iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Public Pre-Kindergarten Programs Slowed, Even Reversed, By Recession

Janeece Docal Prekindergarten

KIMBERLY HEFLING   01/17/12 02:03 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — The expansion in public prekindergarten programs has slowed and even been reversed in some states as school districts cope with shrinking budgets. As a result, many 3- and 4-year-olds aren't going to preschool.

Kids from low-income families who start kindergarten without first attending a quality education program enter school an estimated 18 months behind their peers. Many never catch up, and research shows they are more likely to need special education services and to drop out. Kids in families with higher incomes also can benefit from early education, research shows.

Yet, roughly a quarter of the nation's 4-year-olds and more than half of 3-year-olds attend no preschool, either public or private. Families who earn about $40,000 to $50,000 annually face the greatest difficulties because they make too much to quality for many publicly funded programs, but can't afford private ones, said Steven Barnett, director of the National Institute for Early Education Research at Rutgers University.

And as more students qualify for free or reduced lunch – often a qualifier to get into a state-funded prekindergarten program – many families are finding that slots simply aren't available, he said.

In Arizona, a block grant that funded prekindergarten for a small percentage of kids was cut altogether, although a separate public fund still supports some programs. In Georgia, a drop in state lottery dollars meant shaving 20 days off the prekindergarten school year. Proposed cuts in such programs have led to litigation in North Carolina and legislative battles in places like Iowa.

But even in states like New York, where state funding available for prekindergarten has remained relatively steady in recent years, fewer children have access to the programs because inflation has made them more expensive or districts can't come up with the required matching dollars, said Billy Easton, executive director of the Alliance for Quality Education in Albany, N.Y.

Today's climate contrasts with that of 2007, when then-New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer promised universal, public prekindergarten for all 4-year-olds. Other governors made similar commitments when the economy was stronger.

Far from meeting Spitzer's goal, just 40 percent of 4-year-olds attend a state-funded prekindergarten program in about two-thirds of the state's school districts, according to the advocacy group Winning Beginning NY.

"I think it's a moment in time when we have to really push harder," Easton said. "Pre-K is proven to be the most effective education strategy that we can invest in. What it means is that because we failed to live up to our commitment so far to our youngest children, more of them will end up out of work or they will make less money than they would've otherwise and more of them will end up in prison."

Barnett's institute has estimated it would cost about $70 billion annually to provide full-day prekindergarten to every 3- and 4-year old in America, including before- and after-care services.

About 40 states fund prekindergarten programs, typically either in public schools or via funds paid to private grantees, for at least some children. That's in addition to the federal Head Start program, which is designed to serve extremely poor children and offers a broader range of social services. In some places, state-funded prekindergarten and Head Start programs are combined.

Typically, state-funded prekindergarten programs have a narrower focus on education and cognitive development and serve a broader population than the federal Head Start program, which serves nearly 1 million kids.

In Wisconsin, school districts that offer prekindergarten to 4-year-olds must offer it universally, and roughly 90 percent of districts do. But budget cuts mean districts are forced to make other changes like increasing the size of pre-K classes.

"Unfortunately, as the awareness and the need (for early learning) becomes more and more evident, our money gets tighter and tighter and tighter and more programs are not instituted in those areas," said Miles Turner, executive director of the Wisconsin Association of School District Administrators.

Three states offer prekindergarten to all 4-year-olds, according to Pre-K Now, a decade-long project of the Pew Center on the States.

The District of Columbia goes a step further, with universal pre-K for 3- and 4-year-olds. The program is viewed by many as not just a way to help low-income children in the historically low-performing district, but also as a driver to keep middle- and upper-class families in the city and the school system.

At D.C.'s Powell Elementary School, 3- and 4-year-olds sit cross-legged with whiteboards and black markers in hand as teacher Laura Amling belts out, "Up, down, up, down" over classical music. The tots scribble marks similar to an "M" at her command.

This program is not child care. The schedule is filled with Spanish and other lessons, including "buddy reading," with kids describing books to one another.

The kids eat breakfast and lunch family style, so they learn proper etiquette. Songs are sung as the children move to activities to help curb behavior problems. Teachers teach children coping skills and make home visits to bond with parents and children.

While it's too early to know the long-term impact, Principal Janeece Docal says kindergarteners with a pre-K background are writing sentences and discussing books with 3rd-grade level content.

"They trust their teachers. They love their friends," Docal said. "They are invested in their education and you can see that they own that classroom."

Added Amling, "They want to learn and they are really so happy."

Over the past decade, state dollars for prekindergarten more than doubled nationally to $5.1 billion, while at the same time access increased from a little more than 700,000 children to more than 1 million, according to Pre-K Now.

But cuts in state-funded programs began showing up in the 2009-10 school year, according to Barnett's group. He said he's concerned not just that fewer children will be served, but that the quality of the programs will also be affected.

Still, early childhood learning advocates say they are encouraged, in part, because of a recent federal emphasis on improving early childhood programs.

Nine states were awarded a collective $500 million in grants last month to improve access to and the quality of early childhood programs for kids from birth to age 5. A month earlier, President Barack Obama announced new rules under which lower-performing Head Start programs will have to compete for funding.

Not everyone is convinced it's worth the cost.

Chester E. Finn Jr., president of Thomas B. Fordham Institute and a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution of Stanford University, said the government should tightly target its resources on families who really need the prekindergarten programs and otherwise aren't going to get them.

Finn, who has written a book about preschool policy, said Obama's effort on Head Start is a beginning, but more needs to be done. Finn also questioned whether the government was capable of funding universal prekindergarten at a quality level.

"What the universal programs do is they provide an unnecessary windfall for a lot of families that are otherwise doing this on their own just fine, or pretty well, and not enough for kids who really need it," Finn said.

Richard M. Clifford, senior scientist at the FPG Child Development Institute at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, said other developed countries – including much of Europe – provide prekindergarten programs.

"Kids come into the regular school better prepared to succeed in school," Clifford said. "In the long term, eventually, I think you'll see all 4-year-olds be eligible for pre-K in this country, but it will take a long time."

___

Online:

Alliance for Quality Education: http://www.aqeny.org

FPG Child Development Institute: http://www.fpg.unc.edu

Head Start: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ohs

National Institute for Early Education Research: http://nieer.org

Pre-K Now: http://www.preknow.org

Thomas B. Fordham Institute: http://www.edexcellence.net

___

Kimberly Hefling can be followed at http://twitter.com/khefling

FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

WASHINGTON — The expansion in public prekindergarten programs has slowed and even been reversed in some states as school districts cope with shrinking budgets. As a result, many 3- and 4-year-ol...
WASHINGTON — The expansion in public prekindergarten programs has slowed and even been reversed in some states as school districts cope with shrinking budgets. As a result, many 3- and 4-year-ol...
Filed by Emmeline Zhao  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 14
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AndyWright68
A truly free society is inevitable!
12:51 AM on 02/01/2012
The government wants your kids as young as they can get them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frdafury
There's no kill switch on awesome!
02:05 PM on 01/18/2012
What is amusing or frightening about this situation is that we know what is the right thing to do...it's simple...send our 3-4 yo's to pre-school. IT has benefits that last a life time for citizens. BUT and it is a big BUT, our "experts" at government and education and economics and business are just a dither that this costs money that won't go into their pockets. And that is the simple answer. Funny, Gordon Gecko was a fictional character that lived on Wall Street yet the way these self-same experts behave, you would think he was either their "god" or on the right hand of god. At any rate, till greed declines and doing the right thing for the right consequences actually becomes viable, we will have decline. It's that simple and those that are rational and thinking and (shudder) logical can see it. Too many plan for "just me right now" and forget that they are part of a much larger collective. If they got their heads out of their butts and looked at the long term, everyone, including them could be much more successful if they all just did the right thing. Yea, that will happen.
11:00 AM on 01/18/2012
What the universal programs do is they provide an unnecessary windfall for a lot of families that are otherwise doing this on their own just fine, or pretty well, and not enough for kids who really need it," Finn said.
----------------------------------------
Unnecessary windfall? Do not test for eligibility if:

1. You want social cohesion.
2. You want monitoring of standards of provision by educated parents.
3. You do not want large sums spent enforcing a difficult, bureaucratic eligibility scheme.

And finally. the emphasis in all pre-schools should be upon social play.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
dadw5boys
Disabled Vietnam Vet
04:22 AM on 01/18/2012
As I see it they are only squeezed out if the parents allow it. If you can pay a babysitter then you can pay one to teach kids even if it is in someone's home.
4 or 5 parents can get togeather and pay some college students to teach/babysit the kids. Call up one of the Sororities at any college and I will bet you they can come up with a plan and even get grants to run it espically if there is a Education Department at the College. If not then hit up the Business Department and get some of the Business Students in on a Business Plan to setup a child care/ preschool organization.
Personally I would be teaching my kids myself even if they did go to school. I would put the responsibility on anyone to make sure my kids are ready for 1st grade that is MY responsibility.
08:19 AM on 01/18/2012
Well, you could do that. Or you could combine programs or double class sizes, like the article says. But none of those options are going to be as good as actually doing it right.
03:30 AM on 01/18/2012
HOLY SMOKES....I guess the only solution might be for mom and dad to turn-off the TV and actually read with the kids. What has America come to?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
dadw5boys
Disabled Vietnam Vet
04:28 AM on 01/18/2012
yeah both parents working 60 to 80 hours a week and paying baby sitters. by the time you get home and fix dinner and get a bath it is bed time because kids are a real problem if they do not get at least 8 hours of deep sleep.
Been there lived thru that. If the parent could teach kids everything they needed there would be no need for schools and the status guo would never change.
04:46 AM on 01/18/2012
60 - 80 hours so thay can have two smart phones, two BMW's, a 4000 sq ft home, a cabin and pay the babysitter
12:32 PM on 01/18/2012
No excuse for not making sure your kid is reading and doing homework.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nuff swaid
07:57 PM on 01/17/2012
the best way to close the achievement gap and the effort wallows--sad
12:31 PM on 01/18/2012
The best way to close the achievement gap (aside from parents not reproducing when they can't take care of themselves) would be to read to your kid every night and be a parent.
01:06 PM on 01/17/2012
Pre-K programs are important, but I suspect that they are not the most cost effective approach. Typically they start at age 3 or 4. Too much has already happened to the child - you need to affect the early childhood environment. I would suggest that programs for pregnant women and new mothers/child care providers combined with some form of infant play co-ops where the mothers / providers could meet, the kids could play, and the mothers / providers could be given guidance on better child rearing practices would be cost effective. Churches and social welfare groups would probably be the ones to best run such programs. See http://heckmanequation.org/ for information on the importance of early childhood skills acquisition.