iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

In South Carolina, Candidates And Citizens Occupy Separate Realms

South Carolina Primary Candidates Citizens

First Posted: 01/18/12 11:44 PM ET Updated: 01/19/12 09:59 AM ET

COLUMBIA, S.C. -- Inside a cavernous ballroom at a downtown hotel, Newt Gingrich stands beneath crystal chandeliers, addressing a crowd of several hundred local businesspeople -- most of them men in dark suits and ties, and many looking not unlike Newt Gingrich.

The former House speaker long ago mastered the art of tapping into revulsion for what he and fellow conservatives portray as the American welfare state. At this candidate forum sponsored by the South Carolina Chamber of Commerce on Tuesday afternoon, he goes right to the well, assailing people who have been collecting unemployment benefits for many months. In a Gingrich administration, he promises, they would be forced to enroll in job training or forfeit their checks.

"We never again pay anybody for 99 weeks of doing nothing," Gingrich says, provoking cheers. "It is profoundly wrong to pay people for doing nothing."

Six blocks away, in the hulking rectangle that is the city's central unemployment office, another gathering is under way. Hundreds of jobless people are jammed into a waiting room to arrange the continuation of their weekly benefits check. Downstairs, dozens wait for a free computer to peruse job listings.

From inside this stultifying space, the campaign in this electorally crucial Southern state might just as well be happening on some other planet. Many of the people massed here dismiss the candidates as something like characters on an irritating reality television show seen only while flipping channels. They are occupied with the daily struggle to pay bills minus a paycheck. But ask people about Gingrich's rhetoric and that of other candidates who voice similar positions, and many vent disgust at intimations that their joblessness amounts to a chosen lifestyle financed by the taxpayer. As if they have chosen to be without work for months and years at a time.

"Are we here just 'cause we like coming here?" says Stephen Ballard, who lost his job installing air conditioners in December, surrendering a roughly $500-a-week paycheck for a $179-a-week unemployment check. "If you think there's jobs down here, come down and show us."

In the runup to Saturday's state Republican presidential primary, a vast disconnect separates the narrative of the stump from the struggles consuming millions of households. Two conversations seem to occupy two discrete spaces, a divide that is emblematic of many cleavages in American life, from the income inequality capturing headlines to the gap between black and white unemployment.

Ballard, who is white, sees this disconnect as reflective of the basic difference in life perspective separating would-be leaders from ordinary people. He has spent his adult years engaged in physical labor -- driving forklifts, loading boxes, tending lawns and installing air-conditioning ducts. The people vying to be president have spent theirs inside the corridors of power and elite corporate offices, occupying the sorts of comfortable homes and hotel suites that power and wealth convey.

"When's the last time you heard of a poor broke politician getting into office?" he asks, as he leans against the doorway of an unemployment office that is emblazoned with a sticker declaring, SC WORKS COLUMBIA: BRINGING EMPLOYERS AND JOB SEEKERS TOGETHER. Only half of that promise has been delivered.

"The rich stay with the rich," he says. "They don't socialize with people outside their circle."

The candidates cannot hear such critiques. They are perpetually elsewhere -- at yacht clubs on the coast and at town halls down the freeway, on the steps of the state Capitol less than a mile away, and in ballrooms like the one inside the downtown Marriott, where Gingrich describes the long-term unemployed as people who have lost the will to work.

A LIFETIME OF WORK

On this day, Ballard is dressed as if prepared for the work to which he is accustomed -- in leather lace-up boots scuffed at the toes, faded blue jeans, a gray sweatshirt and a blue baseball cab pulled over his balding head. But after four decades of steady work, he has seen his days yield to an all-consuming struggle to locate the next job.

He first tasted joblessness in late 2008, when South Carolina's unemployment rate spiked above 9 percent, on the way to reaching nearly 12 percent the following year. For more than two years, he looked for another job, before his old employer hired him back last February -- albeit with a $2-an-hour slash in pay. When the business took another bad turn late last year, he again was cut loose.

He is still physically strong, he says, and still eager to earn a living. His last job paid $13 an hour, yet he has not hesitated to put his name in for janitorial and warehouse jobs that pay less than $8 an hour. Rejection has landed atop rejection, each cementing the realization that he is a 58-year-old man in a time when that fact alone seems to blot out all others.

"A lot of companies," he says, "if you're more than 40 years old, they ain't going to touch you."

He lives in a modest, rural home with his wife, who has a disability, and his 19-year-old daughter, who is taking cosmetology classes. His rent is $400 a month, a sum he once afforded easily. Back when the economy was expanding and construction was buzzing, he remembers, he was bringing home as much as $1,400 every two weeks.

"Every Friday, I'd take my wife and my father-in-law out to a steak place," he says. "I had money up the yin yang. I'd give my wife $100, my daughter $100, and tell them to do whatever they liked with it."

But since unemployment entered his life, he has six times seen his check cut off, he says, while Congress fought with the White House over the terms of extending emergency benefits. More than once, he has had to ask for his landlord's good graces after falling into arrears. In the spring of 2010, he got so deep into delinquency on his electric bill that the power was shut off. ("We grilled outside," he says. "Same as after Hurricane Hugo.")

The telephone company cut off his service for lack of payment, and he cannot afford Internet access at home, which constrains his job search. He puts gas in his truck and drives to a local library to scan job listings. He goes to a branch of Staples -- the office supply chain propelled by Mitt Romney's private equity firm, Bain Capital -- where he makes mass copies of his resume and then walks from shop to shop dropping them off.

"I've got $40 in my pocket, and I've got to give twenty to my daughter for gas," he says. "I don't know how I'm going to pay next month's rent. It kind of kills your self-worth, to be honest with you. You're just sitting around wondering, 'Damn, can I pay the bills?'"

He turns on the news and catches glimpses of the presidential candidates hopscotching around South Carolina. They seem to be talking from the same script -- promising that cutting taxes and stripping away government regulations will spur private industry to expand and that this will produce large numbers of jobs.

"They can get up there and promise everything in the world," he says. "Make the economy better? I don't know how. Do they know how? I don't know what's going to turn this country around."

'CAN'T THINK ABOUT THE FUTURE'

A night earlier, the candidates commanded a stage at a convention center in Myrtle Beach -- five white guys wearing suits, pressed white shirts and generic ties. They sparred over the issues that have become familiar to anyone following the campaign. Will the front-runner, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, release his tax returns? Has he been using a political action committee to smear Gingrich? Is Bain, his private equity firm, a job-killing machine? Is Romney sufficiently conservative, particularly on social issues such as abortion?

As has been the case from Iowa to New Hampshire and now here, the candidates jockeyed to proclaim themselves more pro-free enterprise than the next, with each implicitly portraying the nation's enduring hard economic times as an outgrowth of the Obama administration's supposed embrace of socialism, through means such as attempting to regulate the financial system.

"Dodd-Frank does need to be gone," declared Rick Perry, the Texas governor, referring to the new law aimed at preventing a replay of the 2008 financial crisis. "I would get rid of a large number of those financial regulations." Romney and Gingrich have said much the same.

Among the sorts of voters likely to turn out on Saturday, this sort of talk is red meat.

"This is a market fundamentalist state," says Doug Woodward, an economist at the University of South Carolina's Moore School Business. "They have a deep-seated fear of government intervention in the economy."

Diane Paynter has been following the campaign as if taking in events in another country, the candidates speaking in a language she only partially understands. Her own reality is consumed by issues largely absent from the political conversation: the problems of young people in a community beset by intergenerational poverty.

Paynter works for a nonprofit that runs programs for at-risk middle school students in one of the poorest ZIP codes in the state. She pours her heart into her work, she says, yet she is cognizant that she is straining against forces larger than any one program can ever address -- a long-term crisis of unemployment and its attendant problems, from substance abuse to violence. It is a difficult place for young people to grapple with adolescence.

"They are headed down the gangway and not doing well in school," she says. "It's a place where, if you do well in school, it's perceived as a weakness."

Paynter is white, while some 90 percent of the students at her school are African-American. More than 90 percent receive free or reduced-price school lunches, an indication of the poverty that grips their households, many of them headed by single parents who work two jobs to pay the bills.

At the debate on Monday night and again in appearances throughout Columbia on Tuesday, Gingrich captured headlines by noting that Obama has presided over the greatest expansion of food stamps in history, a statistical truth that presented by itself implies something that is at best debatable -- that the current generation of aid recipients proves a failure of the administration's economic policies. The expansion of food stamps began during George W. Bush's administration, the result of the Great Recession that unfolded on his watch.

Gingrich has seized on this expansion as evidence that Obama's vision is supposedly one of national dependence on the dole in place of work, telling the Chamber of Commerce crowd that he will "run a campaign of paychecks versus food stamps."

Paynter's eyes roll as she reflects on this kind of talk.

"Even with food stamps, there's hunger out there," she says. "You can't feed a kid healthy food based on what these people can spend on groceries. You can't afford food and vegetables. It's very expensive to eat well. And lots of people who are working still need food stamps because they don't earn enough."

From Paynter's perspective, the candidates are pandering to interest groups that revel in depicting poverty as moral failure. But they are also reflecting their remove from the sorts of people she encounters daily.

"I don't know that there's any incentive for the candidates to connect with the real world," she says. "I doubt they even know anybody who has been unemployed or the scariness of knowing your check's going to run out and not knowing what you're going to do."

Paynter and her husband, Greg, have spent the last decade constantly vulnerable to that fear. A computer programmer, Greg lost his $75,000-a-year job in 2001 when his company landed in bankruptcy. In the years since, he has bounced from one contract position to the next, most lasting no more than six months, while she has worked for nonprofits earning from $30,000 to $40,000 a year.

Joblessness has been more frequent than employment in the Paynter household. Diane and Greg have run through their savings, once about $70,000. They have slipped into delinquency on the mortgage on their four-bedroom suburban house.

In the spring of 2010, they resigned themselves to finally losing their home, as Greg's unemployment benefits were about to expire. But at the last minute, he secured a contract job that ran the rest of the year, though it was a four hours' drive away in Georgia.

She is aware, as she tells this story, that she amounts to a relatively fortunate person in these times, and in Columbia, a city of 129,000 people, where more than 1 in 5 are officially poor, according to the U.S. Census.

But how many more potential disasters will arrive, and how much more staving off can they manage? These are the questions that gnaw at her as she tries not to ponder the decades ahead. These are the questions she wishes the politicians would address.

"I can't think about the future," she says. "People ask me what my retirement plan is, and I say, 'I'm just going to have to die young."

UP MAIN STREET

Rick Santorum, the former senator from Pennsylvania, is the last to speak inside the Marriott. He, too, casts himself as a champion of American-style capitalism, even as he argues for policies that encourage a return of manufacturing jobs -- a talking point that distinguishes him from the field.

"There will be income inequality, and there should be," he says. "That's what America is about." He casts inequality as the inevitable outgrowth of a system in which people are free to strive for success. Some will find it, while others fail.

The crowd filters out into the mild South Carolina evening, landing on Main Street, a brick-paved corridor dotted by palmetto trees and flower baskets, and lined with al fresco dining establishments along with boutiques and cappuccino bars.

Less than a mile to the north, the stretch of Main Street that flows into North Main is a desolate strip through a high-crime, low-income community, one dominated by businesses relinquished to failure. What was once Cashion Electricians lies abandoned.

The former Kirby Croft Blooming Plants sits empty, its sign and tattered awning the only evidence of its former existence. The fading letters painted on the side of a vacant building, spelling out "Wilson's Upholstery, Since 1956" are like a half-written tombstone, leaving no clue as to when the business disappeared.

But tucked into the back of one of the few remaining businesses, an Allstate insurance office, a new enterprise has recently set up: Sweet Temptations Bakery.

For 15 years, the bakery's owner, Vessell Wilson, 52, ran the business out of his Columbia home with his wife Rosa and daughter, reaping revenues from their luscious sour cream butter cream cake, among other confections. For years, they sought to expand, but they could not persuade a bank to lend them the money needed to establish a commercial kitchen, Wilson says.

"We had to turn down a lot of orders because of limited space," Wilson says. "The banks, they don't want to help you. If you don't have money, they don't want to give you money."

Eight months ago, they availed themselves of an offer from the landlord to set up here, enabling a modest expansion that created two new jobs.

Warm and easygoing, Wilson is happy to be here, a conspicuous island of success in a sea of lost causes. He is grateful to so far be weathering an historic economic downturn. Yet he still thinks of what might have been.

"If we could have gotten the loan, we could have done more," Wilson says. "We would have hired 10 people."

The Republican candidates have not visited this far up Main Street, he says, and this is hardly surprising: Wilson's business sits in a predominantly African-American neighborhood that votes overwhelmingly Democratic. Still, Wilson, who is black, is struck by the exclusion of his issues from a campaign that is supposed to be about the economy.

He is a successful entrepreneur in a city in which nearly 1 of every 5 businesses is black-owned, according to the U.S. Census. No one seems to be talking about credit availability, the lifeblood of free enterprise.

"I guess small business ain't quite as important as people talking about abortion and what not," Wilson says. "But small business is what makes this country what it is."

You step onto Main Street from the bakery and you look south, and there is the Bank of America building -- a triangular-topped tower that anchors downtown. There is the Capitol dome, the backdrop for many campaign events and the center of the thriving part of Main Street.

It all seems so far away.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,941
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (65 total)
01:01 AM on 01/29/2012
These politicians are definitely on a different planet. If the Republicans win the next election - God help us.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mjtaylor22
09:16 AM on 01/21/2012
yea man the great recession was caused because business was too constrained, coiuld do the risky busienss they wanted to do...dam govt.....over seeing the criminal l busienss minds........they didn't need ..fyi regulations are laws...we need laws for the criminals white collar and blue collar........nuff said..and Dems beleive nothing you said.....Repugs de regulate so that business can de fraud the poor and the not so poor out of house home and all their money....didn't you see the last 8 years....that was all REpublicans...........
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
flowereater
Proceed, Governor . . .
03:43 PM on 01/20/2012
Ging"RICH" needs to have his silver spoon displaced.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BG2323
my micro-bio is empty
03:24 PM on 01/20/2012
my vote is with Herman Cain
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whythismess
01:14 PM on 01/20/2012
all that bashing of bank of america, and those crooks never ONCE told us they used to work for them.

thats a pretty clear conflict of interest.
09:43 AM on 01/20/2012
With ttoday's anniversary of Citizens Unite, along with the lap-dog enablers of the Lamestream Media, Congress and Presidential Candidate Romney know that the status quo will prevail no matter how many insightful, articulate and cogent arguments come from the other side of the political aisle.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whythismess
08:24 PM on 01/19/2012
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MiddleMolly
Working to better the USA!
1743 Fans
Become a fan

8 minutes ago( 8:14 PM)
Find one law that one of the people that has been appointed by O has broken. Just one. One source. One law.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

what caused the destruction of our economy was legalized.
thats why sachs, citigroup,etc got off so lightly under obama.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MiddleMolly
Working to better the USA!
08:30 PM on 01/19/2012
Find one law. One source that any of the people appointed by O has done anything criminal.
08:36 PM on 01/19/2012
You are asking that someone who is completely fact challenged track down a fact. If this person actually spent some time learning something and FOUND a fact, they wouldn't know what to with it anyway.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whythismess
12:16 PM on 01/20/2012
we have all found LOTS lol.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whythismess
08:19 PM on 01/19/2012
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/07/bank-earnings-obama_n_1079482.html#comments

not a fox news link

Wall St. Firms Have Already Earned More Under Obama Than During Entire Bush Presidency: Report

do we want another 4 years of wall streets enrichment while the rest of us suffer?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MiddleMolly
Working to better the USA!
08:44 PM on 01/19/2012
You didn't bother to read the whole article, did you? It explains things pretty well. It's clear that most of those profits were leftover from the B#sh administration and cleaning up with TARP. It's a good article. I would recommend that anyone who is parroting the "Big banks earned more money under O than under B#sh" read the article.. the whole article.
08:55 PM on 01/19/2012
Objective reality means little or nothing to people like him (her? it?). All that matters to them is Ideological Soundness.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whythismess
08:17 PM on 01/19/2012
obama called small business "the engine of job creation".

unemployment is chronically over 9%

explain this

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2011/06/24/geithner_tax_small_business_so_government_doesnt_shrink

why is obama rewarding the VERY criminals who led to the meltdown?

do we want to keep rewarding wall street another 4 years?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CAdawn
Love a liberal
08:14 PM on 01/19/2012
G0d is back in the debate. Whatever happened to separation of church and state?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whythismess
08:01 PM on 01/19/2012
record poverty is NOT progress from the bush years.
chronic unemployment is NOT progression from the bush years
more profits for wall street under obamas first 3 years then ALL of bushes 8 is NOT progress.
record foodstamp need is NOT progress.
NDAA is NOT progress.
a million people losing healthcare because its become to unaffordable is NOT progress.
SOPA/PIPA is NOT progress.
continuing endless wars and funding private armys for iraq is NOT PROGRESS.
TBTF is NOT progress.
record homelessness is NOT progress.

and you wonder how, even as a progressive, i could want bush back?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whythismess
08:08 PM on 01/19/2012
oh did i forget?

more immigrants deported under obama then bush is NOT progress.
bp ruining our shorelines because they were allowed to drill with categorical exemptions is NOT progress.

sorry there is just so many examples of a lack of progress you cant remember them all all the time.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CAdawn
Love a liberal
08:09 PM on 01/19/2012
Nurse!!
08:29 PM on 01/19/2012
I am fanning you for a one word comment, a three word bio and a picture of Rita Hayworth - eye candy.
photo
VeryGrood
only class worse than micro-bio was molecular-bio
07:59 PM on 01/19/2012
PS- WHERE ARE THE JOBS, Newt? Your brethren promised that this would be the focus of their term.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whythismess
08:03 PM on 01/19/2012
newt hasnt spent a trillion of our dollars for no jobs at least. in fact they forced obama to keep the bush tax cuts and unemployment actually went down after a stead rise following stimulus.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whythismess
08:05 PM on 01/19/2012
http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000

nothing beats simple truth.
08:32 PM on 01/19/2012
It is best that if you have only a passing and faint concept of economics, that you stay away from them. There is NO ECONOMIST in the world who has even the tiniest bit of credibility, that denies the stimulus created and save several million jobs. And if you knew anything about economics, you would realize that what you are saying is the equivalent of saying gravity does not exist. Please take your right wing fantasies back to Faux News, where they belong.
photo
VeryGrood
only class worse than micro-bio was molecular-bio
07:58 PM on 01/19/2012
I bet many of the unemployed would love the ability to train for a new job.

Lets see how we can make this happen.

1- provide beneficial training to all unemployed, at no expense to them... because they can't afford it.
2- provide childcare for these people... since they can't afford it.
3- Ensure that there will be jobs available to them once they complete training... because there aren't any now.

What part of "there are not enough jobs for those who wish to work" do the republicans not understand?

THIS IS SIMPLE MATH. There are 13 million unemployed people in the US. There are 3.2 million available jobs.

13M > 3.2M.

It is a very sad day that republicans, who, granted, aren't really known for their logic, reasoning, mathematical, and scientific knowledge are UNABLE to figure that simple equation out.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MiddleMolly
Working to better the USA!
08:01 PM on 01/19/2012
Exactly. That ratio (the number of officially unemployed to the latest number of job openings) is not as high as it once was.. But it's still very, very high. And that doesn't include the number of people working part-time who want full-time work, the number of people who "want a job" but haven't looked in the last four weeks, the number of people working temporary jobs, and the number of people who are working below their old skill or salary level.

I have written the same thing, VeryGood... Simple math eludes these people. A shameful bunch.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whythismess
08:04 PM on 01/19/2012
actually the number of jobs vs the number of workers is the best ratio its been since 2007.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MiddleMolly
Working to better the USA!
08:40 PM on 01/19/2012
In January 2007, that ratio was 1.6 jobseekers per opening. In December 2007, that ratio was 1.9 jobseekers per opening. I just pulled up the BLS data and calculated that ratio for those two months. I ask you to provide facts, and when you do, they are wrong.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whythismess
07:57 PM on 01/19/2012
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CAdawn
Love a liberal
1476 Fans
Become a fan
11 minutes ago( 7:43 PM)
We have many republican­s on this site that we can have a decent conversati­on with. Flossy is one that comes to mind. When we see comments like "Stand up against this would be dic ta tor that wants to bring America down so he can build it into his image" then we lose interest.
You know and I know that McConnell said he wanted the president to be a one term president. That is the R's goal; not the betterment of the country.
----------------------------------------------

not being rude here. just making an observation. you are engaging in th same over the top rhetoric. you are taking something he said, and adding your own value judgement to it based on your own perceptions.

i mean really, why would mcconell want to LOSE his own job? the simple fact is that MANY americans agree with him. if you go by the polls, a majority do. obama must go before we can progress as a nation. all we have done the last 3 years is regress.

record poverty is NOT progression from bush years.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
maninla
www.kitchensinkradio.podomatic.com
09:32 PM on 01/19/2012
Record poverty didn't just come out of nowhere.

When the poverty rates under Bush shot up for something like five years in a row, I didn't hear a lick from "the right". When the largest tax-cuts ever resulted in zero job growth, not a peep from GOP supporters wondering "where are the jobs".

You mention Mitch McConnell. What did he say should be the GOP's #1 priority? If your answer is to create jobs for the American people, you'd be dead wrong.

Your party spent eight years destroying jobs and bringing about a Great Recession, followed by another three years doing everything in its power to see to it that the American President failed. How you can call yourselves patriots, I'll never know.

Out of sheer curiousity, can you give me details as to what the economic policy of a Republican President would consist of? Because I'm thinking it's going to be more of the exact same policy that brought about the record poverty you complain about. You know, deregulation and massive tax-cuts aimed at the rich in hopes that their excesses will trickle down.

Well, I've got my umbrella out and galoshes on...WHERE'S THE TRICKLE DOWN?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mjtaylor22
09:13 AM on 01/21/2012
sorry, republicans dont speak of progress...they only slash n burn. and that aint progress
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IHateTheGOP
I'll take reason over superstition - every time
07:56 PM on 01/19/2012
So Rmoney keeps his money in the Cayman Islands. Just your average republican for sure.
anfractuous
Like you care.
08:52 PM on 01/19/2012
That's the cornerstone of his foreign policy.