More

Toyota Sudden Acceleration Lawsuit Defense Revealed: Blame The Driver

Toyota

First Posted: 01/13/12 06:10 PM ET Updated: 01/13/12 08:34 PM ET

A court filing by Toyota earlier this week lays out how the automaker plans to defend itself against sudden acceleration claims: by blaming the drivers.

Toyota is facing nearly 200 lawsuits claiming that unintended acceleration caused accidents and deaths in 2009 and 2010. The first of these suits to go through courts comes from the family of Paul Van Alfen, a Utah man who crashed into a stone wall after exiting Interstate 80 in 2010. He died at the scene of the crash and his soon-to-be daughter-in-law died the following day. His son and wife survived the crash and told police that Van Alfen tried to brake but couldn't.

This week Toyota told the U.S. District Court in Santa Ana, Calif., that the black box recorder on Van Alfen's 2008 Toyota Camry shows that the driver never pushed the brake. "Any injuries to the Plaintiffs caused by the crash were caused in whole or in part by Paul Van Alfen's actions," says Toyota attorney Vincent Galvin in the court filing, first reported by the National Law Journal.

This could point to a shift in strategy for Toyota, which surprised industry watchers in January 2010 by admitting that mechanical problems with gas pedals caused some cars to accelerate when drivers weren't intending for this to happen. Toyota issued two recalls in 2009 and in 2010, and arrived at a settlement in at least one case.

This line of argument may well serve as its legal defense strategy for approaching the costly litigation process for the scores of remaining cases, especially for those filed after the recall was announced. Toyota's defense in the Van Alfen case is more in line with the standard industry line first used by Audi in response to sudden acceleration claims in the 1980s. Then, about 1,000 people complained their Audi 5000s surged out of control, resulting in 175 injuries and four deaths.

At the time Audi said the problem was the car's design, which led drivers to press on the gas pedal when they thought they were pressing on the brake. Essentially, the company blamed driver error. Audi fixed the problem by moving the brake pedal farther away from the gas pedal and making it impossible to put the car into drive without first pressing on the brake. In 1989, a report from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration seemed to confirm Audi's explanation, saying that most unintentional acceleration happened because drivers hit the gas instead of the brakes.

There is still time for the Toyota lawyers and Van Alfen's lawyers to further lay out their arguments in the case. Toyota says its court filing this week was intended to assert that there was a system in place that could have shut down the accelerator if the driver were to press on the brake, but that Van Alfen did not have that system installed.

"While we sympathize with anyone in an accident involving one of our vehicles, our filing was intended to show that there is no basis to the claim that the lack of brake override ... was a cause of the Van Alfen accident," said Celeste Migliore, a Toyota spokeswoman. She did not want to comment on whether Van Alfen stepped on the brakes, she said.

Toyota's black box evidence may seem irrefutable, but black boxes in cars are not like those in airplanes, explained Mukul Verma, an auto consultant with the accident reconstruction firm MP Holcomb. They record only a few seconds of data before a crash, Verma told The Huffington Post. Airplane accident investigators can essentially reconstruct an accident from the data they recover from a black box, but car accident investigators need to rely on other data, like skid marks, evidence on the vehicle and eyewitness reports, he added.

"I would not be willing, just based on what the black box says, to dismiss the possibility the driver used his brakes," Verma said.

Police said there were skid marks leading up to the scene of Van Alfen's Nov. 5, 2010 crash.

Skid marks on a dry road could indicate the driver was braking, Verma said.

The Van Alfen case is scheduled to go to trial in February 2013.

In all, Toyota recalled about 8 million vehicles for two different sudden acceleration causes. It paid $10 million to settle the case of one California family: An off-duty police officer crashed into a ravine while one of the passengers called 911. All four people in the car died.

This story was updated at 8:20 p.m. to provide more context about Toyota's recalls.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
A court filing by Toyota earlier this week lays out how the automaker plans to defend itself against sudden acceleration claims: by blaming the drivers. Toyota is facing nearly 200 lawsuits claimi...
A court filing by Toyota earlier this week lays out how the automaker plans to defend itself against sudden acceleration claims: by blaming the drivers. Toyota is facing nearly 200 lawsuits claimi...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 382
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
01:36 PM on 01/20/2012
Wow. Here is a similar city settlement artice (from the SF Chronicle) of the City of Berkeley to pay out $170K to a woman hit by a squad car http://bit.ly/yaU8hX
photo
webwzrd
Reality is liberal indoctrina­tion.
04:51 PM on 01/17/2012
The very simple arguments that debunk Toyota's claims is the question of WHY these events are more prevalent in Toyotas than in other brands. Are Toyota drivers less skilled? I would certainly doubt that, so the answer is what is different about Toyotas, and that means a design flaw.
09:12 PM on 01/17/2012
I was going to write a comment but after reading yours, I have nothing more to add. You are correct.
01:18 PM on 01/18/2012
How do you know the events are more prevalent in Toyotas? The press, that always needs something sensational to report, is a very bad measure of such things.
photo
webwzrd
Reality is liberal indoctrina­tion.
01:27 PM on 01/18/2012
For the reasons you stated, the press itself would be reporting if other brands were crashing for similar reasons.
02:32 PM on 01/17/2012
Not surprised. The only fault they believe in is the one that runs right through their country.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joseph LeCompte
The USA isnt broke.It was robbed.
02:41 AM on 01/17/2012
Reminds me of the Firestone/Ford Explorer blowout/rollover issue. The explorers center of gravity was higher than normal. Engineers suggested running the tire pressure lower to lower the cats height. Firestone had replaced union workers for a few months and the tires were poorly made. Hot(low pressure/high friction) defective tires pliers bad design equalled blowouts and rollovers. But for months each company blamed each other and operator error.
07:53 PM on 01/16/2012
Toyota right, these accidents were a result of the drivers own stupidity. These drivers were probably members of the "I pressed the gas pedal instead of the brake" xanax popping senior citizen lame excuse padre.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Hpotterfan77
The Liberal Leaning Deist!
12:46 PM on 01/17/2012
I might agree if the number were something like 50-75 people but 200 people all having the same problem with the same brand of car? Come on!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim NLN
Obama 2012 and beyond!
01:57 PM on 01/16/2012
The Japanese are incapable of admitting fault!
01:49 PM on 01/16/2012
There definitely have been many cases of the past of drivers mistaking the gas and brake pedal, but a black box that is specific to toyota and only toyota can read the data is not proof of anything. It seems that toyota tried to change brake operation to increase efficiency. Brakes and steering on a car are two areas where any changes need to run through the same tests that airplanes go through on their components. It is a safety issue.
01:45 PM on 01/16/2012
Same thing Audi went through decades ago and nothing was found wrong with the cars. These days cars are made for the global market. Every country gets the same cars. So we are having trouble with this but no one else is. It must be a problem with the rest of the world because we're Americans and we're never wrong! Actually American's are terrible drivers on par with many third world countries I've seen.
thebuzzmanisone
you say micro i say give me another brew
09:26 PM on 01/16/2012
not every country gets the same cars we have one of the most safest cars in the world with our crash tests.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Willie Qwit
Willie don't qwit!
10:31 AM on 01/16/2012
What this post reinforces for me is how low lawyers will stoop to avoid the truth and protect their clients. Talk about an idiotic defense. People are dying. It's not like these are all tiny little fender benders.
01:51 PM on 01/16/2012
Sometimes the truth hurts and the lawyers are right! How many people die doesn't change the truth of it. This isn't the first time it's happened and won't be the last. Audi went through this and wasn't found at fault either but it brought us those wonderful shift interlocks where you have to put your foot on the brake to shift an automatic out of park since you have to idiot proof the world when you have so many idiots!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marian Norton
08:57 PM on 01/16/2012
I don't recall any other country having a Ford Pinto go up in flames. I do recall many here. Might have something to do with the fact that different standards are in place in differing countries, thus, cars are made for different markets. When a police officer cannot bring a car back under control, I'm thinking maybe the lawyers are scraping the bottom of the 'defense' toilet bowl.
photo
cyclone70
if there was a time to reach for the pitchfork
10:27 AM on 01/16/2012
OK - if it is indeed driver error than you would see this problem in similar proportions on all automakers cars, but you don't

toyota sure didn't learn from their tome deafness when this first came up - they are sounding like detroit automakers did in the 70s
01:56 PM on 01/16/2012
That's not true it would show up in all cars equally. The ergonomics of control placement differ slightly in vehicles for a number of reasons and that's what gets people. They stand on the gas instead of the brakes. Even if this were true ever hear of neutral or turning off the ignition? Face it! We are never at fault even when we are and somebody else is going to pay!
photo
cyclone70
if there was a time to reach for the pitchfork
02:24 PM on 01/16/2012
Well by your logic, then it is indeed a toyota design problem, if other automakers ergonomic make it more dificult to confuse the pedals and toyotas design does not

and againif it were a driver error problem, you would still be seeing it manifest in similar problems for other automakers - you do not
photo
traumabob
Sardonic Pseudo-intellectual Unabashed Liberal
08:39 AM on 01/16/2012
We need someone to do an in-depth study to determine what it is that causes so many totally incompetent drivers to purchase Toyota vehicles.

It's not Nobel Prize material, but it would be good to know these things.
03:23 PM on 01/17/2012
New Toyota Ad Campaign: Toyota, Not Just For Incompetent Drivers Anymore!
11:52 PM on 01/15/2012
hello honda
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
tacevad
American SS Card Carrying Socialist
09:12 PM on 01/15/2012
I too blame the drivers... for being gullible enough to buy a TOYota in the first place
01:58 PM on 01/16/2012
What's wrong with Toyota other than they are incredibly boring?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
tacevad
American SS Card Carrying Socialist
03:27 PM on 01/16/2012
that list is too long for here
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MyResponsibility
To Disagree,one need not be disagreeable
08:46 PM on 01/15/2012
With the Camry’s throttle pinned while going 70 mph, the brakes easily overcame all 268 horsepower straining against them and stopped the car in 190 feet—that’s a foot shorter than the performance of a Ford Taurus without any gas-pedal problems and just 16 feet longer than with the Camry’s throttle closed. From 100 mph, the stopping-distance differential was 88 feet—noticeable to be sure, but the car still slowed enthusiastically enough to impart a feeling of confidence. We also tried one go-for-broke run at 120 mph, and, even then, the car quickly decelerated to about 10 mph before the brakes got excessively hot and the car refused to decelerate any further. So even in the most extreme case, it should be possible to get a car’s speed down to a point where a resulting accident should be a low-speed and relatively minor event. From Car & Driver
08:36 PM on 01/15/2012
Looks like Toyota is going into its version of Damage Control once again.