iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Mitt Romney Allegedly Pulls Back Handshake Upon Learning That DREAM Act Advocate Is Undocumented

First Posted: 01/18/12 05:22 PM ET Updated: 01/18/12 06:55 PM ET

NEW YORK -- Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney suddenly pulled back his hand after hearing that a young college student who greeted him at a New York fundraiser Tuesday night was undocumented, according to DREAM Act activists.

"He extended his hand to shake mine," the young woman told The Huffington Post. "But once I said I was undocumented, he pulled his hand away from me."

The 19-year-old college student, who asked to be identified only as Lucy because of her undocumented status, said she was also booed by Romney supporters as she was escorted out of a New York City fundraiser. One of the supporters told her to "go back to Mexico," and she responded that she was "actually from Peru," according to her account of the event.

The Romney campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the alleged incident.

Lucy was among nearly a dozen young protesters who are advocates of a bill that would provide legal status to some undocumented immigrants who entered the United States as children. Three students, including Lucy, went into the Sheraton New York Hotel and Towers, where the fundraiser was held, to ask the presidential hopeful why he "didn't support their dreams." The other demonstrators waited outside, carrying placards with messages such as, "DREAM ACT NOW. ROMNEY IS NOT A FRIEND TO LATINOS. NY VETOES ROMNEY."

In a video shared with The Huffington Post, the college student taped part of her encounter with the GOP frontrunner on her cell phone, although their hands are not visible on the recording. She can be heard asking Romney if he would support the DREAM Act. The candidate responded that he already said publicly that he would veto the legislation.

Romney was talking when Lucy interjects that she did not come to the country illegally. She told HuffPost later that she was brought to the United States when she was 9 years old on a travel visa by her mother. On the video, Lucy tells the Republican candidate that she had a 4.0 grade point average in college.

"That's wonderful," Romney replied before being ushered away from the young woman by his staffers, one of whom can be seen moving in between the young activist and the candidate.

The young college student said she was on track to graduate with a degree in broadcast journalism in three years. Her mother, who Lucy says brought her to the United States for a better life, works as a housekeeper in New York City. Like other DREAM Act advocates at the protest, Lucy said she worries that she will not be able to work after she graduates from college if she does not have the required papers.

Those in Lucy's position are permitted to return to their home country and apply for legal status, but under current law, many face three or 10-year bans to reentering the country. The long wait times make it difficult, if not impossible, to return, and many young people in Lucy's position do not see returning to their home country to enter the United States legally as a viable option.

Another protester at the Romney fundraiser was Jong Min, a 32-year-old man from South Korea, who said he represents another face of the DREAM Act.

"The DREAM Act is not just a Mexican issue. It's not just a Latino issue. It's an immigrant issue. It's everybody's issue," Min told HuffPost.

After graduating from the University of Tennessee magna cum laude, Min said he was only able to find jobs at grocery stores and in construction work because higher level work mandated documents that he could not provide. He said he was brought to the United States as a one-year-old by his mother, a fact he only discovered when he applied to a residency program at a hospital while he was a student at Stuyvesant High School in New York City.

"My mom told me my whole life I had a green card. I went home that day in search of this mythical, magical green card, and I never found it. I had no clue that I was undocumented until I was 17," Min said.

Min added that he is frustrated he cannot contribute to society because of his immigration status.

"What happens after all that education?" he asked. "I spent all of my life working towards something, and now I can't even use what I have to offer."

Standing outside the hotel during Romney's fundraising event, Jong Min, Lucy and other Dream Act advocates loudly voiced their disapproval of a candidate who said he would veto legislation that would permit them to remain in the U.S.

"Veto Romney! Veto Romney!," they chanted in unison.

The group said that while they cannot vote because of their undocumented status, they do not think Romney would be able to win over Latinos -- an important voting block in many states -- without supporting the DREAM Act.

Some pollsters argue that Latinos, the nation's fastest growing minority group, decided the 2008 election in favor of President Obama in key swing states like Florida. While Obama won 67 percent of the Latino vote in 2008, George W. Bush won nearly half of the Latino vote in 2004.

According to a recent Pew Hispanic Center report, 91 percent of Latinos support the DREAM Act. Ruben Gallego, a state representative in Arizona, said in a teleconference last week that the DREAM Act will be a particularly emotional issue for the community in the 2012 election.

"This is about our kids. Attacking the DREAM Act, and attacking our kids, is really not a wise political move for Republicans," he said.

Tuesday night's protesters echoed Gallego's assertion.

As Romney quickly ducked into his car, the protesters chanted, "Latinos do not support Romney. Latinos do not support Romney."


THE NATION'S HARSHEST ANTI-IMMIGRATION LAWS:
Loading Slideshow...
  • The Template: California Proposition 187 (1994)

    California's Proposition 187 was submitted to the voters with the full support of then Republican governor Pete Wilson. It essentially blamed undocumented immigrants for the poor performance of the state economy in the early 1990s. The law called for cutting off benefits to undocumented immigrants: prohibiting their access to health care, public education, and other social services in California. It also required state authorities to report anyone who they suspected was undocumented. <strong>Status:</strong> The law passed with the support of 55 percent of the voters in 1994 but declared unconstitutional 1997. The law was killed in 1999 when a new governor, Democrat Gray Davis, refused to appeal a judicial decision that struck down most of the law. Even though short-lived, the legislation paved the way for harsher immigration laws to come. On the other hand, the strong reaction from the Hispanic community and immigration advocates propelled a drive for naturalization of legal residents and created as many as one million new voters.

  • The Worst: Arizona SB 1070

    The Arizona Act made it a misdemeanor for an undocumented immigrant to be within the state lines of Arizona without legal documents allowing their presence in the U.S. The law was widely criticized as xenophobic and for encouraging racial profiling. It required state authorities to inquire about an individual's immigration status during an arrest when there was "reasonable suspicion" that the individual was undocumented. The law would allow police to detain anyone who they believed was in the country illegally. <strong>Status:</strong> The law was signed into law by Arizona Governor Jan Brewer on April 23, 2010, immediately generating a swirl of controversy and questions about its constitutionality. In July 2010 and February 2012, federal judges blocked different provisions of SB 1070, setting the stage for the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/25/sb1070-ruling-supreme-court_n_1614119.html" target="_hplink">the Supreme Court decision of June 25, 2012</a> which struck down multiple provisions but upheld the controversial "papers please" provision, a centerpiece of the law which critics say will lead to racial profiling

  • Following Arizona's Footsteps: Georgia HB 87

    The controversy over Arizona's immigration law was followed by heated debate over Georgia's own law. HB 87 required government agencies and private companies to check the immigration status of applicants. This law also limited some government benefits to people who could prove their legal status. <strong>Status:</strong> Although a federal judge temporarily blocked parts of the law considered too extreme, it went into effect on July 1st. 2011. House: 113-56 Senate: 39-17

  • Verifying Authorized Workers: Pennsylvania HB 1502

    This bill, which was approved in 2010, bans contractors and subcontractors employ undocumented workers from having state construction contracts. The bill also protects employees who report construction sites that hire illegal workers. To ensure that contractors hire legal workers, the law requires employers to use the identification verification system E-verify, based on a compilation of legally issued Social Security numbers. <strong>Status:</strong> Approved on June 8th 2010. House: 188-6 (07/08/2010) <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/donkeyhotey/" target="_hplink">Flickr photo by DonkeyHotey</a>

  • A Spin Off of Arizona: Utah HB 497

    Many states tried to emulate Arizona's SB 1070 law. However, most state legislatures voted against the proposals. Utah's legislature managed to approve an immigration law based on a different argument. Taking into consideration the criticism of racial profiling in Arizona, Utah required ID cards for "guest workers" and their families. In order to get such a card workers must pay a fee and have clean records. The fees go up to $2,500 for immigrants who entered the country illegally and $1,000 for immigrants who entered the country legally but were not complying with federal immigration law, <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/2011/mar/06/nation/la-na-illegal-immigration-20110306" target="_hplink">according to the LA Times.</a> <strong>Status: </strong> Law went into effect on 03/15/2011 House: 59-15 (03/04/2011) Senate: 22-5 (03/04/2011)

  • The Most Comprehensive: Florida HB-1C

    Florida's immigration law prohibits any restrictions on the enforcement of federal immigration law. It makes it unlawful for undocumented immigrants within the state to apply for work or work as an independent contractor. It forbids employers from hiring immigrants if they are aware of their illegal status and requires work applicants to go through the E-verify system in order to check their Social Security number. <strong>Status: </strong>effective since October 1st, 2010

  • The Hot Seat: Alabama HB 56

    The new immigration law in Alabama is considered the toughest in the land, even harder than Arizona's SB 1070. It prohibits law enforcement officers from releasing an arrested person before his or her immigration status is determined. It does not allow undocumented immigrants to receive any state benefit, and prohibits them from enrolling in public colleges, applying for work or soliciting work in a public space. The law also prohibits landlords from renting property to undocumented immigrants, and employers from hiring them. It requires residents to prove they are citizens before they become eligible to vote. The law asked every school in the state to submit an annual report with the number of presumed undocumented students, but this part, along with others, were suspended by federal courts. <strong>Status:</strong> Approved June 2nd, 2011 House: 73-28 (04/05/2011) Senate: 23-11 (05/05/2011) <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/longislandwins/" target="_hplink">Flickr photo by longislandwins</a>


WATCH RELATED:
FOLLOW HUFFPOST LATINO VOICES

NEW YORK -- Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney suddenly pulled back his hand after hearing that a young college student who greeted him at a New York fundraiser Tuesday night was undocumented, acco...
NEW YORK -- Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney suddenly pulled back his hand after hearing that a young college student who greeted him at a New York fundraiser Tuesday night was undocumented, acco...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 729
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
12:18 PM on 05/25/2012
Unless you are Native American, YOU are ILLEGAL. I am so freaking sick of all the hate and divisiveness rampant in this country.

We MUST stop! Let's work together and REbuild this great nation. If we continue to tear one another apart, we will fail.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frctm5
01:54 AM on 04/10/2012
I would gladly trade these motivated non-citizens for some of our legally born citizens. Immigration is good for this country and often immigrants are more appreciative of what America has to offer than our domestic whiners.
07:28 PM on 02/09/2012
Mitt should have said to her: "It is unfortunate that your parents brought you here illegally when you were a child. I understand you had no control over that. However, you are an adult now and you do have control over what you choose now. And apparently you choose to live in the US in violation of our immigration laws and you demand special privileges. I cannot support your argument because to do so I would have to betray young American citizens who also didn't have a choice about where they were born, but who are citizens and whose rights and lives have a priority over yours because they are citizens--and you are not. I suggest you go back to your home country and make life there. I also suggest that if you are angry about your situation you take it up with your parents as they are the ones that created it. You need to understand that American citizens do not owe you anything just because your parents didn't respect the law in their opportunistic efforts to make a better life and because you don't respect the law."
09:23 AM on 04/21/2012
"because to do so I would have to betray young American citizens who also didn't have a choice about where they were born, but who are citizens "
How and where exactly are American citizens like me betrayed?
09:25 AM on 04/21/2012
"and whose rights and lives have a priority over yours because they are citizens--and you are not."
Constitutionally, that's not as true as you seem to think so.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Johnny Angel Wendell
03:59 PM on 01/29/2012
How can you claim to be in favor of "family values" but then favor policies that break families up or negate the effect of what parents do for a better life for their kids?

This nonsense over illegals didn't exist back in Boston when I was living there in the 80's and why? Because the illegals were from Ireland, just like so many Bostonians, therefore, they didn't care. The lie about how it's only for "respect for law" is always revealed to be so when the immigrants in question come from where you come from, look like you, speak like you.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
George Global
Diogenes has left the building
03:26 PM on 01/25/2012
This illustrates a big problem with Romney. All image and zero substance.
He had a chance to talk with this woman and hear her story.
After gathering the info, he could have rendered an opinion (think I know what that wouldda been) out of knowledge, not ignorance/fear.

Gingrich would have detained her for the authorities...just 'cause he's mean.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
unimatrix0
03:12 PM on 01/25/2012
Our politicians shake the hands of world leaders who kill and torture their own people, but Mitt can't shake the hand of a US resident, who was brought here illegally by her parents, and is attending college? Was she suppose to run away from home at age 12, 15, 17? and go back to Peru with no money, support, or documentation to support the claim she is a citizen of Peru?
My uncle had a much different experience. He knew he was here illegally, which is why he never tried to become a citizen. His mother snuck him over the border when he was a few months old, He went to public school, worked, and collected social security before you had to prove you were legal to work. He married my aunt (born here) and had children, but he never became a citizen. Then after 9/11 we took a cruise and he needed a passport. Well he had a passport, since his mother got him one to come into the US once legally for a visit (but returned illegally). The cruise line was shocked when this 70+yrs man produced a Canadian passport with the photo of a 2 month child and the birth certificate to go with it, and a current US driver's lisence. It took a while, but they let on the ship. Had he been Mexican and not Canadian there is no doubt in my mind they would not have let him on the ship.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
George Global
Diogenes has left the building
03:21 PM on 01/25/2012
Your story is a great example how our enforcement seems racist.
12:50 AM on 01/25/2012
no doubt some of you huffpost commenters posted some of the hateful responses
http://colorlines.com/archives/2012/01/charlottes_first_baby_sparks_anti_latino_hate.html
photo
spytheweb
Black Democrat
01:51 PM on 01/24/2012
"He extended his hand to shake mine," the young woman told The Huffington Post. "But once I said I was undocumented, he pulled his hand away from me." 

Because you are in the country illegally, without any ID, because you sneak around under cover and your life is built upon lies. You think being in a country where you are illegal and unwanted is normal and ok. Who needs a license and insurance, i'am illegal.

This is what happens when the government refuses to enforce the law. If she was in Japan, she wouldn't walk up to a politician and say she's illegal, because if she did she would be on her way out of the country. It's because the US is wishy washy with these people is why they do things like this. The day is coming that crack downs will be the rule of the day and enforcement comes back into play. It's going to be ugly.
05:59 PM on 01/24/2012
it's already ugly just read your own comment
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ssassy78
Laughter is the best medicine.
06:53 PM on 01/24/2012
Clearly, she did not have a choice. She was a child and her PARENTS brought her here illegally. Providing a variety of immigration options in a land that claims its 'immigrant heritage' with such pride should be a social goal. I have a much bigger issue with the CORPORATIONS that thrive off of illegal labor and play two sides of the fence. We wouldn't have an illegal immigrant issue if there weren't a demand for them to be here. The Republicans provide the climate for industry to exploit them, and the Democrats provide the subsidies to sustain them. The CHILDREN are the victims of a larger issue. The Dream Act is not a bad idea, as the CHILDREN are part of America's fabric. We regularly provide visas for SKILLED workers to enter the US under the excuse that we don't have skilled labor, when the truth is companies don't want to PAY for skilled labor. Immigration is used to divide people, but follow the money. That's where you'll find the real 'winners' in all of it.

Worse proposals could be on the table than the Dream Act. At least it's a step in the direction of reform.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
methnkng
02:54 PM on 01/29/2012
At 18, she is an adult and has a choice. Be a law abiding person and return to her country and apply to come here on the same terms as everyone else. Or become a criminal like her parents. She obviously thinks she is above the law. She is not.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marymrevis
Life is PRECIOUS! Make it count.
04:47 PM on 01/22/2012
I'm not stating my political views here, but I will say this. This young person SHOULD HAVE ENTERED THE USA IN THE LEGAL AND PROPER WAY. She isn't documented but is in college??? I would CERTAINLY HOPE someone is now checking into this, and see WHY and HOW she was able to get by with this. I'm guessing she is a nice person and everyone deserve a chance at bettering their lives... BUT NOT ILLEGALLY. My reaction upon learning this about her..would have been the same as Rommey's. Rommey wasn't mean or nasty..he was making a statement without saying a word to this illegal. She should go back to Peru and come back when she can enter the US properly and has her visa issues cleared up. Maybe she should thank her mother for trying to take the sneaky way in life..that only now will create major problems for her..instead of protesting. Which by the way, SINCE SHE IS AN ILLEGAL IMMIGRATE..SHE HAS NO RIGHTS TO PROTEST FOR! HERE IN THE US.
02:27 AM on 01/23/2012
"she is undocumented but in college"?

Yeah, the least she could have done would have been to drive without a license, apply for food stamps, join a gang, abuse the wellfare system; that would have fit into the stereotype.

Now that she's doing more for this country than your daughters will ever hope for you really need to vilify her. After all, they had everything while she had nothing; the only difference is that she's trying to make something of herself - but a stupid piece of paper is standing in her way!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marymrevis
Life is PRECIOUS! Make it count.
12:18 AM on 01/25/2012
@Klabb If that "stupid piece of paper" is important to her, worth having and to be proud of, then it's worth getting it the LEGAL way..not by being undocumented. She would get legal first, then pursue her dreams. Bottom line..end of story
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
methnkng
02:57 PM on 01/29/2012
You think she is setting a fine example by becoming a criminal?

How is she doing more for his country than decent, law abiding American daughters who work hard, study hard, contribute to society... and don't engage in document fraud, id theft, driving without a licencse, tax evasion etc?
09:15 PM on 01/24/2012
oh sweetie, nobody cares about shaking your hand :(
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marymrevis
Life is PRECIOUS! Make it count.
11:58 PM on 01/24/2012
@dissentisgood LOL LOL...didn't know reading this ignorance would be so entertaining. Move along now.
11:16 PM on 03/27/2012
Oh trust me, the latino voters care, thats why Romney will loose the election.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DougDeWitt
progressive social-capitalist
02:34 PM on 01/22/2012
Mitt unequivocally does NOT have my vote!

Nor should he, Newt, or even Barack have even One Latino Vote!

Stop sending these clowns to Sacramento. Stop sending them to Washington. They do NOT have even the most remote interest in making Immigration Laws in America fair or equitable for Latinos. They are all sliming around for your votes right now, careful not to promise anything they can't deny later, when their conservative white backers are holding that big check out, Only in the event they promise to screw the Latino community once again...

This year, there is going to be an actual choice, although the White Media will throw rocks at it, telling you voting for a Libertarian who promises to push an Open Borders, universal work-visas for anyone who requests one, Immigration Policy, will be a wasted vote.

Don't believe them. Come together as a massive political force, work for a candidate who will change the face of American society, who will return the American federal government to one in service to Children, and The Family, instead of in service to American Corporate Greed.

Yes, when the Republican Party finally snubs Ron Paul, the Libertarian Party will pick him up, and he and Gary Johnson will lead a charge for the White House...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Viper1st
multi quasi faceted
05:01 PM on 01/22/2012
PEWHispanic.org ~ 81% of all immigrants are Hispanic/Latino

Therefore ~ of the 1 million legal immigrants granted "vetted" legal entry into the USA, each & every year since 2001, 810,000 per year legally entering the USA, are Hispanic/Latinos

WOW !! an overwhelming of legal immgirants entering the USA are Hispanic/Latinos ~ that's discrimination against all the other races of peoples throughtout the world.

Talk about Hispanic/Latinos being given an unfair advantage over other minorities?

10 million "vetted" legal immigrants in 10 years, on their "pathway" to the rights & benefits of Naturalized U.S. Citizenship

"Vetted" by USCIS on the following four criteria:

CRIMINAL Background Check
MEDICAL Background Check
EDUCATION LEVEL, beneficial to the USA
SKILLS SET, beneficial to the USA

Illegals, unauthorized to be in the USA ~ just want the almighty USD
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DougDeWitt
progressive social-capitalist
07:26 AM on 01/25/2012
you're close... you're confusing 90-day tourist/visitation visas with permanent-residence visas.

Those 1 million annual visas are tourist visas, good for 90-days. In order to be on a pathway to citizenship, permanent residence visas are the prerequisite. As Mexican nationals have been excluded from the Diversity Visa program for years, there are currently only three paths available for permanent residence visas for them:

Investment of $1 Million in a US company, creating at least ten jobs.
Investment of $500K in a US company located in an economically depressed, EB-5 Zone, creating at least ten jobs.
Be an internationally-recognized sports super-star, qualifying for an Exceptional Ability visa.

http://www.mexicolawblog.com/2011/09/07/u-s-immigration-options-for-mexican-nationals/
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Patricia Ladas
Lives in Sacramento, CA; worked for US Govt in Sau
07:34 PM on 01/23/2012
An exellent argument for keeping the clowns out of DC and Sacramento, but I simply can't think that Ron Paul is the man to lead the charge to restore America. Mr. Paul wants to return to the America he knew 5 decades ago. We can never go back, but we can make the present and future better. I've heard nothing from Mr. Paul that is new; he proposes the same solutions every four years and in America four years is equivalent to 400.

i wish I had a much confidence as you. We do need to continue the conversation.

Pat
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DougDeWitt
progressive social-capitalist
07:29 AM on 01/25/2012
Actually, the Libertarian Party is running Gary Johnson. Ron Paul is still a Republican... this week. Gary Johnson's agenda is quite parallel to the LP's.

I agree we do need to continue the conversation!

Doug
photo
quixmar
You may not agree with me, but you know I'm right.
03:39 PM on 01/21/2012
This young woman apparently admitted to being a law breaker. Where were the cops?

Tell you what? Everyone gets a "do one crime for free" card, and we will allow amnesty. That way you can swindle, rob a bank, steal your neighbors Bently and hand the card to the cops when they come knocking.
03:16 PM on 01/24/2012
This woman is in college. She's not going to "rob" or "swindle" anyone. And BTW, when you're nine, you can't be convicted of a crime. She had no power to make a decision back then.
photo
quixmar
You may not agree with me, but you know I'm right.
03:49 PM on 01/24/2012
I think you misread my post. Try reading it as slowly as I typed it for the substance. The reference was for the rest of us legally here. If we allow some law breakers amnesty, then we should all get 1 free pass. Not a difficult concept to understand.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
methnkng
03:01 PM on 01/29/2012
She has the power to make a decision now. Be a law abiding person or become a criminal. She chose to become a criminal. She is already robbing the US taxpayer with her subsidized colleged education. I bet she also works.. meaning she is engaging in either id theft ( a felony ), or document fraud ( a felony ) or tax evasion ( a felony).
photo
Misanthropical
I am unPC and I don't care!
02:10 AM on 01/25/2012
Great idea! If they can get away with ignoring our laws, US citizens should be able to do the same! F&F
11:04 AM on 01/21/2012
Mitt has my vote !
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
Misanthropical
I am unPC and I don't care!
02:12 AM on 01/25/2012
Another ditto! F&F
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:08 AM on 01/21/2012
ok this was ALL a setup, she KNEW what he was going to say, he has said that he would veto the bill when asked in public, what did she think his answer would change when it was one on one? I for one applaud him for sticking to what he said. And as far as pulling back, hey the guy is there to drum up votes and illegals cant and SHOULDNT be able to vote! Why waste your time changing the mind of someone who can't even vote for you?
photo
Misanthropical
I am unPC and I don't care!
02:13 AM on 01/25/2012
I agree F&F
02:55 AM on 01/21/2012
No way Republican.
photo
jdshannon03
The Most Interesting Man In The World
07:50 PM on 01/20/2012
Here's a thought. I just wonder if it would be easier for the legal citizens to get jobs if the ILLEGALS weren't stealing some of them? Easy answer, YES it would. Send the illegals back to whatever country they came from, and good riddance! Don't let the door at the border hit you on the A$$ on the way out.
10:30 PM on 01/20/2012
Not true, because I don't see any candidate to make a backbreaking job of 15 hours a day for less than minimum wage.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BeasTT
11:48 PM on 01/20/2012
Legal workers have labor laws to protect them from such conditions, as well as being paid a legal wage. Something you missed or didn't bother to mention.
02:40 AM on 01/22/2012
Exactly.......that's why we must demand that companies and corporations follow the law. We also must demand a 'living wage.' You're anger needs to be directed at the greedy corporate farmers and businesses, not Americans who are tired of open borders and illegal immigration!
11:04 AM on 01/21/2012
I suspect you're not interested in reality, but on the off-chance you are, here's info on an opportunity for unemployed legal citizens to take a job away from an undocumented alien. Go for it! http://money.cnn.com/2010/07/07/news/economy/farm_worker_jobs/index.htm