iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Mitt Romney Effect: His Rich Guy Tax Rate Will Help Democrats Win, Steve Israel Says

Posted: 01/18/2012 2:03 pm

WASHINGTON -- News of the relatively meager tax rate Mitt Romney pays will "create fury" and help hand the Democrats control of the House of Representatives in the fall, said Rep. Steve Israel (D-N.Y.), the chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.

Romney, a wealthy businessman and heir, revealed recently that his taxes will probably come in at about 15 percent, which is significantly less than what is paid by many Americans -- particularly those in the upper-middle class -- who earn far less than he does.

In the latest example of how Democrats seeing a Romney effect helping down-ballot contenders for lower offices, Israel said Wednesday that having a rich, low-taxed member of the "one percent" at the top of the GOP ticket only helps Democratic candidates.

"This election is going to be about rebuilding the middle class," Israel said at a briefing to announce the Democrats' best prospects for winning in the fall. "When people find out in the middle class that they are paying a higher tax rate than somebody who does much better than they do, who gets a much larger paycheck than they do, that's going to create fury."

And that fury will be directed at "an economic system that has squeezed the middle class" and work to the advantage of Democrats, Israel argued.

"To the extent that that is an issue -- and I think it is the defining issue in the presidential campaign and in the House campaigns -- we do better," Israel said.

The Romney campaign referred to an article by GOP economist Douglas Holtz-Eakin that described discussions of Romney's taxes as "silly." Eakin argued that much of Romney's income comes from investments, not from having to work at a job that pays a salary, and therefore is taxed mostly at the 15 percent capital gains rate.

National Republican Congressional Committee spokesman Paul Lindsay, however, said that the GOP thinks voters will blame the overall economy on Democrats.

"The economic system that will define this election is the one instituted by President Obama that has hurt job creation and made a bad economy even worse," Lindsay said. "It has squeezed all taxpayers, and Democrats are the guilty party who will be held accountable for it on Election Day."

Republicans also have argued that, if there's a down-ballot effect, it will be from Obama hurting Democrats.

But when it came to the top of his own ticket, Israel argued that the national picture was less important, even with President Obama running against Congress as a "do-nothing" body -- a charge that could tarnish down-ticket Democrats just as much as Republicans.

"I've had the privilege of speaking to the president about this on several occasions and I believe that he has been more assertive in using the word 'Republican' when he runs against the Congress," said Israel.

Israel also said he did not want Democrats to distance themselves from Obama, explaining that the president's larger message would still benefit them. "To the extent that the president reminds people that the Republican Congress has tried to prevent any progress on the economy, has defended tax breaks for millionaires but opposed tax cuts for the middle class, the more he campaigns against those responsible in Congress, the better it is," he said.

Israel also contended he has a different focus than the president's campaign.

"We have created our own battleground, our own battle spaces, our own field program, our own message," Israel said. "The battleground to take the House back for us -- it goes through California and Illinois. I'm not sure the DNC or the president is going to be investing huge resources in California and Illinois. For us, it's Texas. We've got to do well in Texas."

Illinois and California are generally regarded as safe Obama territory, while Texas goes reliably for Republican candidates. Israel did admit that there is overlap between the White House campaign and House races in states such as Nevada, Pennsylvania and Florida, but he insisted his candidates would succeed independently.

"We have our own candidates who reflect the specific and unique priorities and values of those districts, and that's how we will win," Israel said. "We will win this on the streets and not at the 30,000-foot level."

Democrats need to take back 25 seats to win control of the House. Israel said that he has 76 "real deal" competitive races -- a slight improvement to the estimate he made just last week.

His comment's came in announcing nearly 40 "Red-to-Blue" contests that Israel thinks Democrats have a strong chance at winning, and where they will focus resources.

Far more than Romney's taxes, Israel said the overall environment as coming together in a way that could entirely flip the dynamic of 2010's contests, when Republicans powered by the Tea Party drubbed the Democrats.

Citing growing outrage at income inequality and what he called GOP attempts to end Medicare and hike payroll taxes, among other things, Israel said that Democrats were picking up momentum, especially with crucial independents, in a way that reminded him of 2010.

"Last cycle was just a perfect storm. We had gale force winds against us," Israel said. "This cycle, it looks like it may be generating a perfect storm against the Republicans."

Michael McAuliff covers politics and Congress for The Huffington Post. Talk to him on Facebook.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,348
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (21 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marijam
Independent
09:23 AM on 01/20/2012
No, it won't help Democrats win since there isn't a tax rate for Democrats and a different one for Republicans. Unless, of course, there aren't any Democrats in Romney's tax bracket?
01:29 PM on 01/19/2012
BREAKING NEWS : Romney would hike taxes on poor 60%
Analysis of plan says the rich would see taxes cut 15% and the middle class would see taxes fall 2.2%. The plan would increase the deficit, something the GOP candidate disputes.

Republican Mitt Romney's tax plan would increase taxes on low-income families while cutting taxes for the middle-class and the rich, according to an independent study released Thursday.



On average, households making less than $20,000 would see their taxes increase by more than 60%, said the Tax Policy Center, a Washington research group that studied the Romney plan.
Santorum's tax plan leaves hole in budget

Households making between $50,000 and $75,000 would get small tax cuts, averaging 2.2%, or about $250, the study said. People making more than $1 million would get tax cuts averaging 15%, or about $146,000.



"Virtually everybody with a big income is getting a tax cut," said Roberton Williams, a senior fellow at the Tax Policy Center.



Overall, Romney's plan would reduce tax revenues by $180 billion in 2015, adding to the federal budget deficit, the study said. Romney's campaign disputes the estimate, saying tax cuts in the plan would help improve the economy, leading to more revenue. http://money.msn.com/tax-tips/post.aspx?post=0de0ad5d-1e48-4224-86b4-a8664b10fcf0
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Larry Lambert
You're for America or for the t-party
01:16 PM on 01/19/2012
All his money in the Cayman banks in offshore accounts so he does not pay taxes, in other words a TAXDODGER!!.

But he is a man of the people, he understands America. Remember when he recently had to renovate his California house with a 12 million dollar do-over. Us 99%s understand the tribulations of putting 12 million in our houses just for renovations, and then having to go through the hassle of bringing the money in from the Cayman bank without having to pay taxes.

I am certainly going to vote for him, I am tired of hiding my money in the Cayman Islands or in Switzerland.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marijam
Independent
09:24 AM on 01/20/2012
perfectly legal, if you don't like it, vote out all incumbents of both political parties since they made the rules that made it legal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Larry Lambert
You're for America or for the t-party
10:29 AM on 01/20/2012
taxdodger!
06:57 PM on 01/25/2012
Larry, You are calling him a taxdodger & yet what he is doing is perfectly legal under the system. Anyone can open an offshore account as long as they are not doing so to hide an illegal activity (ie money landering). Romney would have paid taxes on the monies before depositing them into the offshore account (ie through normal income tax or capital gains). On a slightly different note but in regards to understanding America, the current occupant of the White House, says "Everyone should pay their fair share." Well guess what the rich already are. According to the Congressional Budget Office, a NON-partisan entity, The 10% of households with the highest incomes pay more than half of all federal taxes. They pay more than 70% of federal income taxes. Sounds like you believe in punishing success from hard work. Success from hard work is what made this country great. If Mitt Romney worked all his life & benefited from the fruits of his labor, if he can afford to do $12 million in renovations on his house, why shouldn't he? Everyone in the US, if they choose to do so, has the ability to succeed. Granted everyone comes from different circumstances, but the end result can be the same.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Larry Lambert
You're for America or for the t-party
11:59 AM on 01/26/2012
what are you talking about where is the wealth concentrated in the 1% from a percentual basis of course they pay more because the rest don't have the income to pay taxes! It is income and should be taxed as such. Cayman Islands is for drug dealers and TAXDODGERS!

Nobody is buying that tired same old lame excuses and trickle down bs anymore.
12:09 PM on 01/19/2012
This won't help democrats and their demagoguery:

http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/205025-dems-receive-more-bain-dollars-than-gop
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
libwithaclue
GOPers taste like chicken and smell like......
12:40 PM on 01/19/2012
The meme is already in the wind, GOPer: Millionaire Mittens hides his money offshore to pay no taxes! That's what the voters are taking away from all this and you know it. Spin all you want, you're not going to change the story; you can't. Mittens "I like firing people" Romney is toast. So who's your next candidate...............oops, you're all out of them.
12:44 PM on 01/19/2012
The real question is how much do YOU get paid to be an online conservative troll?
12:05 PM on 01/19/2012
It may hurt him, but only because his rivals and the media are being blatantly dishonest. His effective tax rate of 15% is actually higher than the average American. I have yet to read this in ONE article about this issue however. The average effective rate across all tax filers per IRS data was 12.7% in 2009. That is a fact. 50% pay ZERO percent. So quit the BS. It's pathetic and dishonest.
12:20 PM on 01/19/2012
Shhhhhh...only spin is accepted as gospel here. Don't disrupt the party.
12:30 PM on 01/19/2012
50% pay zero because they don't make enough to pay taxes. Romney, as well as all other rich people, should be paying 90%.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lachelle Wolfe
So proud to be a Democrat!
12:02 PM on 01/19/2012
Money never trickles down, but it sure is a win win for all when it's spent at the bottom, because it never sets in a bank, it soars up!!!!
photo
geneandeddie59
Internationally unknown
11:39 AM on 01/19/2012
What's the debate here?... investing creates more jobs than spending?
No way!... consumer demand creates more jobs... the more money consumers spend, the more jobs created.... unfortunately, the jobs are in China.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lachelle Wolfe
So proud to be a Democrat!
11:57 AM on 01/19/2012
nail on the head F & F
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
libwithaclue
GOPers taste like chicken and smell like......
12:42 PM on 01/19/2012
YEP!! Fanned.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wikwox
So there I was, playing the piano....
11:38 AM on 01/19/2012
Romney will get the "I hate Obama" vote but I wonder how much more, as a candidate he has many weaknesses and fails to inspire. I expect the calls for releasing his tax returns will force him to do so at some point. Perhaps then we can end the era of the 15% tax rate for millionairs and billionaires.
12:11 PM on 01/19/2012
The dissatisfied with Obama voting block is getting pretty big. As a president he has many weaknesses, and for all of his inspirational speak, it has yet to turn into any meaningful action.
12:32 PM on 01/19/2012
Because the republicans block him at every turn.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
libwithaclue
GOPers taste like chicken and smell like......
12:44 PM on 01/19/2012
In your dreams, GOPer. Mittens is going down. All those middle class independents and GOPer voters are not going to be happy when they see how Mittens avoids paying taxes. They're going to stay home.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Derrick
12:33 PM on 01/19/2012
I never realized that a President was suppose to "inspire" us. As for Romney paying a 15% tax rate, its within the tax code and law. A person choosing to invest their money should be a role model for the millions of people out there whose money burns a hole in their pockets. I guess its a generation-thing. I was always taught to save at least 10% of my income and unlike many never had to borrow money and therefore pay someone else to use theirs...simple math. Sure it made for tough times 10 to 15 years ago; but it pays off. I know, I'll get a bunch of replies saying they don't make enough to save the 10%....but if you live within your means, it can be a reality.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
woodstock41
Prepare, people, or perish!
05:12 PM on 01/19/2012
It's not a problem with investing. It's when investing is your "work" and you pay less tax on this income than others who actually go to a job and get a regular paycheck. Romney's 15% may be within the tax code, but it shouldn't be. It's a faulty system that needs reform.
11:17 AM on 01/19/2012
Most Americans and especially the uninformed typical independent voters don't understand the nature of private equity firms that buy up 'troubled' companies. What private equity firms do is take out massive loans to purchase the company. You'd think that this would make the PE firm want to ensure that the companies are successful. However, after they purchase the company they pay themselves back using the companies assets, with a hefty profit, pay out dividends to investors, and load the companies down with enormous debt.

In some cases the companies do become successful, like the four out of 10 that Romney was in charge of buying. If they do and the PE firm can take them public there is another windfall for the PE capitalists. If they don't? Well, C'est la vie. Nobody has lost except the employees of the company since the executives are also paid huge bonuses to cut the company down to bare bones to pay back banks.

What's behind all of this is the Gordon Gekko strategy of not making anything but in owning things and gutting them for the gain of Bain executives and other investors. Of course, the truth is that when capitalism is based on buying and selling companies instead of making things, soon the emphasis is on quick hit profits for the few not building or creating a viable company that creates jobs for the many.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lachelle Wolfe
So proud to be a Democrat!
11:58 AM on 01/19/2012
Well put! F & F
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
atlasusa
low tolerance for stupid low information arrogant
11:13 AM on 01/19/2012
Why should profits earnings from investments be taxed at a lower rate than earnings from hard work/employment?
The justification is capital gains are re-invested to create jobs in America.
I know when I get my paycheck, I spend it on services and goods here in America so doesn't that create jobs?
At least I know MY money is spent primarily locally/domestically . . . . I am not taking lavish overseas vacations and spending my earnings abroad creating jobs in foreign countries.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lachelle Wolfe
So proud to be a Democrat!
11:59 AM on 01/19/2012
F & F
photo
DougSmith
I calls it like I sees it
10:50 AM on 01/19/2012
Romney and Off-Shore Accounts

http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/video/romney-invests-millions-offshore-funds-15391189

These tax dodging off-shore investments will be his undoing.

He already pays a much lower tax rate than a working man but if that's not good enough and he used off-shore accounts to pay even less whether it's legal or not will not only sink his presidential hopes but do another good thing and that's highlight the unfairness in our tax code.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
victorlove1
I Build I Create I Play I Am
10:41 AM on 01/19/2012
Mitt had/has a 24% tax savings on his investment portfolio, so the question is:

Did he create any jobs with those savings, did he re-invest those savings or did he bank them?

I base my question on the statements that "higher corp. tax rates are job killing" while "lower corp. tax rates create jobs". Well?
11:19 AM on 01/19/2012
"I don't make anything, I own things."

Gordon Gekko 'Wall Street'

There's your answer.
10:36 AM on 01/19/2012
Romney's enthusiastic participation in the corporate plutocrats' war against the middle class is a crucial and well-deserved criticism of the elitist candidate,

but what has President Obama done to defend working people from the bankers and other economic cannibals who are devouring the 99? Subsidize Wall Street while letting millions of American go homeless?
photo
DougSmith
I calls it like I sees it
10:32 AM on 01/19/2012
"According to the latest CBS News/New York Times Poll, conducted before the president announced his plan, the public supports increasing taxes in order to help reduce the budget deficit - at least on those with higher incomes.

Fifty-six percent of Americans think taxes should be increased on households earning $250,000 a year or higher to help lower the deficit, while 37 percent say taxes should not be raised on those households."

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20110458-503544.html
photo
DougSmith
I calls it like I sees it
10:29 AM on 01/19/2012
Romney can earn $13 million a year for doing absolutely nothing and pay a lower tax rate on that income than you do.

$264 million at 5% interest produces about $13 million in income.

But apparently that's not even a good enough deal for Romney. If he really had anything to do with off-shore accounts to avoid paying taxes in this country, he is toast.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Derrick
12:50 PM on 01/19/2012
So, DougSmith; if Romney's income is $13 Million and his tax rate is 15%; then he pays $1.95 Million in taxes. This is still more than the average tax rate of 12.6% across the board. As for his obligation to investing his money in America... I agree it is not a model for an American running for public office; nonetheless, it's his money to do with as he wishes. I see all this rhetoric as a significant reason to reforming the tax code to a flat-rate tax from bottom to top with no deductions. This would solve this concern and encourage folks to bring their money back to America...maybe if the yields were attractive; but certainly the tax concern would be more conducive for doing so.
photo
DougSmith
I calls it like I sees it
02:24 PM on 01/19/2012
I agree that taxes should be fairer and flatter.

We still need a progressive system but should get rid of all the deductions and incentives government uses to encourage and discourage things.

See, even though the devil is in the details and I don't think 12% of a wealthy person's income is the same as 12% of a poor man's, we both agree that the tax code needs a major overhaul.