More

Debt Ceiling Hike: House Passes Symbolic Measure To Prevent Increase In Limit

Debt Ceiling Vote

ANDREW TAYLOR   01/18/12 05:26 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — The GOP-controlled House on Wednesday kicked off another session with a protest vote against raising the government's borrowing cap by $1.2 trillion, but the maneuver amounted to political theater under a process stacked on purpose in President Barack Obama's favor.

The nearly party-line 239-176 vote puts the House on record against Obama's use of unprecedented authority – awarded to him through a mechanism devised by the Senate's top Republican – to unilaterally raise the so-called debt limit unless Congress can muster the votes to block him.

The Senate is sure to kill the measure next week, and Obama's veto power serves as a final guarantee that the increase will go through as intended and that the nation won't face another debt crisis like last summer.

The political dance choreographed under last summer's Budget Control Act was designed to permit lawmakers, mostly Republicans, to vote against debt increases but not actually block them – and provoke a first-ever, market-rattling default on U.S. government obligations.

The debate offered tea party-backed GOP freshmen an almost three-hour opportunity before C-Span cameras to cast blame on the White House and Democratically controlled Senate for the nation's fiscal ills. The national debt has skyrocketed during Obama's first term – from $10.6 trillion on Inauguration Day to $15.2 trillion today. Much of the blame lies with the deep recession Obama inherited, which made revenues plummet, but almost $1 trillion of the increase can be attributed to Obama's 2009 deficit-financed economic stimulus bill.

"Instead of giving the President more power to spend money we do not have, Congress should work together to find ways to cut spending and put America back on a path to fiscal responsibility," said Rep. Joe Wilson, R-S.C.

"Today's vote will clearly show the American people who in this chamber want to further grow the size of government, let it intrude further into the private sector, and give more power Washington bureaucrats to meddle in the everyday lives of American citizens," said Rep. Randy Hultgren, R-Ill. "And in contrast, it will show those of us who believe that a smaller government increases our constituents' liberty."

Democrat Jared Polis of Colorado said that under last year's nonbinding House GOP budget plan, the national debt would have risen by more than $5 trillion over the coming decade anyway. And he pointed out that the new borrowing authority is needed to pay for a $1 trillion-plus omnibus spending bill that many Republicans supported just last month.

"We're here playing a counter-productive and absurd game," Polis said.

"Let's be honest with the American people," said Democratic Whip Steny Hoyer of Maryland. "We've all incurred a debt. We all spent the money. We drove on the roads. We were defended abroad. We invested in health care research. We all incurred these debts."

Even one GOP veteran said Wednesday's debate was a futile exercise, given how the August debt pact intentionally stacked the cards in Obama's favor.

"We have, in effect, given the president of the United States the ability to raise the debt ceiling without us ... having any control whatsoever," said veteran Rep. Dan Burton, R-Ind. "We gave the president carte blanche and it's dead wrong."

Conservative groups weren't joining in the GOP pep rally. The Club for Growth, which raises campaign cash for free-market conservative candidates, issued a half-dozen "Debt Hypocrisy Alerts" blasting lawmakers like Jim Renacci, R-Ohio, Tom Rooney, R-Fla., and Tom Reed, R-N.Y., for touting their support for Wednesday's measure after voting to increase the debt limit last summer.

Democrats went through the motions as well, arguing against a measure that they know isn't going anywhere.

"They're playing with fire and that's reckless. They know that others will put out the fire. And we'll vote, many of us, to do that today, and if we don't succeed, the Senate will do so," said Rep. Sander Levin, D-Mich. "This, I think, is worse than a charade because it really assumes that the agenda of this congress should essentially be a kind of a plaything."

The House passed a similar resolution in September after Obama used his authority to raise the debt cap by $500 billion.

Last year's debt agreement permits a total debt limit increase of $2.1 trillion in exchange for an equivalent amount in spending cuts, which would be spread out over the coming decade. The first $900 billion comes from caps on the day-to-day operations of federal agencies.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — The GOP-controlled House on Wednesday kicked off another session with a protest vote against raising the government's borrowing cap by $1.2 trillion, but the maneuver amounted to po...
WASHINGTON — The GOP-controlled House on Wednesday kicked off another session with a protest vote against raising the government's borrowing cap by $1.2 trillion, but the maneuver amounted to po...
Filed by Luke Johnson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 454
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
  1 of 1  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
stopthemadness69 06:18 PM on 01/18/2012
Obama has added 4.6 trillion in 3 years. That's a deficit of 1.5 trillion per year on average, that's only 200 billion per year more than bush's last budget deficit. Let's see. Bush had a 1.3 trillion deficit at the end of the good old bubble days, Obama has a deficit of 1.5 trillion in the middle of an economic disaster. Who is the big spender again? let's not forget that most of  Read More...
PC Contrarian
Political Correctnes­s is the opiate of the left.
05:23 PM on 02/02/2012
Here's an entertaining proposal for reducing the deficit:
http://www.youtube.com/embed/KV-RqPtT2PU
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:32 PM on 01/22/2012
"The fact that we are here today to debate raising America’s debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the U.S. Government can’t pay its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our Government’s reckless fiscal policies. … Increasing America’s debt weakens us domestically and internationally. Leadership means that ‘the buck stops here. Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better."

-- Sen. Barack Obama, March 16, 2006

"If my Republican friends believe that increasing our debt by almost $800 billion today and more than $3 trillion over the last five years is the right thing to do, they should be upfront about it. They should explain why they think more debt is good for the economy....

How can they explain that they think it’s fair to force our children, our grandchildren, our great grandchildren to finance this debt through higher taxes. That’s what it will have to be. Why is it right to increase our nation’s dependence on foreign creditors?

... They should explain this. Maybe they can convince the public they’re right. I doubt it. Because most Americans know that increasing debt is the last thing we should be doing."

Senator Harry Reid, 2006
ColoradoPete
End of term coming.......
02:35 AM on 01/19/2012
I got the message from this action taken by the House.

I wonder if President Obama got the message???
photo
elkabong
Campaign finance is the disease.
07:44 PM on 01/18/2012
Congress determined to disable the automatic cuts they agreed to four months ago
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/01/17/1055715/-Congress-determined-to-disable-the-automatic-cuts-they-agreed-to-four-months%C2%A0ago?via=blog_1
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:37 PM on 01/18/2012
PBO's first TV ad to air possible on Thursday.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=sq3GGwgV7R0
07:20 PM on 01/18/2012
If Republicans genuinely cared about this country's spiraling debt, they'd roll back the Bush tax cuts, eliminate corporate subsidies and tax loopholes, tax "carried interest" for what it is, income, and create tax incentives to make it more profitable for companies to bring outsourced jobs back to the U.S.
photo
Hooponopono
From Maine to Hawaii
07:14 PM on 01/18/2012
Reagan and the 2 Bushs created 73% of our national debt. They could not have piled this monstrosity on the backs of their conservative base. All through Bush 2's terms the loudest deficit hawks we have, McConnell, Boehner, Canter et al, were helping Bush like crazy to pile up this deficit that they have deposited on the backs of our kids and grandkids. They had an a miracle conversion to balanced budget while Obama had his hand on the bible.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:12 PM on 01/18/2012
we're talking about a party whose entire economic platform for the 2012 election is to raise taxes on 80% of us, hide it by claiming their "flattening" the tax code will tax those deadbeat poor people with no money (even though anyone knows if you eliminate the 0 % rate on the bottom tier of income, you actually raise taxes on middle class folks too, tax rates cover income levels, not total income, nice bait and switch). Meanwhile, there is one select group of people who this country has given much, and even in the worst recession in history, have profitted greatly, and the response is to give them more. It would be comical if it wasn't at risk of actually working.
photo
Hooponopono
From Maine to Hawaii
07:07 PM on 01/18/2012
The Tea Party Mantra:

FIRST - CUT GOVERNMENT SPENDING.
SECOND - KEEP YOUR GOVERNMENT HANDS OFF MY MEDICARE.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:02 PM on 01/18/2012
If the House Republicans truly wanted to do something, they would put forth a bill that would stimulate the US economy and create domestic jobs...
photo
Hooponopono
From Maine to Hawaii
07:09 PM on 01/18/2012
That will be the absolute last thing they will do. Their election chances this fall depend entirely on high unemployment. Now do you understand why they have blocked more than 30 Obama jobs bills?
photo
JJenius
Being lucky is often forgotten!
07:01 PM on 01/18/2012
You may be a regressive if you think any newly elected 1%'er will help any of the 99%'ers after the election.
photo
sillylittleme
humble cosmos shaker
07:00 PM on 01/18/2012
The Rs just love giving the sane among us a reason to put them on the unemployment lines come Jan '13.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hswanson2
Could you work if farmers didn't
06:59 PM on 01/18/2012
I love it more GOP hypocrisy (that is like more rabbits in Australia - how would you know already too many to count).
photo
sleepyguy510
We have met the enemy, and it is us....Walt Kelly
06:59 PM on 01/18/2012
Back to business as usual. In lieu of doing any real work for America they get right to the political theater and symbolism.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Phil Van Voorhis
06:59 PM on 01/18/2012
Now Congress will begin debating this nonsense again, and why not? Why would they ever want to explain where our jobs have gone, and the role they played in it?