iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

White House Will Not Support SOPA, PIPA

White House Sopa

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 01/14/12 12:19 PM ET Updated: 01/16/12 02:24 PM ET

Saturday marked a major victory for opponents of proposed anti-piracy legislation Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and PROTECT IP Act (PIPA), which would target foreign-based websites violating U.S. copyrights.

House of Representatives bill SOPA and its Senate counterpart PIPA are designed to punish websites that make available, for example, free movies and music without the permission of the U.S. rights holders. Opponents of the bills, however, worry that the proposed laws would grant the Department of Justice too much regulatory power. Google Chairman Eric Schmidt has called the measures "draconian." Other Internet giants who oppose the bill include Facebook, eBay, Mozilla, Twitter, and Huffington Post parent company AOL.

The White House on Saturday officially responded to two online petitions, "Stop the E-PARASITE Act" and "Veto the SOPA bill and any other future bills that threaten to diminish the free flow of information," urging the President to reject SOPA and PIPA.

The statement was drawn up by Victoria Espinel, Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator at Office of Management and Budget, Aneesh Chopra, U.S. Chief Technology Officer, and Howard Schmidt, Special Assistant to the President and Cybersecurity Coordinator for National Security Staff. They made clear that the White House will not support legislation that disrupts the open standards of the Internet.

"While we believe that online piracy by foreign websites is a serious problem that requires a serious legislative response, we will not support legislation that reduces freedom of expression, increases cybersecurity risk, or undermines the dynamic, innovative global Internet," the statement read in part.

The White House statement went on to say, however, that the Obama Administration believes "online piracy is a real problem that harms the American economy" and that 2012 should see the passage of narrower legislation that targets the source of foreign copyright infringement.

The letter also highlighted the following four points:

Any effort to combat online piracy must guard against the risk of online censorship of lawful activity and must not inhibit innovation by our dynamic businesses large and small. [...] We must avoid creating new cybersecurity risks or disrupting the underlying architecture of the Internet. [...] That is why the Administration calls on all sides to work together to pass sound legislation this year that provides prosecutors and rights holders new legal tools to combat online piracy originating beyond U.S. borders [...] We expect and encourage all private parties, including both content creators and Internet platform providers working together, to adopt voluntary measures and best practices to reduce online piracy.

This is not the end of the debate, the White House statement emphasized. "Moving forward, we will continue to work with Congress on a bipartisan basis on legislation that provides new tools needed in the global fight against piracy and counterfeiting, while vigorously defending an open Internet based on the values of free expression, privacy, security and innovation," the letter also read.

Following the release of the White House's statement, SOPA sponsor and House Judiciary Chairman (R-Texas) Lamar Smith issued a statement of his own.

“I welcome today’s announcement that the White House will support legislation to combat online piracy that protects free speech, the Internet and America’s intellectual property," Smith said, according to The Hill. "That’s precisely what the Stop Online Piracy Act does."

On Friday, CNET reported that Smith said he will remove from the bill one of the most hotly contested provisions, Domain Name System requirements. Previously, SOPA had called for DNS blocking of infringing websites.

On Thursday, PIPA author Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont) said that "more study" was needed to asses the bill's DNS-blocking provision, the Wall Street Journal wrote.

The White House's statement condemned DNS blocking in regulatory efforts and said that it "pose[s] a real risk to cybersecurity and yet leave contraband goods and services accessible online. We must avoid legislation that drives users to dangerous, unreliable DNS servers and puts next-generation security policies, such as the deployment of DNSSEC, at risk."

A House Oversight Committee hearing on SOPA's DNS-blocking provision had previously been scheduled for January 18. However, according to Tech Dirt, Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-California) said that the hearing will be postponed for the time being and that the focus now should be placed on the Senate's PIPA bill, which Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nevada) has committed to moving forward in the next two weeks.

UPDATE: The Motion Picture Association of America Inc. (MPAA), the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce have each released a response to the White House's position on SOPA and PIPA.

Michael O’Leary, Senior Executive Vice President for Global Policy and External Affairs for the MPAA said the following in a statement emailed to the HuffPost:

While we agree with the White House that protection against online piracy is vital, that protection must be meaningful to protect the people who have been and will continue to be victimized if legislation is not enacted. Meaningful legislation must include measured and reasonable remedies that include ad brokers, payment processors and search engines. They must be part of a solution that stops theft and protects American consumers. [...] On behalf of the 2.2 million Americans whose jobs depend on the film and television industries, we look forward to the Administration playing a constructive role in this process and working with us to pass legislation that will offer real protection for American jobs.

In the same email, Mitch Glazier, Senior Executive Vice President of the RIAA, said, "[L]egislation is of no benefit, nor will we support it, if it allows the leading Internet companies to direct law abiding consumers to unlawful and dangerous sites."

David Hirschmann, President and CEO of the Global Intellectual Property Center at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, reiterated the Chamber's strong support for both SOPA and PIPA. "The Administration's main concern, centered on DNS issues, has already been addressed by both Senator Leahy and Representative Smith. We also applaud Senator Reid, Senator Leahy, and Representative Smith for their commitment to move forward with pending legislation through an open and bipartisan process," Hirschmann said.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

Saturday marked a major victory for opponents of proposed anti-piracy legislation Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and PROTECT IP Act (PIPA), which would target foreign-based websites violating U.S. copy...
Saturday marked a major victory for opponents of proposed anti-piracy legislation Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and PROTECT IP Act (PIPA), which would target foreign-based websites violating U.S. copy...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8,234
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (135 total)
  1 of 7  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
jasev01 04:03 PM on 01/14/2012
I wrote this once and the site messed up and I lost a long post but it's worth writing again because it needs to be said. This is a topic I have researched from undergraduate through law school and I work in the field today.  Many of my clients are copyright holder and I am the hammer that does the enforcing; I might lose some if they knew I felt this way but this needs to be said.  The media  Read More...
02:20 PM on 06/18/2012
Blocking online sites is going to be more trouble than it's worth. The online community is only getting larger. In fact, if some one asked me how to get into college, I would tell them to learn web development and coding. There's no controlling it anymore, but we can teach the upcoming generation of tech wizards to be more responsible with their knowledge.
05:14 PM on 01/19/2012
People, I agree that Obama probably will reverse on this, but keep in mind that because of how the American electoral system works (8 years is max), the first four years of presidency are basically just one long election campaign for the next one. They never do anything because no one wants to become one of those very few presidents who only last one term - it's an embarrassing title to carry, for obvious reasons.

My point is this - any change that Obama ACTUALLY believes he can foster, he will actually work on AFTER the election. He no longer has to care really about public opinion, cause unless he gets ousted (which isn't likely to happen), nothing will happen to him. So if he honestly thinks SOPA/PIPA are crap (which he probably does. He IS a democrat, believe it or not; they tend to dislike things that Republicans champion, and in this case that's a good thing), he won't reinstate it in December, cause why would he?

My point is this - I fear that he'll flip on the issue too. He did with NDAA, and we know that. But let's see if he does before we officially start bitching at him, okay?
06:27 AM on 01/19/2012
Had the recording and motion picture industries not have behaved like greedy wolves for decades,perhaps consumers would have felt a smidgen of loyalty. The recording industry took advantage of its artists for the better part of the 20th century; and then when artists began getting a fairer share, passed on the added expense to consumers, with the price of CDs skyrocketing around the world. And now that we've had enough, and online sharing makes music accessible to many, the industry wants recourse. Well sorry for them! Artists are already adhusting to the new reality. You're not hearing bands clamouring for the new legislation. This is just a gluttonous industry looking to protect itself ... again ... as it's always done!
05:24 PM on 01/18/2012
If these folks dont want their stuff to be pirated off the internet, then they should not put it on there. Our government needs to quit trying to save everyone by taking away their rights and responsibilities. Of the people, by the people and for the people. NOT for government or business. AND AGAIN, if you dont want your stuff pirated from the internet, dont put it out there!
04:20 PM on 01/18/2012
my memory tells me that Iraq SomedumbInsane, Germany's Hittingonher, and other nations have done this and opposed anyone against, took the opposers out and executed them, S.O.P.A is sending the same message, if it passes it is a death sentence for all, be careful what you say or feel or post!
04:14 PM on 01/18/2012
I live in the south in a very small town and had never heard of Sopa until today. If Sopa ever gets passed I will not hear of the Internet either. May as well watch Realty TV since Soap Operas are no longer the in thing, not that I watch either. But why hasn't it been on my news?

We already have laws against copyright, so why not just inforce them? My feeling is that these new laws would bring in other new laws that would not be so "Free Speech" friendly. What kind of a country am I living in?
photo
DatelessNerd
Have your Blue Dogs spayed or neutered.
06:47 PM on 01/17/2012
Attention, Corporate America.

If the Bill of Rights interferes with your business model, the problem ISN'T the Bill of Rights.
10:40 AM on 01/18/2012
no... if it does, it just means you aren't lobbying hard enough for an ammendment.
photo
sipiony2
Go outside!
06:30 PM on 01/17/2012
Basically, give entertainment industry control over the internet. Don't pretend this is about american jobs and not about trying to control the market shift from hard copy to digital download. The future is coming, and they know what it is, and now they are desperately trying to make the people bend over and hand control over to them. I will no longer be purchasing sony or nintendo products, since they sent letters to congress urging them to pass the bill. (foreign companies are trying to take your rights away).
03:28 PM on 01/17/2012
Why don't they just stop overcharging for their products? Do they really have to have billions and billions of dollars? This wouldn't be happening if they weren't so damn greedy. Lower your prices so people can afford your product.

And yes, our Prez of the moment will most likely sign the bills if presented with enough cash.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
J0E1
Don't blame me, I'm not a republicrat.
11:22 AM on 01/17/2012
It's ok, just throw some wording in there giving the president some power in the bill and magically, you will see a signature appear.
11:05 AM on 01/17/2012
liberals and conservatives alike agree that this is a big business attempt to control the internet. If President Obama does shoot down this legislation then i will have new found respect for this man. The SOPA and PIPA bills must be defeated.

the tea party.
05:05 PM on 05/17/2012
well it is 6 months later and the Internet is now under his control by executive orders and lies.
photo
tjdwill02
There is no free lunch
11:03 AM on 01/17/2012
Once again the Obama administration and House Democrats show distain for the Constitution and the sovereignty of the people !
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RMIrby672
Some people are just too crazy to be mocked!
06:47 PM on 01/17/2012
You want this law passed?
photo
tjdwill02
There is no free lunch
06:52 PM on 01/17/2012
NO ! The majority of the time the most difficult thing that Congress can do is NOTHING. this is one of those times...................
09:46 AM on 01/17/2012
say the right thing.. then do the republican thing.. obama will not veto this.. he will compromise any value in it for the left out.. then allow it to pass.. wait and see.
07:13 AM on 01/17/2012
Does anyone know what this means?
“next-generation security policies, such as the deployment of DNSSEC”
wish the article had explained the quote from “the White House” (pretty talented building, speaking as it so often does !)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TruelyFedUp
Ethics is nothing else than reverence for life.
01:25 AM on 01/17/2012
Funny how when corporate trade is involved D.C. protects, but when we the people need protecting they create laws that allow the President to decide whether we are bad (and thus lose all our rights) or good, and whether we should be allowed to be Americans or thrown out of the country and shunned. Perhaps, those of us that fail to vote for Obama will be expelled to Mexico, or to China to work as prison labor.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
B Powell
Accurate fact trumps loud emotion, always.
03:37 AM on 01/17/2012
You are overshooting. Very sensationalist.
07:14 AM on 01/17/2012
not by much
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TruelyFedUp
Ethics is nothing else than reverence for life.
09:29 AM on 01/17/2012
Not when the govenor of Lousiana calls in the militarily trained National Guard to police private citizens. http://www.infowars.com/louisiana-rep-moves-to-violate-posse-comitatus-and-put-troops-on-new-orleans-streets/