iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Waste Water: America's Hidden 60 Million Barrel A Day Industry


First Posted: 01/16/12 09:04 AM ET Updated: 01/16/12 07:02 PM ET


(John Kemp is a Reuters market analyst. The views expressed are his own)

By John Kemp

LONDON, Jan 16 (Reuters) - The biggest output of the U.S. oil and gas industry is not oil or gas but dirty water.

Every day, U.S. oil and gas producers bring to the surface 60 million barrels of waste water, with a salt content up to 20 times higher than sea water and laced with hazardous chemicals.

For the most part, they dispose of it safely, as required by federal and state laws.

Most of it is re-injected into oil and gas bearing formations to maintain pressure, or into disposal formations far below the freshwater aquifers.

Safe disposal of so much hazardous water should put into perspective some of the recent concerns about water management raised by opponents of hydraulic fracturing.


60 MILLION BARRELS

Environmentalists and policymakers have raised concerns about the massive amount of water used fracturing oil and gas wells, and the resulting strain on local water supplies, as well as the safe disposal of fracking fluids and briny salt water brought to the surface from fracked wells.

Risks to freshwater aquifers are often cited as a key reason to restrict fracking or subject it to strict new federal regulations.

But the challenges of disposing of waste water contaminated with hazardous chemicals are not unique to fracked wells, and there is already a comprehensive framework of federal and state rules governing safe disposal designed to protect drinking water supplies.

Environmentalists have zeroed in on the huge amount of water injected into oil and gas wells to fracture rock formations, and the exotic chemicals added to help carry the frack sand into the cracks, reduce corrosion and remove excess drilling mud.

Fracturing a multi-stage well can involve injecting millions of gallons of water under intense pressure, with 3-12 chemicals typically added to reduce friction and address site specific problems, according to the U.S. Department of Energy ("Modern Shale Gas Development in the United States," Apr 2009).

But the problem of disposing of fracking fluids pales beside the challenge of disposing of all the briny water produced alongside the oil and gas, from conventional wells as much as fracked ones.

The average oil well produces 7.6 barrels of water for every barrel of crude. The water/oil ratio can rise to as much as 24:1 or even 42:1 in states like Florida and Illinois. On average, 88 percent of the material brought to the surface from an oil well is water, rising to 98 percent for wells nearing the end of their productive lives.

For gas wells, 260 barrels of water are produced for every million cubic feet of natural gas.

In 2007, the daily output of the U.S. oil and gas industry was 4.8 million barrels of crude, 66 billion cubic feet of natural gas, and 58 million barrels of waste water, according to a study by the Argonne National Laboratory's Environmental Science Division ("Produced Water Volumes and Management Practices in the United States", Sep 2009).

"Produced water is the largest volume by-product or waste stream associated with oil and gas exploration and production," according to the Argonne study. "The cost of managing such a large volume of water is a key consideration to oil and gas producers."


150,000 DISPOSAL WELLS

Produced water occurs alongside oil and gas in the same underground formations and brought to the surface with them. The salt content of produced water can be 20 times higher than sea water, and it contains traces of the hydrocarbons that it was found alongside, including chemicals harmful to human health such as benzene.

Safe disposal of so much briny and contaminated water presents an enormous challenge and is already strictly regulated.

Of the 58 million barrels of waste water produced every day, roughly half (29 million barrels) is re-injected into oil and gas bearing formations to help maintain pressure and enhance ultimate oil recovery. Another 20 million barrels are injected into non-hydrocarbon formations for disposal.

Less than 2 million barrels per day are discharged on the surface, and almost all of those are in offshore fields. Only 380,000 barrels are discharged onshore.

Disposal through re-injection of into non-oil bearing formations is already subject to the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) and other federal regulations.

The act prohibits injection which endangers an underground source of drinking water (USDW). The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established minimum standards for Underground Injection Control (UIC). But states are free to establish and enforce their own standards provided they are certified as at least as stringent, and most have now done so.

In 2002, EPA estimated there were 147,000 wells licensed for the disposal of wastes associated with the production of oil and gas (so-called Class II waste disposal wells).

To prevent waste migrating into freshwater aquifers, EPA regulations require Class II disposal wells to be appropriately sited; cased and cemented, particularly in the sections crossing freshwater-bearing layers; and the wells must be periodically monitored to ensure the containment remains effective ("Protecting Drinking Water Through Underground Injection Control," Jan 2002).

None of this is meant to imply fracking does not pose challenges. However, the industry is already handling more than 60 million barrels per day of waste water contaminated with high-levels of salt and cancer-causing chemicals, most of that from wells that would be considered "conventional" rather than fracked.

The oil and gas industry's use of water to fracture wells needs to be carefully regulated to ensure it is not diverting freshwater from competing uses without proper compensation. And waste disposal must continue to be stringently regulated. But the water management problems posed by fracking are no different from those which have long been associated with conventional wells.

References: (1) "Produced Water Volumes and Management Practices in the United States" (2009): http://www.ead.anl.gov/pub/doc/ANL_EVS__R09_produced_water_volume_report_2437.pdf (2) "Modern Shale Gas Development in the United States" (2009): http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/oil-gas/publications/EPreports/Shale_Gas_Primer_2009.pdf

(3) "Protecting Drinking Water Through Underground Injection Control" (2002): http://www.gwpc.org/e-library/documents/general/Protecting%20Drinking%20Water%20Through%20Underground%20injection%20Control-%20Drinking%20Water%20Pocket%20Guide%202.pdf

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

(John Kemp is a Reuters market analyst. The views expressed are his own) By John Kemp LONDON, Jan 16 (Reuters) - The biggest output of the U.S. oil and gas industry is ...
(John Kemp is a Reuters market analyst. The views expressed are his own) By John Kemp LONDON, Jan 16 (Reuters) - The biggest output of the U.S. oil and gas industry is ...
(John Kemp is a Reuters market analyst. The views expressed are his own) By John Kemp LONDON, Jan 16 (Reuters) - The biggest output of the U.S. oil and gas industry is ...
(John Kemp is a Reuters market analyst. The views expressed are his own) By John Kemp LONDON, Jan 16 (Reuters) - The biggest output of the U.S. oil and gas industry is ...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 123
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
cosmicdart
paragon of paradigms
07:18 PM on 01/22/2012
Given that it takes 319 gallons of fresh water to produce one gallon of petroleum we have an enormous waste of energy taking place. At 8000/BTU per gallon needed to distill water, the solar heat needed for 319 gallon is 2,552,000 BTU to extract one gallon of petroleum that gives us only 140,000 BTU in heat energy. We're using over 18 times more energy for the water than we get out of the petroleum. Energy wise petroleum is non-economical. Solar energy is much more economical. Also we must consider all the fresh water that's polluted by the use of fossil fuels every year. The real ratio could be as high as 40 to 1 energy wise. Water is much much much more valuable than petroleum. Civilization must go Green as soon as possible. We waste 20 trillion BTU worth of solar energy per day extracting petroleum from the ground, 7200 trillion BTU a year. This is outrageous! Enough solar energy to supply all of our world wide needs for a decade or so is wasted every year.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Gudzikowski
free,natural,harmless,individual
12:14 AM on 01/19/2012
I wonder how many parts per million it will take to kill everybody in 20yrs.
02:05 PM on 01/18/2012
it is highly suspicious when enviromentalists worked so hard to get parks set aside(to protect the enviroment from development) using eminent domain and seizure laws and phoney willing seller tactics to get hold of private land holdings just to turn around give it to the gov who turns around and gives it for pennies on the dollar to lease and steal resources that are public without the gov paying royalties to the public via tax breaks or a check in the mail, after all the gov is owned by the people aren't they? example, the gorge park in cuyahoga falls, it was set aside as a park now corporations want to come in and destroy half of it to build a energy producing dam, really? there used to be a dam there many years ago, the remnants still there and yet they took the land , promising the land owner it would be kept a park, thus lying) to shut it down only to remake it later on when a different group of people have a desire to profit off of it? so was it about protecting the land or was it about bunch of big shots getting the land cheap and putting the profits in their pockets instead of the defrauded individual land owner? property rights transfer as it were? now they are extracting oil and gas in places that were supposed to be protected.

rosa
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:05 PM on 01/22/2012
You are SO RIGHT! Yet the public is hoodwinked again and again into allowing such things to go on. Profit ABOVE ALL ELSE! I hope you realize which political theology rewards people that use our public treasure for their own greed, it is not the democratic party. They do have some lier's and deceivers within their midst, but as a whole they still believe in true compassion and equality. I hope you remember that when you vote this November. Elect true democratic candidates to allow this country to prosper again, instead of just the top 1%. These people will make money no matter what.
cosmicdart
paragon of paradigms
12:23 PM on 01/18/2012
Fresh water for industrial purposes seems to be one of the most valuable commodities that we have. We need water to get fossil energy, but it takes solar energy to make fresh water. My guess is that the solar energy that Nature needs to make our fresh water is many times greater than the energy we get out of our fossil fuels. Why not just keep the fresh water and sell that around the world to make money, and replace fossil fuel energy with solar energy? How much solar energy does it take to distill one gallon of fresh water? Perhaps our dollar should be based upon fresh water instead of petroleum. Fresh water tankers replace oil tankers. We become the wealthy fresh water producers of the world.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:10 PM on 01/22/2012
You do not know how "valuable" fresh clean water really is. There will come a time when drinking water will cost more than you can afford to give. I am afraid by then our use of fossil fuels will have polluted our water suppy so that only the rich (oil company's) will be able to afford it
cosmicdart
paragon of paradigms
06:33 PM on 01/22/2012
What I'm saying is that the energy needed for Nature to make the fresh water needed to extract and refine our fossil fuels is much much greater than the energy that we get out of those fossil fuels. We'd be better off using solar energy directly instead of the fossil fuels themselves. By using fresh water to get fossil fuels we're wasting energy. Fresh water is more valuable than fossil fuels.
12:14 PM on 01/18/2012
Mr. Kemp, I thank you for the education on the water waste in the energy industry. Very eye opening. But unless I am misunderstanding, your comments on the concerns with water waste in fracking are not necessarily the primary issues as I understand them. Although it sounds as if water waste is certainly concerning, I am more concerned about the issue that chemicals can and are contaminating our drinking water sources. That is potentially a more colossal issue than waste water disposal.
cosmicdart
paragon of paradigms
12:38 PM on 01/18/2012
The more we poison the underground fresh water resources of the world, the more valuable our above ground fresh water resources become. In time, drinking water might be so scarce world-wide that water shall cost more than fossil fuel. If you destroy the supply, then you increase the value of what remains. Water dollars shall replace petro-dollars some day. As AGW turns our lakes into parched lands, water becomes even more valuable. The 1% see the profit in this!
10:09 AM on 01/18/2012
Now for terrible environmental disasters, and we wonder why our kids get sick every year and develop new forms of viruses? But the relevance of pure water was at all times, and do not forget that such problems should be solved on a global scale!
06:19 AM on 01/18/2012
Yes, and when we run out of clean water we'll all enjoy a tall glass of cold OIL! Can't wait.
cosmicdart
paragon of paradigms
07:39 PM on 01/22/2012
If the oil companies want to use 319 gallons of fresh water to extract one gallon of petroleum they should distill this fresh water from ocean water. This means that they will need to burn 17 gallons of petroleum to distill the fresh water needed to get one gallon of petroleum out of the ground. But that 17 gallons of petroleum would need 5423 gallons of fresh distilled water that will require the burning of 92,191 gallons of petroleum>>> they can't win!
02:09 AM on 01/23/2012
But they don't see it that way. These people can't think beyond the end of their noses and instant gratification means everything - regardless of consequences. And the governments allowing this, the politicians, are just as guilty - and they don't see it either.
05:19 AM on 01/18/2012
Haven't seen any one talk about the possibioitiy that this chemical water could be the fault of all the dead fish we haved been seeing, and the whales, and other sea creatures. The fact that cancer is so prevalent and other diseases, alzheimers, diabeties and all kinds of things are becoming more prevalent. Pretty scary.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mhh310351
Roosevelt Democrat
07:00 PM on 01/17/2012
Wasn't the author of this article a former writer for the TV show "Scare Tactics"?

From the Syfy network?
photo
baxtron
tek phlarpt
04:28 PM on 01/17/2012
don't worry. that water issue won't hit for another 10-15 years.
06:22 AM on 01/18/2012
That 'dirty' water issue is hitting right now...the Inuit of northern Alberta are already experiencing cancers on account of the Athabasca River being poisoned. Tell them it won't hit for another 10-15 years. Tell them that you don't give a hoot as long as money can be made.
02:50 PM on 01/17/2012
Filter your tap water before you drink it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
powder chowder
☮ Peace: the final frontier...
12:08 PM on 01/17/2012
this fracking discussion brings to mind similar neglegent environmental messes created by the mining industries decades ago. Just take the minerals and leave the clean up for future gerations to deal with.
11:31 AM on 01/17/2012
3% of the earths water is fresh water, the rest is salt water. 1% is frozen in glaciers, 1% is surface water such as rivers, streams and lakes and the final 1% is underground. Not much fresh water around.
cosmicdart
paragon of paradigms
12:43 PM on 01/18/2012
And there will be even less around soon whereby the 1% control the little that is left which they shell sell to us for $100 a barrel. Who need oil when ya got this going for ya!
09:53 AM on 01/17/2012
I am so glad information is disseminated so quickly now. I am grateful that market analysts are not the only information getting out there. I am glad that the voice of intelligent people of America can now be better heard. Does this mean we will turn the tide on corporate greed? I don't know, we are up against a lot of money persuading people to their argument, but it seems we are getting to a point that insulated analysts such as the above are looked at as laughable by a great deal of people, and maybe gives others a chance to see another side. I hope we are not just preaching to the choir. Our water issues are so immense, it is sad unless you are as one poster says one of the 99% who will be insulating themselves in a gated, watered (they may need a bubble too) community. I wonder if there will be a seat at the table for this guy above? Doubt it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
missiontango
I used to do drugs. I still do, but I used to too.
07:49 AM on 01/17/2012
There will be a day in the not too distant future when Americans will scratch their heads and say "what were we thinking." We will realize that we allowed hydraulic fracturing to go on long after it was found to be devastating to our wells and aquifers. The bottom line is that we are allowing the bottom line of energy companies to continue to drive practices that will harm us all in due time. Fat cat CEOs will drive up the PPS of their companies and reap incredible fortunes in stock options. They will then hide that money off shore and find gated communities to live in where they have not destroyed the environment, probably in Belize, Costa Rica etc. These companies are as we speak spending millions on PR and spin to make you think that their practices are not doing what they are absolutely doing. Once again the only people who can stop this are our State legislatures and our Congress which are owned by the energy companies lock, stock and barrel.
10:54 AM on 01/17/2012
Where do you get your conspiracy theories that produced water disposal and hydraulic fracturing completion practices are devastating aquifers? If you took the time to stop, read, listen, and learn from the voluminous peer reviewd technical litureature you will find that the wastewater practices of the recent (not pre-1940s) onshore petroleum production industry have a reliable and documented safety record. I have worked both sides of this as both an exploration geoscientist for 8 years and 20+ years as a groundwater hydrologist and the nonsensical scare aguments posed by teh renewable-now zealots do not hold "water". I see the real issue as a complete failure of earth science education in this country--nothing more.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PaulBardinas
Educating one person at a time.
01:31 PM on 01/17/2012
Just curious, what did you think of the documentary film Gasland? I think the fact that the previous administration exempted the gas industry from adhering to Clean Air & Water standards say a great deal. The notion that the oil & gas industry has the safety of the environment or people as it's priority is laughable. In every case it has always been shown that the industry will pollute as much as possible until forced by regulations and regulators (EPA) to STOP and not one second sooner. Wether or not fracing destroys aquifers is not the point. The point most people who object to fracking is that it is mostly unregulated and whenever something is unregulated bad things always seem to happen.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mhh310351
Roosevelt Democrat
04:56 PM on 01/17/2012
celcius232 why argue except for sport with Anti-Frackers? I mean they are the flip side of the Climate Change Deniers coin!

They will get their information from talking heads or the movies but never a peer review paper and they will reject any science that does not agree with their politics.

Climate Change Deniers or Anti-Frackers are both equally Science impaired!