iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Keystone XL Pipeline: Canadian Officials Remain Hopeful Despite Setback

ROB GILLIES   01/19/12 04:47 PM ET   AP

TORONTO — Canada is looking at alternatives for exporting its oil since U.S. President Barack Obama announced he was blocking a pipeline from Alberta to Texas.

A pipeline executive said Thursday that the company was weighing whether to build a segment of the line – from Oklahoma to Texas – that wouldn't require U.S. State Department approval. And government officials said Canada would push harder for a pipeline to the Pacific Coast, where oil could be shipped to China.

At the same time, Canadian officials said, they are hopeful the 1,700-mile (2,740-kilometer) Keystone XL pipeline will be built.

Alberta Premier Alison Redford, the leader of the Canadian province that has the world's third-largest reserves of oil, said that while Canada is disappointed at Obama's decision, the government believes Obama has made it clear the U.S. would consider a new Keystone XL pipeline application with a new routing.

Obama called Prime Minister Stephen Harper to explain that the decision on Wednesday was not on the merits of the pipeline but rather on the "arbitrary nature" of a Feb. 21 deadline set by Republican legislators as part of a tax measure he signed, Harper's office said.

"The fact that the president has said that the decision was not based on the merits we take as a signal that there is an opportunity to make a decision that is in the national interest that allows the project to go ahead," Redford told The Associated Press in a telephone interview.

Calgary-based TransCanada Corp., which proposed the pipeline, said Thursday it was considering building the pipeline in segments, with the first connecting an existing pipeline in Oklahoma to refineries in Texas.

The Obama administration had suggested development of an Oklahoma-to-Texas line to alleviate an oil glut at a Cushing, Oklahoma, storage hub.

"If our shippers are interested in building that portion of the pipeline (first), we would look at that," TransCanada President and CEO Russ Girling told The Associated Press in an interview.

Obama's rejection of Keystone XL "clearly gives flexibility to do that," Girling said. He emphasized that the company had made no decisions.

U.S. officials have said that building the pipeline in sections could speed up the process since the U.S. State Department would not be involved if the pipeline does not cross the U.S.-Canada border.

Girling's remarks were in contrast to a statement TransCanada issued on Wednesday declaring it would reapply for a presidential permit to build the full pipeline. Girling said the company still expects to reapply, but "will take our time for how to refile it."

He said a new route that avoids environmentally sensitive areas of Nebraska should be made public in a matter of weeks

In Washington, the proposed $7 billion pipeline has become a political hot potato.

Republicans – who earlier put the president in the awkward position of having to make a decision on it before Feb. 21 – now hope to force Obama to deal with it yet again before next November's presidential election. He wants to put it off beyond that.

Republicans are looking to drive a wedge between Obama and two key Democratic constituencies. Some labor unions support the pipeline as a job creator, while environmentalists fear it could lead to an oil spill disaster.

The Alberta-to-Texas pipeline proposed by TransCanada would carry 800,000 barrels of oil a day from Alberta across six U.S. states to the Texas Gulf Coast, which has numerous refineries.

Natural Resource Minister Joe Oliver said it's clear the process is not yet over and said Canada is hopeful the pipeline will be accepted on its merits.

Redford said Obama's decision adds urgency to Enbridge's proposed pipeline to the Pacific Coast of British Columbia that would allow Canadian oil to be shipped to Asia for the first time.

The project is undergoing a regulatory review in Canada.

"Asian markets are a very viable alternative. I say alternative, I probably shouldn't. It's not an either or situation. There's an opportunity here for us to grow our markets in both directions and we'd like to be able to do that," Redford said.

Canadian officials see the pipeline to the Pacific coast as critical as Canada seeks to diversify its energy customer base beyond the United States, which Canada relies on for 97 percent of its energy exports.

Alberta has more than 170 billion barrels of oil reserves. Daily production of 1.5 million barrels from the oil sands is expected to increase to 3.7 million in 2025. Only Saudi Arabia and Venezuela have more reserves.

Sinopec, a Chinese state-controlled oil company, has a stake in Enbridge's proposed $5.5 billion Northern Gateway Pipeline. Chinese state-owned companies also have invested more than $16 billion in the oil sands in the last two years.

Tens of billions more are expected to be invested in Canada's oil sands if the Pacific pipeline is built.

There is fierce environmental and aboriginal opposition to the Pacific pipeline, but Harper's government has called it a nation-building project that is crucial to the country's goal of becoming an energy super power.

___

Associated Press writer Matthew Daly contributed to this story from Washington, D.C.

Check out photos below of Keystone XL protests:
Keystone Protest Retrospective
1  of  53
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
From Getty: SAN FRANCISCO, CA - OCTOBER 25: Protestors against the construction of the Keystone XL oil pipeline hold signs and stand on a Keith Haring sculpture as they demonstrate outside of the W Hotel before the arrival of U.S. President Barack Obama on October 25, 2011 in San Francisco, California. Hundreds of protestors from a wide variety of activist groups staged protests outside of the W Hotel where President Obama was holding a $7,500 per person fundraiser. (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)
FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

TORONTO — Canada is looking at alternatives for exporting its oil since U.S. President Barack Obama announced he was blocking a pipeline from Alberta to Texas. A pipeline executive said Thursda...
TORONTO — Canada is looking at alternatives for exporting its oil since U.S. President Barack Obama announced he was blocking a pipeline from Alberta to Texas. A pipeline executive said Thursda...
TORONTO — Canada is looking at alternatives for exporting its oil since U.S. President Barack Obama announced he was blocking a pipeline from Alberta to Texas. A pipeline executive said Thursda...
TORONTO — Canada is looking at alternatives for exporting its oil since U.S. President Barack Obama announced he was blocking a pipeline from Alberta to Texas. A pipeline executive said Thursda...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 124
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beckym1488
I have dislike for Libs
12:47 PM on 01/22/2012
China already owns half or more of our country, so why not get Canada's oil too. Then they can sell it to us.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alvdh1
12:16 AM on 01/22/2012
One of the favorite pro Keystone pipeline mantras is that it will reduce America's dependence on foreign oil. The last time I checked, Canada was a sovereign country. Unfortunately, the dumbing down of America by the media and Republican party has no shortage of fools.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beckym1488
I have dislike for Libs
12:42 PM on 01/22/2012
We wouldn't have to depend on so mush oil from the Middle East if we could drill in the US, but the liberals don't want that either. So Canada is a good alternative, but Liberals don't want that either. Obama and Liberals want us depending on the Middle East for oil forever, while they drive big SUV's and other gas hungry vehicles. The pipeline would also create a lot of blue collar jobs, which America needs. The government creates a bunch of government jobs and we think that's helping us? nope
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alvdh1
01:20 PM on 01/22/2012
We wouldn't have to depend on so much oil from the Middle East if we could drill in the U.S.. Did you hear this line of bunk on Fixed News or is this from a left over leaflet you received four years ago from the Drill Baby Drill McCain campaign. First of all, U.S. oil production peaked in 1970. We have been through countless Republican Presidents since then, but we are still producing 5 million barrels of oil per day less than we were in 1970. What this means is that all of the easy to access oil has been discovered.

In addition, it is glaring apparent that you have no idea about what the Republicans have done to fight vehicle energy efficiency improvements for the last forty years.They have treated oil as if it is an infinite resource. When, if it already hasn't, the world enters an irreversible decline of oil production, what exactly will your new mantra be for energy production. Drill baby drill isn't going to stop the inevitable depletion of the worlds oil reserves, especially with 2 billion Asian people trying to attain Western lifestyles.

If facts are what you are seeking, the rotary rig activity in the U.S. currently exceeds activity during any year Bush was in office. See Below

http://www.wtrg.com/rotaryrigs.html
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alvdh1
12:10 AM on 01/22/2012
Maybe it is time to build a tall fence along our Northern border?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beckym1488
I have dislike for Libs
12:43 PM on 01/22/2012
What for?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alvdh1
01:33 PM on 01/22/2012
To keep filthy, dirty forest destroying tar sands oil out of the U.S..
photo
artleads
Let's have a national retreat.
11:28 PM on 01/21/2012
So Canada (or its reprehensible leader) is not giving up. All the more reason why we mustn't give up either. Just today on the McLaughlin show I heard Elenor Cliff (the very soul of reason) saying that the pipeline will be approved in 2013. If she can cave likle that, you know that pipeline opponents can't stop working even for a moment. Our goal should at least be that the pipeline doesn't happen under the Obama presidency.
photo
PeaceUponUs
MOLON LABE
02:11 PM on 01/21/2012
Turning down the Keystone Pipeline condemns more people to a life of slavery in Saudi. The oil field workers in Saudi are prisoners from China rented by the China to the Saudis. The smell of slavery is on the hands of this government!!!!
photo
artleads
Let's have a national retreat.
11:34 PM on 01/21/2012
Please! This could be true (although I'm very skeptical). But is the alternative the enslavement of the entire planet to the tyranny of Big Oil? And are you concerned over the millions of death that fossil fuels addiction is causing and that would multiply with the pipeline?
photo
PeaceUponUs
MOLON LABE
10:25 AM on 01/22/2012
Here is your alternative. The oil from the Bakken fields in North Dakota (a US State) will now continue to be "trucked" around the nations forcing more and more environmental damage to occur.

Millions of death's due to fossil fuels, seriously? Do you understand how many lives have been saved because we have affordable energy? Do you know how many lives were saved during Katrina alone because they had diesel generators to provide power to hospitals, nursing homes, fire departments and police? Do you have any idea how many lives have been saved because our military and hospital ships have been able t respond to world crisis and events all powered by "Big Oil"? Do you have an inkling of who the share holders that own "Big Oil" companies? You are living in a false world of bull. Good luck with that as you print your dribble on a computer whose power is provided by "Big Oil", you smart phone is recharged by "Big Oil", as your mother's oxygen is pumped by "Big Oil", as America is fed by "Big Oil". Get a clue. Big Oil is thousands of small companies, employing as a result, millions of Americans throughout this Nation allowing fools like yourself to complain without you doing anything to make things better.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beckym1488
I have dislike for Libs
12:44 PM on 01/22/2012
Who cares!! Move
07:46 AM on 01/21/2012
The people in the US are saying NO. Just as in NH we are saying NO to Quebec Hydro but our corporatist puppet governor John Lynch and the corporations that back him keep trying to shove their power lines and plans for fracking down our throats. We the people need to change laws. Stop corporate personhood, stop corporate rule!
photo
PeaceUponUs
MOLON LABE
02:08 PM on 01/21/2012
The people of the US did not say NO! The government said "NO". The people no longer have a voice. The government decides what is good and what s bad for the people. We are all now officially "Obamanauts"!!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beckym1488
I have dislike for Libs
12:44 PM on 01/22/2012
agreed!!!
photo
artleads
Let's have a national retreat.
11:36 PM on 01/21/2012
Yes. I never expected to see Canada as the bully, kicking America in the pants.
photo
4everright
My heart went boom
01:52 PM on 01/20/2012
the keystone project is going to be a huge thorn in the side of Obama during his campaign. Turning down jobs, new sources of tax revenue, more independence from foreign oil just to appease his base is going to bite him back big time.
02:50 PM on 01/20/2012
I keep asking....please....tell me exactly what mandate will be placed on the owners of the oil flowing through the pipeline that will require it delivered into the U.S. market. Please tell me what regulatory or contractual device will be used to effectively interfere with the owners right to sell the refined product on the world market? Otherwise..........vapor.........
03:29 PM on 01/20/2012
When you say, "more independen­ce from foreign oil" you need to inform us why you would think this oil, once refined, is going to stay in the U.S. Otherwise you sound like just so many others whose talking points are meant to tickle the gullible. You made the statement and all I am asking is how you can make it? Would not a pipeline moving the same amount of lower carbon oil from U.S. Bakken produce the same or even more jobs? Why would moving highly toxic tar oil from Canada produce more U.S. jobs? I do get that if a politician's supporters are engaged in the Texas refinery business (Senator Hoeven's number 1 contributors are Oil and Gas) that batting on their behalf is good for campaign contributions; however, one needs to attend to substantial statements backed by facts when attempting to convince folk who are or nearly immune to political vapor. Let's face it, a bit more crudely, I am not attracted by political farts.
11:54 AM on 01/20/2012
There is a refinery in Whiting Indiana, why don't they build a pipe line to there? Because they want easy access to the gulf for shipping purposes. The republicans scream "DRILL, DRILL, DRILL", saying we need the oil. But in reality, they want the American taxpayer to subsidize the construction of the pipe line so the oil companies can increase their profits. And DAMN the enviorment!!!!!!!!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WESmith
Energy Conservation can save you M-O-N-E-Y!!!!!!!!
12:12 PM on 01/20/2012
The refinery in Whiting Indiana can't handle asphaltenes.

The American taxpayer subsidizes oil companies because we get $13 in taxes, royalties and lease payments for every $1 in subsidy. Quit a good deal.

We The People don't give a damn about the environment. Why should the people we finance to supply us with pollutants care?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wanderland
Generic white guy
10:18 AM on 01/20/2012
Hmm... Why isn't a pipeline to Canada's Pacific coast a first choice, rather than a lame threat?

This is not an ordinary oil pipeline, it's a pipeline for tar sands slurry which has to be heated in order to flow. Pumping a viscous liquid that needs to be heated over the Canadian Rockies presents an expensive problem.

If Keystone XL or something similar doesn't occur, I kind of doubt the cross the Rockies threat will come to fruition for a decade or more to come.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rosalee Harris
09:48 AM on 01/20/2012
Here I was thinking that Canada was a bit more environmentally conscious than us. I guess unfortunately I was wrong.
photo
artleads
Let's have a national retreat.
11:40 PM on 01/21/2012
It has tasted the raw meat of super-powerdom based on oil, and it is hooked.
09:35 AM on 01/20/2012
I am really surprised that Canadia/ens have tolerated this type of scorched earth industry.
They were once hailed as the 'Boy Scouts of the world'. Yet I look at the production narrative of tar sands outfits like Inter Oil (IOC) and just shake.
This shows human behavior as that of a parasite.
Canadia/ens are supposed to be more intelligent and better educated than the people to their south.
Yet this procedure to squeeze blood money from tar sands refutes that concept.
They are as dumb and greedy and villianous as the Americans.
photo
artleads
Let's have a national retreat.
11:42 PM on 01/21/2012
They have substituted oil power for moral power. I guess it's a human flaw to want to laud it over others. The irony is that Canada increasingly is lauding it over the US.
08:55 AM on 01/20/2012
Canadian officials had better give up that pipeline. They may think of profit, but they forget the environment, plenty of animal species; they would contribute actively to the desctruction of the planet and its future - I mean, also the future of their OWN kids.
photo
artleads
Let's have a national retreat.
11:44 PM on 01/21/2012
They are already doing these nefarious things, which makes the job of resisting them very difficult (but not impossible).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chipher
06:50 AM on 01/20/2012
"...to alleviate an oil glut ..." is code-speak for '...on to Beijing!..."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grappler1987
Heaven is a gift, not a reward
02:41 AM on 01/20/2012
"The oil is going overseas anyway and no real monetary return for the U.S."

Why do so many folks believe this? The vast majority of our imports stay in America.

http://www.eia.gov/energy_in_brief/images/charts/imports_domestic_petro_shares_demand-large.gif

We are extremely dependent on imported oil.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chipher
06:52 AM on 01/20/2012
We're a net exporter of processed fuels. US demand is decreasing. E.g. we're Canada's btich.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WESmith
Energy Conservation can save you M-O-N-E-Y!!!!!!!!
11:04 AM on 01/20/2012
It would be stupid to spend all that money pumping asphaltenes to Texas and make fuel out of it. There is little profit in fuel.
photo
artleads
Let's have a national retreat.
11:46 PM on 01/21/2012
Bravo! I couldn't have said it better. I shall remember the term.
photo
Son of Liberty 1765
Exposing Government Lies.
07:19 PM on 01/19/2012
If they hold out for 12 months, we will have approval on inaugeration of Romney.
08:01 PM on 01/19/2012
God I hope so..this guy has spent more money than any human in history and all we got is more people addicted to the "dole".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chipher
06:53 AM on 01/20/2012
...you mean the Wall Street record profits dole...?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Monk Monkey
Watching probability clouds precipitate
04:18 PM on 01/20/2012
Haha - If I know who you were, I'd bet you all the money you have that Obama will be reelected.

Romney. Right. Good luck with that. My suggestion is to pump all your money into his campaign.