iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Paul Fights Washington Spending, Flies First Class

Plane

BRETT J. BLACKLEDGE and STEPHEN BRAUN   01/16/12 12:19 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul has been spending large amounts on airfare as a congressman, flying first class on dozens of taxpayer-funded flights to his home state. The practice conflicts with the image that Paul portrays as the only presidential candidate serious about cutting federal spending.

Paul flew first class on at least 31 round-trip flights and 12 one-way flights since May 2009 when he was traveling between Washington and his district in Texas, according to a review by The Associated Press of his congressional office expenses. Four other round-trip tickets and two other one-way tickets purchased during the period were eligible for upgrades to first-class after they were bought, but those upgrades would not be documented in the expense records.

Paul, whose distrust of big government is the centerpiece of his presidential campaign, trusts the more expensive government rate for Continental Airlines when buying his tickets. Paul chose not to buy the cheaper economy tickets at a fraction of the price because they aren't refundable or as flexible for scheduling, his congressional staff said.

"We always get him full refundable tickets since the congressional schedule sometimes changes quickly," said Jeff Deist, Paul's chief of staff. Paul might have to pay out of his own pocket for canceled flights in some cases if he didn't buy refundable tickets, Deist said.

But records show that most of the flights for Paul were purchased well in advance and few schedule changes were necessary. Nearly two-thirds of the 49 tickets were purchased at least two weeks in advance, and 42 percent were bought at least three weeks in advance, the AP's review found.

Paul charged taxpayers nearly $52,000 on the more expensive tickets, or $27,621 more than the average Continental airfare for the flights between Washington and Houston, according to the AP's review of his congressional expenses and average airfares compiled by the Department of Transportation.

The more expensive tickets have other benefits as well, including allowing Paul to upgrade to first class when his staff reserves a flight because his frequent government travel gives him membership in an elite class of Continental customers who earn travel perks. Upgrades to first-class with cheaper fares are possible, at times limited to available seats days before the flight. But those upgrades are not guaranteed and some require ticket changes at the airport, according to the airline's frequent flyer rules.

The AP reviewed congressional travel before the Iowa caucuses for the two members of Congress running at the time – Paul and Rep. Michele Bachmann of Minnesota. Bachmann later ended her presidential campaign.

House records show Bachmann, like most other congressional members, also paid the more expensive government rate for airfare. But her staff would not provide access to more detailed expense records that show when and what type of tickets were purchased.

Paul's congressional staff provided access to all expense records requested.

Congressional members don't have to pay the government rate for travel, but most do, including many like Paul and Bachmann who advocate cuts in federal spending.

"You could almost always beat the government rate," said Steve Ellis, vice president of the Washington-based Taxpayers for Common Sense, a federal budget watchdog group. "They need to be walking the walk, and one of the ways they can do that is to be fiscally responsible for how they spend their member office money."

Jesse Benton, Paul's campaign manager, didn't respond to a written request to explain how Paul's use of more expensive airfare, which allows him to fly first class, corresponds with his commitment to cut federal spending. Instead, he sent a statement that started, "No one is more committed to cutting spending than Dr. Paul."

But Paul's congressional travel conflicts with claims in campaign appearances that he's the most frugal and serious deficit hawk in the race.

"The talk you hear in Washington is pure talk, because there is nobody suggesting, the other candidates are not talking about real cuts," Paul said in a speech to supporters last week after his second-place finish in New Hampshire.

He has proposed cutting $1 trillion from the federal budget during his first year as president, and has confronted other candidates in public forums as "big government conservatives."

"You're a big spender, that's all there is to it," Paul told former Sen. Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania during a GOP debate in New Hampshire.

Paul boasts on his website about declining other congressional perks, such as a pension and all-expense-paid travel "junkets" that other lawmakers take. And he says he regularly returns money from his congressional account to the treasury.

But when it comes to his congressional travel, Paul has opted not to search for cheaper airfares that could mean returning more of his office account to the treasury, which uses any money returned by House or Senate members to help reduce the federal deficit.

Paul paid $51,972 for his government-rate flights between Washington and Houston between May 2009 and March 2011, or more than twice the $24,351 average airfare on Continental for travel between Washington and Houston. The average airfare figure represents the price for all tickets purchased for Continental flights between Washington and Houston, including economy and first-class travel, according to the Transportation Department's Domestic Airline Fares Consumer Report, which collects airfare information for the nation's busiest travel routes.

Paul's staff regularly booked him in first class on flights when tickets were purchased, according to expense records. His office paid between $1,217 and $1,311 for each round-trip flight, compared to the average airfare for that trip ranging from $528 to $760, according to the airline fares consumer report.

The period reviewed by the AP was the most recent period for which complete congressional expense records were available.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul has been spending large amounts on airfare as a congressman, flying first class on dozens of taxpayer-funded flights to his home state. Th...
WASHINGTON — Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul has been spending large amounts on airfare as a congressman, flying first class on dozens of taxpayer-funded flights to his home state. Th...
Filed by Andrew Burmon  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 230
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
10:28 AM on 02/08/2012
This is really the only thing you have on him?
03:14 PM on 01/18/2012
Oops! Turns out that Ron Paul does fly coach, and upgrades with his frequent flyer miles. Not as good of a story though. http://on.msnbc.com/zO2X3Y
04:54 PM on 01/22/2012
Don't expect a retraction or apology, that would be above them. Ron Paul 2012 !!
02:03 AM on 01/18/2012
just watched lawrence o'donnell's last word where he completely debunked this story. o'donnell, by the way, is a liberal progressive, who lamented the fact that he couldn't confirm this type of dirt on ron paul.
photo
Sansculotte
I never did like Tea
10:57 PM on 01/17/2012
Upon further reporting it turns-out he flies coach - but uses his miles to get upgrades.
Absolutely nothing wrong with that.
I humbly retract my post denouncing him over this story. I was hasty and misinformed. My bad.
photo
BiznessLady
Stop the GOP/TP War on Women
01:44 AM on 01/17/2012
You all sound so friggin ridiculous. It is obvious that no one cares about this article but you. SMH

Obama/Biden 2012
01:11 AM on 01/17/2012
Ron Paul is consistent & honest and has my vote. I'm hoping for a strong finish in South Carolina and polls seem to show him surging somewhat. He did great in the debate tonight, again, and more Republicans need to consider him as a serious candidate.

http://www.whatthehellbook.com/2012/01/05/fired-for-not-believing-in-hell/

http://www.whatthehellbook.com/the-book/
09:21 PM on 01/16/2012
i wish journalists can write something worth reading. this isnt news. dagnabit.
08:45 PM on 01/16/2012
MSM fail
This article is meant to make Dr. Paul look bad, don't fall for it. He votes against congressional salary pay increases and has said he will be the president of the U.S. and receive the same amount the average american family makes which is $30k roughly, Mitt is BLOATED with money. We don't need Rich ruling during this time of suffering for the poor. Mitt will only protect the rich and corporate interest.
Ron Paul 2012
08:41 PM on 01/16/2012
Ron Paul 2012: About Those First Class Flights...

By Hao Li, International Business Times
January 16, 2012 6:35 PM EST

- "[Ron Paul's] House office runs a budget surplus and returns unspent office funds to the U.S. Treasury http://tinyurl.com/8xczy5o ...[In 2010] Paul spent $56,000 on travel expenses, which makes him the 178th biggest travel spender in Congress ... As for overall spending...Paul shelled out $1.37 million, which places him 232nd. This compares to the $1.66 million spent by then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi the top overall spender for 2010. Paul’s spending as a congressman, therefore, seems middle-of-the-pack – not scandalous – as some articles are implying."

http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/282599/20120116/ron-paul-2012-those-first-class-flights.htm
08:41 PM on 01/16/2012
Insinuating that Paul spent big on 1st class when he actually bought coach tickets doesn't seem very accurate. Failing to note that he returns large amounts of unused money (over $100,000 each of the last two years) from his office budget doesn't seem at all balanced and therefore fair. Isn't this a simple reprint from AP, point by point with barely enough difference in content to constitute intellectual ownership without even bothering to compare Paul's travel habits to other members of Congress?

This entire "article" is paraphrased and offers little in the way of balanced reporting.
10:59 PM on 01/16/2012
Such is the ugly game the MSM plays.

"News organization" A puts forth a flimsy attack on Ron Paul. Doesn't matter if the facts are refutable, because once the accusation has been made, the rest of them can join in, ever-so-innocently just referencing the initial flimsy attack.

Voila! The non-news item is everywhere, because they''re all repeating it in concert, like a pack of vicious children taunting their victim in the schoolyard.
05:31 PM on 01/17/2012
Agreed, they've never dig this deep into Romney's records even though they obviously could.
08:12 PM on 01/16/2012
Why did you not tell us what the average congress member spends in flights and what class they fly?

If the focus is on spending, why not tell us how Paul stacks up in total spending by candidate?

How many congress members reject the Congressional Retirement Plan like Paul does?

How many congress members return a portion of their budget each year?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:46 PM on 01/16/2012
Next one you should write: Obama fights Washington Spending, flies First Class on Air Force One with Michelle on Private Jets because she wanted to stay home for an extra hour.
08:42 PM on 01/16/2012
:] yeah... guess they "forgot" about that little detail.
07:22 PM on 01/16/2012
This is a ridiculously stupid article. It's not alone; I've read variations of this same topic across the internet. There is a big difference between how you spend taxpayers money which is restricted by the Constitution, and how you spend money that people voluntarily give to you when there is less restrictions. If you think that this in any way represents what he will do with taxpayers money, then you cannot think rationally; rather, you stretch things to fit what you want to see. Besides, paying for plane tickets to get to where you need to go is a reasonable use for campaign money. It would be different if he was using it for lavish parties and booze.
07:27 PM on 01/16/2012
Oops, now I see that this isn't talking about his campaign...I've been reading some of those, and I assumed this was just another one.
06:26 PM on 01/16/2012
I want to know why the Government Rate is not the cheapest fare! Maybe some airline lobbyists got the Government to pay "extra dollar" and put a few in their own pockets. If a Government official can not fly Government rates without criticism than something is wrong with the system, not the official!
08:47 PM on 01/16/2012
It might also be because the the legislative jobs are full time jobs now; though they never were meant to be. If they were in fact part-time roles in society; and the government truly cared about the people then the fares would in fact be lower to accommodate for various incomes. No instead lobbyists only want greedy people who think the same way about money, apparently it's everything to those people, to hold positions in congress so their votes can be bought.
06:13 PM on 01/16/2012
i'll bite. this article was interesting enough to prompt me to check out other congressional travel expenses.

http://www.legistorm.com/trip_browse_by_approver/index/office_type/HM.html

Doing a sort of the cost of trips taken was eye opening.
06:24 PM on 01/16/2012
So looking up Ron Paul on that link you sent. It looks like he was approved for 5 flights and only took one on Taxpayer money for $913 which would make this and other news articles completely false and misleading? Am I reading this right? It looks like he actually spent close to the lowest out of everyone.
07:19 PM on 01/16/2012
I need to add that the above article talks about trips beginning in 2009 whereas the link i sent doesn't appear to show any dates. the link could very well apply to 2010 or 2011 costs only. it's kind of difficult to find the actual travel expenses of congress in any format that lists dates as well. it would help if all of these news articles cited where they got their data. but my hunch is that if they did, they'd be forced to acknowledge the spending of other congress members as well, which defeats the purpose of this article to make ron paul look like a hypocrit.
06:28 PM on 01/16/2012
Very enlightening! Thank you for that!