More

President Obama's SOPA Stance Could Cost Campaign Money, Says Hollywood Lobbyist Chris Dodd

Chris Dodd

First Posted: 01/19/12 07:05 PM ET Updated: 01/19/12 07:38 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- Hell hath no fury like a lobbyist scorned. Former Democratic senator and current head of the Motion Picture Association of America Chris Dodd threatened to cut off campaign contributions from Hollywood to the reelection campaign of President Barack Obama.

In an interview with Fox News about the White House's recent statement on controversial anti-piracy legislation, Dodd said:

Candidly, those who count on quote 'Hollywood' for support need to understand that this industry is watching very carefully who's going to stand up for them when their job is at stake ... Don't ask me to write a check for you when you think your job is at risk and then don't pay any attention to me when my job is at stake." ... I would caution people don't make the assumption that because the quote 'Hollywood community' has been historically supportive of Democrats, which they have, don't make the false assumptions this year that because we did it in years past, we will do it this year ... These issues before us -- this is the only issue that goes right to the heart of this industry."

The White House released a statement on the anti-piracy bills on Jan. 14 that, while calling for some kind of legislation to be passed, echoed critics of the bills supported by Dodd and the movie industry. That hasn't sat well with Hollywood lobbyists like Dodd, who seemed stunned by the reversal in fortune for their prized legislation in the past week.

As The Huffington Post reported on Wednesday, the anti-piracy fight put the White House in the middle of a major battle between two nearly equally matched donor communities in the Democratic Party: Hollywood and Silicon Valley. Both industries gave $9 million to the president's election campaign in 2008 and are nearly evenly matched this time around.

Despite Dodd's threats, there have been few signs that Hollywood money is slow in coming for Obama's reelection. His top donor is DreamWorks CEO Jeffrey Katzenberg, who has raised at least $500,000 for the campaign and the Democratic National Committee and contributed $2 million to a super PAC backing the president. Obama has also held fundraising events at the mansions of Hollywood executives and at movie studio lots.

The threat of withholding money may actually do more harm than good for Dodd's efforts. A public quid pro quo threat, makes it more difficult for the White House to move from its current stand on the legislation.

Adam Smith, communications director for Public Campaign, a nonprofit campaign finance watchdog, told The Huffington Post that Dodd's threat seemed "desperate" and represented "a shining example of what's wrong with our political system, where you have this one industry trying to force the hand of policymakers with this threat that is basically blackmail."

Dodd's outburst comes one day after Internet companies and activists blacked out Web sites across the Web in protest of both the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and the Protect IP Act (PIPA). The blackout, which included Wikipedia, Google, reddit, Craiglist, and ICanHazCheezburger, was matched by a campaign to get visitors to those sites to ask their representatives in Washington to oppose the bills. Close to two dozen lawmakers, mostly Republicans, responded to the campaign by announcing that they were switching their position to oppose the legislation as currently drafted.

"Some technology business interests are resorting to stunts that punish their users or turn them into their corporate pawns," Dodd said of the blackout campaign.

(AOL Inc., HuffPost's parent company, is lobbying against the Stop Online Piracy Act and the Protect IP Act. AOL CEO Tim Armstrong has met with President Obama.)

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Hell hath no fury like a lobbyist scorned. Former Democratic senator and current head of the Motion Picture Association of America Chris Dodd threatened to cut off campaign contributions...
WASHINGTON -- Hell hath no fury like a lobbyist scorned. Former Democratic senator and current head of the Motion Picture Association of America Chris Dodd threatened to cut off campaign contributions...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 522
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (22 total)
09:34 PM on 04/06/2012
If they say it on Fox News, then it MUST be true.
photo
FilthyHarry
Expletive Deleted
07:31 PM on 01/23/2012
Please!!! Please cut off the money! The single most corrupting influence on politics and Dodd wants to cut it off? He's a hero!

Would love to see him charged with attempted bribery or interfering with an election.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ipolitics123
What an excellent day for an exorcism.
02:28 PM on 01/21/2012
OK, let's hear some condemnation from all those libs who screamed about Republicans retiring and getting big bucks from lobbyists...

(crickets)

That's what I thought.
07:36 PM on 01/22/2012
At least SOME Democrats do stuff that goes AGAINST the interest of the 1%, as opposed to the Republicans who almost never do that.
photo
Someone Out There
..................................................
01:04 PM on 01/23/2012
How's this: Arrest him for bribery immediately. Most progressives I know feel the same way. It's called integrity. You might want to look up the definition.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ochaye
09:41 AM on 01/21/2012
"Candidly, those who count on quote 'Hollywood' for support need to understand that this industry is watching very carefully who's going to stand up for them when their job is at stake ... Don't ask me to write a check for you when you think your job is at risk and then don't pay any attention to me when my job is at stake."

Chrissy made an error: please substitute "lobbyist bonus" for "job"
09:31 PM on 04/06/2012
Substitute "Lobbyist" for "Professional Bribery Facilitator".
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
soisay
Angry? Scared? Thank a Republican.
11:48 PM on 01/20/2012
Dodd's threat is the bare faced reason to reform electioneering, to make money meaningless somehow. He literally said his clients would systematically withhold bribes and that such bribes are required for reelection.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ipolitics123
What an excellent day for an exorcism.
02:31 PM on 01/21/2012
So when Republicans act like scum, it's Republicans' fault, and when Democrats act like scum, it's the Republicans' fault.

Nice logic. Do liberals take responsibility for ANYTHING?
07:37 PM on 01/22/2012
Many more Republicans act like scum than do Democrats.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
soisay
Angry? Scared? Thank a Republican.
05:21 PM on 01/23/2012
IP123: I have no idea how you got that idea, and am sad that every "ink blot" shows you "liberals that don't take responsibility for ANYTHING".

I said that RIAA & MPAA are throwing dough around to buy votes, and threatening to withhold dough if you "vote the wrong way". While the NRA and Evangelical Right (and NARAL and Sierra) always bothered me with their litmus test for voters, it was still an appeal to voters opinions, not a check from a few millionaires / billionaires or now even foreign owned corporations.

Wall Street, Big Oil, Big Coal, Cable TV, Telecomm, Military-Industrial, Automotive, Retail, and on an on, all spread the dough, and they give it to WHOEVER will vote their way. The whole system stinks to high heaven.

The problem is (1) money matters and (2) "Lobbying money" is not considered an illegal bribe. Americans, thats YOU and ME, regardless of political party or opinion, need to make money insignificant in elections, so candidates are forced to stand on their IDEAS, and face the voters, not just run ad after ad after ad (about willie horton, OBL, "raised your taxes", "cost jobs", "supports breast cancer", etc, etc).

I don't know exactly how to do that, but it NEEDS to get done.
07:44 PM on 01/20/2012
One problem for Dodd the Crook; Obama wasn't dependant on Hollywood money in 2008 (unlike HRC). He relied rather heavily on micro-donations via the web. Simply put, it's in his best interest to veto without a second thought.
So if he signs either one into law... Say hello to President Romney. Obama wouldn't just be shooting himself in the foot, he would be doing that with a high caliber shotgun, repeatedly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ipolitics123
What an excellent day for an exorcism.
02:33 PM on 01/21/2012
HAHAHAHA. Obama raised $300 million from donors big and small in 2008. He spent a lot of time on his knees in Hollywood, trust me.

This one fundraiser netted $9 million - that didn't come from little old ladies (unless you count Barbra Streisand):

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/09/17/politics/main4454389.shtml
07:38 PM on 01/22/2012
Yeah, and he also wants to cut taxes for the rich, maintain oil subsidies and private jet tax breaks, cut spending for the poor.
Oh, wait...
05:04 PM on 01/20/2012
Hes a tool.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ted Glass
04:54 PM on 01/20/2012
Chris Dodd has resorted to going on Fox News to spread his message for the MPAA? Just goes to show that absolute money corrupts absolutely.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ted Glass
04:53 PM on 01/20/2012
Hollywood's jobs are not at risk, LOL. That's like saying the Koch Brother's jobs are at risk because of more regulation. They will be just fine.

The problem with Hollywood's view on this subject is that they think every song/movie/tv show downloaded illegally is direct lost revenue for them. That is not true in the least. Most people wouldn't BUY all the music/content that they can get online, they just simply don't have the money. If anything the pirates serve to further the spread of Hollywood's content by allowing more people access to it, which in theory raises how much content Hollywood sells overall. Again, if people are unable to get their content online for free, they mostly just wont have that content.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gernger
03:15 PM on 01/20/2012
Quid pro quo donations are illegal. It's called brbery. Apparently it's done all the time. Otherwise how else would Grover Norquist have so much power.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Mediorite
Flash in the Pan
02:49 PM on 01/20/2012
I was perplexed that so many Senate Democrats supported PIPA until I learned that Dodd was the head lobbyist for it. Then it all became crystal clear.

We need to make it illegal for retired public servants to get paid to lobby their former colleagues.
CosmicFreddy
Your micro-bio is empty ... and it's going to stay
02:42 PM on 01/20/2012
Yet another glaring example of "pay for play". Do they have no shame anymore?
photo
BBackSoon
Hello, I must be going.
02:18 PM on 01/20/2012
Chris Dodd can . . . Well you get the idea.
photo
PosterNutbaG
Micro-bios are for losers... Oh wait...
02:06 PM on 01/20/2012
So is he saying that campaign contributions come with strings attach? Unbelievable!
02:01 PM on 01/20/2012
This is ridiculous. The SOPA/PIPA bills were horribly written by people who are pretty
ignorant of how the internet works. The bills were really about stifling competition from the internet,
which mainstream media companies are terrified of. They just can't deal with the changes in technology and the new content creators that don't need their distribution models.