:48 AM on 01/15/2012
not all research backs up early education, look at Finland for example, they don't start kids in school till age 7 and have some of the highest education numbers in the world. They believe young children learn more through play.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ironicisntit
04:15 PM on 01/15/2012
They do not start school till 7 yrs old, but all children in Finland can attend state funded day care and 6 yr olds attend state funded half day preschool. Also, student in Norway, Sweden, Finland and many other countries, end compulsory education at age of 15. Then thye can attend "college prep" for three years, however they can also choose to not continue their education, or go to vocational school.
12:39 PM on 01/16/2012
Yet in much of Europe, kids can read at 3 or 4. Here there are kids that can't read throughout grade school.
foresure
Brash and Harsh
11:13 PM on 01/16/2012
prfessordonna:

Fanned for your extremely good sense. The only thing I disagree with is the loss of the Senior year.

I was always a "good student", and am now I senior, but I still remember Senior year as a good time for "growing-up".

I went from senior year to a full-time University. I am not sure how gracefully I would have managed that without the extra year to mature.
10:58 AM on 01/18/2012
Maybe so, I also had a good time my Senior Year as well, but could have just as easily gone on to college. My question is: Is it worth the extra cost, for the senior year to be just to have a good time and/or to allow extra maturity? Once the adjustment was made to make the Jr. year the last year of high school, that would be the year that all of the celebratory events of 'Senior Year' would take place.

I personally think that the main reason senior year is still around is because of sports. They bring in money for the district and parents want to have the extra year of coaching so their kids will have a better chance for a college scholarship. This is all at tax payer expense....so again, we have to look at the cost-benefit of this 'extra' year.

Even when I started college in the early 1960's, it was not that unusual for average/above average students to start at age 16 because they had been given the opportunity to do so by taking 'Senior English" during their Jr. Year or in summer school. It would be nice if public schools still gave students this option.
12:58 AM on 01/15/2012
4 year olds don't have the social or motor skills of 5 year olds. Pre-kindergarten is nothing but susidized daycare. This was a new program that's being eliminated. The parents aren't upset because their kids will miss out on any learning experience but because they'll have to ante up for daycare when they thought they were getting a freebie.
08:54 AM on 01/16/2012
F&F!
12:39 PM on 01/16/2012
Thank you!
12:22 AM on 01/15/2012
California is a rotten state and electing Governor Moonbeam will turn out to be it's deathknell.