iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Newt Gingrich's Marriage: What Ex-Wife Marianne Gingrich Really Knows, And Why She Won't Tell

Posted: 01/19/2012 5:36 pm

WASHINGTON -- After 20 years of marriage to Newt Gingrich, his ex-wife Marianne has said she knows enough secrets to end his presidential campaign. She'll get her chance to on Thursday night, when a lengthy interview she gave to ABC airs on national television.

But if Marianne Gingrich really intends to show American voters what she knows about her ex-husband, she'll need to do more that just repeat the same sad relationship stories she has already told to numerous print journalists.

As Gingrich surged to the front of the Republican field in South Carolina on Thursday, however, that's precisely what Marianne did in an advance clip, explaining how Newt Gingrich proposed an "open marriage" situation to her as their relationship crumbled in 1999. ABC called the well-trodden story the most "provocative" statement of the two-hour interview.

But wait, not even Gingrich himself disputes that he was a conniving, unfaithful spouse! On the contrary, he offers himself up as an example of Christian redemption any time journalists, rivals, or voters ask about his "baggage."

And while more examples of what a bad husband Gingrich was might make for good viewing, Marianne knows far more important things about Newt that she hasn't told anyone before, and that would go well beyond the philandering to help voters understand a complicated candidate. Below are three important topics American voters should know about, and only Marianne can tell them. Of course, she probably won't, but listen carefully and she may drop some new clues.

1. How Newt Gingrich mis-handles money
One of the things Marianne has said repeatedly is that the couple was perpetually broke, leaving her desperate for money to pay their bills. While his first wife initially handled the bills, Marianne took over the management task when she married Gingrich. This included Newt's personal debt, his alimony and child-support payments, financing for his campaigns, a rental apartment and an expensive lifestyle in Washington. Over 20 years, they amassed no savings, and when the House Ethics Committee fined then-Speaker Gingrich a record-breaking $300,000 penalty in 1997 for violations, there was nothing to pay it with. "We didn't have anything," she has said. Today, Gingrich spends millions on jewelry at Tiffany & Co., takes Greek cruises, and flies in private jets. Still spending lavishly, only wealthier now that he's entered the private sector.

2. Gingrich's mystery mea culpa book and his 1997 breakdown
Gingrich is known to have had two periods of dark depression while he was in office, one in 1979 and another in 1997, both of which were so severe as to prompt action by friends and colleagues. In '97, following his ethics scandal Marianne says Gingrich began writing a book apologizing for his misdeeds, but she and his congressional staff destroyed it before it could be published. Gingrich grew more erratic over the course of the year to the point where he "wasn't functioning," and eventually Republican leaders staged a formal intervention. Marianne has never touched on what Gingrich was sorry for in his book, or what he was really like to be around in private during that year. Given the immense stress and the 24-7 nature of the presidency, these are fair questions to ask.

3. What drives Marianne to protect Newt even as she damages his campaign
It's obvious from print interviews and from what Marianne holds back from the press that she still has a solid affection for Gingrich, or at the very least, a strong sense of protectiveness. While this doesn't fit naturally with ABC's portrayal of her as a "bitter" ex-wife, it also makes Marianne's decision to talk about their marriage in the first place seem even stranger, especially given how much it could hurt Gingrich in conservative South Carolina. Moreover, once Marianne does start talking, she leaves out key details of the couple's breakup, like how Newt repeated over and over during couples' therapy, "I can't handle a Jaguar right now, all I want is a Chevrolet." By that point he had been seeing Callista Bisek -- now Mrs. Gingrich -- for six years, so it's easy to imagine who's who in Gingrich's mind.

These may not be easy subjects to tackle, but they're important ones, and Marianne is only person who can do it. If she does, she could reveal crucial elements of what Gingrich might be like in the oval office.

CLICK below for a quick slideshow of Newt Gingrich's many women.

1959 - Jackie Battley Gingrich
1  of  11
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
While still a junior in high school, Newt Gingrich began an affair with his high school geometry teacher, Jackie Battley, in 1959. He was 16 at the time, and she was 23. The official story is that the pair began dating when Gingrich turned 18, but people who know him well, including his ex-wife Marianne Gingrich, who spoke to Esquire, say he was 16.
RATE IT!   |  
VOTE
CURRENT TOP 5 PICK YOUR OWN TOP 5
USERS WHO VOTED
NEW! CREATE YOUR OWN SLIDESHOW

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- After 20 years of marriage to Newt Gingrich, his ex-wife Marianne has said she knows enough secrets to end his presidential campaign. She'll get her chance to on Thursday night, when a l...
WASHINGTON -- After 20 years of marriage to Newt Gingrich, his ex-wife Marianne has said she knows enough secrets to end his presidential campaign. She'll get her chance to on Thursday night, when a l...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,339
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (29 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SmallTownMarm
10:43 AM on 02/05/2012
It's a wonder he hasn't pulled a PETERSON on his second wife. You know what I mean, Chicagoland!!
05:53 AM on 01/27/2012
Marianne who had affair with Newt when he was with the first wife doesn't have a leg to stand on. She is just bitter and resentful and the public realized this. Her calculated timing alone was suspect. Oh and of course the liberal media going out out their way to take Newt down.
01:25 AM on 01/31/2012
Why do so many people whine about "liberal bias" in journalism and education, but no one seems to mind conservative bias in law enforcement and big business?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SmallTownMarm
10:44 AM on 02/05/2012
THANK YOU, NOBODOBODON. It's all about privilege and special treatment, isn't it?
03:43 AM on 09/28/2012
This is old news move on to something current that you all can rant about
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Xylem44
...TO THE LEFTTO THE LEFT
12:36 PM on 09/24/2012
Newt is low level carbon life form who created this whole fiasco himself. That he can have the nerve to run for any office that is not dog catcher is a testament to the size of his ego... which is only superseded by the size of his head. The likes of him needs to retired from the public eye so that people can once again trust government.
02:55 PM on 01/25/2012
If you do a YouTube search under “Rabbi Chaim Gruber responds,” you should find Rabbi Gruber discussing why polygamy is allowed in the Torah, aka, the Bible. The rabbi (who has recently made national news for other reasons), states that monogamous relationships can be ideal. However, he too explains that the Torah/Bible allows a man more than one wife at a time, although a woman can only be married to one man at a time . Why? Biology: A man can literally be married to more than one woman at once, as he can simultaneously father children from more than one woman. (Without getting into the currently raging debate of who should be able to marry who, one can define the start of a "literal" marriage as conception, for only then do the genes, the fleshes of the man and woman, literally become inseparably married.) A woman, however, cannot be literally married to two men at once, as she conceives from only one man at a time. The Torah's/Bible's allowance of polygamy is therefore not some religious conspiracy designed by men, but rather just a reflection of what is.
07:34 AM on 01/26/2012
My attempt is to not turn this into a religious debate, but I have to say that the Torah and the Bible are not synonymous as you try to state. Additionally, I would like to direct you to the New Testament of the Bible to clarify the Biblical meaning of marriage, the relation to Jesus & the Church (Man & Woman) and disagree with your conspiracy theory. The issue with Mr Gingrich is not what faith he professes, but rather the hypocrisy he displays, the self serving narcissistic qualities and his ability to reconcile and rationalize his actions while eluding scrutiny.
02:19 PM on 01/26/2012
Regarding the "Torah" and "Bible," they are synonymous, although not exactly. I am aware. However, it is just a simple way of describing it, as oppossed to the Torah being "The Law Book aspect of the Bible," "The first five books of the Bible," etc. Also, merely calling it the "first five books," in my mind makes it less important than it is, as all the other books are commentary on these first five. Also, there has been no change in the biologal manner that a man can simultanously impregnate a woman in the past 2000 years as I am aware. Further, I recall reading and hearing many times that many wrongly think that the biblical allowance ("biblical" refers to both what is in the Torah and Bible, even by your standards I would think) of polygamy is a practice designed by men to oppress women. Finally, I was defending Newt to the degree of putting out the idea that men are forced into a social acceptance of potentially very repressive forced monogamy, to which Newt himself is a victim. However, I am also saying that as a presidential candidate, he should step up to the plate and make these ideas known, so to change such repressive sexual structures, that can result in social calamity. Perhaps if Newt had been allowed two wives, he and his first would still be together. They then would not have wasted all their love, time, and effort they had invested in one another.
11:38 AM on 01/23/2012
This guy wasn't fit to be the Speaker before, isn't fit now, and was appropriately drummed out of office. The ethics violations may have been the last straw but it it interesting how few of his former colleagues welcomed his return to the political stage. That speaks volumes even if you have little good to say about Congress in general. It is not about the indiscretions solely but the whole person that emerges. He routinely betrayed people close to him, wives, professors, campaign workers, and these are just the ones we know of. The presence of his young daughters didn't even slow him down. He will say anything and has the arrogance to think you should believe him because it is him speaking, not that anyone should have the intelligence to decide for themselves. "I was a Historian for Fannie Mae," not a lobbist. He clearly sees himself above everyone else and that justifies whatever he says or does. He has a known history of addiction (drinking) and (suicidal thoughts) depression. He lacks discipline as evidenced by the flight of virtually all of his campaign staff at one time and while we all may have financial stress at times, what does it day about someone who was nearly bankrupt and even now with money, has a Tiffiany Bill greater than an upper midclass home? No one is perfect but America deserves better, regardless of party.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
richodg5
10:52 AM on 01/23/2012
Was Newt bullied in school? Newt obviously is a sex addict and should be looked upon as a person with medical problem. If you believe that I have some swampland in Fla.for sale.....Gone
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
UptheStairs
10:24 AM on 01/23/2012
He sure is a cutie in that high school pic!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CarlB6979
10:04 AM on 01/23/2012
I would love to have seen this much coverage of the "Fast and Furious" debacle that cost a border patrol agent his life. How about the voter intimidation by the New Black Panther Party. I guess the media's job is not so much report news as it is to protect the Dear Leader and his henchmen.
01:18 AM on 01/31/2012
Voter intimidation by the New Black Panther Party has been covered - it didn't happen. No voters were intimidated. One dude posed for photos. That's it. Find a first-hand eye-witness report to prove it, or stop spreading that lie.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mopsy1
09:58 AM on 01/23/2012
Marianne should probably get a clue that she is only helping Newt. Wonder how much the Romney SuperPAC paid her.
09:41 AM on 01/23/2012
So, John F. Kennedy, Bill Clinton, Newt Gingrich . . . anyone else?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RickW44
08:58 AM on 01/26/2012
I don't think we should take it lightly. This is a matter of character.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:15 AM on 01/23/2012
Newt captures 41% of the 'married women' vote. apparently they find his ex tiresome too.

we want obama out
07:46 AM on 01/26/2012
I can't help myself on this one.. I'm assuming that the 41% of married women accounts for those women who have no issues with living an "open marriage" (which would not be surprise to find a coloration between the two).. If so, can I then assume that the remaining 59% of married women (ie. the majority of married women) have issue with an "open marriage" as Newt wanted and lived for 6 years, which is why he has yet to capture the majority of "married women" votes? Linking his personal choices, hypocrisy in his personal conduct and political views to his fitness in serving as our president (let alone the best candidate in the Republican party) is important. I prefer a trustworthy, responsible and moral candidate to one who is not. I can discuss differences with a trustworthy, responsible and moral candidate - I can not with someone who is self serving, narcissistic and does not live their values.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SmallTownMarm
10:51 AM on 02/05/2012
If you "voted for Abe Lincoln" as your name suggests, you cannot possibly be a Republican. That's ridiculous. They would never accept Lincoln's beliefs and values. It has been said by nearly everyone who studies political science, history or even has common sense. If you support Gingrich, which this reply sort of suggests, realize that he would love slavery and oppression of underprivileged people 'cause he could be even richer and more powerful...and he loves those things more than America, liberty or the people of this country.
photo
lisaman
I am a liberal American so get over it
09:13 AM on 01/23/2012
I think the voters in SC looked at her and said, she was his mistress too, why should we care. Then Newton used it to his advantage by showing how much of a dick he can be and the crowd went wild with the joy of watching an old fat white man show his hate. Made them reminisce of better times when the white man ruled this country.
09:09 AM on 01/23/2012
Oh can it...Liberals are drooling over a Gingrich nomination to face Obama: He;s unelectable and it would hand Obama a victory in November. A great primary candidate is not a good General Election Candidate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kimberly Owsley
Love me for who I am, not who you want me to be.
12:38 AM on 04/24/2012
ALL of the Republicant nominees this year are and/or were unelectable. Unfortunately that does not stop the people who vote despite knowing nothing about a presidential hopeful except for whether or not they hate the gays...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:06 AM on 01/23/2012
so help me straighten this out leftists.... with clinton it was about sex... with newt it's a character flaw... what up?
grenfrow
We're gonna need a bigger boat.
08:59 AM on 01/23/2012
No, it is about hypocrisy. Gingrich and other so called moralist were appalled by Clinton's infidelity. Now those same people (like you) say his actions don't matter. Also, Gingrich appears to me and others I've talked to as mentally unstable. I truly believe this man is unbalanced.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:17 AM on 01/23/2012
no. you guys never get it right.

it was about workplace law violation (willy) and perjury.

oh, well if 'the others you've talked to' have deemed Newt mentally irregular, that's good enough for me
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hilltopstudiob
10:46 AM on 01/23/2012
And therefore potentially dangerous.
09:10 AM on 01/23/2012
NOW you got it: You see, its not WHAT is done it's WHO does it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:29 AM on 01/23/2012
yes
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:30 AM on 01/23/2012
i hate it when double standards have double standards
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:05 AM on 01/23/2012
oh yea. the ex-wife. no better and more reliable source than a woman scorned
grenfrow
We're gonna need a bigger boat.
09:00 AM on 01/23/2012
Also, the one who knows him best.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:29 AM on 01/23/2012
I'm sure she has nothing but the interests of a nation at heart
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wisdom67
To each his reach
11:18 AM on 01/23/2012
He took a vow before God; he lied twice and we should believe him...furthermore a woman scorned may only be breaking her silence and not lying...never thought of that did you.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:44 PM on 01/23/2012
I'm sure she's the unbiased, truthful, even tempered, woman not scorned
05:32 AM on 01/23/2012
Newton got his Chevrolet. GM used to have a penchant for "C" names. The Chevrolet Calista?
grenfrow
We're gonna need a bigger boat.
09:02 AM on 01/23/2012
Calista......... more like a Yugo.
10:48 AM on 01/23/2012
A person compared Mrs. Newt to a Yugo.

Perhaps, but, could it be, just could it be, Newton knew that this could happen? Do you think he picked Chevrolet because it would sell well in America when he would be running for president in 2012? Why not?

This is a carnival roadshow and let's appreciate it for what it's worth. A footnote in America's history. 20 years from now, old timers will remember when the Tea Party briefly took control.

Theo R. tried something similar with the Bull Moose Party and there were many more in the 19th century. Few nearly as crazy as the Tea People but some were close. Bryan's Cross of Gold speech? What Fox could do with that. .